Non-redundant optical phased array: erratum

Taichiro Fukui; Ryota Tanomura; Kento Komatsu; Daiji Yamashita; Shun Takahashi; Yoshiaki Nakano; Takuo Tanemura; Takuo Tanemura

doi:10.1364/OPTICA.453419

Abstract

This erratum corrects the error in Fig. 5 of our earlier paper [Optica 8, 1350 (2021) [CrossRef] ].

Fig. 5. Numerically derived FFPs of various OPAs: (a) 1D OPAs ($N = {{14}}$) based on Golomb ruler (red) and uniform array (blue), (b) 2D uniform OPA ($N = {{36}}$), (c) 2D Costas-based OPA ($N = {{36}}$).

Download Full Size | PDF

In our previous paper [1], unfortunately, we made a mistake in Fig. 5. The figures of Fig. 5(b) and Fig. 5(c) are located in the opposite position. The correct version of Fig. 5 is provided here.

Reference

1. T. Fukui, R. Tanomura, K. Komatsu, D. Yamashita, S. Takahashi, Y. Nakano, and T. Tanemura, “Non-redundant optical phased array,” Optica 8, 1350–1358 (2021). [CrossRef]

Previous Article Next Article

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.

Figures (1)

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Numerically derived FFPs of various OPAs: (a) 1D OPAs (

$N = {{14}}$

) based on Golomb ruler (red) and uniform array (blue), (b) 2D uniform OPA (

$N = {{36}}$

), (c) 2D Costas-based OPA (

$N = {{36}}$

).

View in Article | Download Full Size | PDF