Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Anomalous polarization-sensitive Fabry-Perot resonance in a one-dimensional photonic crystal containing an all-dielectric metamaterial defect: erratum

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

This erratum corrects some typing errors of our original paper, Opt. Express 31(20), 32669 (2023) [CrossRef]  . The correction does not affect the results of the original paper.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Equation (9) on page 32672 of our paper [1] is corrected as follows:

$$\frac{{{{({{k_x}} )}^2}}}{{{\varepsilon _{\textrm{D}x}}}} + \frac{{{{({k_{\textrm{D}z}^{\textrm{TE}}} )}^2}}}{{{\varepsilon _{\textrm{D}x}}}} = {({{k_0}} )^2}. $$
In the paragraph above Fig. 3 on page 32674 of our paper [1], the sentence “As the incident angle increases from 0° to 60°, the 2nd Fabry-Perot resonance under TM polarization shifts from 1682.32 to 1430.01 nm while that under TE polarization shifts from 1682.32 to 1588.99 nm.” is corrected to “As the incident angle increases from 0° to 60°, the 2nd Fabry-Perot resonance under TM polarization shifts from 1678.02 to 1426.59 nm while that under TE polarization shifts from 1678.02 to 1583.26 nm.”. In addition, the sentence “As the incident angle increases from 0° to 60°, the theoretically predicted wavelength difference rapidly increases from 0 to 158.98 nm.” is corrected to “As the incident angle increases from 0° to 60°, the numerically calculated wavelength difference rapidly increases from 0 to 156.67 nm.”.

In the paragraph below Fig. 3 on page 32674 of our paper [1], the sentence “As the incident angle increases from 0° to 60°, the 2nd Fabry-Perot resonance under TM polarization shifts from 1678.02 to 1426.59 nm while that under TE polarization shifts from 1678.02 to 1583.26 nm.” is corrected to “As the incident angle increases from 0° to 60°, the 2nd Fabry-Perot resonance under TM polarization shifts from 1682.32 to 1430.01 nm while that under TE polarization shifts from 1682.32 to 1588.99 nm.”. In addition, the sentence “As the incident angle increases from 0° to 60°, the theoretically predicted wavelength difference rapidly increases from 0 to 156.67 nm.” is corrected to “As the incident angle increases from 0° to 60°, the numerically calculated wavelength difference rapidly increases from 0 to 158.98 nm.”.

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (2021A1514010050, 2022A1515010726, 2023A1515011024); National Natural Science Foundation of China (12104105, 12264028, 12304420, 12364045); Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202201011176); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20232BAB201040, 20232BAB211025); Start-up Funding of Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University (2021SDKYA033); Interdisciplinary Innovation Fund of Nanchang University (2019-9166-27060003).

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

References

1. F. Wu, Y. She, Z. Cheng, et al., “Anomalous polarization-sensitive Fabry-Perot resonance in a one-dimensional photonic crystal containing an all-dielectric metamaterial defect,” Opt. Express 31(20), 32669–32683 (2023). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

( k x ) 2 ε D x + ( k D z TE ) 2 ε D x = ( k 0 ) 2 .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.