Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

On-chip phase-shift induced control of supercontinuum generation in a dual-core Si3N4 waveguide

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We investigate on-chip spectral control of supercontinuum generation, taking advantage of the additional spatial degree of freedom in strongly-coupled dual-core waveguides. Using numerical integration of the multi-mode generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation, we show that, with proper waveguide cross-section design, selective excitation of supermodes can vary the dispersion to its extremes, i.e., all-normal or anomalous dispersion can be selected via phase shifting in a Mach-Zehnder input circuit. The resulting control allows to provide vastly different supercontinuum spectra with the same waveguide circuit.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Integrated photonic waveguide circuits have strongly enhanced the control of gain and output spectra in on-chip nonlinear optical conversion. Examples are ultrahigh efficiencies in second-harmonic generation [1], spectral shaping of four-wave mixing [2] or Kerr comb generation with integrated low-power diode pumping [3]. Most challenging is controlling supercontinuum generation (SCG), where intense ultra-short optical input pulses are converted into broadband radiation in a single pass through a waveguide [4].

In all these optical conversions, a central ingredient to spectral control is based on imposing phase matching by proper control of the waveguide dispersion. In integrated photonic waveguides, this can be achieved with lithographic dispersion engineering, leveraged by a high index contrast between core and cladding materials. For instance, in silicon nitride waveguides, anomalous dispersion can be induced, e.g., to provide broadband coherent radiation spanning more than an octave [57]. Alternatively, the cross-section can be fabricated for all-normal dispersion, such as to render the broadened bandwidth suitable for temporal compression [8].

To enable control of supercontinuum spectra also after lithographic fabrication, essentially four types of approaches have been investigated so far. Straightforward spectral shaping can be achieved with subsequent filtering such as with prisms [9] or waveguide circuits [10], however, this reduces the pump-to-output conversion efficiency. A second, more complex set of approaches exerts control of SCG via manipulating the pump radiation. Examples are tuning the pump wavelength [11,12], pumping at several wavelengths simultaneously [13,14], or varying the pump pulse duration [15], pulse shape [16], and the pulse energy [1720]. These methods provide shaping of SCG within certain ranges, however, alteration of the pump radiation is generally unwanted, as a change of pulse energy, spectrum and pulse shape is technologically involved. A third way of spectrally controlling supercontinuum is to tune the material dispersion. A straighforward example is tuning the temperature [21] such as demonstrated in liquid-core fibers. However, in solid-state materials of widely transparent waveguides, the effect is rather weak because thermo-optic coefficients are small, in the order of 10${^{-5}}$ (RIU/$^{\circ }$K) for Si$_{3}$N$_{4}$ and SiO$_{2}$ [22]. An optical control of dispersion, on ultrashort time scales, has been shown using the intensity dependence of the refractive index [23]. However, such Kerr effects are also small and efforts are high, as a second, intense and independently controllable laser is to be injected.

More recently, spectral control of SCG has begun to include the most powerful approach exploiting spatially multimode waveguides. Here the additional degrees of freedom in tailoring optical fields are expected to facilitate a new class of complex nonlinear optical devices [24]. Corresponding experiments are, however, constrained so far to bulk-fiber approaches controlled with free-space optics [25]. For instance, a wide range of largely different supercontinuum spectra has been demonstrated in a multimode fiber by varying the translation-stage alignment for the input beam [26]. However, due to the bulk approach associated with fiber input coupling, exciting particular spatial modes required adjustments of free-beam input focusing and direction. Drawbacks are then that selectivity in transverse excitation is limited by free-space diffraction, while oblique beam injection is rather alignment sensitive, introducing restrictions on long term stability.

Here we propose a novel path toward strong control of SCG suitable for a chip-integrated approach. As depicted in Fig. 1, a Mach-Zehnder waveguide input circuit (colored in grey) in front of a strongly coupled dual-core waveguide section (blue) selects in which transverse supermode the supercontinuum is generated. We present numerical investigations based on finite element calculations and the multi-mode nonlinear generalized Schrödinger equation to show that configuring the input circuit and choosing a proper design for the dual-core waveguide cross-section allows to select between two extremes of dispersion in supercontinuum generation. Using phase shifters (yellow) for addressing the symmetric supermode (SM) designed for all-normal dispersion generates spetcrally smooth and condensed supercontinuum output (see blue spectrum). Addressing the anti-symmetric supermode (AM) designed for strongly anomalous dispersion generates a much wider spectrum, though with a more complex structure (see orange spectrum). We observe robustness of the approach as deviations from desired phase adjustments do not introduce additional complexities through intermodal nonlinear coupling. Benefiting from the on-chip spatial mode selection with a Mach-Zehnder type of input circuit, the described input coupling of pump pulses is solely to a single spatial mode at the chip entrance facet. However, following the input coupling, different transverse modes can be addressed via on-chip phase shifting, enabling the spectral control of SCG.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Configuration for control of SCG in the Si$_{3}$N$_{4}$ dual-core waveguide (colored in blue) integrated with a Mach-Zehnder input circuit (grey). The phase shifters (yellow) integrated on the two arms of the input circuit can select in which transverse supermode supercontinuum is generated.

Download Full Size | PDF

2. Input circuit and dual-core waveguide

For definiteness and to provide an example that may be implemented in an experiment covering wide spectral ranges, we consider the silicon nitride waveguide platform with Si$_{3}$N$_{4}$ cores embedded in a SiO$_{2}$ cladding. For allowing an ultrashort input pulse to be injected with high efficiency via free-space, fiber-to-chip or chip-to-chip coupling, an adiabatic input taper is implemented having a matched single-spatial mode at the input facet. To avoid any significant premature supercontinuum generation, the light intensity is kept sufficiently low with a bigger mode field diameter via a small core cross-section. Next the input pulse is divided into two approximately equal fractions that travel independently through the two arms of the input circuit. Implementing such an input circuit requires a propagation length of at most 1.5 mm. Given a core cross-section of 280 nm (width) by 150 nm (height), the calculated dispersion coefficient and effective mode area at 1554-nm wavelength are −30 ps/nm/km and 168 $\mu$m$^{2}$, respectively. This leads to a dispersive and nonlinear characteristic length of about 1055 mm and about 10 mm for a pulse energy of 3 nJ in each of the arms, respectively. Therefore the dispersive and nonlinear effects are expected to be negligible in the input circuit. To adjust the relative phase of light in the two arms, and to compensate for potential fabrication errors in the optical path length differences, for instance thermoelectric heaters can be considered. Using two heaters in parallel has the advantage that at most half of the heating power is needed compared to a single heater. Due to the short length of the phase shifters, the wavelength dependence of the induced phase difference between the two arms can safely be neglected across the bandwidth of the input pulses. For instance, we calculate that the relative phase difference is less than 0.5% across an 8 nm-bandwidth at 1554-nm wavelength. After phase shift adjustment, the two arms are adiabatically brought in proximity and tapered to tight-guiding thick-cores, thereby increasing the on-axis intensity. As the two tapered waveguides approach each other, the two formerly individual mode fields hybridize into transverse supermodes of the dual-core waveguide [27]. We note that letting two equally dimensioned cores approach adiabatically as in standard directional couplers [28,29] ensures that, in the dual-core section, only two fundamental supermodes become noticeably excited, which are the fundamental symmetric supermode (SM) and the anti-symmetric supermode (AM) as depicted in Fig. 1. Describing the optical fields in a dual supermode basis [27] serves for correctly including the strong linear coupling and also eases numerical modelling.

To calculate the transverse field distributions of the two fundamental supermodes and the corresponding dispersion parameter profiles for the investigated core cross-sections, we use a 2D mode solver (Ansys Lumerical FDTD). To provide fully developed supercontinuum generation on chip-sized (sub-centimeter) interaction lengths, we start the design considerations with a typical single-core cross-section (1 $\mu$m by 800 nm). In order to induce hybridization into two distinct supermodes, two such identical cores are placed in close proximity. Choosing a small horizontal gap of 300 nm between the cores is found to maximize the difference in the mode field distributions and dispersion of the supermodes. Figures 2(a) and 2(b) show the field distributions for the SM and the AM supermodes, respectively. The color code indicates the sign and strength of the electric field distributions. Quantitatively, the calculated effective mode area at 1554-nm wavelength for the SM is 1.91 $\mu$m$^{2}$ with 80% of the light confined in the Si$_{3}$N$_{4}$ core. And for the AM, the effective mode area is 1.74 $\mu$m$^{2}$ with 84% of the light confined in the Si$_{3}$N$_{4}$ core. Figure 2(c) provides a closer inspection of the light distribution in the materials. As a result of the difference in distribution, the two supermodes are expected to exhibit significantly different dispersion. The corresponding second-order dispersion parameters are displayed in Fig. 2(d). As observed, the SM and the AM in the dual-core waveguide offer opposite signs of the dispersion with the SM and the AM providing all-normal dispersion (green solid curve) and strong anomalous dispersion (violet solid curve), respectively. To highlight the merits of the dual-core vs a single-core approach, the dispersion of the TE$_{00}$ and the TE$_{10}$ modes for a single-core of the same overall dimensions (2.3 $\mu$m by 800 nm) are also given in Fig. 2(d). It can be seen that these modes are symmetric and anti-symmetric as well and thus possess different dispersion profiles. However, the sign of the dispersion is the same within much of the displayed wavelength range, such that the range of phase-shift induced change in dispersion is much smaller, and also the wavelength range where the sign can be altered is much smaller. A single-core waveguide can have all-normal and anomalous dispersion for the TE$_{00}$ and the TE$_{10}$ modes as well. However, this requires a significant increase of waveguide width and renders the anomalous dispersion regime narrowband and close to normal. In contrast, the two supermodes in the dual-core waveguide offer opposite signs of dispersion parameters over a wide range such that vastly different supercontinuum spectra are expected.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. a) Modeled E$_\textrm {x}$ field distribution of the SM at 1554 nm. b) Modeled E$_\textrm {x}$ field distribution of the AM at 1554 nm. c) Normalized field strength of the SM (green solid curve) and the AM (violet solid curve) at 1554 nm. The blue- and the yellow-shaded area represent the SiO$_{2}$ cladding and the Si$_{3}$N$_{4}$ core, respectively. d) Dispersion parameter profiles. For the dual-core waveguide, the SM (green solid curve) possesses all-normal dispersion and the AM (violet solid curve) possesses anomalous dispersion. For a single-core waveguide of equal overall dimensions (2.3 $\mu$m by 800 nm), the TE$_{00}$ mode (black dashed curve) and the TE$_{10}$ mode (red dashed curve) both posses anomalous dispersion.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Supercontinuum modelling

To model SCG in the SM and the AM we use the multi-mode generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation (MM-GNLSE) [30] which is prepared to include higher-order dispersion, self-steepening, Raman scattering and nonlinear coupling of the modes. The latter, via intermodal effects such as cross-phase modulation (XPM) and four-wave mixing (FWM), is accounted for by the intermodal nonlinear coupling constants calculated from mode field overlap integrals [30,31]. Spontaneous generation of light is implemented as white noise fields set to the strength of the vacuum field in both modes. As we are considering SCG in Si$_{3}$N$_{4}$ waveguides, where Raman scattering is a very weak process [32], Raman scattering is turned off in our modelling. Integration of the equation is carried out assuming pumping with an Er-doped fiber laser system using as example a 1554-nm pump wavelength with a Gaussian pump pulse of 165 fs duration (corresponding to a bandwidth of 8 nm). The integration is numerically implemented over a propagation length of 10 mm. Using pulse energies in the range of 1 nJ, such length is sufficient to bring the spectral broadening to its saturation, meaning that the output spectra do not significantly broaden any more with further increasing the input power or propagation length.

4. Results

First, we consider pumping only the symmetric supermode (SM) that provides all-normal dispersion. Experimentally, this mode of excitation would be selected by setting the heater-induced phase difference, $\Delta {\phi}$, between the two Mach-Zehnder arms in the input circuit equal to zero. The effect of deviations from such ideal setting is discussed further below. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show, respectively, the spectral and temporal evolution of SCG in the SM as a function of the propagation length. A pulse energy of 3 nJ (17 kW peak power) is chosen to let the spectral evolution become well-completed within the 10 mm propagation length. Figures 3(c) and 3(d) show, for comparison, the evolution of the non-pumped mode (AM). It can be observed that a supercontinuum is generated in the pumped mode, while the non-pumped mode contains only spurious radiation (the spectrally integrated pulse energy fraction amounts to 1.6 $\times$ 10$^{-6}$). A similar behavior is observed when using multi transverse mode modelling of SCG in a single-core waveguide, where SCG is only observed in the fundamental transverse mode [6]. In the pumped mode, the following essential dynamical features for the SCG in the SM can be identified: i) at the beginning of propagation, self-phase modulation (SPM) is the main contributor to the spectral broadening; ii) at a distance of around 2 mm, optical wave breaking occurs at the leading pulse edge and gives rise to a new spectral band extending toward short wavelengths down to 600 nm; iii) after around 4 mm propagation, the spectrum becomes continuously smoother. A −30-dB spectral bandwidth of about 1300 nm is achieved with a flat and smooth shape. Although our system is spatially multimode and includes self-steepening, we note that, it might be worth to search for potential constants of motion, as found for single-mode Kerr-only broadening [33].

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. a) Spectral evolution of SCG when only the SM is pumped with 3 nJ. b) Temporal evolution of the SM. The temporal frame is chosen to move with the group velocity of the pump pulse in the SM. The white circle indicates where optical wave breaking occurs. The according c) spectral and d) temporal evolution in the non-pumped mode (AM) does not display any noticeable radiation.

Download Full Size | PDF

For the other case where pump radiation is injected only into the anti-symmentric mode (AM), $\Delta {\phi }$ in the input circuit is set equal to $\pi$. The spectral and temporal evolution profiles of the supercontinuum in the pumped mode are shown in Figs. 4(a) and (b), respectively. For pumping the AM, we find that lower pulse energies are sufficient for full spectral evolution within 10 mm, shown an example of 0.4 nJ and 2.3 kW peak power. The well-know reason is the rather different dynamics: i) at the beginning, SPM is the main contributor to the broadening dynamics; ii) at around 3 mm a higher-order soliton emerges (labeled A, calculated soliton-order of 2); iii) with further propagation, soliton fission appears at a distance of around 5 mm such that the higher-order soliton splits into fundamental solitons (B and C), while dispersive waves lead to extensive broadening of the spectrum. As observed, the spectrum is much wider (more than 2500 nm), as expected due to the stronger confinement of the mode in the waveguide cores and due to the anomalous dispersion offered by the AM. We note that the tilt of the trajectories of the pulses in Fig. 4(b) is due to the different group velocity of the pulse in the AM compared to the group velocity in the SM, the latter being chosen for the co-moving time frame. In Fig. 4 we have displayed only the evolution in the pumped mode because we find that the energy in the non-pumped mode (SM) is negligible again (a fraction of 1.5 $\times$ 10$^{-5}$).

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. a) Spectral evolution of SCG in the AM when only that mode is pumped with 0.4 nJ. b) Temporal evolution of the AM. The temporal frame is chosen to move with the group velocity of the pump pulse in the SM. The white circle indicates where soliton A emerges; the red circle indicates where soliton fission occurs, splitting soliton A into fundamental solitons B and C.

Download Full Size | PDF

5. Discussion

To explore the robustness of the scheme, the numerical modelling was extended to the case of simultaneous pumping of various linear superpositions of the AM and the SM. Such situations can be represented by imperfect phase adjustment in the Mach-Zehnder waveguide input circuit, i.e., deviations from setting $\Delta {\phi }$ equal to zero or $\pi$, as might arise due to experimental imperfections. With imperfect phase settings, SCG in all-normal and anomalous dispersion can occur simultaneously and the two SCG processes may influence each other in a complex manner that is difficult to control, mainly via intermodal FWM and intermodal dispersive wave generation [31]. The biggest possible deviation from pumping a single supermode occurs when $\Delta {\phi }$ is maximally different from 0 and $\pi$, i.e., $\Delta {\phi }$ = $\pi$/2. In this case, the SM and the AM equally share the pump radiation. To illustrate such an example we chose a total pulse energy of 0.8 nJ to synchronously excite both supermodes with each 0.4 nJ, while all other parameters are maintained.

The spectral and temporal evolution is given in Fig. 5. It can be seen that there is supercontinuum generation in both supermodes, and that the separate spectra and dynamics are similar to what is observed with pumping only a single supermode at a time. To analyze dual-mode pumping with regard to energy exchange by intermodal nonlinear interaction, Fig. 6 plots on a finer scale how much the pulse energy of each mode changes with propagation. It can be seen that there is some energy exchange. However, the exchange is rather weak, at the pJ-level, which is in the order of 1% of the pump pulse energy (0.4 nJ per mode). A further feature is that the exchange is transient, limited to the initial dynamics in the first millimeter. In the spectral domain, the intermodal interaction is barely visible as indicated with the white circles in Fig. 5(a), and in the temporal domain shown in Fig. 5(b) it appears essentially absent. Beyond about 1-mm propagation length, there is no longer an interaction between the supermodes.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. a) Evolution of supercontinuum spectra in the SM and the AM when pumped with equal pulse energies (phase difference setting $\Delta {\phi }$ = $\pi$/2, initially 0.4 nJ pump energy in each mode). The white circles indicate where the pulses suffer a little distortion. b) Temporal evolution of SCG in the SM and the AM. The temporal frame is chosen to move with the group velocity of the pump pulse in the SM.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Calculated change of mode energy in the SM and the AM versus propagation length for equal initial pulse energies of 0.4 nJ pump energy. The black dashed line indicates the termination of energy exchange between the SM and the AM.

Download Full Size | PDF

Such decoupling from nonlinear interaction can best be explained via the different temporal evolution profiles given in Fig. 5(b) where different tilts of trajectories indicate different group velocities. For further clarification, the absolute group velocities of the SM and the AM are plotted in Fig. 7(a) as extracted from the dispersion of the effective indices in (b). At the considered pump-wavelength of 1554-nm it can be seen that there is a significant velocity mismatch amounting to about 3% of the absolute light velocity, with pulses in the AM lagging behind. As a result, the initial temporal overlap required for nonlinear intermodal effects quickly vanishes with propagation. Therefore, even with the maximum deviation from single supermode pumping assumed here, the total output remains to good approximation a simple superposition of the individual supercontinuum spectra. The processes do not mingle in time, or space nor in the spectral domain and therefore remain well distinguishable. However, as the initial pulse energy per mode increases, the characteristic nonlinear length decreases and nonlinear intermodal effects are expected to take place on a faster time scale. Therefore, we consider a very high pump pulse energy of 6 nJ equally divided over the two supermodes, each mode having 3 nJ, which is sufficient for the SM to enter the optical wave braking regime (see Fig. 3(a)). As the corresponding nonlinear characteristic length is about 100 $\mu$m, we limit the maximum propagation length to 4.5 mm, which is sufficient for complete development of the supercontinuum (see Fig. 3(a)). Figure 8(a) and Fig. 8(b) show the spectral and temporal evolution of the nonlinear optical pulse propagation, respectively. Figure 8(a) shows that the SM now develops a wider spectrum, extending to the same short wavelength as present in the spectrum of the AM. Likewise, Fig. 8(b) shows that the SM undergoes a synchronized temporal broadening to the approximate extent of the AM, which starts when soliton fission takes place for the AM. Due to the higher pulse energy, the solition fission now already happens when the two modes still experience temporal overlap and overlap between the two modes is retained for longer propagation distances. We attribute this to the nonlinear coupling between the modes that now is seeded by the initial strong presence of both modes. Note, that this nonlinear coupling is also present when only one of the modes is pumped, however, in that case the nonlinear coupling starts from noise for the other mode. That makes the energy transfer between the modes negligible for the propagation distances where the two modes temporally overlap. When the process is strongly seeded due to both modes having the same high initial energy of 3 nJ, an energy transfer of about 8% is observed from the AM to SM at the end of the propagation, as can be seen in Fig. 8(c) that shows the evolution of the pulse energy in both the AM (red line) and SM (blue line) modes. Finally, we note that the nonlinear intermodal coupling seems to suppress optical wave breaking that happens after a propagation distance of about 2.5 mm when only the SM mode is pumped (see Fig. 3(a)).

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. a) Group velocity profiles and b) effective indices as a function of wavelength for the SM and the AM. Two standard pump wavelengths are indicated.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 8.

Fig. 8. a) Evolution of supercontinuum spectra in the SM and the AM for initial energies of 3 nJ in each mode. b) Temporal evolution of SCG in the SM and the AM. The temporal frame is chosen to move with the group velocity of the pump pulse in the SM. c) Calculated mode energy change in the SM and the AM vs propagation.

Download Full Size | PDF

To quantify the degree of residual nonlinear coupling for cases that would be more typical when experimentally aiming on single-supermode pumping, we also investigated SCG when the SM or the AM is dominantly excited with only some small fraction exciting the other mode. In the calculations, we find that intermodal nonlinear interaction becomes negligible. For instance with about 95% of the pump radiation in one of the supermodes the energy exchange is typically less than 3 $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ of the total energy, which is much smaller than that in the most extreme case of 3 nJ per mode. We note, however, that the calculated nonlinear decoupling of SCG in two supermodes becomes progressively weaker when shifting to a shorter pump wavelength (for instance 1 $\mu$m or closer toward the visible) with the given dual-core cross section. This can be indeed expected based on Fig. 7 where the group velocities and phase velocities of the SM and AM approach each other toward shorter wavelength.

6. Conclusion

To conclude, we propose an approach for controlling integrated waveguide supercontinuum generation via supermode selection solely with on-chip phase tuning. The approach is based on transverse spatial mode dynamics in strongly coupled dual-core waveguides. Thereby, simple phase tuning can be used to vary the dispersion to its extremes, i.e., to select either all-normal (all positive) dispersion, or strong and wide anomalous (negative) dispersion, and thus generate vastly different output spectra. Exploiting strong linear coupling in a dual-core waveguide vs. a single-core transverse mode approach maximizes the difference in mode dispersion. This also minimizes the nonlinear coupling between the symmetric and anti-symmetric supermodes, which is found to be negligible for the considered case of single-mode pumping with ultrashort pulses from Er-lasers (1554-nm) when optimizing the dual-core waveguide cross section. Maximizing the difference in group velocities also provides a significant robustness of supercontinuum generation vs. imperfect phase tuning in supermode selection. Controlling supercontinuum over wide ranges, via simple on-chip phase shifting to access either anomalous dispersion or all-normal dispersion may bring increased flexibility to integrated photonics applications involving configuring of broadband light [12]. Potentially the approach can also be extended to systems with multicore waveguide-arrays.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (SYNOPTIC OPTICS P17-24 project 1).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank C. Roeloffzen for useful discussion and inspiration regarding waveguide design for the input circuit.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. C. Wang, C. Langrock, A. Marandi, M. Jankowski, M. Zhang, B. Desiatov, M. M. Fejer, and M. Loncar, “Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conversion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Optica 5(11), 1438–1441 (2018). [CrossRef]  

2. J. P. Epping, M. Kues, P. J. M. van der Slot, C. J. Lee, C. Fallnich, and K.-J. Boller, “Integrated cars source based on seeded four-wave mixing in silicon nitride,” Opt. Express 21(26), 32123–32129 (2013). [CrossRef]  

3. B. Stern, X. Ji, Y. Okawachi, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “Battery-operated integrated frequency comb generator,” Nature 562(7727), 401–405 (2018). [CrossRef]  

4. M. Jankowski, C. Langrock, B. Desiatov, A. Marandi, C. Wang, M. Zhang, C. R. Phillips, M. Loncar, and M. M. Fejer, “Ultrabroadband nonlinear optics in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Optica 7(1), 40–46 (2020). [CrossRef]  

5. X. Liu, M. Pu, B. Zhou, C. J. Krückel, A. Fülöp, V. Torres-Company, and M. Bache, “Octave-spanning supercontinuum generation in a silicon-rich nitride waveguide,” Opt. Lett. 41(12), 2719–2722 (2016). [CrossRef]  

6. J. P. Epping, T. Hellwig, M. Hoekman, R. Mateman, A. Leinse, R. G. Heideman, A. van Rees, P. J. M. van der Slot, C. J. Lee, C. Fallnich, and K.-J. Boller, “On-chip visible-to-infrared supercontinuum generation with more than 495 THz spectral bandwidth,” Opt. Express 23(15), 19596–19604 (2015). [CrossRef]  

7. M. A. G. Porcel, F. Schepers, J. P. Epping, T. Hellwig, M. Hoekman, R. G. Heideman, P. J. M. van der Slot, C. J. Lee, R. Schmidt, R. Bratschitsch, C. Fallnich, and K.-J. Boller, “Two-octave spanning supercontinuum generation in stoichiometric silicon nitride waveguides pumped at telecom wavelengths,” Opt. Express 25(2), 1542–1554 (2017). [CrossRef]  

8. I. Rebolledo-Salgado, Z. Ye, S. Christensen, F. Lei, K. Twayana, J. Schröder, M. Zelan, and V. Torres-Company, “Coherent supercontinuum generation in all-normal dispersion Si3N4 waveguides,” Opt. Express 30(6), 8641–8651 (2022). [CrossRef]  

9. P. Cimalla, J. Walther, M. Mehner, M. Cuevas, E. Koch, G. Maguluri, M. Mujat, B. H. Park, K. H. Kim, W. Sun, N. V. Iftimia, R. D. Ferguson, D. X. Hammer, T. C. Chen, and J. F. de Boer, “Simultaneous dual-band optical coherence tomography in the spectral domain for high resolution in vivo imaging,” Opt. Express 17(22), 19486–19500 (2009). [CrossRef]  

10. D. N. Neshev, A. A. Sukhorukov, A. Dreischuh, R. Fischer, S. Ha, J. Bolger, L. Bui, W. Krolikowski, B. J. Eggleton, A. Mitchell, M. W. Austin, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Nonlinear spectral-spatial control and localization of supercontinuum radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(12), 123901 (2007). [CrossRef]  

11. N. M. Lüpken, D. Becker, T. Würthwein, K.-J. Boller, and C. Fallnich, “Toward integrated synchronously pumped optical parametric oscillators in silicon nitride,” Opt. Express 29(24), 39895–39903 (2021). [CrossRef]  

12. M. Song, M. Song, S. Lim, H. Choi, T. Lee, G. Choi, Y. Jung, and J. T. Ahn, “Programmable and tunable flat-top supercontinuum laser sources via electro-optic intensity and phase modulation scheme,” Sci. Rep. 12(1), 18036 (2022). [CrossRef]  

13. M. Brinkmann, S. Janfrüchte, T. Hellwig, S. Dobner, and C. Fallnich, “Electronically and rapidly tunable fiber-integrable optical parametric oscillator for nonlinear microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 41(10), 2193–2196 (2016). [CrossRef]  

14. P.-A. Champert, V. Couderc, P. Leproux, S. Février, V. Tombelaine, L. Labonté, P. Roy, C. Froehly, and P. Nérin, “White-light supercontinuum generation in normally dispersive optical fiber using original multi-wavelength pumping system,” Opt. Express 12(19), 4366–4371 (2004). [CrossRef]  

15. M. Andreana, A. Labruyère, A. Tonello, S. Wabnitz, P. Leproux, V. Couderc, C. Duterte, A. Cserteg, A. Bertrand, Y. Hernandez, D. Giannone, S. Hilaire, and G. Huss, “Control of near-infrared supercontinuum bandwidth by adjusting pump pulse duration,” Opt. Express 20(10), 10750–10760 (2012). [CrossRef]  

16. B. Wetzel, M. Kues, P. Roztocki, C. Reimer, P. L. Godin, M. Rowley, B. E. Little, S. T. Chu, E. A. Viktorov, D. J. Moss, A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, and R. Morandotti, “Customizing supercontinuum generation via on-chip adaptive temporal pulse-splitting,” Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4884 (2018). [CrossRef]  

17. G. Genty, J. M. Dudley, and B. J. Eggleton, “Modulation control and spectral shaping of optical fiber supercontinuum generation in the picosecond regime,” Appl. Phys. B 94(2), 187–194 (2009). [CrossRef]  

18. Y. Tang, L. G. Wright, K. Charan, T. Wang, C. Xu, and F. W. Wise, “Generation of intense 100 fs solitons tunable from 2 to 4.3 µm in fluoride fiber,” Optica 3(9), 948–951 (2016). [CrossRef]  

19. F. Wang, Q. Li, Z. Kang, C. F. Wu, D. Ding, G. S. Qin, Z. Y. Yang, and Y. Ohishi, “Numerical demonstration of widely tunable femtosecond soliton generation in chalcogenide microstructured fibers,” Laser Phys. Lett. 16(10), 105402 (2019). [CrossRef]  

20. L. Zhang, S. G. Yang, Y. Han, H. W. Chen, M. H. Chen, and S. Z. Xie, “Simultaneous generation of tunable giant dispersive waves in the visible and mid-infrared regions based on photonic crystal fibers,” J. Opt. 15(7), 075201 (2013). [CrossRef]  

21. C. Wang, G. Feng, W. Li, J. Men, X. Chen, C. Yang, and S. Zhou, “Effect of temperature on supercontinuum generation in CS2-core optical fiber,” IEEE Photonics J. 10(5), 1–11 (2018). [CrossRef]  

22. A. Arbabi and L. L. Goddard, “Measurements of the refractive indices and thermo-optic coefficients of Si3N4 and SiOx using microring resonances,” Opt. Lett. 38(19), 3878–3881 (2013). [CrossRef]  

23. O. Melchert, C. Brée, A. Tajalli, A. Pape, R. Arkhipov, S. Willms, I. Babushkin, D. Skryabin, G. Steinmeyer, U. Morgner, and A. Demircan, “All-optical supercontinuum switching,” Commun. Phys. 3(1), 146 (2020). [CrossRef]  

24. L. G. Wright, W. H. Renninger, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, “Nonlinear multimode photonics: nonlinear optics with many degrees of freedom,” Optica 9(7), 824–841 (2022). [CrossRef]  

25. L. G. Wright, F. O. Wu, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, “Physics of highly multimode nonlinear optical systems,” Nat. Phys. 18(9), 1018–1030 (2022). [CrossRef]  

26. M.-L. Hu, C.-Y. Wang, Y.-F. Li, L. Chai, and A. M. Zheltikov, “Tunable supercontinuum generation in a high-index-step photonic-crystal fiber with a comma-shaped core,” Opt. Express 14(5), 1942–1950 (2006). [CrossRef]  

27. W. K. Burns, “Normal mode analysis of waveguide devices. part i: Theory,” J. Lightwave Technol. 6(6), 1051–1057 (1988). [CrossRef]  

28. M. Mrejen, H. Suchowski, T. Hatakeyama, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Experimental realization of two decoupled directional couplers in a subwavelength packing by adiabatic elimination,” Nano Lett. 15(11), 7383–7387 (2015). [CrossRef]  

29. T. A. Ramadan and R. M. Osgood, “Adiabatic couplers: Design rules and optimization,” J. Lightwave Technol. 16(2), 277–283 (1998). [CrossRef]  

30. F. Poletti and P. Horak, “Description of ultrashort pulse propagation in multimode optical fibers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25(10), 1645–1654 (2008). [CrossRef]  

31. N. M. Lüpken, M. Timmerkamp, R. Scheibinger, K. Schaarschmidt, M. A. Schmidt, K. J. Boller, and C. Fallnich, “Numerical and experimental demonstration of intermodal dispersive wave generation,” Laser Photonics Rev. 15(9), 2100125 (2021). [CrossRef]  

32. A. Klenner, A. S. Mayer, A. R. Johnson, K. Luke, M. R. Lamont, Y. Okawachi, M. Lipson, A. L. Gaeta, and U. Keller, “Gigahertz frequency comb offset stabilization based on supercontinuum generation in silicon nitride waveguides,” Opt. Express 24(10), 11043–11053 (2016). [CrossRef]  

33. D. Castelló-Lurbe, P. Andrés, and E. Silvestre, “Dispersion-to-spectrum mapping in nonlinear fibers based on optical wave-breaking,” Opt. Express 21(23), 28550–28558 (2013). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Configuration for control of SCG in the Si$_{3}$N$_{4}$ dual-core waveguide (colored in blue) integrated with a Mach-Zehnder input circuit (grey). The phase shifters (yellow) integrated on the two arms of the input circuit can select in which transverse supermode supercontinuum is generated.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. a) Modeled E$_\textrm {x}$ field distribution of the SM at 1554 nm. b) Modeled E$_\textrm {x}$ field distribution of the AM at 1554 nm. c) Normalized field strength of the SM (green solid curve) and the AM (violet solid curve) at 1554 nm. The blue- and the yellow-shaded area represent the SiO$_{2}$ cladding and the Si$_{3}$N$_{4}$ core, respectively. d) Dispersion parameter profiles. For the dual-core waveguide, the SM (green solid curve) possesses all-normal dispersion and the AM (violet solid curve) possesses anomalous dispersion. For a single-core waveguide of equal overall dimensions (2.3 $\mu$m by 800 nm), the TE$_{00}$ mode (black dashed curve) and the TE$_{10}$ mode (red dashed curve) both posses anomalous dispersion.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. a) Spectral evolution of SCG when only the SM is pumped with 3 nJ. b) Temporal evolution of the SM. The temporal frame is chosen to move with the group velocity of the pump pulse in the SM. The white circle indicates where optical wave breaking occurs. The according c) spectral and d) temporal evolution in the non-pumped mode (AM) does not display any noticeable radiation.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. a) Spectral evolution of SCG in the AM when only that mode is pumped with 0.4 nJ. b) Temporal evolution of the AM. The temporal frame is chosen to move with the group velocity of the pump pulse in the SM. The white circle indicates where soliton A emerges; the red circle indicates where soliton fission occurs, splitting soliton A into fundamental solitons B and C.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. a) Evolution of supercontinuum spectra in the SM and the AM when pumped with equal pulse energies (phase difference setting $\Delta {\phi }$ = $\pi$/2, initially 0.4 nJ pump energy in each mode). The white circles indicate where the pulses suffer a little distortion. b) Temporal evolution of SCG in the SM and the AM. The temporal frame is chosen to move with the group velocity of the pump pulse in the SM.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Calculated change of mode energy in the SM and the AM versus propagation length for equal initial pulse energies of 0.4 nJ pump energy. The black dashed line indicates the termination of energy exchange between the SM and the AM.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. a) Group velocity profiles and b) effective indices as a function of wavelength for the SM and the AM. Two standard pump wavelengths are indicated.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. a) Evolution of supercontinuum spectra in the SM and the AM for initial energies of 3 nJ in each mode. b) Temporal evolution of SCG in the SM and the AM. The temporal frame is chosen to move with the group velocity of the pump pulse in the SM. c) Calculated mode energy change in the SM and the AM vs propagation.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.