Abstract

Due to advances in optical technology, a wide range of spectrometers is available. Recent interests in soil global libraries and sensor fusion presents a challenge with respect to combining data from different instrumentation. Little research, however, has been done on the comparison of visible-near infrared (vis-NIR) spectrometers for soil characterisation. There is a need for more work on the effects of scanning strategies and use of different soil instrumentation. We compared three vis-NIR spectrometers with varying resolution, signal-to-noise ratios and spectral range. Their performance was evaluated based on spectra collected from 194 Danish top soils and used to determine soil organic carbon (SOC) and clay content. Scanning procedures for the three spectrophotometers where done according to uniform laboratory protocols. Soil organic carbon and clay calibrations were performed using PLS regression. One third of the data set was used as an independent test set. A range of spectral preprocessing methods was applied in search of model improvement. Validation for SOC content using an independent data set derived from all three spectrophotometers provided values of RMSEP between 0.45% and 0.52%, r²=0.42–0.59 and RPD = 1.2–1.4. Clay content was predicted with a higher precision resulting in RMSEP values between 2.6% and 2.9%, r² = 0.71–0.77 and RPD values in the range from 2.2 to 2.5. No substantial differences in the prediction accuracy were found for the three spectrometers, although there was a tendency that, in the tradeoff between noise and resolution, low noise was the more important for SOC and clay predictions. The application of different spectral preprocessing procedures did not generate important improvements of the calibration models either. Additionally, data simulation analysis, including resampling to a coarser resolution and addition of noise, was performed. No, or very little, effect of sampling resolution and additional noise on the performance of the spectrophotometers was reported. The results from this study showed that, as long as strict laboratory scanning protocols were followed, no significant differences in constituent determination were found, despite differences in spectral range, spectral resolution, spectral sampling intervals and sample presentation methods. The differences in predictive abilities between the spectrometers were mostly due to differences in spectral range.

© 2013 IM Publications LLP

Accurate and rapid detection of soil and fertilizer properties based on visible/near-infrared spectroscopy

Zhidan Lin, Rujing Wang, Yubing Wang, Liusan Wang, Cuiping Lu, Yang Liu, Zhengyong Zhang, and Likai Zhu
Appl. Opt. 57(18) D69-D73 (2018)

Evaluation of univariate and multivariate calibration strategies for the direct determination of total carbon in soils by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: tutorial

Wesley Nascimento Guedes, Diego Victor Babos, Vinícius Câmara Costa, Carla Pereira De Morais, Vitor da Silveira Freitas, Kleydson Stenio, Alfredo Augusto Pereira Xavier, Luís Carlos Leva Borduchi, Paulino Ribeiro Villas-Boas, and Débora Marcondes Bastos Pereira Milori
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40(5) 1319-1330 (2023)

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for the environmental determination of total carbon and nitrogen in soils

Madhavi Z. Martin, Stan D. Wullschleger, Charles T. Garten, and Anthony V. Palumbo
Appl. Opt. 42(12) 2072-2077 (2003)

Spark-induced breakdown spectroscopy and multivariate analysis applied to the measurement of total carbon in soil

Morgan S. Schmidt, Kellen J. Sorauf, Keith E. Miller, David Sonnenfroh, Richard Wainner, and Amy J. R. Bauer
Appl. Opt. 51(7) B176-B182 (2012)

Design and testing of a new high-accuracy ultraviolet–visible–near-infrared spectrophotometer

Joanne C. Zwinkels and Denis S. Gignac
Appl. Opt. 31(10) 1557-1567 (1992)