Abstract
Light is an excellent medium for both classical and quantum information transmission due to its speed, manipulability, and abundant degrees of freedom into which to encode information. Recently, space-division multiplexing has gained attention as a means to substantially increase the rate of information transfer by utilizing sets of infinite-dimensional propagation eigenmodes such as the Laguerre-Gaussian “donut” modes. Encoding in these high-dimensional spaces necessitates devices capable of manipulating photonic degrees of freedom with high efficiency. In this work, we demonstrate controlling the optical susceptibility of an atomic sample can be used as powerful tool for manipulating the degrees of freedom of light that pass through the sample. Utilizing this tool, we demonstrate photonic mode conversion between two Laguerre-Gaussian modes of a twisted optical cavity with high efficiency. We spatiotemporally modulate the optical susceptibility of an atomic sample that sits at the cavity waist using an auxiliary Stark-shifting beam, in effect creating a mode-coupling optic that converts modes of orbital angular momentum l = 3 → l = 0. The internal conversion efficiency saturates near unity as a function of the atom number and modulation beam intensity, finding application in topological few-body state preparation, quantum communication, and potential development as a flexible tabletop device.
© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement
1. Introduction
Efficient control over photonic degrees of freedom, including frequency, polarization, and spatial mode, has widespread applications in information and communication. Put simply: the more degrees of freedom one can manipulate, the more information one can encode in a single channel of light. This idea is utilized regularly in both classical and quantum communication, where light has been multiplexed in arrival time [1–3], frequency [1–4], polarization [3], quadrature [3], and most recently space [3,5–12] to substantially increase information transfer over a fiber [13–15] and free-space link [16]. Spatial information may be conveniently encoded within families of propagation eigenmodes; the Hermite-Gaussian (HG) and Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) families are appealing for their orthogonality and infinite-dimensionality, supporting the exploration of higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces for quantum computing [17,18], formation of orbital angular momentum qudits [7,18–23], improved quantum key distribution [7,19,23–27], lower-crosstalk quantum communication [25,28,29], and distribution of quantum information to multiple users in a quantum network [21].
High-dimensional optical information encoding requires the ability to manipulate the various photonic degrees of freedom through “mode conversion” [12,30–39]. Frequency and polarization mode conversion can be achieved quite flexibly at near-unit efficiency using electro-optic modulators [40] and waveplates. However, efficient spatial mode conversion is more challenging. In general, spatial mode conversion requires a spatially-dependent phase and amplitude modification of a photon’s electric field. While phase can be modified losslessly by a phase-imprinting device, amplitude modification occurs only through propagation or discarding amplitude via a physical barrier, limiting the efficiency with which spatial mode conversion can occur. For instance, devices such as spatial light modulators, digital micromirror devices, vortex plates, and liquid crystal q-plates [41–44] are excellent devices for generating modes with orbital angular momentum (OAM) by imprinting incident light with a spiral phase. While the resulting mode has the correct phase winding to be purely LG, its amplitude distribution does not. Rather, the resulting mode can be expressed as an expansion of the LG radial modes for a given OAM, illustrating that a phase imprint alone is insufficient for highly efficient spatial mode conversion to a single LG mode [25,45]. Thus, mode-converting devices have been designed to modify light in environments such as waveguides, cavities, and photonic crystals that limit the occupiable spatial modes to enhance conversion to a single target mode. Among these devices are a HG$\leftrightarrow$LG mode converter using an astigmatic microcavity [46], an arbitrary HG mode-order converter utilizing the impedance mismatches between coupled Fabry-Pérot resonators [47], design-by-specification converters based on computational methods [48], and an assortment of silicon photonic converters that harness refractive index variation to smoothly modify a propagating spatial mode [49–61].
In this paper, we explore a new method in which spatial and frequency mode conversion occur simultaneously in a single system with high efficiency. In effect, we create a rapidly sculptable, rotating optic inside of an optical cavity that converts photons between cavity modes. In practice, we modulate [62], in both space and time, the optical susceptibility of a stationary atomic sample at the waist of a twisted optical cavity using a strong auxiliary beam, inducing a coupling between cavity modes. This auxiliary beam Stark shifts the energy levels of the atomic sample to create a spatiotemporally-varying optical susceptibility across the atomic sample akin to a rotating optic. Photons that are incident on the atomic sample accrue a position-dependent phase that couples the incident mode to other modes of the cavity, which enables repeated light-atom interactions and preferentially enhances the emission of light into supported, resonant spatial modes. We measure the efficiency of this conversion process for increasing atom number and modulation beam intensity. We find a parameter regime in which the internal conversion efficiency saturates near unity.
2. Experimental overview
We demonstrate conversion between LG modes of orbital angular momenta $l=3 \rightarrow l=0$ (i.e., LG$_{30}\rightarrow$LG$_{00}$). Our optical cavity is a four-mirror twisted cavity, meaning one mirror lies outside of the plane formed by the remaining three [63]. As the eigenmodes of this cavity are non-degenerate LG modes, cavity photons require a change in both their spatial and frequency degrees of freedom to undergo mode conversion. This change can be accomplished by passage through the an atomic sample whose optical susceptibility varies in time and space. Provided the variation occurs at the frequency difference between $l=0$ and $l=3$ and imprints a phase on $l=0 (3)$ such that the resulting spatial mode has non-zero overlap with $l=3 (0)$, a coupling will be engineered between the $l=0$ and $l=3$ cavity modes.
Figure 1(a) illustrates our mode conversion scheme. A $^{87}$Rb atomic sample resides at the waist of our twisted optical cavity, which hosts modes at $780$ nm (near the $5\textrm {S}_{1/2}\leftrightarrow 5\textrm {P}_{3/2}$ transition of $^{87}$Rb) and at $1529$ nm (near the $5\textrm {P}_{3/2}\leftrightarrow 4\textrm {D}_{5/2}$ transition of $^{87}$Rb). The $5\textrm {P}_{3/2}\leftrightarrow 4\textrm {D}_{5/2}$ transition of the atomic sample is energetically modulated by a time-varying, spatially-dependent optical Stark shift generated by an auxiliary “modulation” beam at $1529$ nm whose intensity distribution is illustrated in Fig. 1(b). This pattern is achieved by overlapping $1529$ nm $l=0$ and $l=3$ modes, forming an intensity profile with three “holes” that rotates at the frequency difference ($\approx 65$ MHz) between the modes. Illuminating the atomic sample with this profile changes the resonance condition of individual atoms with intracavity $780$ nm photons, creating a spatiotemporally-varying optical susceptibility across the sample that adopts the modulation beam profile (Fig. 1(c)). As the modulation beam profile is comprised of both the $l=0$ and $l=3$ modes, a coupling is engineered between the $l=0$ and $l=3$ modes at $780$ nm. Note that the atomic sample is stationary whereas the modulation profile rotates, enabling far faster temporal modulation of incident probe light than that which can be achieved by a real, rotating optic. We utilize the atomic level scheme illustrated in Fig. 1(d), which may be understood as a near-resonant four-wave mixing process.
We begin our experimental sequence by transporting a sample of laser-cooled $^{87}$Rb into the waist of our twisted optical cavity from a magneto-optical trap. The modulation beam and weak probe beam co-propagate through the cavity and illuminate the atomic sample for a probe time of $10$ ms. Probe photons are injected into the $l=3$ cavity eigenmode. These photons pass through the modulated atomic sample and the resulting photons are collected on the cavity output during the probe time. See Supplement 1 for additional details about the experimental setup.
3. Results
We search for $l=3\rightarrow l=0$ mode conversion for several different combinations of modulation beam intensity and atom number by collecting only $l=0$ light from the cavity using a single mode fiber as a filter (Fig. 2(a)). For each of these combinations, we scan the frequency of the probe beam about a point in the dispersive regime, where the $l=0$ and $l=3$ cavity resonances are detuned from the atomic $5P_{3/2}$ state as illustrated in Fig. 1(d). This scan generates the $l=0$ spectra in Fig. 2(b). We observe an increase in the $l=3\rightarrow l=0$ internal conversion efficiency, $\mathcal {E}_{3\rightarrow 0}$, for increasing $\Omega$ and $N\eta$, in effect the modulation beam intensity and resonant optical density, respectively. Note that the internal conversion efficiency does not account for losses induced by the cavity mirror surfaces and impedance matching, which is instead captured by the external conversion efficiency. Here, we quote the internal efficiency to better capture the inherent potential of this conversion method rather than experimental imperfections which may be corrected. See Supplement 1 for additional details about $\mathcal {E}_{3\rightarrow 0}$ and the external conversion efficiency. $N\eta$ is the collective cooperativity [64] where $N$ is the atom number and $\eta$ is the single atom cooperativity. This quantity can be generally interpreted as the number of times a photon is lensed by the atomic sample before it leaks out of the cavity. See Supplement 1 for additional details about $N\eta$ and $\Omega$, respectively. As $\Omega$ increases, we observe the $l=0$ cavity transmissions collapse leftward toward the location of the bare $l=3$ transmission at $\delta _p=0$. This behavior is a result of the $5P_{3/2}$ state energetically shifting away from the $l=0$ and $l=3$ cavity resonances at higher modulation beam intensities, reducing the dispersive shift of the resonances.
To verify photons are indeed converted into the $l=0$ mode of the cavity, we perform a spatial and frequency analysis of the cavity output. In principle, the modulated atomic sample induces a coupling between the $l=3$ mode and many other spatial modes. However, with the exception of the $l=6$ mode, these modes are Purcell suppressed because they are non-resonant. Despite a potential $3\leftrightarrow 6$ coupling, we do not observe $l=6$ light on the cavity output, likely because the $l=6$ mode is further detuned from the $5\textrm {S}_{1/2}\leftrightarrow 5\textrm {P}_{3/2}$ atomic resonance compared to $l=3$ and $l=0$ modes (see Supplement 1). Thus, in general, the non-degenerate mode structure of the cavity improves the isolation of a target mode by frequency discrimination.
The increase of $\mathcal {E}_{3\rightarrow 0}$ with $\Omega$ and $N\eta$ can be interpreted intuitively in the context of sculpting an effective optic from the atomic sample. For $\Omega =0$, there is no modulation of the atomic sample. Probe photons pass through an effective optic that imparts an almost completely flat phase, providing essentially no coupling between the $l=3$ and $l=0$ modes. For $N\eta =0$, no atoms are present; there is no effective optic. Thus, $\mathcal {E}_{3\rightarrow 0}$ regardless of $\Omega$. For $\Omega >0$ and $N\eta >0$, we begin to observe $l=3$ to $l=0$ conversion as the effective optic acquires density and a spatially-dependent optical susceptibility.
Figure 3 is a more in-depth investigation of $\mathcal {E}_{3\rightarrow 0}$ as a function of $\Omega$ and $N\eta$. $\mathcal {E}_{3\rightarrow 0}$ increases for increasing $\Omega$ and $N\eta$ and saturates near unity. In a double-ended cavity like ours, where light can leak out one of two cavity mirrors, $\mathcal {E}_{3\rightarrow 0}$=1 corresponds to a maximum external efficiency of 25% for lossless mirrors. For a general double-ended cavity comprised of two equally-transmissive cavity mirrors, incident light can be fully transmitted as the cavity is impedance matched. If a mode-converting element is placed within the cavity, this impedance matching condition is broken, limiting the amount of light, both converted and unconverted, that exits the cavity through the output mirror. In a single-ended cavity, the maximum external efficiency increases to 100% (see Supplement 1).
4. Conclusion
We have demonstrated a highly efficient method to simultaneously manipulate photonic degrees of freedom by spatiotemporally modulating the optical susceptibility of an atomic sample. In our twisted optical cavity, we observe $l=3\rightarrow l=0$ conversion at an internal efficiency near unity. Extending this method to a low loss, single-ended cavity will provide conversion near 100% efficiency for both internal and external efficiencies. As the main import of our twisted cavity is to limit the occupiable cavity modes and enable repeated interactions of a cavity photon with the atomic sample, other cavity geometries such as non-twisted two- or three-mirror cavities containing an atomic sample would suffice as a platform for carrying out this mode conversion method. This method is additionally extendable to other atomic species, different propagation eigenmodes, polarization and $l=0\rightarrow l=3$ conversion (see Supplement 1), and the coherent conversion of single photons [65]. While the external conversion efficiency of this method can, in principle, be quite high, higher-order modes may be more difficult to convert to and from due to their large physical size compared to the atomic sample and minimal overlap with smaller spatial modes. Additionally, the conversion bandwidth is comparable to the linewidth of the cavity, which may be quite narrow relative to current commercial devices and not ideal for all applications. Nevertheless, mode conversion via optical susceptibility modulation might find applications in quantum state preparation, quantum information, and development as a tabletop device. One might use this method to grow topological few-body states of light by controllably adding orbital angular momentum to intracavity photons [66], convert within mode pairs for mode-division multiplexed transmission [25], or create a miniaturized device based on intracavity electro-optic elements whose refractive indices are modulated in space and time.
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-18-1-0317, FA9550-19-1-0399).
Acknowledgment
We acknowledge conversations with M. Fleischhauer. C.B. acknowledges support from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowships Program (GRFP).
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data availability
Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
Supplemental document
See Supplement 1 for supporting content.
References
1. N. Baharudin, R. Alsaqour, H. Shaker, O. Alsaqour, and T. Alahdal, “Review on multiplexing techniques in bandwidth utilization,” Middle-East J. Sci. Res. 18(10), 1510–1516 (2013). [CrossRef]
2. P. K. Sangdeh and H. Zeng, “Overview of multiplexing techniques in wireless networks,” in Multiplexing (IntechOpen, 2019).
3. P. J. Winzer, “Optical Networking Beyond WDM,” IEEE Photonics J. 4(2), 647–651 (2012). [CrossRef]
4. H. Ishio, J. Minowa, and K. Nosu, “Review and status of wavelength-division-multiplexing technology and its application,” J. Lightwave Technol. 2(4), 448–463 (1984). [CrossRef]
5. D. J. Richardson, J. M. Fini, and L. E. Nelson, “Space-division multiplexing in optical fibres,” Nat. Photonics 7(5), 354–362 (2013). [CrossRef]
6. P. J. Winzer, “Spatial multiplexing: The next frontier in network capacity scaling,” IET Conf. Publ. 2013, 372–374 (2013). [CrossRef]
7. G. B. Xavier and G. Lima, “Quantum information processing with space-division multiplexing optical fibres,” Commun. Phys. 3(1), 9–11 (2020). [CrossRef]
8. B. J. Puttnam, G. Rademacher, and R. S. Luís, “Space-division multiplexing for optical fiber communications,” Optica 8(9), 1186–1203 (2021). [CrossRef]
9. Y. Su, Y. He, H. Chen, X. Li, and G. Li, “Perspective on mode-division multiplexing,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 118(20), 200502 (2021). [CrossRef]
10. P. J. Winzer, “Making spatial multiplexing a reality,” Nat. Photonics 8(5), 345–348 (2014). [CrossRef]
11. C. Xia, G. Li, N. Bai, and N. Zhao, “Space-division multiplexing: the next frontier in optical communication,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 6(4), 413–487 (2014). [CrossRef]
12. A. E. Willner, J. Zhao, M. P. J. Lavery, M. Mirhosseini, R. W. Boyd, S. M. H. Rafsanjani, S. Oliver, and Y. Zhou, “Using all transverse degrees of freedom in quantum communications based on a generic mode sorter,” Opt. Express 27(7), 10383–10394 (2019). [CrossRef]
13. K. A. Patel, J. F. Dynes, M. Lucamarini, I. Choi, A. W. Sharpe, Z. L. Yuan, R. V. Penty, and A. J. Shields, “Quantum key distribution for 10 Gb/s dense wavelength division multiplexing networks,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104(5), 051123 (2014). [CrossRef]
14. N. Bozinovic, Y. Yue, Y. Ren, M. Tur, P. Kristensen, H. Huang, A. E. Willner, and S. Ramachandran, “Terabit-scale orbital angular momentum mode division multiplexing in fibers,” Science 340(6140), 1545–1548 (2013). [CrossRef]
15. J. Sakaguchi, Y. Awaji, N. Wada, A. Kanno, T. Kawanishi, T. Hayashi, T. Taru, T. Kobayashi, and M. Watanabe, “Space division multiplexed transmission of 109-Tb/s data signals using homogeneous seven-core fiber,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 658–665 (2012). [CrossRef]
16. J. Wang, J. Y. Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y. Yan, H. Huang, Y. Ren, Y. Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, “Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing,” Nat. Photonics 6(7), 488–496 (2012). [CrossRef]
17. T. Ralph, K. Resch, and A. Gilchrist, “Efficient toffoli gates using qudits,” Phys. Rev. A 75(2), 022313 (2007). [CrossRef]
18. D.-X. Chen, R.-F. Liu, P. Zhang, Y.-L. Wang, H.-R. Li, H. Gao, and F.-L. Li, “Realization of quantum permutation algorithm in high dimensional hilbert space,” Chin. Phys. B 26(6), 060305 (2017). [CrossRef]
19. G. Molina-Terriza, J. P. Torres, and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nat. Phys. 3(5), 305–310 (2007). [CrossRef]
20. S. K. Goyal and T. Konrad, “Teleporting photonic qudits using multimode quantum scissors,” Sci. Rep. 3(1), 3548 (2013). [CrossRef]
21. J. C. García-Escartín and P. Chamorro-Posada, “Quantum multiplexing with the orbital angular momentum of light,” Phys. Rev. A 78(6), 062320 (2008). [CrossRef]
22. D. Cozzolino, B. Da Lio, D. Bacco, and L. K. Oxenløwe, “High-dimensional quantum communication: benefits, progress, and future challenges,” Adv. Quantum Technol. 2(12), 1900038 (2019). [CrossRef]
23. M. Erhard, R. Fickler, M. Krenn, and A. Zeilinger, “Twisted photons: new quantum perspectives in high dimensions,” Light: Sci. Appl. 7(3), 17146 (2018). [CrossRef]
24. M. Mirhosseini, O. S. Maga na-Loaiza, M. N. O’Sullivan, B. Rodenburg, M. Malik, M. P. Lavery, M. J. Padgett, D. J. Gauthier, and R. W. Boyd, “High-dimensional quantum cryptography with twisted light,” New J. Phys. 17(3), 033033 (2015). [CrossRef]
25. A. E. Willner, H. Huang, Y. Yan, Y. Ren, N. Ahmed, G. Xie, C. Bao, L. Li, Y. Cao, Z. Zhao, J. Wang, M. P. J. Lavery, M. Tur, S. Ramachandran, A. F. Molisch, N. Ashrafi, and S. Ashrafi, “Optical communications using orbital angular momentum beams,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 7(1), 66–106 (2015). [CrossRef]
26. A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, “Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons,” Nature 412(6844), 313–316 (2001). [CrossRef]
27. M. Krenn, M. Huber, R. Fickler, R. Lapkiewicz, S. Ramelow, and A. Zeilinger, “Generation and confirmation of a (100 × 100)-dimensional entangled quantum system,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111(17), 6243–6247 (2014). [CrossRef]
28. Y. Ren, Z. Wang, G. Xie, L. Li, Y. Cao, C. Liu, P. Liao, Y. Yan, N. Ahmed, Z. Zhao, A. Willner, N. Ashrafi, S. Ashrafi, R. D. Linquist, R. Bock, M. Tur, A. F. Molisch, and A. E. Willner, “Free-space optical communications using orbital-angular-momentum multiplexing combined with mimo-based spatial multiplexing,” Opt. Lett. 40(18), 4210–4213 (2015). [CrossRef]
29. U. Tariq, H. Shahoei, G. Yang, and D. L. MacFarlane, “Orbital angular momentum orthogonality based crosstalk reduction,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 98, 17–24 (2021). [CrossRef]
30. D. Shen, T. He, X. Yu, and D. Zhao, “Mode Conversion and Transfer of Orbital Angular Momentum between Hermite-Gaussian and Laguerre-Gaussian Beams,” IEEE Photonics J. 14(1), 1–6 (2022). [CrossRef]
31. G. Liang and Q. Wang, “Controllable conversion between Hermite Gaussian and Laguerre Gaussian modes due to cross phase,” Opt. Express 27(8), 10684 (2019). [CrossRef]
32. N. K. Fontaine, R. Ryf, H. Chen, D. T. Neilson, K. Kim, and J. Carpenter, “Laguerre-gaussian mode sorter,” Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1865 (2019). [CrossRef]
33. Y. Zhou, J. Zhao, Z. Shi, S. M. H. Rafsanjani, M. Mirhosseini, Z. Zhu, A. E. Willner, and R. W. Boyd, “Hermite–gaussian mode sorter,” Opt. Lett. 43(21), 5263–5266 (2018). [CrossRef]
34. M. W. Beijersbergen, L. Allen, H. Van der Veen, and J. Woerdman, “Astigmatic laser mode converters and transfer of orbital angular momentum,” Opt. Commun. 96(1-3), 123–132 (1993). [CrossRef]
35. A. M. Yao and M. J. Padgett, “Orbital angular momentum: origins, behavior and applications,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 3(2), 161–204 (2011). [CrossRef]
36. O. Danaci, C. Rios, and R. T. Glasser, “All-optical mode conversion via spatially multimode four-wave mixing,” New J. Phys. 18(7), 073032 (2016). [CrossRef]
37. S. Nie, S. Yu, S. Cai, M. Lan, and W. Gu, “Multichannel mode conversion and multiplexing based on a single spatial light modulator for optical communication,” Proc. SPIE 55(7), 076108 (2016). [CrossRef]
38. W. G. Shen, Y. Chen, H. M. Wang, and X. M. Jin, “OAM mode conversion in a photonic chip,” Opt. Commun. 507, 127615 (2022). [CrossRef]
39. D. G. Pires, J. C. Rocha, A. J. Jesus-Silva, and E. J. Fonseca, “Optical mode conversion through nonlinear two-wave mixing,” Phys. Rev. A 100(4), 043819 (2019). [CrossRef]
40. R. C. Cumming, “The serrodyne frequency translator,” Proc. IRE 45(2), 175–186 (1957). [CrossRef]
41. B. Piccirillo, E. Karimi, E. Santamato, and L. Marrucci, “Light propagation in a birefringent plate with topological charge,” Opt. Lett. 34(8), 1225–1227 (2009). [CrossRef]
42. B. Piccirillo, E. Karimi, E. Santamato, L. Marrucci, and S. Slussarenko, “Efficient generation and control of different-order orbital angular momentum states for communication links,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28(1), 61–65 (2011). [CrossRef]
43. E. Karimi, B. Piccirillo, E. Nagali, L. Marrucci, and E. Santamato, “Efficient generation and sorting of orbital angular momentum eigenmodes of light by thermally tuned q-plates,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(23), 231124 (2009). [CrossRef]
44. S. Slussarenko, B. Piccirillo, V. Chigrinov, L. Marrucci, and E. Santamato, “Liquid crystal spatial-mode converters for the orbital angular momentum of light,” J. Opt. 15(2), 025406 (2013). [CrossRef]
45. D. Wei, Y. Cheng, R. Ni, Y. Zhang, X. Hu, S. Zhu, and M. Xiao, “Generating controllable laguerre-gaussian laser modes through intracavity spin-orbital angular momentum conversion of light,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 11(1), 014038 (2019). [CrossRef]
46. K. Nakagawa, K. Yamane, R. Morita, and Y. Toda, “Laguerre–Gaussian vortex mode generation from astigmatic semiconductor microcavity,” Appl. Phys. Express 13(4), 042001 (2020). [CrossRef]
47. M. Stone, A. Suleymanzade, L. Taneja, D. I. Schuster, and J. Simon, “Optical mode conversion in coupled fabry–perot resonators,” Opt. Lett. 46(1), 21–24 (2021). [CrossRef]
48. J. Lu and J. Vučković, “Nanophotonic computational design,” Opt. Express 21(11), 13351–13367 (2013). [CrossRef]
49. C. Li, D. Liu, and D. Dai, “Multimode silicon photonics,” Nanophotonics 8(2), 227–247 (2018). [CrossRef]
50. H. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. He, Q. Zhu, L. Sun, Y. Su, H. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. He, Q. Zhu, L. Sun, and Y. Su, “Compact Silicon Waveguide Mode Converter Employing Dielectric Metasurface Structure,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(4), 1801191 (2018). [CrossRef]
51. A. Karabchevsky and Y. Greenberg, “Spatial eigenmodes conversion with metasurfaces engraved in silicon ridge waveguides,” Appl. Opt. 58(22), F21–F25 (2019). [CrossRef]
52. M. Wajih, U. Siddiqi, C. Tu, J. E.-Y. Lee, C. Zhu, Y. Xu, Y. Dong, B. Zhang, and Y. Ni, “A compact silicon-based TM0-to-TM2 mode-order converter using shallowly-etched slots,” J. Opt. 22(1), 015802 (2020). [CrossRef]
53. H. Wang, J. Xiang, K. Wang, X. Guo, Y. Zhao, Y. Su, and Y. Zhang, “Ultra-compact silicon mode-order converters based on dielectric slots,” Opt. Lett. 45(13), 3797–3800 (2020). [CrossRef]
54. B. Zhang, C. Zhu, X. Hu, Y. Ni, Y. Xu, and Y. Dong, “On-chip silicon shallowly etched TM0-to-TM1 mode-order converter with high conversion efficiency and low modal crosstalk,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37(5), 1290–1297 (2020). [CrossRef]
55. C. Zhu, Y. Xu, Z. Kang, X. Hu, Y. Dong, B. Zhang, Y. Ni, and P. Xu, “Silicon-Based TM0-to-TM3 Mode-Order Converter Using On-Chip Shallowly Etched Slot Metasurface,” Photonics 8(4), 95 (2021). [CrossRef]
56. D. A. B. Miller, S. Fan, and V. Liu, “Ultra-compact photonic crystal waveguide spatial mode converter and its connection to the optical diode effect,” Opt. Express 20(27), 28388–28397 (2012). [CrossRef]
57. Y. Huang, G. Xu, and S. T. Ho, “An ultracompact optical mode order converter,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 18(21), 2281–2283 (2006). [CrossRef]
58. D. Dai, Y. Tang, J. E. Bowers, Y. Shani, C. Henry, R. Kistler, K. Orlowsky, and D. Ackerman, “Mode conversion in tapered submicron silicon ridge optical waveguides,” Opt. Express 20(12), 13425–13439 (2012). [CrossRef]
59. D. Dai, J. Wang, and S. He, “Silicon multimode photonic integrated devices for on-chip mode-division-multiplexed optical interconnects (invited review),” Prog. Electromagn. Res. 143, 773–819 (2013). [CrossRef]
60. L. H. Frandsen, Y. Elesin, L. F. Frellsen, M. Mitrovic, Y. Ding, O. Sigmund, K. Yvind, Y. Ding, J. Xu, F. Da Ros, B. Huang, H. Ou, and C. Peucheret, “Topology optimized mode conversion in a photonic crystal waveguide fabricated in silicon-on-insulator material,” Opt. Express 22(7), 8525–8532 (2014). [CrossRef]
61. G. Chen and J. U. Kang, “Waveguide mode converter based on two-dimensional photonic crystals,” Opt. Lett. 30(13), 1656–1658 (2005). [CrossRef]
62. L. W. Clark, N. Jia, N. Schine, C. Baum, A. Georgakopoulos, and J. Simon, “Interacting Floquet polaritons,” Nature 571(7766), 532–536 (2019). [CrossRef]
63. N. Schine, A. Ryou, A. Gromov, A. Sommer, and J. Simon, “Synthetic Landau levels for photons,” Nature 534(7609), 671–675 (2016). [CrossRef]
64. H. Tanji-Suzuki, I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, M. Cetina, A. T. Grier, J. Simon, and V. Vuletić, “Interaction between atomic ensembles and optical resonators: Classical description,” in Advances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, vol. 60 (Elsevier, 2011), pp. 201–237.
65. H. J. Kimble, “The quantum internet,” Nature 453(7198), 1023–1030 (2008). [CrossRef]
66. P. A. Ivanov, F. Letscher, J. Simon, and M. Fleischhauer, “Adiabatic flux insertion and growing of Laughlin states of cavity Rydberg polaritons,” Phys. Rev. A 98(1), 013847 (2018). [CrossRef]