Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Ray tracing in Rochon prisms with absorption

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We theoretically analyze inhomogeneous plane waves propagating in a Rochon prism made from uniaxial absorbing material. Expressions for the propagation and attenuation directions of the ordinary and the extraordinary waves in the lossy Rochon prism are derived by complex ray-tracing method. As an application, the propagation characteristic of the inhomogeneous plane waves within the lossy Rochon prisms at normal incidence are analyzed and discussed.

© 2017 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Anisotropic uniaxial materials are used widely for making optical devices such as wave plates, polarizers and beam-splitters [1,2]. A Rochon prism is a polarization beam-splitter that is formed by two cemented triangular wedges made from uniaxial birefringent materials. The optical axis of one of the wedges is parallel to the normal of incidence, and the optical axis of the other wedge is perpendicular to the plane of incidence, as is shown in Fig. 1. A linearly polarized incident beam is split into two orthogonal linearly polarized beams named the ordinary-extraordinary ray (oe ray) and the extraordinary-ordinary ray (eo ray) by the Rochon prism. The eo ray will not be deviated at normal incidence, while the oe ray is deviated by a splitting angle γ. The beam deflection angle is determined by the wedge angle of the Rochon prism and the refractive indices of the birefringent material. The propagation of the ordinary ray and the extraordinary ray in the uniaxial lossless prisms or slabs have been analyzed [3–9]. However, when absorption is taken into account, the theoretical description of light waves propagation in uniaxial media becomes rather complicated [10–20]. In this work we theoretically analyze inhomogeneous plane waves propagating in a Rochon prism made from uniaxial absorbing material. Expressions for the propagation directions of the ordinary and the extraordinary waves in the lossy Rochon prism are derived by complex ray-tracing method. As an application, the propagation characteristic of the inhomogeneous plane waves within the lossy Rochon prisms at normal incidence are analyzed and discussed.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Ordinary and extraordinary rays in a lossless Rochon prism. The optical axes of the Rochon prism are such arranged that in the first wedge both of the ordinary and the extraordinary rays propagate along the optical axis at normal incidence, and in the second wedge the light rays propagate perpendicular to the optical axis. The ordinary ray (o ray) in the first wedge will be converted into the extraordinary ray (oe ray) in the second wedge, and the extraordinary ray (e ray) will be converted into the ordinary ray (eo ray), conversely.

Download Full Size | PDF

2. General properties of inhomogeneous waves in isotropic absorbing media

The isotropic absorbing medium is characterized by a complex index of refraction n˜=n-iκ, where n is the real refractive index and κ is the absorption coefficient. When a homogeneous plane wave coming from an isotropic lossless medium and incidents on the isotropic absorbing medium, the angle of incidence and the angle of refraction are related to each other by complex Snell-Descartes law [2,21–24]

nisinθi=n˜sinθ˜t,
where ni is the refractive index of the incident medium, θi is the angle of incidence, and θ˜t is the complex angle of refraction.

The complex refraction angle θ˜t determines a complex direction of light wave propagation in the absorbing medium and hence the refracted wave vector is also complex. The refracted wave vector K˜ can be written as

K˜=ωcn˜k˜,
where ω is the angle frequency, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and k˜ is the unit wave vector. The unit wave vector k˜ is a complex unitary vector, e.g., k˜k˜=1and Re(k˜)Im(k˜)=0.

In general, the refracted waves are inhomogeneous and elliptically polarized plane waves. These elliptically polarized inhomogeneous plane waves can be described in the formalism of complex geometrical optics. With the complex notation for the field vectors (the electric field E˜, the displacement vector D˜, the magnetic field H˜, and the magnetic induction B˜), Maxwell’s equations adopt the form [16–20,25]

D˜=n˜ck˜×H˜,
μ0H˜=n˜ck˜×E˜,
D˜k˜=0,
H˜k˜=0,
where μ0 is the magnetic permeability, and c is the speed of light in vacuum.

Unless otherwise specified, we will consider nonferromagnetic absorbing dielectric media without free charges (B˜=μ0H˜). The constitutive relation between the electric field E˜ and the displacement vector D˜ is given by

D˜=ε˜E˜,
where ε˜0n˜2 is the complex dielectric permittivity, and ε0 is the permittivity of the vacuum.

If we represent by F˜ any of the field vectors, then it can be written as [16–20,25]

F˜=Fexp(iθF)exp[iω(tn˜crk˜)]u˜F=Fexp(iθF)exp[iω(t1cr(nkRe+κkIm))]exp[ωcr(nkImκkRe)]u˜F,=Fexp(iθF)PrAtu˜F
where F is the real constant field amplitude, θF is the initial phase, u˜F is a complex unitary vector in the complex direction of F˜, Pr=exp[iωt(ω/c)r(nkRe+κkIm)] is the wave propagation term, At=exp[(ω/c)r(nkImκkRe)] is the attenuation term, kRe=Re(k˜) and kIm=Im(k˜).

Equation (8) represents any elliptically polarized inhomogeneous plane waves. The complex unitary vector u˜F completely determines the characteristics of the polarization of the field vector. The vector u˜F represents a superposition of two orthogonal elliptically polarized vibrations. The two orthogonal vibrations are determined by the real and imaginary parts of the vector u˜F, respectively.

The inhomogeneity implies that the normal to the planes of constant phase and constant amplitude could be not coincide. The real direction of wave propagation is parallel to the normal to the plane of constant phase, and the direction of attenuation is parallel to the normal to the plane of constant amplitude. The directions of the wave propagation kPrand attenuation kAt, in the real space are given by [16–20,24]

kPr=nkRe+κkImn2kRe2+κ2kIm2,
kAt=nkImκkRen2kIm2+κ2kRe2.

The angle αk between the wave propagation direction kPr and the attenuation direction kAt can be calculated from

αk=arccos(kPrkAt).

3. Complex ray-tracing in Rochon prisms with absorption

3.1 Inhomogeneous plane-waves propagation in uniaxial anisotropic absorbing media

The dielectric permittivity ε˜ is a complex tensor in an anisotropic absorbing medium. The complex dielectric permittivity tensor can be diagonalized into principal axes in the case of higher symmetry crystal classes. In the principal coordinate system (XYZ) where the Z-axis is parallel to the optical axis of the uniaxial absorbing medium, the dielectric permittivity tensor takes the form

ε˜0[n˜o2000n˜o2000n˜e2],
where n˜o and n˜e are the ordinary and the extraordinary refractive indices, respectively.

The wave propagation unit vector k˜ obeys complex Fresnel’s equation, which in the principal coordinate system can be written as [16–20]

k˜X21n˜21n˜o2+k˜Y21n˜21n˜o2+k˜Z21n˜21n˜e2=0.

For a given complex direction of wave propagation k˜, there are two allowed orthogonally defined elliptically polarized inhomogeneous plane waves (the polarization is linear when the medium is lossless). One of the waves called an ordinary wave (o-wave), and another one called an extraordinary wave (e-wave). The complex refractive index of the o-wave is equal to the refractive index n˜o, while the complex refractive index of the e-wave changes with the complex wave propagation direction k˜e. The effective index of refraction n˜eff for the e-wave can be calculated from [20]

n˜eff(θ˜)=n˜on˜en˜e2cos2θ˜+n˜o2sin2θ˜
where θ˜=arccos(k˜enc) is the angle that the e-wave vector k˜e makes with the optic axisnc.

The electric displacement vector D˜o (or the unit vector u˜Do) and the electric field vector E˜o (or the unit vector u˜Eo) of the o-wave are perpendicular to the complex plane determined by the unit wave vector k˜o and the optics axis nc. However, the electric displacement vector D˜e (or the unit vector u˜De) and the electric field vector E˜e (or the unit vector u˜Ee) of the e-wave lie in the complex plane determined by the unit wave vector k˜e and the optics axis. Different from the ordinary wave, the unit e-wave vector u˜Ee is perpendicular to the complex ray propagation direction s˜e, which could be not along the complex wave propagation direction, e.g., u˜Ees˜e=0 and u˜Eek˜e0.

The ray direction of the extraordinary wave is characterized by the complex Poynting vectorS˜e, which is defined as [20]

S˜e=E˜e×H˜e=Seexp(iθSe)exp[i2ω(tn˜effcrs˜e)]s˜e=Seexp(iθSe)exp[i2ω(tn˜effcosα˜ecrk˜e)]s˜e,
where s˜e=u˜Ee×u˜He is the complex unit ray vector, Se is the constant field amplitude of the Poynting vector, θSe is the initial phase, and α˜e=arccos(k˜es˜e) is the complex dispersion angle between the unit ray vector s˜e and the unit wave vector k˜e. The complex dispersion angle α˜e can be calculated from
tanα˜e=tan(ξ˜θ˜)=(n˜o2n˜e2)tanθ˜n˜e2+n˜o2tan2θ˜.
Here ξ˜=arccos(s˜enc) is the angle that the e-ray vector makes with the optic axis.

The Poynting vector S˜e has a clear physical interpretation in the complex geometrical formalism. The propagation direction of the energy in the uniaxial absorbing medium is a function of time and the tip of the Poynting vector describes an ellipse determined by the unit Poynting vector and the effective index of refraction. The centre of the ellipses is given by the time-averaged value of the Poynting vector S˜e=Re(S˜e)/2.

3.2 Wave and ray directions of inhomogeneous plane-waves in lossy Rochon prism

A. Wave and ray directions of inhomogeneous plane-waves in the first wedge of the lossy Rochon prism

Considering a homogeneous plane wave coming from an isotropic lossless medium (Region I) and incidents on the entrance face of the lossy Rochon prism with an incident angle θi, as is shown in Fig. 2(a). In Fig. 2(b), the x1y1z1 coordinate system is chosen such that the x1z1 plane is the plane of incidence and both the normal to the interface n1 and the optic axis nc1 are in directions parallel to the z1 axis. The complex direction cosines of the refracted ordinary wave in the first wedge (Region II) can be written as

k˜o=(sinθ˜o,0,cosθ˜o),
where θ˜o=arcsin[nisinθi/n˜o] is the complex refracted angle, n˜o is the ordinary refractive index, and ni is the refractive index of the incident medium.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Ray tracing in a lossy Rochon prism. (a) Ordinary and extraordinary rays in the lossy Rochon prism. (b) Incident and refracted rays at the entrance face of the lossy Rochon prism. (c) Geometry of the interface between the two wedges in the lossy Rochon prism. (d) Incident and refracted rays at the exiting face of the lossy Rochon prism.

Download Full Size | PDF

The ray-tracing of the extraordinary wave in the first wedge (Region II) of the lossy Rochon prism is slightly complicated than that of the ordinary wave. The complex direction cosines of the extraordinary wave is given by

k˜e=(sinθ˜e,0,cosθ˜e),
where θ˜e=arcsin[nisinθi/n˜eff] is the complex refracted angle, and n˜eff is the effective index of refraction.

The effective index of refraction n˜effcan be calculated from Eqs. (14) and (18) with θ˜=arccos(k˜enc1)=θ˜e, which gives a quadratic equation of cotθ˜e, then [20]

tanθ˜e=n˜enisinθ˜in˜on˜e2ni2sin2θ˜i.

As the optic axis nc1 lies on the plane of incidence, the direction cosines of the extraordinary ray can be written as

s˜e=(sinξ˜e,0,cosξ˜e),
where ξ˜e=θ˜e+α˜e is the complex refracted angle for the extraordinary ray.

B. Wave and ray directions of inhomogeneous plane-waves in the second wedge of the lossy Rochon prism

When the inhomogeneous plane-waves incident on the interface between the two lossy wedges in the Rochon prism, the ordinary wave (o wave) in the first wedge (Region II) will be refracted and converted into extraordinary wave (oe wave) in the second wedge (Region III), and the extraordinary wave (e wave) in the first wedge will be refracted and converted into ordinary wave (eo wave) in the second wedge, as is shown in Fig. 2(c). As the optic axis nc2 of the second wedge is perpendicular to the plane of incidence, the refractive indices are n˜effn˜e and n˜o for the oe-wave and the eo-wave, respectively. In this special case, the wave and the ray directions of the oe-wave are coincide.

In the x2y2z3 coordinate system where the x2z2plane is the plane of incidence and the normal to the interfacen2 is along the z2 axis, the effective incident angles at the interface can be written as

θ˜io,e=θ˜o,e+β,
where θ˜io,e are the incident angles for the o-wave and the e-wave at the interface, θ˜o,e are the refractive angles for the o-wave and the e-wave in the first wedge, and β is the wedge angle.

Thus, the refraction angles for the oe-wave and the eo-wave in the second wedge are given by

θ˜oe=arcsin[n˜on˜esin(θ˜o+β)]
θ˜eo=arcsin[n˜effn˜osin(θ˜e+β)],
where θ˜oe and θ˜eo are the refraction angles for the oe-wave and the eo-wave, respectively.

Thus, the direction cosines k˜oe and k˜eo for the oe-wave and the eo-wave in the second wedge can be written as

k˜oe=(sinθ˜oe,0,cosθ˜oe),
k˜eo=(sinθ˜eo,0,cosθ˜eo).

C. Exiting angles of ordinary and extraordinary waves at the exiting face of the lossy Rochon prism

The x3z3 plane is the plane of incidence and the normal to the interfacen3 is along the z3 axis, as is shown in Fig. 2(d). The effective incident angles at the exiting face of the second wedge are given by θ˜oe,eoi=βθ˜oe,eo. Thus, the refracted angles (or the exiting angles) for the oe-wave and the eo-wave can be written as

γ˜oe=arcsin[n˜enisin(βθ˜oe)],
γ˜eo=arcsin[n˜onisin(βθ˜eo)],
where γ˜oe and γ˜eo are the exiting angles for the oe-wave and the eo-wave, respectively. It should be noted that the exiting angles in Eqs. (26) and (27) may have no real angle solutions in real space. It implies that the exiting waves are inhomogeneous waves.

4. Propagation characteristic of inhomogeneous plane waves within the lossy Rochon prisms at normal incidence

In this section, we will apply the expressions developed in the previous sections to analyze the propagation characteristic of the inhomogeneous plane waves within the lossy Rochon prisms at normal incidence. In this special case, the effective refraction index is n˜effn˜o for the e-wave in the first wedge of the prism. The o-wave and the e-wave propagate along the direction of z1 and their field amplitudes are attenuated by the same termAt=exp[ωκod1/c] within the first wedge, where d1 is the thickness of the first wedge.

The direction of the refracted e-wave (eo wave) in the second wedge is unchanged, and its field amplitude is attenuated by the termAteo=exp[ωκod2/c] within the absorbing wedge, where d2 is the thickness of the second wedge. The direction of the refracted o-wave (oe wave) will be deflected in the second wedge.

When the o-wave is incident on the interface between the two absorbing wedges, the refracted angle θ˜oe in the second wedge is given by

θ˜oe=arcsin[n˜on˜esin(β)].

The angle θ˜oe is determined by the indices of refraction n˜o,e and the wedge angle β. The directions of the wave propagation kPr and attenuation kAt can be calculated directly from Eqs. (9) and (10). In order to find the relations among the refractive indices and the wedge angle, the wave vector Κ˜oe can be written as the form

Κ˜oe=ωcn˜ek˜oe=ωcn˜e(sinθ˜oe0cosθ˜oe)=ωc(nmkPriκmkAt)=ωcnm(sinθm0cosθm)iωcκm(sinψm0cosψm),
where nm and κm are the apparent refractive indices, θm and ψm are the refracted angles for the wave propagation and the attenuation terms, respectively.

The real and the imaginary parts of the wave vector Κ˜oe obey

nm2κm2=ne2κe2,
nmκmcosαk=neκe.

From Eqs. (28)-(31), we can get

nm2=(ne2κe2)+(no2+κo2)sin2β2+[(ne2κe2)(no2κo2)sin2β]2+4[neκenoκosin2β]22,
κm2=(no2+κo2)sin2β(ne2κe2)2+[(ne2κe2)(no2κo2)sin2β]2+4[neκenoκosin2β]22,
nmsinθm=nosinβ,
κmsinψm=κosinβ.

From Eqs. (8), (29) and (33), we can get the attenuation term of the oe wave

Atoe=exp(ωcκmd2cosαk),
where d2 is the ray path in the second wedge. It should be noted that the field amplitude of the oe wave can be strongly attenuated than the that of the oe wave if the term κmd2cosαk is much larger than κod2.

In the Region IV, the transmitted oe wave vector Κ˜oetoe can be written as

Κ˜oetoe=ωcnik˜oetoe=ωcni(sinγ˜oe0cosγ˜oe)=ωc(nmtkPrtiκmtkPrt)=ωcnmt(sinθmt0cosθmt)iωcκmt(sinψmt0cosψmt),
where nmt and κmt are the apparent refractive indices, θmt and ψmt are the refracted angles for the wave propagation and attenuation terms, respectively.

The real and the imaginary parts of the wave vector Κ˜oetoe obey

nmt2κmt2=ni2,
ψmt=π2+θmt.

From Eqs. (37)-(39), we can get

nmt2=ni2+nm2sin2(βθm)+κm2sin2(βψm)2+[ni2nm2sin2(βθm)+κm2sin2(βψm)]2+4nm2κm2sin2(βθm)sin2(βψm)2,
κmt2=nm2sin2(βθm)+κm2sin2(βψm)ni22+[ni2nm2sin2(βθm)+κm2sin2(βψm)]2+4nm2κm2sin2(βθm)sin2(βψm)2,
nmtsinθmt=nmsin(βθm),
κmtsinψmt=κosin(βψm).

Equation (42) shows that the deflection angle (or splitting angle) θmt of the Rochon prism is determined by the complex refractive indices of the uniaxial absorbing medium and the wedge angle.

We present numerical examples for the propagation characteristic of the inhomogeneous waves within the lossy Rochon prism at different wedge angles. The surrounding media are assumed to be air with ni=1. Figures 3 and 6 show the apparent refractive indices (nm and κm) and the refracted angles (θm and ψm) of the oe wave in the second wedge of the Rochon prism. The real refractive indices of the uniaxial material areno=1.6and ne=1.4 but the absorption coefficients are different in Figs. 3 and 4. The real refractive indices of the uniaxial material arene=1.4 and no=1.6 but the absorption coefficients are different in Figs. 5 and 6. The attenuation directions are usually different from the wave propagation directions and the apparent absorption coefficients increase with the larger of wedge angles.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Plots of the apparent refractive indices (nm and κm) and the refracted angles (θm and ψm) for various values of wedge angleβ with the complex refractive indices of n˜o=1.60.5i and n˜e=1.40.5i. Total reflection occurs at the angle ofβ=arcsin[neκe/noκo]=69.3.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Plots of the apparent refractive indices (nm and κm) and the refracted angles (θm and ψm) for various values of wedge angleβ with the complex refractive indices of n˜o=1.61.0i and n˜e=1.41.0i. Total reflection occurs at the angle of β=arcsin[neκe/noκo]=69.3.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Plots of the apparent refractive indices (nm and κm) and the refracted angles (θm and ψm) for various values of wedge angleβ with the complex refractive indices of n˜o=1.40.5i and n˜e=1.60.5i.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 Plots of the apparent refractive indices (nm and κm) and the refracted angles (θm and ψm) for various values of wedge angleβ with the complex refractive indices of n˜o=1.41.0i and n˜e=1.61.0i.

Download Full Size | PDF

In Figs. 2 and 3, the refracted angles θm can be equal to π/2 at some special wedge angles. Considering the term 4(neκenoκosin2β)=0 in the Eqs. (32) and (33), it requires κe=κo=0 or sin2β=neκe/noκo(κo0, κe0).

In the lossless case (κe=κo=0), Eqs. (32) and (33) can be reduce to

nm=ne2+no2sin2β2+|ne2no2sin2β|2={ne,ne2>no2sin2βnosinβ,ne2no2sin2β,
κm=no2sin2βne22+|ne2no2sin2β|2={0,ne2>no2sin2βno2sin2βne2,ne2no2sin2β,
θm={arcsin(nonesinβ),ne2>no2sin2βπ/2,ne2no2sin2β,
ψm0.

Equations (44)-(47) indicate that the refracted wave is the so-called evanescent wave that can propagate along the interface of two lossless media when no2sin2βne2, which is plotted in Fig. 7.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 Plots of the apparent refractive indices (nm and κm) and the refracted angles (θm and ψm) for various values of wedge angleβ with the refractive indices of n˜o=1.60.0i and n˜e=1.40.0i. Total reflection occurs at the angle of β=arcsin[ne/no]=69.3.

Download Full Size | PDF

In the absorbing case of sin2β=neκe/noκo, Eqs. (32) and (33) can be rewritten as

nm=(ne2κe2)+(no2+κo2)sin2β2+|(ne2κe2)(no2κo2)sin2β|2,={ne2κe2+κo2sin2β,(no2κo2)sin2β<ne2κe2nosinβ,(no2κo2)sin2βne2κe2
κm=(no2+κo2)sin2β(ne2κe2)2+|(ne2κe2)(no2κo2)sin2β|2,={κosinβ,(no2κo2)sin2β<ne2κe2no2sin2β(ne2κe2),(no2κo2)sin2βne2κe2
θm={arcsin[nosinβne2κe2+κo2sin2β],(no2κo2)sin2β<ne2κe2π/2,(no2κo2)sin2βne2κe2,
ψm={π/2,(no2κo2)sin2β<ne2κe2arcsin[κosinβno2sin2β(ne2κe2)],(no2κo2)sin2βne2κe2.

We can define an angle of total reflection θmπ/2 at the interface between the two absorbing media. When total reflection occurs, the apparent refractive indices and the refracted angles are given by

{nm=noneκe/κoκm=ne2κe2/κo2(ne2κe2)θmπ/2ψm=arcsin[κo2neκe/noκone2κe2κo2(ne2κe2)],
with

{(no2κo2)neκe(ne2κe2)noκosinβ=neκe/noκo.

Equation (53) can be regard as the criteria for the total internal reflection of the e-wave at the interface between the two absorbing wedges at normal incidence in the Rochon prism.

Similarly, considering the term 4(neκenoκosin2β) is zero in the Eqs. (40) and (41), the total reflection can occurs at the exiting face of the Rochon prism when ni2ne2sin2(βθm). And the apparent refractive indices and the refracted angles are given by

nm=ni2+ne2sin2(βθm)+2+|ni2ne2sin2(βθm)|2={ni,ni2>ne2sin2(βθm)|nesin(βθm)|,ni2ne2sin2(βθm),
κm=ne2sin2(βθm)ni22+|ni2ne2sin2(βθm)|2={0,ni2>ne2sin2(βθm)ne2sin2(βθm)ni2ni2ne2sin2(βθm),
θm={arcsin[nesin(βθm)ni],ni2>ne2sin2(βθm)π/2,ni2ne2sin2(βθm),
ψm0.

5. Conclusions

We theoretically analyze inhomogeneous plane waves propagating in the Rochon prisms made from uniaxial absorbing materials. Detailed expressions for the complex and real propagation and attenuation directions of the refracted inhomogeneous waves in the Rochon prisms are derived by complex ray-tracing method. As an application, the propagation characteristic of the inhomogeneous plane waves within the lossy Rochon prisms at normal incidence are analyzed and discussed.

The real wave propagation direction of the refracted inhomogeneous wave can be along the interface (θmπ/2) between the two absorbing wedges of the Rochon prism. It can be regard as the total internal reflection for the absorbing media although the attenuation direction of the inhomogeneous plane is not perpendicular to the direction of wave propagation.

This work has concentrated on inhomogeneous plane waves propagation in the lossy Rochon prisms, however, further work will deal with the transmission and the polarization characteristics of the inhomogeneous plane waves in the lossy Rochon prisms.

References and links

1. A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Optical Waves in Crystals (Wiley, 1984).

2. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon, 1999).

3. R. White, “Deviation produced by anisotropic prisms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70(3), 281–287 (1980). [CrossRef]  

4. M. C. Simon and P. A. Larocca, “Minimum deviation for uniaxial prisms,” Appl. Opt. 34(4), 709–715 (1995). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. C. C. Montarou and T. K. Gaylord, “Analysis and design of modified Wollaston prisms,” Appl. Opt. 38(31), 6604–6616 (1999). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. M. Avendaño-Alejo, I. Moreno, and O. Stavroudis, “Minimum deviation angle in uniaxial prisms,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24(8), 2431–2437 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. W. Wu, F. Wu, M. Shi, F. Su, P. Han, and L. Ma, “A unit structure Rochon prism based on the extraordinary refraction of uniaxial birefringent crystals,” Opt. Express 21(11), 13162–13168 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. M. Avendaño-Alejo, “Analysis of the refraction of the extraordinary ray in a plane-parallel uniaxial plate with an arbitrary orientation of the optical axis,” Opt. Express 13(7), 2549–2555 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. M. Avendaño-Alejo and M. Rosete-Aguilar, “Optical path difference in a plane-parallel uniaxial plate,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23(4), 926–932 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. L. P. Mosteller and F. Wooten, “Optical properties and reflectance of uniaxial absorbing crystals,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58(4), 511–518 (1968). [CrossRef]  

11. O. E. Piro, “Optical properties, reflectance, and transmittance of anisotropic absorbing crystal plates,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 36(6), 3427–3435 (1987). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. F. Bréhat and B. Wyncke, “Reflectivity, transmissivity and optical constants of anisotropic absorbing crystals,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 24(11), 2055–2066 (1991). [CrossRef]  

13. T. Hasegawa, J. Umemura, and T. Takenaka, “Simple refraction law for uniaxial anisotropic absorbing media,” Appl. Spectrosc. 47(3), 338–340 (1993). [CrossRef]  

14. R. Echarri and M. T. Garea, “Behaviour of the Poynting vector in uniaxial absorbing media,” Pure Appl. Opt. 3(3), 931–941 (1994). [CrossRef]  

15. H. Greiner, “Power splitting between refracted ordinary and extraordinary waves in uniaxial crystals with absorption,” Optik (Stuttg.) 114(3), 109–112 (2003). [CrossRef]  

16. C. Alberdi, S. Alfonso, M. Berrogui, J. M. Diñeiro, C. Sáenz, and B. Hernández, “Field and Poynting vectors of homogeneous waves in uniaxial and absorbing dielectric media,” J. Mod. Opt. 49(9), 1553–1566 (2002). [CrossRef]  

17. J. M. Diñeiro, M. Berrogui, S. Alfonso, C. Alberdi, B. Hernández, and C. Sáenz, “Complex unitary vectors for the direction of propagation and for the polarization of electromagnetic waves in uniaxial and absorbing dielectric media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24(6), 1767–1775 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. C. Alberdi, S. Alfonso, J. M. Diñeiro, B. Hernández, and C. Sáenz, “Interface between transparent isotropic and uniaxial absorbing dielectric media: equations for ray tracing and for the direction of propagation,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25(10), 2476–2488 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. J. M. Diñeiro, C. Alberdi, B. Hernández, and C. Sáenz, “Uniaxial absorbing media: conditions for refraction in the direction of the optical axis,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30(3), 385–391 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. Y. Wang, L. Liang, H. Xin, and L. Wu, “Complex ray tracing in uniaxial absorbing media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25(3), 653–657 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. F. Parmigiani, “Some aspects of the reflection and refraction of an electromagnetic wave at an absorbing surface,” Am. J. Phys. 51(3), 245–247 (1983). [CrossRef]  

22. M. A. Dupertuis, M. Proctor, and B. Acklin, “Generalization of complex Snell-Descartes and Fresnel laws,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11(3), 1159–1166 (1994). [CrossRef]  

23. P. C. Y. Chang, J. G. Walker, and K. I. Hopcraft, “Ray tracing in absorbing media,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 96(3–4), 327–341 (2005). [CrossRef]  

24. L. G. Guimarães and E. E. S. Sampaio, “A note on snell laws for electromagnetic plane waves in lossy media,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 109(11), 2124–2140 (2008). [CrossRef]  

25. S. Alfonso, C. Alberdi, J. M. Diñeiro, M. Berrogui, B. Hernández, and C. Sáenz, “Complex unitary vectors for the direction of propagation and for the polarization of electromagnetic waves in absorbing isotropic media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21(9), 1776–1784 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Ordinary and extraordinary rays in a lossless Rochon prism. The optical axes of the Rochon prism are such arranged that in the first wedge both of the ordinary and the extraordinary rays propagate along the optical axis at normal incidence, and in the second wedge the light rays propagate perpendicular to the optical axis. The ordinary ray (o ray) in the first wedge will be converted into the extraordinary ray (oe ray) in the second wedge, and the extraordinary ray (e ray) will be converted into the ordinary ray (eo ray), conversely.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Ray tracing in a lossy Rochon prism. (a) Ordinary and extraordinary rays in the lossy Rochon prism. (b) Incident and refracted rays at the entrance face of the lossy Rochon prism. (c) Geometry of the interface between the two wedges in the lossy Rochon prism. (d) Incident and refracted rays at the exiting face of the lossy Rochon prism.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Plots of the apparent refractive indices ( n m and κ m ) and the refracted angles ( θ m and ψ m ) for various values of wedge angleβ with the complex refractive indices of n ˜ o =1.60.5i and n ˜ e =1.40.5i . Total reflection occurs at the angle of β=arcsin[ n e κ e / n o κ o ]=69 .3 .
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Plots of the apparent refractive indices ( n m and κ m ) and the refracted angles ( θ m and ψ m ) for various values of wedge angleβ with the complex refractive indices of n ˜ o =1.61.0i and n ˜ e =1.41.0i . Total reflection occurs at the angle of β=arcsin[ n e κ e / n o κ o ]=69 .3 .
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Plots of the apparent refractive indices ( n m and κ m ) and the refracted angles ( θ m and ψ m ) for various values of wedge angleβ with the complex refractive indices of n ˜ o =1.40.5i and n ˜ e =1.60.5i .
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Plots of the apparent refractive indices ( n m and κ m ) and the refracted angles ( θ m and ψ m ) for various values of wedge angleβ with the complex refractive indices of n ˜ o =1.41.0i and n ˜ e =1.61.0i .
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Plots of the apparent refractive indices ( n m and κ m ) and the refracted angles ( θ m and ψ m ) for various values of wedge angleβ with the refractive indices of n ˜ o =1.60.0i and n ˜ e =1.40.0i . Total reflection occurs at the angle of β=arcsin[ n e / n o ]=69 .3 .

Equations (57)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

n i sin θ i = n ˜ sin θ ˜ t ,
K ˜ = ω c n ˜ k ˜ ,
D ˜ = n ˜ c k ˜ × H ˜ ,
μ 0 H ˜ = n ˜ c k ˜ × E ˜ ,
D ˜ k ˜ =0,
H ˜ k ˜ =0,
D ˜ = ε ˜ E ˜ ,
F ˜ =Fexp(i θ F )exp[ iω( t n ˜ c r k ˜ ) ] u ˜ F =Fexp(i θ F )exp[ iω( t 1 c r(n k Re +κ k Im ) ) ]exp[ ω c r(n k Im κ k Re ) ] u ˜ F , =Fexp(i θ F ) P r A t u ˜ F
k Pr = n k Re +κ k Im n 2 k Re 2 + κ 2 k Im 2 ,
k At = n k Im κ k Re n 2 k Im 2 + κ 2 k Re 2 .
α k =arccos( k Pr k At ).
ε ˜ 0 [ n ˜ o 2 0 0 0 n ˜ o 2 0 0 0 n ˜ e 2 ],
k ˜ X 2 1 n ˜ 2 1 n ˜ o 2 + k ˜ Y 2 1 n ˜ 2 1 n ˜ o 2 + k ˜ Z 2 1 n ˜ 2 1 n ˜ e 2 =0.
n ˜ eff ( θ ˜ )= n ˜ o n ˜ e n ˜ e 2 cos 2 θ ˜ + n ˜ o 2 sin 2 θ ˜
S ˜ e = E ˜ e × H ˜ e = S e exp(i θ S e )exp[ i2ω( t n ˜ eff c r s ˜ e ) ] s ˜ e = S e exp(i θ S e )exp[ i2ω( t n ˜ eff cos α ˜ e c r k ˜ e ) ] s ˜ e ,
tan α ˜ e =tan( ξ ˜ θ ˜ )= ( n ˜ o 2 n ˜ e 2 )tan θ ˜ n ˜ e 2 + n ˜ o 2 tan 2 θ ˜ .
k ˜ o =(sin θ ˜ o ,0,cos θ ˜ o ) ,
k ˜ e =(sin θ ˜ e ,0,cos θ ˜ e ) ,
tan θ ˜ e = n ˜ e n i sin θ ˜ i n ˜ o n ˜ e 2 n i 2 sin 2 θ ˜ i
s ˜ e =(sin ξ ˜ e ,0,cos ξ ˜ e ) ,
θ ˜ i o,e = θ ˜ o,e +β ,
θ ˜ oe =arcsin[ n ˜ o n ˜ e sin( θ ˜ o +β)]
θ ˜ eo =arcsin[ n ˜ eff n ˜ o sin( θ ˜ e +β)],
k ˜ oe =(sin θ ˜ oe ,0,cos θ ˜ oe ),
k ˜ eo =(sin θ ˜ eo ,0,cos θ ˜ eo ).
γ ˜ oe =arcsin[ n ˜ e n i sin(β θ ˜ oe )],
γ ˜ eo =arcsin[ n ˜ o n i sin(β θ ˜ eo )],
θ ˜ oe =arcsin[ n ˜ o n ˜ e sin(β)].
Κ ˜ oe = ω c n ˜ e k ˜ oe = ω c n ˜ e ( sin θ ˜ oe 0 cos θ ˜ oe ) = ω c ( n m k Pr i κ m k At )= ω c n m ( sin θ m 0 cos θ m )i ω c κ m ( sin ψ m 0 cos ψ m ),
n m 2 κ m 2 = n e 2 κ e 2 ,
n m κ m cos α k = n e κ e .
n m 2 = ( n e 2 κ e 2 )+( n o 2 + κ o 2 ) sin 2 β 2 + [( n e 2 κ e 2 )( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β] 2 +4 [ n e κ e n o κ o sin 2 β] 2 2 ,
κ m 2 = ( n o 2 + κ o 2 ) sin 2 β( n e 2 κ e 2 ) 2 + [( n e 2 κ e 2 )( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β] 2 +4 [ n e κ e n o κ o sin 2 β] 2 2 ,
n m sin θ m = n o sinβ,
κ m sin ψ m = κ o sinβ.
A t oe =exp( ω c κ m d 2 cos α k ),
Κ ˜ oe t oe = ω c n i k ˜ oe t oe = ω c n i ( sin γ ˜ oe 0 cos γ ˜ oe ) = ω c ( n m t k Pr t i κ m t k Pr t )= ω c n m t ( sin θ m t 0 cos θ m t )i ω c κ m t ( sin ψ m t 0 cos ψ m t ),
n m t 2 κ m t 2 = n i 2 ,
ψ m t = π 2 + θ m t .
n m t 2 = n i 2 + n m 2 sin 2 (β θ m )+ κ m 2 sin 2 (β ψ m ) 2 + [ n i 2 n m 2 sin 2 (β θ m )+ κ m 2 sin 2 (β ψ m )] 2 +4 n m 2 κ m 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) sin 2 (β ψ m ) 2 ,
κ m t 2 = n m 2 sin 2 (β θ m )+ κ m 2 sin 2 (β ψ m ) n i 2 2 + [ n i 2 n m 2 sin 2 (β θ m )+ κ m 2 sin 2 (β ψ m )] 2 +4 n m 2 κ m 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) sin 2 (β ψ m ) 2 ,
n m t sin θ m t = n m sin(β θ m ),
κ m t sin ψ m t = κ o sin(β ψ m ).
n m = n e 2 + n o 2 sin 2 β 2 + | n e 2 n o 2 sin 2 β | 2 ={ n e , n e 2 > n o 2 sin 2 β n o sinβ, n e 2 n o 2 sin 2 β ,
κ m = n o 2 sin 2 β n e 2 2 + | n e 2 n o 2 sin 2 β | 2 ={ 0, n e 2 > n o 2 sin 2 β n o 2 sin 2 β n e 2 , n e 2 n o 2 sin 2 β ,
θ m ={ arcsin( n o n e sinβ), n e 2 > n o 2 sin 2 β π/2, n e 2 n o 2 sin 2 β ,
ψ m 0.
n m = ( n e 2 κ e 2 )+( n o 2 + κ o 2 ) sin 2 β 2 + | ( n e 2 κ e 2 )( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β | 2 , ={ n e 2 κ e 2 + κ o 2 sin 2 β , ( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β< n e 2 κ e 2 n o sinβ, ( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β n e 2 κ e 2
κ m = ( n o 2 + κ o 2 ) sin 2 β( n e 2 κ e 2 ) 2 + | ( n e 2 κ e 2 )( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β | 2 , ={ κ o sinβ, ( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β< n e 2 κ e 2 n o 2 sin 2 β( n e 2 κ e 2 ) , ( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β n e 2 κ e 2
θ m ={ arcsin[ n o sinβ n e 2 κ e 2 + κ o 2 sin 2 β ], ( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β< n e 2 κ e 2 π/2, ( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β n e 2 κ e 2 ,
ψ m ={ π/2, ( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β< n e 2 κ e 2 arcsin[ κ o sinβ n o 2 sin 2 β( n e 2 κ e 2 ) ], ( n o 2 κ o 2 ) sin 2 β n e 2 κ e 2
{ n m = n o n e κ e / κ o κ m = n e 2 κ e 2 / κ o 2 ( n e 2 κ e 2 ) θ m π/2 ψ m =arcsin[ κ o 2 n e κ e / n o κ o n e 2 κ e 2 κ o 2 ( n e 2 κ e 2 ) ] ,
{ ( n o 2 κ o 2 ) n e κ e ( n e 2 κ e 2 ) n o κ o sinβ= n e κ e / n o κ o .
n m = n i 2 + n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m )+ 2 + | n i 2 n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) | 2 ={ n i , n i 2 > n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) | n e sin (β θ m ) |, n i 2 n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) ,
κ m = n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) n i 2 2 + | n i 2 n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) | 2 ={ 0, n i 2 > n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) n i 2 n i 2 n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) ,
θ m ={ arcsin[ n e sin(β θ m ) n i ], n i 2 > n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) π/2, n i 2 n e 2 sin 2 (β θ m ) ,
ψ m 0.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.