Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Multi-mode strong coupling in Fabry-Pérot cavity−WS2 photonic crystal hybrid structures

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Optical microcavities embedded with transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) membranes have been demonstrated as excellent platforms to explore strong light-matter interactions. Most of the previous studies focus on strong coupling between excitons of unpatterned TMDC membranes and optical resonances of various microcavities. It is recently found that TMDC membranes patterned into photonic crystal (PhC) slabs can sustain guided-mode resonances that can be excited and probed by far-fields. Here, we present a comprehensive theoretical and numerical study on optical responses of Fabry-Pérot (F-P) cavity-WS2 PhC hybrid structures to investigate the multi-mode coupling effects between excitons, guided-mode resonances and F-P modes. We show that both the exciton resonance and the guide-mode resonance of the WS2 PhC can strongly interact with F-P modes of the cavity to reach strong coupling regime. Moreover, a Rabi splitting as large as 63 meV is observed for the strong coupling between the guided-mode resonance and the F-P mode, which is much larger than their average dissipation rate. We further demonstrate that it is even possible to realize a triple mode strong coupling by tuning the guide-mode resonances spectrally overlapped with the exciton resonance and the F-P modes. The hybrid polariton states generated from the triple mode coupling exhibit a Rabi splitting of 120 meV that greatly exceeds the criterion of a triple mode strong coupling (∼29.3 meV). Our results provide that optical microcavities embedded with TMDC PhCs can serve as promising candidates for polariton devices based on multi-mode strong coupling.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Strong coupling between light and matter is an ongoing topic in nanophotonics as it promises various applications including but not limited to quantum manipulation [1], ultra-fast optical switching [2], low-threshold semiconductor lasers [3], Bose-Einstein condensation [4]. To reach strong coupling, the coherent energy exchange rate between light and matter needs to surpass their average dissipation rate. A considerably large Rabi splitting on the spectral response of a photonic system is the hallmark of strong coupling along with generating new hybrid modes known as light-matter hybrid polaritons [5,6]. In the past decades, a variety of hybrid photonic systems have been exploited to realize strong coupling such as coupled plasmonic and Fabry-Pérot (F-P) cavities [710], plasmonic nanoantennas loaded with quantum dots, Si nanodisks covered with uniform molecular J-aggregates [11], etc. Among these hybrid systems, optical microcavities coupled with transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) monolayers have attracted particular interests [1215] owing to the intriguing excitonic features of TMDC monolayers including large binding energies and sharp resonances. In this respect, the most extensive studies are strong coupling between plasmonic resonances and excitons, namely plasmon-exciton strong coupling, which has been realized in both individual and periodic metallic nanostructures integrated with TMDC monolayers [1619]. In a similar configuration, strong coupling between Mie-type resonances and excitons has been observed in individual Si nanoparticles covered with WS2 monolayers [20,21]. In addition, it has also been demonstrated that photon-exciton strong coupling can be achieved in TMDC monolayers inserted in F-P cavities with metallic or DBR mirrors [2224].

Besides the intriguing excitonic features, TMDC layers inherently possess a high refractive index (n > 4) in the visible regime [25,26], which offers the possibility to generate transverse electric (TE) polarized waveguide modes in a TMDC layer with sub-nanometric thickness. However, theoretically speaking such TE polarized waveguide mode in an unpatterned TMDC membrane is a bonded mode which is challenging to be probed by far-field measurements. Very recently, this issue has been settled by pattering TMDC membrane into photonic crystal (PhC) slabs with ångström thickness, and then the TE waveguide mode dispersion is folded to generate guided-mode resonances (GMRs) that can be probed via far-field measurements [28]. Compared to an unpatterned TMDC membrane, it is then expected that the coupling between a TMDC PhC slab and an optical microcavity will be more subtle because GMRs must be involved in addition to exciton resonances. It is also worth noting that the spectral responses of the GMR of a TMDC PhC membrane is readily to be tuned by adjusting the period, which is quite a desirable feature in terms of studying its coupling effect with other modes.

Considering the study of coupling effects between a TMDC PhC slab and an optical microcavity is still lack, here in this work we investigate a hybrid WS2 PhC−F-P cavity system aiming to study the interactions between F-P cavity modes, exciton emissions, and GMRs. We first show that the strong coupling between exciton resonance and F-P cavity modes can be achieved with a Rabi splitting of 51 meV at room temperature. We further found that GMRs of the WS2 PhC can also interact with F-P cavity modes and their coupling strength intimately depends on the geometry parameters of the hybrid system. At an optimal condition, a strong coupling between GMRs and F-P modes is reached with a Rabi splitting as large as 63 meV. Finally, we deliberately blue shifts the GMR to be spectrally overlapped with the exciton resonance by decreasing the period of the WS2 PhC. Under this condition, a triple mode anti-crossing behavior is observed near the degenerate energy when changing the cavity length. By fitting the spectral response with a three-coupled oscillator model, the Rabi splitting between the F-P mode, the exciton, and the GMR is obtained as 120 meV which we believe reaches a strong coupling between three modes. Our results unambiguously demonstrate that GMRs of a TMDC PhC provide an additional degree of freedom for the manipulation of collective optical responses of a TMDC–optical cavity hybrid system.

2. Two mode strong coupling between F-P mode and GMR (exciton)

Figure 1(a) schematically shows the hybrid structure investigated in this study, which consists of an F-P cavity constructed by two 40 nm thick Ag mirrors and a WS2 PhC inserted in the cavity. The PhC is a patterned five-layer (5 L) WS2 membrane with total thicknesses (denoted as t) of 3.09 nm and air holes in a 2D square array on x-y plane. The radius of all the air holes is kept as 250 nm and the period (Λ) of the square array is assumed to be 700 nm. In the following theoretical and numerical studies, the complex permittivity of Ag is fitted based on the experimentally measured data given in [27], and that of the WS2 membranes with layer numbers from 1 L to 5 L is fitted based on the experimentally measured data given in [28]. The hybrid structure is excited by an x-polarized plane wave propagating along the -z direction. Without loss of generality, the surrounding medium of the whole structure and that between the WS2 and Ag mirrors is supposed to be air. To study the coupling effects between different modes in such hybrid structure, we first inspect the resonances of the corresponding uncoupled components, i.e. the bare WS2 PhC and the empty F-P cavity. Figure 1(b) shows the numerically calculated transmission spectra of the bare WS2 PhC (blue lines) and reflection spectra of the F-P cavity modes (green dotted and dashed lines) with two selected cavity lengths by using a commercial simulation package FDTD solution. It is seen that the transmission spectrum of the bare WS2 PhC has two dips that correspond to the exciton resonance near 620 nm and the GMR near 710 nm, respectively. The upper right inset in Fig. 1(b) shows the profile of the electric field amplitude in a single unit cell of the WS2 PhC at the transmission dip of the GMR. It is seen that the electric field amplitude exhibits an interference pattern in y-direction, which indicates such GMR corresponds to the resonance of guided waves with diffraction orders of $({0, \pm 1} )$. As to the empty F-P cavity, when the cavity length is 870 nm the F-P mode contributes to a reflection dip around the same spectral range as that of the exciton of the bare WS2 PhC. When increasing the cavity length to 970 nm, the F-P mode red shifts to about 675 nm which is slightly shorter than the resonant wavelength (∼710 nm) of the GMR of the bare WS2 PhC.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic view of the hybrid structure composed of a WS2 PhC and an F-P cavity with two 40 nm thick Ag films as mirrors. The WS2 PhC is a 5 L WS2 membrane drilled with air holes in a 2D square array with period of Λ = 700 nm and the radius of air holes are r = 250 nm. The length of the F-P cavity is H and the WS2 PhC is placed at a distance of Z from the bottom mirror. The whole structure is excited by a normally incident x-polarized plane wave. (b) Numerically calculated transmission spectra of a bare 5 L WS2 PhC (blue lines) and reflection spectra of the empty F-P cavities of two selected cavity lengths (green dotted and dashed lines). The upper right inset shows the profile of electric field amplitude of the GMR in a single unit cell of the 5 L WS2 PhC membrane where the black dashed circle represents the boundary of the air hole. The lower right inset shows the profile of electric field amplitude of the 3th F-P mode where the white dashed lines represent the boundaries of the Ag mirrors towards the cavity. (c) Reflection spectra of the hybrid structures with the selected cavity lengths. (d) Reflection spectra for hybrid structures when the cavity length H changes from 700 to 2500 nm. The vertical white-dash-dotted lines mark the resonant wavelength of the exciton resonance and the GMR. The horizontal green-dotted lines mark the cavity lengths of 870 nm and 970 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

We then calculated the reflection spectra of the hybrid structures by placing the WS2 PhC at the center ($Z = {H / 2}$) of the F-P cavities with the above selected cavity lengths, as shown in Fig. 1(c). For the hybrid structure with cavity length of 870 nm (dashed line), the coupling between the exciton resonance and the F-P mode results in new hybrid polariton states manifested as two reflection dips that are spectrally separated about 51 meV. Interestingly, for the hybrid structure with cavity length of 970 nm the reflection spectrum (solid line) also shows two sharp dips separated about 63 meV with almost the same depth. This implies that significantly coupling between the GMR of the WS2 PhC and the F-P mode happens though their resonance wavelengths obtained from the uncoupled structures are not exactly the same.

To gain further insight of the coupling effects between different modes in the hybrid structure, Fig. 1(d) shows the calculated contour plot of the reflection as a function of the wavelength (x-axis) and the cavity length (y-axis). First, it is seen that F-P modes of different orders contribute to the predominant bands of reflection dips of which the resonant wavelengths vary as the cavity length changes. Second, multiple spectral anti-crossing can be observed at several different wavelengths. Specifically, at the wavelength of the exciton resonance, i.e. 620 nm as marked by the vertical white-dotted line, anti-crossing appears but only on the bands of the odd F-P modes, indicating that only F-P modes of odd orders can effectively couple to the exciton resonance. Meanwhile, as the cavity length increases the coupling strength between F-P modes and the exciton resonance reduces, which results in smaller Rabi splitting. Similarly, the coupling between the GMR and F-P modes of odd orders leads to more distinct anti-crossing features on the bands of reflection dips around 710 nm. However, a different feature must be noted that the center of the Rabi splitting between the GMR and the F-P modes blue shifts as the cavity length decreases. This observation implies that the resonant wavelength of the GMR is also affected by the cavity length. For a bare WS2 PhC under normal incidence, one can expect that the resonant wavelength of the GMR is mainly determined by the period (Λ) of the lattice. When put the WS2 PhC into an F-P cavity, the influence of image charges induced in the cavity mirrors on the resonant wavelength of the GMR must be considered. This can be verified by noticing that the center of Rabi splitting eventually red shifts to 710 nm as the cavity length increases over 2400 nm. For shorter cavity length, for instance 970 nm, the center of Rabi splitting significantly blue shifts to about 675 nm because of the strong interaction with image charges. And for even shorter cavity length, the affection of image charges will be strong enough to completely kill the GMR. The anti-crossing appears at other regions as marked by the white boxes in Fig. 1(d) can be attributed to the coupling between high order GMRs and F-P modes, which we will not pay much attention. Here we stress that it is possible to observe the coupling (spectral anti-crossing) between exciton or GMR and the F-P modes of even orders only if the WS2 PhC is placed offset respect to the center of the cavity. This is because the center of the cavity is exactly a node of the standing wave of an even order F-P mode. On the contrary, the center of the cavity is an antinode of the standing wave of an odd order F-P mode. To illustrate this point, the profile of the electric field amplitude of the 3th order F-P mode is given in the lower right inset in Fig. 1(b), where the electric field amplitude maximizes at the center of the cavity. Details about how the coupling strength between the F-P mode and the GMR is modulated by the position of the WS2 PhC will be discussed later.

To unravel the underlying physics of the above observations, we employ the coupled oscillator model (COM) to analyze the spectral responses of the hybrid structure [29,30]. For the coupling between the exciton and the F-P cavity modes, the Hamiltonian of the COM is given in Eq. (1) when ${e^{i\omega t}}$ is applied for the time dependence of a harmonic wave with angular frequency $\omega $.

$$\left( {\begin{array}{{cc}} {{E_{\textrm{FP}}} + i{\gamma_{\textrm{FP}}}}&g\\ g&{{E_{\textrm{Exciton}}} + i{\gamma_{\textrm{Exciton}}}} \end{array}} \right)\left( {\begin{array}{{c}} \alpha \\ \beta \end{array}} \right) = E\left( {\begin{array}{{c}} \alpha \\ \beta \end{array}} \right),$$
where EFP and γFP (EExciton and γExciton) are the resonance energy and damping rate of the F-P mode (exciton mode), respectively, g represents the coupling strength, E is the eigenvalue of the hybrid modes, and $({\alpha ,\beta } )$ is the eigenvector. Based on Eq. (1), the eigenvalue is solved as:
$${E_ \pm } = \frac{{{E_{\textrm{FP}}} + {E_{\textrm{Exciton}}}}}{2} \pm \sqrt {{g^2} - \frac{{{{({{E_{\textrm{FP}}} - {E_{\textrm{Exciton}}}} )}^2}}}{4}} .$$

Rabi splitting (Ω) can be obtained from Eq. (2) by implementing EFP = EExciton, i.e.:

$$\Omega = 2g.$$

In Eq. (2), EFP as a function of the cavity length is readily known based on the F-P resonance condition, and EExciton is fixed as 1.98 eV as it is the inherent excitonic feature of the 5 L WS2. After fitting the reflection dips of the hybrid modes by Eq. (2), coupling strength g is obtained to further calculate the Rabi splitting (Ω) based on Eq. (3). In Fig. 2(a), we append the results of the COM on the zoomed reflection contour plots (Fig. 1(d)) around the anti-crossing between the exciton resonance (blue lines) and the F-P modes (green lines) of 3th, 5th and 7th order. It is seen that curves of eigenvalues (black-dashed lines) calculated based on Eq. (2) as the function of the cavity length match well with the reflection dips of the hybrid modes. Taking the coupling between the 3th order F-P cavity modes and exciton resonance as an example (left panel of Fig. 2(a)), the Rabi splitting is calculated as 51 meV based on Eq. (3). It is well known that the criteria of two mode strong coupling is the Rabi splitting must exceed their average dissipation rate, i.e. Ω > (γFP + γExciton)/2. Here γFP (γExciton) can be obtained by fitting the reflection (transmission) spectra of the empty F-P cavity (bare WS2 PhC) using a single resonance Lorentz formula. However, we notice that the spectra in Fig. 1(b) near the resonances of both the F-P modes and the GMR exhibit a slightly asymmetric profile which is the sign of a Fano resonance. On the basis of this observation, we also fit the spectra in Fig. 1(b) near the resonances of F-P modes and the GMR using a single resonance Fano formula given in [31]. For comparison, the fitted damping rates of different modes by the Lorentz formula (${\gamma _{\textrm{Lorentz}}}$) and the Fano formula (${\gamma _{\textrm{Fano}}}$) are given in Table 1. It is seen that ${\gamma _{\textrm{Fano}}}$ is only slightly smaller than ${\gamma _{\textrm{Lorentz}}}$ for the F-P modes of lower orders and the GMR. Therefore, in the following discussions we only need to compare the Rabi splitting with the larger average dissipation rate calculated based on ${\gamma _{\textrm{Lorentz}}}$. For the 3th order F-P mode and the exciton resonance, the average dissipation rate is calculated as 28.75 meV (γFP = 10 meV and γExciton = 47.5 meV), confirming that the coupling between them reaches strong coupling regime. The modulus squares of eigen coefficients, i.e. |α|2 and |β|2, are known as Hopfield coefficients that represent the proportion of uncoupled states in the mixed state. The insets in the left panel of Fig. 2(a) show the Hopfield coefficients of the upper (denoted as Up) and lower (denoted as Lp) polariton states as the function of the cavity length. It shows that the Hopfield coefficients of the exciton state and F-P state have opposite trends as the cavity length changes for the Up and Lp polariton states, and both equal to 0.5 at the center of the Rabi splitting. As a matter of fact, the coupling strength between two resonances can be straight forwardly calculated by the overlap integral of their electromagnetic fields based on Eq. (4) [32]:

$$\kappa = \frac{{\int {({{\mu_0}{\textbf H}_1^ \ast {{\textbf H}_2} - {\varepsilon_{\textrm{bg}}}{\textbf E}_1^ \ast {{\textbf E}_2}} )\textrm{d}V} }}{{\sqrt {\int {\varepsilon {{|{{{\textbf E}_1}} |}^2}\textrm{d}V \times \int {\varepsilon {{|{{{\textbf E}_2}} |}^2}\textrm{d}V} } } }}.$$

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) Zoomed reflection contour plots around the anti-crossing between the exciton resonance (blue lines) and the F-P modes (green lines) of 3th, 5th and 7th order from left to the right panel. (b) Zoomed reflection contour plots around the anti-crossing between the GMRs (yellow lines) and the F-P modes (green lines) of 3th, 5th and 7th order from left to the right panel. The black dashed lines are the results of the COM and the insets give the Hopfield coefficients for the Up (top-left) and Lp hybrid polariton states as a function of H.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparison of the fitted damping rates by Fano and Lorentz formulas (cavity lengths are given in the brackets below the name of the F-P mode)

To distinguish with g in Eq. (1), here the couple strength is denoted as $\kappa $, Hi (Ei) represents the electric field of the i-th mode, ɛ = max (ɛ1, ɛ2) where ɛi is the dielectric profiles of the i-th mode, and ɛbg = ɛ1 + ɛ2ɛ is the background dielectric profile. The coupling strength κ between the 3th order F-P cavity mode and the exciton resonance calculated based on Eq. (4) is 30 meV that is close to g (25.5 meV) obtained from the COM, i.e. Equation (2), which confirms the validity and accuracy of the above analyzing method. Similarly, parameters related to the coupling between the exciton resonance and F-P cavity modes of other orders (5th and 7th) are obtained based on Eqs. (24) and listed in Table 2. It is seen that the coupling between the exciton resonance and the F-P cavity modes of 3th, 5th and 7th order all reaches strong coupling regime, though the coupling strength is declining as the cavity length increases.

Tables Icon

Table 2. Parameters of exciton – F-P coupling and GMR – F-P coupling (${E}_\textbf{{FP}}^0$ represents the theoretical resonant energy of the F-P modes while EFP is the actual value used in the COM, A. D. R is short for the average dissipation rate)

When the F-P cavity mode is around 700 nm, the GMRs are coupled to the F-P modes of odd orders as shown by the zoomed reflection contour plots near the anti-crossing points in Fig. 2(b). It is seen that results of the COM (black-dashed lines) is consistent with the reflection dips of the hybrid modes as well. More details about the coupling between the GMRs and F-P cavity modes can be found from the parameters listed in Table 2. First of all, it is apparently that the coupling between the GMRs with the F-P modes of all the considered odd orders reaches strong coupling regime. More importantly, their strong coupling is more prominent than that between the exciton resonances and F-P modes in terms of the magnitude of Rabi splitting. For example, the Rabi splitting between the GMR and the 3th order F-P cavity is 63 meV which is much larger than the average dissipation rate (γFP + γGMR)/2, where γGMR ≈ 3 meV and γFP ≈ 8 meV. This can be understood by the fact that as a quasi-bonded mode the GMR has much smaller radiative loss and therefore quite large quality factor (Q) as verified by the extremely narrow transmission peak shown in Fig. 1(b) for the spectrum of a bare WS2 PhC. Moreover, fields of the GMR of the WS2 PhC are confined around the membrane, resulting in a small model volume which is also beneficial to a large Rabi splitting. Results of Fig. 2(b) are one of the most important contributions of our work, which clearly shows that the GMR in a WS2 PhC is quite suitable for realizing strong coupling in TMDC photonic hybrid resonant structures.

Next we study how the strong coupling between the GMR and the F-P modes can be modulated by the geometry of the structure. Figure 3(a) shows the reflection contour plot of the hybrid structure as a function of the wavelength and the position of the WS2 PhC (Z) when the cavity length is kept as 970 nm. It is seen that there is a variation of Rabi splitting as Z changes. In detail, when the WS2 PhC resides at the antinodes of the standing wave of the F-P mode of odd orders, for example at the center of the cavity (Z = 485 nm), Rabi splitting reaches the maximum (marked by the triangle). Correspondingly, when the WS2 PhC resides at the nodes of the standing wave (Z = 660 nm or Z = 300 nm), the GMR cannot even be excited (marked by the circles) since the amplitudes of the fields vanish at these positions. In between the nodes and antinodes, Rabi splitting varies following the intensity profile of the standing wave. The coupling coefficient κ as the function of the position Z shown in Fig. 3(b) further confirms that the variation of the Rabi splitting is a result of the modulation of coupling strength. Another geometry parameter that may have impacts on the Rabi spitting is the radius of air holes since it is one of the factors determining the complex effective mode index of the guided-mode. Figure 3(c) shows reflection contour plot of the hybrid structure as a function of the wavelength and the radius of air holes. It is seen that the center of the Rabi splitting blue shifts as the radius of air holes increases from 100 nm to 350 nm, which can be explained by the modulation of the resonance wavelength of the GMR by the radius of air holes. More interestingly, the Rabi splitting shows a non-monotonic variation as the radius of air holes changes but has an optimum at radius of 250 nm that corresponds to the radius where the coupling coefficient $\kappa $ reaches the maximum as shown in Fig. 3(d).

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Modulating the strong coupling between GMRs and F-P modes by the geometry of the hybrid structure. (a) Reflection spectra for the hybrid structure of H = 970 nm when the position of the WS2 PhC Z is varied from 120 to 840 nm. (b) Coupling coefficient ($|\kappa |$) as a function of Z. (c) Reflection spectra for the hybrid structure of H = 970 nm when the radius of air holes is varied from 100 to 350 nm. (d) Coupling coefficient ($|\kappa |$) as a function of the radius of air holes.

Download Full Size | PDF

The last parameter that we want to investigate is the layer number of the WS2 PhC because it affects the refractive index of the membrane. Figure 4(a) shows the transmission spectra of WS2 PhC with varying layer numbers from 1 L to 5 L. It is seen that as the same as [28], the transmission dips associated with the GMRs red shift slightly and broaden as the layer number increases, which means a more efficient coupling of the GMR to the excitation field. As a result, hybrid states of the hybrid structure red shifts and the Rabi splitting becomes larger as seen in Fig. 4(b). Correspondingly, the coupling coefficient κ shows a similar uptrend as the layer number increases as shown in Fig. 4(c).

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a) Transmission spectra of the WS2 PhC with varying thickness from 1 L to 5 L. Inset: The enlarged plots of the 1 L and 2 L WS2 PhCs at GMRs. (b) Reflection spectra of the hybrid structure with different layer numbers of the WS2 PhC. (c) Coupling coefficient ($|\mathrm{\kappa } |$) between GMRs and F-P modes as a function of the number of layers.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Triple mode strong coupling between F-P mode, GMR and exciton

Finally, we show that it is possible to realize a triple mode strong coupling through tuning the resonance wavelength of the GMR to spectrally overlap with that of the exciton resonance by adjusting the period Λ of the WS2 PhC. Figure 5(a) shows the transmission of a bare 5 L WS2 PhC as a function of the wavelength and the period Λ. Apparently, the resonance wavelength of the guided-mode is readily to be tuned by changing Λ. More importantly, it is found that the resonance wavelength of the guided-mode can spectrally overlap with that of the exciton resonance at Λ = 625 nm while keeping a very weak coupling between them. This is further confirmed by the transmission spectrum (blue line) of the bare 5 L WS2 PhC with Λ = 625 nm shown in the upper panel of Fig. 5(b), where only a single transmission dip is present. When put this 5 L WS2 PhC into the F-P cavity with H = 860 nm, a triple mode coupling involving exciton resonance, the GMR and the F-P cavity mode happens, resulting in three hybrid modes that correspond to three spectrally separated transmission dips as show in the lower panel of Fig. 5(b). To further study such triple mode coupling, Fig. 5(c) shows the reflection spectra of the hybrid structure against the cavity length H when Λ = 625 nm. It is seen that the triple mode coupling manifested as an interesting anti-crossing and produces three hybrid polariton states which we name them as upper (Up), middle (Mp) and lower (Lp) polariton state in turn from the short to the long wavelength. To analyze this triple mode Rabi splitting, we use the COM with three oscillators, where the Hamiltonian reads [33,34]:

$$\left( {\begin{array}{{ccc}} {{E_{\textrm{FP}}} + i{\gamma_{\textrm{FP}}}}&{{g_{\textrm{FP - GMR}}}}&{{g_{\textrm{FP - Exciton}}}}\\ {{g_{\textrm{FP - GMR}}}}&{{E_{\textrm{GMR}}} + i{\gamma_{\textrm{GMR}}}}&{{g_{\textrm{GMR - Exciton}}}}\\ {{g_{\textrm{FP - Exciton}}}}&{{g_{\textrm{GMR - Exciton}}}}&{{E_{\textrm{Exciton}}} + i{\gamma_{\textrm{Exciton}}}} \end{array}} \right)\left( {\begin{array}{{c}} \alpha \\ \beta \\ \delta \end{array}} \right) = E\left( {\begin{array}{{c}} \alpha \\ \beta \\ \delta \end{array}} \right),$$
where $({\alpha ,\beta ,\delta } )$ is the eigenvector, γFP, γGMR and γExciton are the damping rate of the F-P mode, the GMR and the exciton, respectively, and EFP, EGMR and EExciton are their resonance energies, gFP-GMR, gFP-Exciton and gGMR-Exciton represent the coupling strengths between each other. Based on Eq. (5), the eigenvalues as a function of the wavelength are obtained as shown by the black-dashed lines in Fig. 5(c), which agree with the reflection dips of the three polariton states. Figure 5(d) shows the Hopfield coefficients for the three polariton states as a function of the wavelength, from which we can conclude that the Lp (Up) polariton is mainly a hybrid state by the F-P mode and the guided-mode (exciton mode) while the Mp polariton is a hybrid state by three modes. In the meantime, the middle panel of Fig. 5(d) shows that the optimal cavity length to realize the strongest interaction among these three modes is 860 nm because their Hopfield coefficients are closest to each other at this cavity length. Based on the COM, the parameters related to the coupling at H = 860 nm are obtained and listed in Table 3.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. (a) Transmittance spectra for 5 L WS2 PhC with different array periods. (b) Upper panel: transmission of the bare 5 L WS2 PhC with Λ = 625 nm (blue line) and reflection spectra of the empty F-P cavity (green dashed line) with H = 860 nm; Lower panel: reflection spectra of the corresponding hybrid structure. (c) Reflection spectra of the hybrid structure with Λ = 625 nm when the cavity length H changes from 700 to 950 nm. The yellow, blue and green lines represent the resonance wavelengths of GMRs, exciton resonances, and F-P modes, respectively. Black dotted lines correspond to theoretical fits based on the COM. (d) Hopfield coefficients as a function of the wavelength for F-P modes, GMRs and exciton resonances of the upper (Up), middle (Mp) and lower (Lp) polaritons.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 3. Parameters of Exciton − GMR – F-P triple mode coupling.

To determine whether the interaction between these three modes reaches the strong coupling regime, a criterion of the triple mode strong coupling must be applied [33,34]:

$$\frac{\Omega }{2}\mathrm{\ > }{W_{\textrm{Up}}}{\gamma _{\textrm{Up}}} + {W_{\textrm{Mp}}}{\gamma _{\textrm{Mp}}} + {W_{\textrm{Lp}}}{\gamma _{\textrm{Lp}}},$$
where WUp (γUP), WMp (γMP) and WLp (γLP) are the weights (damping rates) of the hybrid states Up, Mp and Lp, respectively. And the weight of each the hybrid state can be calculated as follows:
$$\left\{ {\begin{array}{{c}} {{W_{\textrm{Up}}} = \frac{{{\gamma_{\textrm{Up}}}}}{{{\gamma_{\textrm{Up}}} + {\gamma_{\textrm{Mp}}} + {\gamma_{\textrm{Lp}}}}}}\\ {{W_{\textrm{Mp}}} = \frac{{{\gamma_{\textrm{Mp}}}}}{{{\gamma_{\textrm{Up}}} + {\gamma_{\textrm{Mp}}} + {\gamma_{\textrm{Lp}}}}}}\\ {{W_{\textrm{Lp}}} = \frac{{{\gamma_{\textrm{Lp}}}}}{{{\gamma_{\textrm{Up}}} + {\gamma_{\textrm{Mp}}} + {\gamma_{\textrm{Lp}}}}}} \end{array}} \right..$$

Using the Hopfield coefficients in Fig. 5(d), the damping rate of each hybrid state is obtained as:

$$\left\{ {\begin{array}{{c}} {{\gamma_{\textrm{Up}}} = 0.17{\gamma_{\textrm{FP}}} + 0.018{\gamma_{\textrm{GMR}}} + 0.81{\gamma_{\textrm{Exciton}}}}\\ {{\gamma_{\textrm{Mp}}} = 0.55{\gamma_{\textrm{FP}}} + 0.27{\gamma_{\textrm{GMR}}} + 0.17{\gamma_{\textrm{Exciton}}}}\\ {{\gamma_{\textrm{Lp}}} = 0.28{\gamma_{\textrm{FP}}} + 0.7{\gamma_{\textrm{GMR}}} + 0.013{\gamma_{\textrm{Exciton}}}} \end{array}} \right..$$

By substituting the fitted damping rates of the F-P mode (γFP ≈ 10 meV), the GMR (γGMR ≈ 38.6 meV), and the exciton (γExciton ≈ 38.6 meV) into Eq. (8), the damping rate of each hybrid state can be calculated. Then, the criterion of a triple mode strong coupling is finally obtained as Ω> 29.3 meV. According to the Rabi splitting listed in Table 3, i.e. Ω = 120 meV, we can declare that a tripled mode strong coupling between the F-P mode, the GMR and the exciton resonance is reached in the hybrid structure. We also emphasis that the Rabi splitting of the triple mode coupling is significantly enhanced compared with the coupling of the two modes, which may find applications in such as biosensing and multi-model nanolasing.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, optical responses of a hybrid structure consisting of a WS2 PhC and an F-P cavity are investigated in this work, which show interesting strong coupling effects between exciton emissions, GMRs and F-P cavity modes. In addition to the coupling between F-P modes and exciton emissions, GMRs of WS2 PhCs can also interact with other modes, which provides extra freedoms to manipulate the collective optical responses of the hybrid structure. We have used the COM and overlap integral to analyze the strong coupling between different modes and obtain the optimal Rabi splitting of 51 meV, 63 meV and 120 meV for the F-P—exciton coupling, the F-P—GMR coupling, and the triple mode coupling, respectively. Compared with the exciton resonances, we show that the GMRs have much higher Q factor and smaller modal volume that both can boost the strong coupling effect. The detailed numerical results of optical responses of the hybrid structure as a function of geometry parameters can be a guidance for relevant experimental designs and studies. It is reasonable to expect that similar strong coupling effects can be observed in other optical cavities embedded with TMDC PhCs, thus our results open a new avenue for studying multi-mode strong coupling based on TMDC materials.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11574228, 11874276, 12004273); Shanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Project (201903D121131).

Acknowledgments

Qiang Zhang and Shaoding Liu are the co-corresponding authors of this work.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. M. A. Sillanpa, J. I. Park, and R. W. Simmonds, “Coherent quantum state storage and transfer between two phase qubits via a resonant cavity,” Nature 449(7161), 438–442 (2007). [CrossRef]  

2. W. L. Chen, K. M. Beck, R. Bucker, M. Gullans, M. D. Lukin, H. Tanji-Suzuki, and V. Vuletic, “All-optical switch and transistor gated by one stored photon,” Science 341(6147), 768–770 (2013). [CrossRef]  

3. S. Kéna-Cohen and S. R. Forrest, “Room-temperature polariton lasing in an organic single-crystal microcavity,” Nat. Photonics 4(6), 371–375 (2010). [CrossRef]  

4. J. D. Plumhof, T. Stöferle, L. Mai, U. Scherf, and R. F. Mahrt, “Room-temperature Bose-Einstein condensation of cavity exciton-polaritons in a polymer,” Nat. Mater. 13(3), 247–252 (2014). [CrossRef]  

5. Q. Zhao, W. Jie Zhou, Y. H. Deng, Y. Q. Zheng, Z. H. Shi, L. K. Ang, Z. K. Zhou, and L. Wu, “Plexcitonic strong coupling: unique features, applications, and challenges,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55(20), 203002 (2022). [CrossRef]  

6. J. Li, X. Y. Deng, L. Jin, Y. L. Wang, T. J. Wang, K. Liang, and Li. Yu, “Strong coupling of second harmonic generation scattering spectrum in a diexcitionic nanosystem,” Opt. Express 31(6), 10249–10259 (2023). [CrossRef]  

7. T. H. Ren, Y. M. Huang, Q. G Sun, L. Jin, Y. L. Wang, L. Yu, and K. Liang, “Dynamic modulation of multi-mode ultra-strong coupling at ambient conditions,” Eur. Phys. J. D 76(10), 195 (2022). [CrossRef]  

8. A. Bisht, J. Cuadra, M. Wersäll, A. Canales, T. J. Antosiewicz, and T. Shegai, “Collective strong light-matter coupling in hierarchical microcavity-plasmon-exciton systems,” Nano Lett. 19(1), 189–196 (2019). [CrossRef]  

9. Y. J. Shi, W. Liu, S. D. Liu, T. Y. Yang, Y. M. Dong, D. J. Sun, and G. Y. Li, “Strong coupling between plasmonic surface lattice resonance and photonic microcavity mode,” Photonics 9(2), 84 (2022). [CrossRef]  

10. Y. T. Bai, H. Y. Zheng, Q. Zhang, Y. Yu, and S. D. Liu, “Perfect absorption and phase singularities induced by surface lattice resonances for plasmonic nanoparticle array on a metallic film,” Opt. Express 30(25), 45400–45412 (2022). [CrossRef]  

11. S. D. Liu, J. L. Fan, W. J. Wang, J. D. Chen, and Z. H. Chen, “Resonance coupling between molecular excitons and nonradiating anapole modes in silicon nanodisk-J-aggregate heterostructures,” ACS Photonics 5(4), 1628–1639 (2018). [CrossRef]  

12. J. Cuadra, D. G. Baranov, and M. Wersa, ¨R. Verre, T. J. Antosiewicz, and T. Shegai, “Observation of tunable charged exciton polaritons in hybrid monolayer WS2-plasmonic nanoantenna system,” Nano Lett. 18(3), 1777–1785 (2018). [CrossRef]  

13. P. Xie, Y.Y. Wu, Y. H. Li, P. J. Chang, H. Zhang, and W. Wang, “Strong light-matter interactions in hybrid nanostructures with transition metal dichalcogenides,” J. Opt. 24(9), 093001 (2022). [CrossRef]  

14. C. Carlson, R. Salzwedel, M. Selig, A. Knorr, and S. Hughes, “Strong coupling regime and hybrid quasinormal modes of a single plasmonic resonator coupled to a TMDC monolayer,” Phys. Rev. B 104(12), 125424 (2021). [CrossRef]  

15. X. Y. Zong, L. X. Li, K. Yu, and Y. F. Liu, “Strong coupling between hybrid plasmonic-photonic resonances and excitons in metallic photonic crystal-monolayer WS2 nanostructures,” Results Phys. 30, 104850 (2021). [CrossRef]  

16. W. J. Liu, B. Lee, C. H. Naylor, H. S. Ee, J. Park, A. T. C. Johnson, and R. Agarwal, “Strong exciton-plasmon coupling in MoS2 coupled with plasmonic lattice,” Nano Lett. 16(2), 1262–1269 (2016). [CrossRef]  

17. L. Liu, L. Y. M. Tobing, X. C. Yu, J. C. Tong, B. Qiang, A. I. Fernández-Domínguez, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, D. H. Zhang, Q. J. Wang, and Y. Luo, “Strong plasmon-exciton interactions on nanoantenna array-monolayer WS2 hybrid system,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 8(5), 1901002 (2020). [CrossRef]  

18. S. J. Wang, Q. Le-Van, F. Vaianella, B. Maes, S. E. Barker, R. H. Godiksen, A. G. Curto, and J. G. Rivas, “Limits to strong coupling of excitons in multilayer WS2 with collective plasmonic resonances,” ACS Photonics 6(2), 286–293 (2019). [CrossRef]  

19. M. Geisler, X. Cui, J. Wang, T. Rindzevicius, L. Gammelgaard, B. S. Jessen, P. A. D. Gonçalves, F. Todisco, P. Bøggild, A. Boisen, M. Wubs, N. A. Mortensen, S. S. Xiao, and N. Stenger, “Single-crystalline gold nanodisks on WS2 mono- and multilayers for strong coupling at room temperature,” ACS Photonics 6(4), 994–1001 (2019). [CrossRef]  

20. S. Lepeshov, M. S. Wang, A. Krasnok, O. VKotov, T. Y. Zhang, H. Liu, T. Z. Jiang, B. Korgel, M. Terrones, Y. B. Zheng, and A. Alu, “Tunable resonance coupling in single si nanoparticle-monolayer WS2 structures,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(19), 16690–16697 (2018). [CrossRef]  

21. H. Wang, J. X. Wen, W. L. Wang, N. S. Xu, P. Liu, J. H. Yan, H. J. Chen, and S. Z. Deng, “Resonance coupling in heterostructures composed of silicon nanosphere and monolayer WS2: A magnetic-dipole-mediated energy transfer process,” ACS Nano 13(2), 1739–1750 (2019). [CrossRef]  

22. S. J. Wang, S. L. Li, T. Chervy, A. Shalabney, S. Azzini, E. Orgiu, J. A. Hutchison, C. Genet, P. Samorì, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Coherent coupling of WS2 monolayers with metallic photonic nanostructures at room temperature,” Nano Lett. 16(7), 4368–4374 (2016). [CrossRef]  

23. X. Z. Liu, T. Galfsky, Z. Sun, F. N. Xia, E. C. Lin, Y. H. Lee, S. Kéna-Cohen, and V. M. Menon, “Strong light-matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals,” Nat. Photonics 9(1), 30–34 (2015). [CrossRef]  

24. L.Y. Zhao, Q.Y. Shang, M. L. Li, Y. Liang, C. Li, and Q. Zhang, “Strong exciton-photon interaction and lasing of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors,” Nano Res. 14(6), 1937–1954 (2021). [CrossRef]  

25. X. W. Zhang, S. Choi, D. Wang, C. H. Naylor, A. T. C. Johnson, and E. Cubukcu, “Unidirectional doubly enhanced MoS2 emission via photonic fano resonances,” Nano Lett. 17(11), 6715–6720 (2017). [CrossRef]  

26. X. W. Zhang, X. J. Zhang, W. Z. Huang, K. D. Wu, M. Q. Zhao, A. T. C. Johnson, S. Tongay, and E. Cubukcu, “Ultrathin WS2-on-glass photonic crystal for self-resonant exciton-polaritonics,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 8(7), 1901988 (2020). [CrossRef]  

27. P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6(12), 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]  

28. X. W. Zhang, C. D. Eknamkul, J. Gu, and A. L. Boehmke , V. M. Menon, J. Khurgin, and E. Cubukcu, “Guiding of visible photons at the ångström thickness limit,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 14(9), 844–850 (2019). [CrossRef]  

29. D. Zheng, S. P. Zhang, Q. Deng, M. Kang, P. Nordlander, and H. X. Xu, “Manipulating coherent plasmon-exciton interaction in a single silver nanorod on monolayer WSe2,” Nano Lett. 17(6), 3809–3814 (2017). [CrossRef]  

30. P. Jiang, G. Song, Y. L. Wang, C. Li, L. L. Wang, and L. Yu, “Tunable strong exciton-plasmon-exciton coupling in WS2-J-aggregates-plasmonic nanocavity,” Opt. Express 27(12), 16613–16623 (2019). [CrossRef]  

31. L. Xu, K. Z. Kamali, L. J. Huang, M. Rahmani, A. Smirnov, R. Camacho-Morales, Y. X. Ma, G. Q. Zhang, M. Woolley, D. Neshev, and A. E. Miroshnichenko, “Dynamic nonlinear image tuning through magnetic dipole quasi-BIC ultrathin resonators,” Adv. Sci. 6(15), 1802119 (2019). [CrossRef]  

32. S. Y. Elnaggar, R. J. Tervo, and S. M. Mattar, “General expressions and physical origin of the coupling coefficient of arbitrary tuned coupled electromagnetic resonators,” J. Appl. Phys. 118(19), 194901 (2015). [CrossRef]  

33. K. As’ham, I. Al-Ani, L. J. Huang, A. E. Miroshnichenko, and H. T. Hattori, “Boosting strong coupling in a hybrid WSe2 monolayer-anapole-plasmon system,” ACS Photonics 8(2), 489–496 (2021). [CrossRef]  

34. B. Li, S. Zu, Z. P. Zhang, L. H. Zheng, Q. Jiang, B. W. Du, Y. Luo, Y. J. Gong, Y. F. Zhang, F. Lin, B. Shen, X. Zhu, P. M. Ajayan, and Z. Y. Fang, “Large Rabi splitting obtained in Ag-WS2 strong-coupling heterostructure with optical microcavity at room temperature,” Opto. Electron. Adv. 2(5), 19000801 (2019). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic view of the hybrid structure composed of a WS2 PhC and an F-P cavity with two 40 nm thick Ag films as mirrors. The WS2 PhC is a 5 L WS2 membrane drilled with air holes in a 2D square array with period of Λ = 700 nm and the radius of air holes are r = 250 nm. The length of the F-P cavity is H and the WS2 PhC is placed at a distance of Z from the bottom mirror. The whole structure is excited by a normally incident x-polarized plane wave. (b) Numerically calculated transmission spectra of a bare 5 L WS2 PhC (blue lines) and reflection spectra of the empty F-P cavities of two selected cavity lengths (green dotted and dashed lines). The upper right inset shows the profile of electric field amplitude of the GMR in a single unit cell of the 5 L WS2 PhC membrane where the black dashed circle represents the boundary of the air hole. The lower right inset shows the profile of electric field amplitude of the 3th F-P mode where the white dashed lines represent the boundaries of the Ag mirrors towards the cavity. (c) Reflection spectra of the hybrid structures with the selected cavity lengths. (d) Reflection spectra for hybrid structures when the cavity length H changes from 700 to 2500 nm. The vertical white-dash-dotted lines mark the resonant wavelength of the exciton resonance and the GMR. The horizontal green-dotted lines mark the cavity lengths of 870 nm and 970 nm.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Zoomed reflection contour plots around the anti-crossing between the exciton resonance (blue lines) and the F-P modes (green lines) of 3th, 5th and 7th order from left to the right panel. (b) Zoomed reflection contour plots around the anti-crossing between the GMRs (yellow lines) and the F-P modes (green lines) of 3th, 5th and 7th order from left to the right panel. The black dashed lines are the results of the COM and the insets give the Hopfield coefficients for the Up (top-left) and Lp hybrid polariton states as a function of H.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Modulating the strong coupling between GMRs and F-P modes by the geometry of the hybrid structure. (a) Reflection spectra for the hybrid structure of H = 970 nm when the position of the WS2 PhC Z is varied from 120 to 840 nm. (b) Coupling coefficient ($|\kappa |$) as a function of Z. (c) Reflection spectra for the hybrid structure of H = 970 nm when the radius of air holes is varied from 100 to 350 nm. (d) Coupling coefficient ($|\kappa |$) as a function of the radius of air holes.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) Transmission spectra of the WS2 PhC with varying thickness from 1 L to 5 L. Inset: The enlarged plots of the 1 L and 2 L WS2 PhCs at GMRs. (b) Reflection spectra of the hybrid structure with different layer numbers of the WS2 PhC. (c) Coupling coefficient ($|\mathrm{\kappa } |$) between GMRs and F-P modes as a function of the number of layers.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. (a) Transmittance spectra for 5 L WS2 PhC with different array periods. (b) Upper panel: transmission of the bare 5 L WS2 PhC with Λ = 625 nm (blue line) and reflection spectra of the empty F-P cavity (green dashed line) with H = 860 nm; Lower panel: reflection spectra of the corresponding hybrid structure. (c) Reflection spectra of the hybrid structure with Λ = 625 nm when the cavity length H changes from 700 to 950 nm. The yellow, blue and green lines represent the resonance wavelengths of GMRs, exciton resonances, and F-P modes, respectively. Black dotted lines correspond to theoretical fits based on the COM. (d) Hopfield coefficients as a function of the wavelength for F-P modes, GMRs and exciton resonances of the upper (Up), middle (Mp) and lower (Lp) polaritons.

Tables (3)

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparison of the fitted damping rates by Fano and Lorentz formulas (cavity lengths are given in the brackets below the name of the F-P mode)

Tables Icon

Table 2. Parameters of exciton – F-P coupling and GMR – F-P coupling ( E {FP} 0 represents the theoretical resonant energy of the F-P modes while EFP is the actual value used in the COM, A. D. R is short for the average dissipation rate)

Tables Icon

Table 3. Parameters of Exciton − GMR – F-P triple mode coupling.

Equations (8)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

( E FP + i γ FP g g E Exciton + i γ Exciton ) ( α β ) = E ( α β ) ,
E ± = E FP + E Exciton 2 ± g 2 ( E FP E Exciton ) 2 4 .
Ω = 2 g .
κ = ( μ 0 H 1 H 2 ε bg E 1 E 2 ) d V ε | E 1 | 2 d V × ε | E 2 | 2 d V .
( E FP + i γ FP g FP - GMR g FP - Exciton g FP - GMR E GMR + i γ GMR g GMR - Exciton g FP - Exciton g GMR - Exciton E Exciton + i γ Exciton ) ( α β δ ) = E ( α β δ ) ,
Ω 2   > W Up γ Up + W Mp γ Mp + W Lp γ Lp ,
{ W Up = γ Up γ Up + γ Mp + γ Lp W Mp = γ Mp γ Up + γ Mp + γ Lp W Lp = γ Lp γ Up + γ Mp + γ Lp .
{ γ Up = 0.17 γ FP + 0.018 γ GMR + 0.81 γ Exciton γ Mp = 0.55 γ FP + 0.27 γ GMR + 0.17 γ Exciton γ Lp = 0.28 γ FP + 0.7 γ GMR + 0.013 γ Exciton .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.