Abstract
Laser-based light detection and ranging (lidar) plays a significant role in both scientific and industrial areas. However, it is difficult for existing lidars to achieve high speed, high precision, and long distance simultaneously. Here, we demonstrate a high-performance lidar based on a chip-scaled soliton microcomb (SMC) that can realize all three specialties simultaneously. Aided by the excellent properties of ultrahigh repetition rate and the smooth envelope of the SMC, traditional optical frequency comb (OFC)-based dispersive interferometry is heavily improved and the measuring dead zone induced by the mismatch between the repetition rate of the OFC and resolution of the optical spectrum analyzer is totally eliminated. Combined with an auxiliary dual-frequency phase-modulated laser range finder, the none-dead-zone measurable range ambiguity is extended up to 1500 m. The proposed SMC lidar is experimentally implemented in both indoor and outdoor environment. In the outdoor baseline field, real-time, high-speed (up to 35 kHz) measurement of a long distance of is achieved with a minimum Allan deviation of 5.6 μm at an average time of 0.2 ms (27 nm at an average time of 1.8 s after high-pass filtering). The present SMC lidar approaches a compact, fast, high-precision, and none-dead zone long-distance ranging system, aimed at emerging applications of frontier basic scientific research and advances in industrial manufacturing.
© 2020 Chinese Laser Press
1. INTRODUCTION
High-accuracy long-distance ranging plays a significant role in frontier sciences and advanced industrial processing, such as multisatellite flying formation-based extraterrestrial planet searching, black-holes imaging, and gravitational waves detection; it heavily relies on the precision of a real-time satellite position detection system [1–4]. During the last few decades, laser-based light detection and ranging (lidar) has been a major interest in the scientific community for its high angle, distance and velocity resolution, high anti-interference capability, as well as its compact volume [5]. Nowadays, with the rapid development of space exploration and industrial production, there is a higher demand for higher-performance lidar [6–8]. Recently, optical frequency combs (OFCs) have been used as revolutionary laser sources to improve the ranging accuracy, acquisition speed, and extended distances of lidar [9–11], and many ranging techniques have been developed, such as the time-of-flight method [12,13], synthetic wavelength interferometry [14–16], dispersive interferometry (DPI) [17–21], and the dual-comb method [22–24], as well as their combinations [25]. However, among the various methods, whether based on the continuous wave (CW) or OFC, few could achieve the high precision, high measuring speed, and large measurement range at the same time. CW lidars have fast measurement speed but limited precision, and new OFC lidars have high accuracy but poor real-time performance.
OFC-based DPI (as shown in Fig. 1), also known as frequency-domain interferometry or spectral interferometry, is well suited for high-accuracy long-distance ranging because of its large coherent length and high tolerance against interference [19,20]. However, there are still some deficiencies in DPI systems. The distance information of a DPI is demodulated from the interference spectrum envelope, and the maximum measurable distance depends on the resolution of the optical spectrum acquisition system. Once is less than the distance measurement cycle (inversely proportional to the repetition rate of the OFC), a measurement dead zone from to will be introduced, as shown in Fig. 2 [26]. Complex experimental techniques, such as scanning reference arm length, repetition rate tuning method [27], and dual-comb or tri-comb schemes [28], have been employed to avoid the dead zone. But these are at the expense of the real-time performance, as well as the stability and integration capacity, which are great challenges for practical applications.
Actually, for a given optical spectrum acquisition system, a simple and effective solution of this issue is using a high repetition rate OFC to shorten the distance measurement cycle, i.e., . When the repetition rate of the OFC is higher than ( is the air group refractive index, is the resolution of the optical spectrum acquisition system), the dead zone will be totally eliminated, as shown in Fig. 2. The emergence of a novel type of integrated broadband coherent optical sources known as microresonator-based soliton microcombs (SMCs) makes this solution possible. Realizing double balances between nonlinearity and dispersion as well as parametric gain and cavity loss in a micrometer-scale optical resonator, an SMC can provide an equidistant comb-shaped spectrum like a traditional mode-locked OFC [29–35]. Benefiting from the miniature structure of the microresonators, SMCs are featured by an ultrahigh repetition rate. Since it emerged, the SMC has exhibited unprecedented prospects in the areas of classical and quantum optical communication systems [36,37], dual-comb spectroscopy [38], chip-scale optical frequency synthesizers [39], and high-accuracy ranging [40,41]. In our work, a self-developed SMC is employed to improve the performance of DPI-based long-distance ranging system.
Benefiting from the ultrahigh repetition rate, an SMC is an ideal laser source to eliminate the dead zone of DPI-based lidar and has a great advantage for compact integration. Besides, the ultrahigh repetition rate of an SMC reduces the demand on spectrometer resolution due to fewer optical modes among each interference spectrum, which is propitious for dynamic and high-speed measurement. To achieve dynamic nanometer measurement at long distances, we built an SMC-based DPI system, where a high-speed InGaAs linear array image sensor (LAIS) is employed for interference spectrum collection that enhances the data acquisition rate, and the periodic ambiguity is extended to 1500 m via an auxiliary dual-frequency phase-modulated laser range finder (PLR). The feasibility of the proposed measurement system is experimentally demonstrated in two scenarios. In the first scenario, an 80 m distance is measured in a well-maintained environment where a high-accuracy incremental laser interferometer group (IMG) is used as reference. For the second scenario, the ranging system is built in an outdoor baseline for up to a 1179 m distance measurement. The results show that the proposed SMC lidar system has the potential to realize nanometric-precision measurement of long distance with a high real-time updating rate of up to 35 kHz. Also, the proposed SMC lidar could be extended from millimeter to hundreds of kilometers length measurement, as well as holding the potential for miniature integration aimed at the various applications of long-distance measurement such as formation flying of satellites, advanced manufacturing, and the frontiers of scientific research.
2. METHODS
A. Soliton Microcomb Generation
The core SMC is generated in a high-index doped silica glass microring resonator (MRR) with a quality factor of 1.7 million [42,43]. Two key techniques are adopted to ensure the SMC generates and survives in the unguaranteed experimental environment. First, the MRR is butterfly-packaged with a compact thermal electric cooler (TEC) [Fig. 3(b)].
The TEC is used to tune the resonances of the MRR for SMC generation and isolate the temperature fluctuation of the external environment to maintain the SMC. Second, an auxiliary laser-assisted intracavity thermal-balanced scheme is adopted to access single SMCs in a deterministic fashion [42]. The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 3(a). In our experiments, the wavelength of a pump laser is fixed at 1560.2 nm with a linewidth of 100 Hz. The pump and auxiliary lasers have similar on-chip power of . Figure 3(c) shows a typical optical spectrum of a single SMC, which exhibits a standard squared hyperbolic secant () envelope. The mode-crossing is almost avoided over the SMC bandwidth, which benefits from the stringent spatial mode control of the device. The repetition rate of the single SMC is 48.97 GHz, corresponding to a pulse spacing of 20.4 ps. As an ideal broadband coherent laser source, the single SMC can survive over 2 h in the outdoor environment, which is critical for our long-distance measurement experiments.
B. Principle of the SMC Lidar
Figure 4 shows the principle of the proposed SMC lidar where two channels, the DPI channel and the PLR channel, are included. For the DPI channel, the self-developed SMC is split into signal and reference combs using an 80∶20 optical coupler (OC), and an optical attenuator (OA) is used to compensate for the transmission loss of the signal comb to improve the visibility of interference fringes. The interference spectrum of the reflected signal comb and the reference comb is spatially separated using two concave mirrors (CMs) and a reflection grating before lighting to a 256-pixel InGaAs LAIS for interference fringe detection [Fig. 4(a)]. The detection system is well designed to ensure that each LAIS pixel is illuminated by a single SMC mode (about 250 valid optical modes). The exposure time of the LAIS can be flexibly set between 26 and 260 μs by adjusting the integration time, which corresponds to a maximum measurement frequency of , with an additional start-up time of 2.5 μs. An equivalent average process is realized during the spectrum acquisition, which is helpful in alleviating the impact of white noise coupled from the pump source, the erbium-doped optical fiber amplifier (EDFA), and the external environment.
Assuming the spectrum of the SMC is expressed as , where is the angular frequency of every optical mode of the SMC, the signal and reference combs are expressed as
where and are the optical spectra and amplitude coefficients of the reference and signal combs, respectively. is the flight delay time of the signal comb, where is the speed of light in a vacuum, and is the frequency-dependent refractive index. The interference spectrum intensity can be calculated as If the air dispersion is negligible, the air refractive index is considered as a constant . Equation (4) can be simplified to One typical interference spectrum is depicted in Fig. 4(e), which is modulated by a cosine term whose period equals the flight delay time of the signal light. The modulation frequency can be extracted through a Fourier transform and the distance can be calculated as The length difference between signal and reference paths can be extracted from the spectrum data using an improved Fourier transform peak-to-peak method [44]. The Fourier transform spectrum (FTS) represents the delay time between the signal pulse and reference pulse, as shown in Fig. 4(f). In order to obtain the exact frequency peak of the FTS, a three-point fitting method is employed [Fig. 4(g)]. Because of the ultrahigh repetition rate of the SMC, the ambiguity-resolved distance is .For the PLR channel, a dual-frequency PLR is employed to estimate the distance and to compensate for the ambiguity of the distance measurement cycle, which is parallel to the SMC-based DPI using a wavelength division multiplexer (WDM) technique, as shown in Fig. 4(c). A phase-modulated laser diode (LD) is used as a light source, and the phase difference between the original modulation signal and the reflected laser signal is regained using a fast Fourier transform (FFT) digital phase discrimination technique. By switching the LD modulation frequencies, two signals are generated by a direct digital synthesis signal generator with 100 kHz frequency difference, i.e., and . A heterodyne method is used to convert the high-frequency phase signals to a low-frequency signal (100 kHz), which facilitates the distance information demodulation. The measurement laser signal is detected by an InGaAs avalanche photodiode (APD) detector. The phase shift of the laser signal is demodulated by a full-phase digital FFT phase discriminator whose precision is about 0.1° for 100 kHz signals. In our scheme, the absolute distance under test can be real-time synthesized once the distance information from DPI and PLR channels is obtained simultaneously.
The distance is calculated by , where and are the ambiguity-resolved distance and measured precise distance of the SMC-based DPI channel, and is the number of the ambiguity-resolved distance. First, the LD is modulated with the synthesized 100 kHz signal, and is obtained by detecting the phase delay, corresponding to a non-ambiguity range (NAR) of 1500 m and a precision of under the phase discriminator precision of 0.1°. Then a 100 MHz modulation signal is imposed on the LD and the heterodyne phase discrimination is employed to detect the phase shift; is obtained similarly, and the distance precision is improved to 1 mm, while the NAR is shortened to 1.5 m. As shown in Fig. 5(a), , , and make up a distance measurement chain and link together to synthesize the ultimate distance, of which the detailed procedure is depicted in Fig. 5(b). is used to calculate , and then the estimated distance is obtained with , where is the NAR of 100 MHz PLR, i.e., 1.5 m. Further, can be obtained with . Consequently, with the data of the air refractive index along the outdoor baseline, the distance can be piece-wise calculated as
where is the air refractive index of the th cycle, and is the air refractive index of the last cycle. is determined by the weighted average environmental data of two adjacent sensors based on the modified Edllen’s formula. Here, an equivalent refractive index, , is defined as Then Eq. (7) can be rewritten as3. RESULTS
To verify the capacity of our SMC lidar, we demonstrate the experimental implementation of an 80 m range in a well-maintained environment and a 1179 m range in an outdoor environment, respectively.
A. Ranging in a Well-Maintained Environment
The proposed SMC lidar is first implemented in a well-maintained environment. The target is mounted on an 80 m-long precision granite guide rail system that is installed in a 10 m deep basement at the National Institute of Metrology (NIM), China. The environmental parameters, including temperature, humidity, acoustical vibration, and atmosphere pressure, are well monitored and controlled using the mounted sensor arrays and control systems, which results in minor environmental turbulence. The air refractive index is calibrated in real time using the monitored environmental data based on the modified Edllen’s formula.
To obtain absolute precision, a referenced absolute distance is simultaneously measured using an IMG. The IMG consists of three parallel installed He–Ne interferometers for Abbe error elimination [Fig. 4(d)]. The absolute precision of the IMG is in the controlled environment. A reference point (zero distance) is calibrated by the proposed scheme and the IMG ranging system synchronously. Then, the target mirror is moved from 0 to 3 mm with a step size of 50 μm. The measured results are shown in Fig. 6(a) (top), while the residuals between the measured and reference values are presented in Fig. 6(a) (bottom) with standard deviation error bars. The residuals are within 100 nm, which indicates the two ranging systems have a similar accuracy. The accuracy of the IMG ranging system linearly decreases as the distance increases. It is no longer suitable as a reference for long-distance ranging. Therefore, a standard deviation analysis is used for measurement accuracy assessment in our following experiments. For longer distance measuring experiments, the target is placed around 1 and 80 m, respectively, and the interference spectra are continuously acquired for 6 s with an updating rate of 35 kHz. Based on a fast peak fitting algorithm and a timely distance demodulation technique [45], the distance information can be recovered in a timely fashion in a medium-performance field-programmable gate array.
The fractional parts of the measurement results of the 1 and 80 m ranging experiments are shown in Figs. 6(b) and 6(c), and the standard deviations are 2.99 and 9.95 nm; the repeatability precision is 28 and 59 nm, respectively. The minimum Allan deviations of the two ranging experiments are 2.88 nm at an average time of 2.74 s, and 5.39 nm at an average time of 2.055 s, respectively [Fig. 6(d)]. It is noted that there are apparent distance drifts for 80 m distance measurements [Fig. 6(c)], which is caused mainly by environmental fluctuation. We believe that the ranging error could be further improved once the environmental fluctuation is well compensated.
B. Long Distance Ranging in an Outdoor Environment
The environmental applicability of the proposed SMC lidar is validated by building the system in a 1200 m outdoor standard baseline located at NIM [Fig. 7(b)]. Environmental parameters along the baseline, including temperature, air pressure, and humidity, are also monitored to calculate the air group refractive index. Temperature is monitored by 60 high-precision Pt-100 platinum resistance temperature sensors, which are installed along the baseline with a spacing of 20 m. Air pressure and humidity are monitored by 3 air pressure sensors and 13 humidity sensors along the baseline. To overcome the optical energy loss caused by beam expansion, an optical transmitter-receiver system is constructed, which consists of a Cassegrain telescope and an automatic space-to-fiber coupling system [Fig. 7(a)]. An eyepiece is used to collimate the light path and aim at the target. The automatic space-to-fiber system optimizes the coupling efficiency through a piezoelectric scanning method. The transmitting–receiving efficiency is about 1%, which is enough for our ranging experiments.
A cube-corner prism is used as the target and placed at about 1179 m away from the optical transmitter–receiver. In order to test the resolving ability of the proposed ranging system, the cube-corner prism is installed on a piezoelectric vibrator to provide high-frequency vibration signals, as shown in Fig. 7(a). According to the test result of the PLR channel, is determined to be 385,072. Considering the air effect group refractive index, which is calculated to be 1.000,267,232 using the modified Edllen’s formula based on the area weighted averaging parameters along the baseline, the integer part of the stationary distance of the target is calibrated to 1,179,305.255,157,9 mm.
The fractional part of the stationary distance is continuously recorded using the proposed ranging system for 5 s, as shown in Fig. 8(a), where three conditions are included, that is stationary, 1 kHz vibration, and 5 kHz vibration. It can be seen that there is an obvious distance drift of , which is mainly induced by the low-frequency noise, arising from the temperature drift, environmental acoustic interference, as well as air turbulence. The low-frequency noise can be clearly observed in the FTS [Fig. 8(d)] which is inevitable in an outdoor environment. According to the modified Edllen’s formula, temperature is the main factor in the change of the air refractive index (e.g., a 1°C temperature fluctuation will result in an air refractive index changing by , corresponding to optical length drift for the distance of 1179 m).
To alleviate the effect of low-frequency noise induced by environmental disturbances and temperature shifts, a digital high-pass (HP) filter is employed. Figure 8(c) shows the Allan deviation of the stationary results before and after the HP filtering. Without the HP filter, the minimum Allan deviation is 5.6 μm at an average time of 0.2 ms, and the Allan deviation increases, along with the average time increasing, up to 57 μm. Using an HP filter, the Allan deviation continuously decreases with an increased average time, and a minimum deviation of 27 nm is obtained at an average time of 1.8 s. 27 nm is regarded as the ranging capability of our outdoor ranging system, which is limited by the air dispersion, which broadens the soliton pulse and leads to the spectral chirp (different arrival times of different optical modes).
Such a system would show better performance in a nondispersive environment such as outer space, where the air refractive index fluctuation and air dispersion are eliminated. Further, the capacity of high-frequency vibrations measurement is verified by imposing a modulation signal on the piezoelectric vibrator, e.g., two frequencies of 1 and 5 kHz. The corresponding real-time ranging results are shown by the red and yellow lines in Fig. 8(a), respectively. The zoom-in waveforms [Fig. 8(b)] represent vibrations of the target; the vibrational frequencies are clearly indicated by the Fourier transform spectra [Fig. 8(d)].
C. Precision Analysis
The continuous precision analysis of length measurement is illustrated in Fig. 9, where the absolute precision and relative precision are depicted in blue and brown lines, respectively. The measuring range is divided into four areas, i.e., the micronano area, the general area, the long-length and the ultralong areas. In the first two areas, the main factors affecting the precision are the systematic error of measuring systems, such as the frequency stability of the laser source, the dispersion error, and the algorithm error. Ideally, absolute precision can be kept better than tens of nanometers. For long-length and ultralong areas, the fluctuation caused by the air refractive index gradually becomes the dominant factor influencing precision. Consequently, the relative precision can only approach the level of air variation, i.e., . If the air refractive index can be compensated, precision can be further improved.
On the other hand, absolute accuracy is not necessary in many ranging applications, but the dynamic process or special frequency may be more crucial, and this information could be obtained by just removing the low-frequency fluctuation of air with an HP filter. As the yellow line in Fig. 9 shows, precision is heavily improved after filtering the low-frequency fluctuation, and the trend inhabits the general area. The minimum Allan deviation of 27 nm can effectively represent the length-measuring capability of the built system. Especially for applications in outer space, such as multisatellite flying formations, where the measurement path is close to a vacuum, it is able to achieve dynamic precise measurement of kilometers’ distance with tens of nanometers of absolute precision. For applications in an outdoor air environment as in the demonstrated experiments, employing a dual-band OFC source is one of the possible solutions to compensate for the air refractive index, which still needs to be further researched.
4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
In this research, aimed at achieving high-speed long-distance ranging with high precision, a chip-scale SMC is introduced to a DPI system for the first time. Traditionally, high-precision long-distance ranging requires complex steps and calculations, which are difficult to apply in practice and which sacrifice real-time performance. Here, both the theoretical analysis and the experimental results show that the problems of existing measuring schemes comprising a large dead zone, low precision, and poor real-time performance can be completely avoided. The proposed SMC lidar is experimentally demonstrated in both a well-maintained environment and an outdoor standard baseline, where the distance detection accuracy reaches nanometer scale. Even for outdoor long-distance measurement of more than 1179 m, a minimum Allan deviation of 27 nm is achieved when the effect of the air refractive index fluctuation is neglected.
Moreover, for the proposed scheme, the maximum measurable distance is determined by the available laser power as well as the coherent length of the laser source. The SMC is pumped by a 100 Hz linewidth laser, which ensures the coherent length of the SMC over 1000 km [46]. Therefore, such a ranging system has the potential to extend the measurable distance to hundreds of kilometers as long as a long-distance light transmitting–receiving antenna is available. Additionally, the measuring speed of our scheme is subject to the spectrum acquisition rate. Actually, each soliton pulse can act as an effective distance probe; thus the maximum achievable measuring speed can approach the repetition rate of SMC (i.e., 48.97 GHz) once an ultrahigh-speed photodetector array is available. The proposed SMC lidar is therefore a promising technique applicable to ultrafast optical three-dimensional shape measurement. In conclusion, the excellent features, large dynamic range, ultrahigh precision, extreme measuring speed, and the compact system-on-a-chip integration potential ensure the SMC lidar can have extensive application prospects in both scientific and industrial areas.
Funding
Key Projects Supported by Science and Technology of Tianjin (18YFZCGX00920); Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2016353); Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB24030600); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB2003501, 2018YFF0212702); National Natural Science Foundation of China (51675380, 51775379, 61635013, 61675231, 61705257, 61805277).
Acknowledgment
F. Z., W. W., W. Z., Wei. Z., and X. Q. organized the project. J. W., Z. Lu., J. C., and Y. W. conducted the various experiments. J. C., J. W., and J. Z. analyzed the data. W. Z., W. W., S. C., and B. L. designed and fabricated the devices. W. W. packaged the samples. All authors discussed results and commented on the paper. J. W., Z. L., W. W., and W. Z. wrote the paper. W. Z. and F. Z. supervised the project. We thank the experimental sites supported by the National Institute of Metrology (NIM), China.
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1. W. Cash, A. Shipley, S. Osterman, and M. Joy, “Laboratory detection of X-ray fringes with a grazing-incidence interferometer,” Nature 407, 160–162 (2000). [CrossRef]
2. N. White, “X-ray astronomy—imaging black holes,” Nature 407, 146–147 (2000). [CrossRef]
3. M. Fridlund, “Future space missions to search for terrestrial planets,” Space Sci. Rev. 135, 355–369 (2008). [CrossRef]
4. S. G. Turyshev and M. Shao, “Laser astrometric test of relativity: science, technology and mission design,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 16, 2191–2203 (2007). [CrossRef]
5. J. Sun, E. Timurdogan, A. Yaacobi, E. S. Hosseini, and M. R. Watts, “Large-scale nanophotonic phased array,” Nature 493, 195–199 (2013). [CrossRef]
6. I. Coddington, W. C. Swann, L. Nenadovic, and N. R. Newbury, “Rapid and precise absolute distance measurements at long range,” Nat. Photonics 3, 351–356 (2009). [CrossRef]
7. W. T. Estler, K. L. Edmundson, G. N. Peggs, and D. H. Parker, “Large-scale metrology—an update,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 51, 587–609 (2002). [CrossRef]
8. N. Bobroff, “Recent advances in displacement measuring interferometry,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 4, 907–926 (1993). [CrossRef]
9. T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hansch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416, 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef]
10. T. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. Haensch, “Femtosecond optical frequency combs,” Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 172, 69–79 (2009). [CrossRef]
11. K. Minoshima and H. Matsumoto, “High-accuracy measurement of 240-m distance in an optical tunnel by use of a compact femtosecond laser,” Appl. Opt. 39, 5512–5517 (2000). [CrossRef]
12. D. Wei, S. Takahashi, K. Takamasu, and H. Matsumoto, “Time-of-flight method using multiple pulse train interference as a time recorder,” Opt. Express 19, 4881–4889 (2011). [CrossRef]
13. J. Takayanagi, H. Jinno, S. Ichino, K. Suizu, M. Yamashita, T. Ouchi, S. Kasai, H. Ohtake, H. Uchida, N. Nishizawa, and K. Kawase, “High-resolution time-of-flight terahertz tomography using a femtosecond fiber laser,” Opt. Express 17, 7533–7539 (2009). [CrossRef]
14. R. Yang, F. Pollinger, K. Meiners-Hagen, J. Tan, and H. Bosse, “Heterodyne multi-wavelength absolute interferometry based on a cavity-enhanced electro-optic frequency comb pair,” Opt. Lett. 39, 5834–5837 (2014). [CrossRef]
15. N. R. Doloca, K. Meiners-Hagen, M. Wedde, F. Pollinger, and A. Abou-Zeid, “Absolute distance measurement system using a femtosecond laser as a modulator,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 21, 115302 (2010). [CrossRef]
16. G. Wu, M. Takahashi, H. Inaba, and K. Minoshima, “Pulse-to-pulse alignment technique based on synthetic-wavelength interferometry of optical frequency combs for distance measurement,” Opt. Lett. 38, 2140–2143 (2013). [CrossRef]
17. M. Godbout, J. D. Deschenes, and J. Genest, “Spectrally resolved laser ranging with frequency combs,” Opt. Express 18, 15981–15989 (2010). [CrossRef]
18. K. N. Joo and S. W. Kim, “Absolute distance measurement by dispersive interferometry using a femtosecond pulse laser,” Opt. Express 14, 5954–5960 (2006). [CrossRef]
19. M. Cui, M. G. Zeitouny, N. Bhattacharya, S. A. van den Berg, and H. P. Urbach, “Long distance measurement with femtosecond pulses using a dispersive interferometer,” Opt. Express 19, 6549–6562 (2011). [CrossRef]
20. S. A. van den Berg, S. van Eldik, and N. Bhattacharya, “Mode-resolved frequency comb interferometry for high-accuracy long distance measurement,” Sci. Rep. 5, 14661 (2015). [CrossRef]
21. K. N. Joo and S. W. Kim, “Refractive index measurement by spectrally resolved interferometry using a femtosecond pulse laser,” Opt. Lett. 32, 647–649 (2007). [CrossRef]
22. V. Duran, P. A. Andrekson, and V. Torres-Company, “Electro-optic dual-comb interferometry over 40 nm bandwidth,” Opt. Lett. 41, 4190–4193 (2016). [CrossRef]
23. G. Wu, S. Xiong, K. Ni, Z. Zhu, and Q. Zhou, “Parameter optimization of a dual-comb ranging system by using a numerical simulation method,” Opt. Express 23, 32044–32053 (2015). [CrossRef]
24. Z. Zhu and G. Wu, “Dual-comb ranging,” Engineering 4, 772–778 (2018). [CrossRef]
25. K. N. Joo, Y. Kim, and S. W. Kim, “Distance measurements by combined method based on a femtosecond pulse laser,” Opt. Express 16, 19799–19806 (2008). [CrossRef]
26. J. Wang, X. Qu, F. Zhang, and J. Chen, “Review of dispersive interferometry ranging with optical frequency comb and the instrumentation prospect,” Proc. SPIE 11437, 114370A (2020). [CrossRef]
27. H. Wu, F. Zhang, F. Meng, T. Liu, J. Li, L. Pan, and X. Qu, “Absolute distance measurement in a combined-dispersive interferometer using a femtosecond pulse laser,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 27, 015202 (2016). [CrossRef]
28. X. Zhao, X. Qu, F. Zhang, Y. Zhao, and G. Tang, “Absolute distance measurement by multi-heterodyne interferometry using an electro-optic triple comb,” Opt. Lett. 43, 807–810 (2018). [CrossRef]
29. Y. Zhou, Y.-X. Ren, J. Shi, and K. K. Y. Wong, “Breathing dissipative soliton explosions in a bidirectional ultrafast fiber laser,” Photon. Res. 8, 1566–1572 (2020). [CrossRef]
30. T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kondratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Temporal solitons in optical microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 8, 145–152 (2014). [CrossRef]
31. Y. Lyu, H. Shi, C. Wei, H. Li, J. Li, and Y. Liu, “Harmonic dissipative soliton resonance pulses in a fiber ring laser at different values of anomalous dispersion,” Photon. Res. 5, 611–612 (2017). [CrossRef]
32. J. Wang, Z. Jiang, H. Chen, J. Li, J. Yin, J. Wang, T. He, P. Yan, and S. Ruan, “High energy soliton pulse generation by a magnetron-sputtering-deposition-grown MoTe2 saturable absorber,” Photon. Res. 6, 535–541 (2018). [CrossRef]
33. M. Liu, T.-J. Li, A.-P. Luo, W.-C. Xu, and Z.-C. Luo, “‘Periodic’ soliton explosions in a dual-wavelength mode-locked Yb-doped fiber laser,” Photon. Res. 8, 246–251 (2020). [CrossRef]
34. X. Xue, X. Zheng, and B. Zhou, “Soliton regulation in microcavities induced by fundamental-second-harmonic mode coupling,” Photon. Res. 6, 948–953 (2018). [CrossRef]
35. T. J. Kippenberg, R. Holzwarth, and S. A. Diddams, “Microresonator-based optical frequency combs,” Science 332, 555–559 (2011). [CrossRef]
36. P. Marin-Palomo, J. N. Kemal, M. Karpov, A. Kordts, J. Pfeifle, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, P. Trocha, S. Wolf, V. Brasch, M. H. Anderson, R. Rosenberger, K. Vijayan, W. Freude, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. Koos, “Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications,” Nature 546, 274–279 (2017). [CrossRef]
37. F. X. Wang, W. Wang, R. Niu, X. Wang, C. L. Zou, C. H. Dong, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, H. Liu, P. Hao, S. Liu, S. Wang, Z. Q. Yin, D. Y. He, W. Zhang, W. Zhao, Z. F. Han, G. C. Guo, and W. Chen, “Quantum key distribution with on-chip dissipative Kerr soliton,” Laser Photon. Rev. 14, 1900190 (2020). [CrossRef]
38. M. G. Suh, Q. F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, X. Yi, and K. J. Vahala, “Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy,” Science 354, 600–603 (2016). [CrossRef]
39. D. T. Spencer, T. Drake, T. C. Briles, J. Stone, L. C. Sinclair, C. Fredrick, Q. Li, D. Westly, B. R. Ilic, A. Bluestone, N. Volet, T. Komljenovic, L. Chang, S. H. Lee, D. Y. Oh, M. G. Suh, K. Y. Yang, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, T. J. Kippenberg, E. Norberg, L. Theogarajan, K. Vahala, N. R. Newbury, K. Srinivasan, J. E. Bowers, S. A. Diddams, and S. B. Papp, “An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics,” Nature 557, 81–87 (2018). [CrossRef]
40. P. Trocha, M. Karpov, D. Ganin, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, A. Kordts, S. Wolf, J. Krockenberger, P. Marin-Palomo, C. Weimann, S. Randel, W. Freude, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. Koos, “Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs,” Science 359, 887–891 (2018). [CrossRef]
41. M. G. Suh and K. J. Vahala, “Soliton microcomb range measurement,” Science 359, 884–887 (2018). [CrossRef]
42. Z. Lu, W. Wang, W. Zhang, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, M. Liu, L. Wang, C. L. Zou, C. H. Dong, B. Zhao, and W. Zhao, “Deterministic generation and switching of dissipative Kerr soliton in a thermally controlled micro-resonator,” AIP Adv. 9, 025314 (2019). [CrossRef]
43. W. Wang, Z. Lu, W. Zhang, S. T. Chu, B. E. Little, L. Wang, X. Xie, M. Liu, Q. Yang, L. Wang, J. Zhao, G. Wang, Q. Sun, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, and W. Zhao, “Robust soliton crystals in a thermally controlled microresonator,” Opt. Lett. 43, 2002–2005 (2018). [CrossRef]
44. J. W. Chen, J. D. Wang, X. H. Qu, and F. M. Zhang, “Analysis of main parameters of spectral interferometry ranging using optical frequency comb and an improved data processing method,” Acta Phys. Sinica 68, 190602 (2019). [CrossRef]
45. J. Wang, T. Huang, F. Duan, Q. Cheng, F. Zhang, and X. Qu, “Fast peak-tracking method for FBG reflection spectrum and nonlinear error compensation,” Opt. Lett. 45, 451–454 (2020). [CrossRef]
46. P. Liao, C. Bao, A. Kordts, M. Karpov, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, L. Zhang, A. Mohajerin-Ariaei, Y. Cao, A. Almaiman, M. Ziyadi, S. R. Wilkinson, M. Tur, T. J. Kippenberg, and A. E. Willner, “Dependence of a microresonator Kerr frequency comb on the pump linewidth,” Opt. Lett. 42, 779–782 (2017). [CrossRef]