Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Optical frequency combs in aqueous and air environments at visible to near-IR wavelengths

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

The ability to detect and identify molecules at high sensitivity without the use of labels or capture agents is important for medical diagnostics, threat identification, environmental monitoring, and basic science. Microtoroid optical resonators, when combined with noise reduction techniques, have been shown capable of label-free single molecule detection; however, they still require a capture agent and prior knowledge of the target molecule. Optical frequency combs can potentially provide high precision spectroscopic information on molecules within the evanescent field of the microresonator; however, this has not yet been demonstrated in air or aqueous biological sensing. For aqueous solutions in particular, impediments include coupling and thermal instabilities, reduced Q factor, and changes to the mode spectrum. Here we overcome a key challenge toward single-molecule spectroscopy using optical microresonators: the generation of a frequency comb at visible to near-IR wavelengths when immersed in either air or aqueous solution. The required dispersion is achieved via intermodal coupling, which we show is attainable using larger microtoroids, but with the same shape and material that has previously been shown ideal for ultra-high sensitivity biosensing. We believe that the continuous evolution of this platform will allow us in the future to simultaneously detect and identify single molecules in both gas and liquid at any wavelength without the use of labels.

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Optical microtoroid resonators are attractive biochemical sensors due to their ultra-high quality (Q) factors and small mode volumes [18]. In addition, microtoroids have a larger capture area compared to nanoscale sensors such as nanorods and nanowires thus making detection events more likely [9]. We have previously demonstrated that single molecules can be detected without the use of labels using a microtoroid optical resonator in combination with noise reduction techniques [1012]. To achieve specific detection, the surface of the resonator needs to be functionalized for the target molecule of interest. A non-functionalized resonator can also detect binding events; however, in this case not only does the target molecule need to be known in advance, but the solution must either be pure or the molecules of interest must have very different binding characteristics.

In many cases, however, target analytes are unknown and need to be identified. Since optical frequency combs can be used to identify molecular species [1315], generating a frequency comb with a microtoroid may enable detection and molecular identification on the same device without having to functionalize the surface of the sensor by measuring amplitude attenuation of comb lines (or absorption spectrum of the target). Surface functionalization adds both complexity and cost to the experiment and reduces the Q-factor which reduces sensitivity. A toroidal geometry is desired for biochemical sensing over other high-Q geometries such as microdisks that have been used to generate combs as it has a large ($\sim$ 100 nm) evanescent field sensing region that is needed for biochemical sensing.

Despite the potential advantages of using frequency combs for biochemical sensing, frequency comb generation in aqueous solution has not previously been demonstrated. A key challenge is that resonator dispersion is altered significantly when an aqueous solution is injected over the resonator, making it difficult to realize the required anomalous mode dispersion. To the best of our knowledge, conventional dispersion engineering techniques have not addressed this issue [16,17]. Here, we generated an optical frequency comb in water and air at visible to near IR wavelengths on a microtoroid optical resonator overcoming a limit of conventional dispersion engineering. This can be achieved via an avoided mode crossing (AMX), which is an interplay between different transverse optical modes in a resonator.

2. Dispersion engineering and avoided mode crossings

Typically, dispersion engineering is needed to generate microresonator based frequency combs [18]. Total cavity dispersion is a function of material, waveguide geometry, and optical mode distribution. Material dispersion can be engineered by either replacing a material or doping it. For biosensing experiments which are performed in aqueous solutions, it is often desired to use visible or near visible wavelengths as the absorption of light in water at those wavelengths is minimized. At these wavelengths, the group velocity dispersion of a typical material is strongly normal, so the overall cavity dispersion is also normal. However, waveguide dispersion can be engineered to compensate the material dispersion [19], resulting in overall anomalous dispersion even at visible wavelengths. Since different optical modes have their own mode profile and effective refractive index ($n_{\text {eff}}$) the overall dispersion is also a function of optical mode [2022].

Numerous forms of microresonator dispersion engineering have been demonstrated in the near-visible regime. In a microbubble resonator, a very thin waveguide structure was fabricated that confined the light and overcompensated the normal dispersion of the silica for the fundamental TM mode at $780~\text {nm}$ [21]. A silica microdisk with a large wedge angle was shown to achieve an anomalous dispersion at $780~\text {nm}$ by controlling the angle of the wedge (a form of waveguide dispersion) [23]. Anomalous dispersion was also generated in a silicon-nitride integrated ring resonator by using a high radial order mode (modal dispersion) [22,24]. These demonstrations are all based on a fixed cladding material; however, varying the surrounding material can alter the overall dispersion.

While tight confinement of light can overcompensate material dispersion in the visible and NIR wavelength regime, a high refractive index contrast between the waveguide material (i.e., silica) and the cladding (i.e., air) is needed. If the surrounding air is replaced by a liquid (n > 1.33), the light loses strong confinement, and the normal dispersion of the material cannot be compensated (see Supplement 1, section 1 for more details). Several ways to overcome this issue include adding a high index material coating on the resonator surface [2527], engineering the modal dispersion of a cavity [22], or replacing the waveguiding material by a higher index material [16,17,28].

If, however, it is desired to preserve the material and structure of a resonator, a different approach is needed. A distinct property of a resonator where different optical modes have their own free spectral range (FSR) is that they can interact and couple with one another resulting in deviations from the original, unperturbed FSR [20,2931]. This localized dispersion perturbation can lead to a local anomalous dispersion which can meet a phase-matching condition for the four wave mixing (FWM) process. At visible or near visible wavelengths, optical frequency combs have been generated via AMXs in a crystalline WGM resonator [30], a microring resonator [3234], dual microring resonators [35,36], and a wedge disk resonator [3739]. Chip-based ring resonators can be designed to introduce AMXs at desired locations using a thermal heater [40] or by adding an another resonator nearby [35,36,41]. Although toroidal resonators have been one of main platforms in biosensing experiments, there has been no demonstration of optical frequency comb generation under a sensing environment where the toroid is immersed in liquid.

3. Device fabrication & dispersion measurement

Currently, microtoroids with a major diameter of $\sim 100~\mu \text {m}$ are used for biosensing applications [10] . This diameter, however, yields a large FSR ($\sim 700~\text {GHz}$ in the NIR) resulting in only tens of mode numbers in the scanning wavelength range ($\sim 8~\text {THz}$) of our system. To efficiently introduce and characterize AMXs, it is highly desirable to have many modes. This can be done by fabricating a larger diameter toroid [42]. To fabricate larger toroids [Fig. 1(b)], we chose a thicker silica layer in order to avoid stress induced defects ("buckling") caused by different thermal expansion coefficients between the silica layer and the substrate as the cavity diameter increases [43]. Buckling can significantly degrade the fabrication quality but can be controlled by proper choice of the device layer thickness and the amount of undercut and is therefore not a limiting factor for the optical performance of the device if for example, we wish to change the FSR of the resonator [37].

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) Experimental Setup. An external cavity diode laser (ECDL) is amplified by a tapered amplifier (TA) and pumped into a cavity. A polarization controller (PC) is used to excite either the TE or TM mode family. Laser wavelength scanning is calibrated using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI). The calibration and transmission data are received by photodetectors (PDs) and monitored using a data acquisition (DAQ) system or an oscilloscope (OSC). The spectrum was simultaneously measured using an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA). (b) Schematic of the sample chamber. Inset: microscope image of the microcavity. (c) Q-factor measurement in air for a microtoroid. The frequency axis is calibrated by a MZI of $FSR_{MZI}\approx 17.5~\text {MHz}$. The loaded Q-factor of the fundamental mode was $\sim 1\times 10^8$. (d) Representative example of the calibrated spectrum scan. (e) Linewidth measurement for the same toroid in water. Typically, the quality factor drops by around a factor of 2. For simplicity, the linewidth of the left peak is used for the Q-factor estimation.

Download Full Size | PDF

To fabricate a large ($\sim$ 500-$\mu \text {m}$) diameter microtoroid, a $\sim$ 700-$\mu \text {m}$ diameter disk resonator is first fabricated using conventional lithography and etching techniques [4446]. A thermally grown $6~\mu \text {m}$ thick silicon dioxide layer on top of the silicon substrate (WaferPro) was used. The amount of undercut for the microdisk needs to be large enough to isolate an optical mode from the silicon pillar and small enough to prevent buckling. By defocusing our laser beam and increasing the power of the CO$_2$ laser, we can reflow $\sim$ 500-$\mu \text {m}$-diameter or larger toroids [Fig. 1(b)]. An ultra-high Q factor (Q > $10^8$) is routinely measured. Figure 1(c) shows a linewidth measurement of a resonance of a large-diameter toroid in air. Laser scanning is calibrated with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI). A linewidth measurement of the cavity in water is shown in Fig. 1(e). Typically the linewidth broadens by around a factor of two when the cavity is immersed in a liquid due to less mode confinement or particle binding due to impurities in the liquid.

The cavity is characterized by first positioning a large-diameter toroid resonator in a sample chamber built by gluing a glass coverslip on top of a custom made sample holder [Fig. 1(b)]. Water which is de-gassed in a vacuum chamber is then injected into the chamber with a syringe pump. When the chamber is filled with liquid, a tapered fiber is coupled to the resonator to inject light into the cavity. A tunable laser (New Focus TLB-6712-P) scans wavelengths from 765 nm to 781 nm while its scan wavelength is precisely calibrated by a MZI with a FSR of $17.5~\text {MHz}$. The calibration data and the transmission signal are both received by photodetectors (New Focus 1801) and monitored by a high sampling rate data acquisition card (NI PCI-6115) [18,47]. An example spectrum is shown in Fig. 1(d). More than 10 modes are excited as shown in the spectrum of approximately two FSRs. In order to introduce AMXs, we excited not only the low order modes but also other higher order modes in the cavity by placing the tapered fiber in contact with the top of the toroid [48] and adjusting phase-matching conditions [49]. In order to enhance the stability of the coupling condition, a wall is fabricated next to the toroid and used to support the fiber [50]. The laser is tuned to a resonance by decreasing optical frequency to achieve thermal locking [51]. The spectrum is recorded using an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA, Thorlabs 202C).

4. Frequency comb generation in water and air

Frequency comb generation in water using a microtoroid resonator via the AMX approach is shown in Fig. 2. The dispersion of the cavity is characterized and plotted in Figs. 2(a), (c), and (e). The measured resonance frequencies are marked as dots over the whole scan spectrum. The resonance frequencies are plotted as deviations from an equidistant frequency grid with a FSR ($D_1$). A mode family can be interpreted as a line connecting dots. If a mode family has a FSR of $D_1$ and no dispersion, it may be shown as a horizontal line. Different slopes of each line can be understood as different FSRs for each mode family. The color of the dots represent measured Q-factors and helps trace a mode family.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Dispersion measurement and frequency comb generation in water. (a) Deviation of the resonance frequencies, $\omega _\mu =\omega _0+D_1\mu +\frac {1}{2}D_2\mu ^2+\ldots$, from an equidistant frequency grid ($\omega _0+D_1\mu$) and $\mu$ is the relative mode number, where $D_1=2\pi \times FSR$ with respect to a pump mode ($\mu _0$). Each dot on the plot related to an eigenfrequency ($\omega _\mu$) of the cavity. A particular mode family is represented as a line that consists of colored dots corresponding to measured Q-factors on a logarithmic scale. The dot color may be used to identify a particular mode family because a mode family has similar Q. The integrated dispersion, $D_{int}=\omega _\mu -\omega _0-D_1\mu =\frac {1}{2}D_2\mu ^2+\ldots$, describes normal dispersion with $D_2/2\pi =-1.1877~\text {MHz}$ (red solid line; higher-order terms are ignored). Black solid lines are drawn to visualize higher order mode families and AMXs. The AMX can be easily observed because it significantly alters eigenfrequencies, degrades the Q-factor (shown by the dot color) and transmission depth of the resonances (not shown here). The pump wavelength and AMX location is highlighted in orange and green, respectively. (b) Generated frequency comb in water when the mode indicated in (a) is pumped. The primary comb is located at the wavelength where the AMX happens (highlighted in green). (c) The integrated dispersion for a mode family with a $D_2/2\pi \sim -0.5158~\text {MHz}$. The pump wavelength and AMX location is highlighted in orange and green, respectively. (d) Generated frequency comb in water by pumping the mode shown in (c). The primary comb is located at the wavelength where the AMX happens (highlighted in green). (e) The integrated dispersion for a mode family where AMXs are considerably strong and dispersion cannot be measured precisely. The pump wavelength and AMX location is highlighted in orange and green, respectively. (f) The generated frequency comb when the mode indicated in (e) is pumped.

Download Full Size | PDF

To better understand the eigenfrequency locations, we analyze the dispersion properties of our comb. The dispersion properties of a mode family with mode frequencies, $\omega _\mu$, can be Taylor expanded as, $\omega _\mu =\omega _0+D_1\mu +\frac {1}{2}D_2\mu ^2+\ldots$, where $\mu$ is the relative mode number with respect to the pump ($\mu _0$), $\omega _\mu$ are the resonance frequencies, $\omega _0$ is the pump frequency, $D_1/2\pi$ is the FSR, and $D_2/2\pi$ is the second order dispersion (with higher order dispersion terms ignored) [52]. It is often useful to introduce an integrated dispersion, $D_{int}=\omega _\mu -\omega _0-D_1\mu =\frac {1}{2}D_2\mu ^2+\ldots$, which shows the deviation of the resonance frequencies from the equidistant frequency grid (FSR = $D_1/2\pi$) with respect to a pump mode ($\mu =0$). The integrated dispersion is plotted to extract $D_2$ by fitting a curve ($D_{i>2}$ are ignored). Note that $\mu _0\neq \mu _{pump}$ for plotting purposes. The fitted dispersion coefficients are $D_1/2\pi =170.7088~\text {GHz}$, $D_2/2\pi =-1.1877~\text {MHz}$ for a family [Fig. 2(a)] and $D_1/2\pi =170.7073~\text {GHz}$, $D_2/2\pi =-0.5158~\text {MHz}$ for another mode family [Fig. 2(c)]. Dispersion for a mode family shown in Fig. 2(e) may not be estimated where a dispersion curve is distorted due to several strong AMXs present for the mode family. Because of the limited wavelength scan range and the presence of strong and weak modal couplings, an accurate measurement of these fits can not be faithfully guaranteed. The discrepancy between the fitted $D_2/2\pi \approx -1.19~\text {MHz}$ and the simulated $D_2/2\pi \approx -1.63~\text {MHz}$ can be attributed to fabrication uncertainty and the aforementioned limits.

Frequency comb generation in water was observed by pumping a resonance at $\sim 780~\text {nm}$ at a pump power of $\sim 20~\text {mW}$ [Fig. 2(a)]. The primary comb (the first generated sideband) is located where the AMX happens [Fig. 2(b)]. A small deviation between the AMX location ($\lambda >772~\text {nm}$) and the primary comb location ($\lambda >773~\text {nm}$) can be explained by a frequency shift resulting from a temperature increase of the cavity as a function of input power and detuning. As the resonance is swept from high to low frequencies, an increase in intracavity power makes the cavity hot and the frequency shift. This alters AMX locations because different transverse modes might have different temperature shift coefficients [36,53]. Another mode family with a strong AMX at $\sim 767~\text {nm}$ and a weak perturbation at $\sim 776~\text {nm}$ is pumped [Fig. 2(c)]. As shown in Fig. 2(d), a stronger modal coupling may satisfy the phase-matching condition first over others when multiple AMXs exist even though the AMX is positioned further away from the others. Thus, the primary comb line is located at $\sim 767~\text {nm}$ rather than $\sim 776~\text {nm}$. Finally, the other mode family [Fig. 2(e)] is pumped where strong AMXs are present and undisturbed dispersion may not be characterized faithfully. The generated frequency comb is shown in [Fig. 2(f)] and a significant asymmetry can be observed.

Some applications such as environmental monitoring require sensing and identification of particles in air [54]. Thus, a broadband frequency comb in air via an AMX is demonstrated and shown in Fig. 3. Two different mode families are investigated. A high order mode family is pumped and the integrated dispersion is shown in Fig. 3(a) with $D_1/2\pi$ of $214.8031~\text {GHz}$ and $D_2/2\pi$ of $-1.4099~\text {MHz}$ approximately. There is no interaction between the pump mode family and a higher-order mode family at $\lambda \sim 773~\text {nm}$ where no apparent frequency shift and line broadening are observed. A weak perturbation is present at $\lambda \sim 779~\text {nm}$, but primary comb lines appear at $\lambda \sim 788~\text {nm}$ (48 FSRs away) which is beyond the scan range of our tunable laser [Fig. 3(b)]. It is interesting to note that when several AMXs exist at the pump wavelength, they compete to determine which is dominant in forming the comb. A strong AMX outside the scan range may explain the position of the primary comb line. As the laser is tuned from high to low frequency, a broader frequency comb is generated covering more than $300~\text {nm}$ [Fig. 3(c)]. A strong AMX might also explain the broad spectrum of the frequency combs [55]. Figure 3(d) shows intergrated dispersion for a low order mode family. Fitting a curve yields $D_1/2\pi \approx 214.7849~\text {GHz}$ and $D_2/2\pi \approx -1.5074~\text {MHz}$. There is a weak AMX at $\lambda \sim 772~\text {nm}$ and a strong AMX $\lambda \sim 778~\text {nm}$. However, it is unexpected the primary comb is not positioned at the strong AMX but rather $\sim 30~\text {nm}$ (63 FSRs) away from the pump wavelength. We believe this observation can be attributed to detuning dependent AMXs and the competition between AMXs. Resonators of similar size have been used to sense H$^{13}$CN, CH$_2$Cl$_2$, and acetone [15,56,57]. Proteins, due to their larger molecular weight, have a broader absorption spectrum. In practice, finer spectroscopic resolution can be obtained by using a dual comb technique to record sharp absorption features in a particular gas phase sample.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Measured dispersion and generated frequency comb in air. (a) Integrated dispersion of a mode family where only a weak modal coupling is present in the scan range. The pump wavelength is highlighted in orange. The dot color represents the quality factor in a logarithmic scale and helps to trace a mode family as shown in (a) and (d). (b) Primary comb lines appear beyond the wavelength scan range from the blue-detuned side. When multiple AMXs exist for the mode family, the primary comb does not appear at the closest AMX location but rather might be dependent on coupling power between the modes. (c) A broadband frequency comb generated as the laser scans from short to long wavelengths. The spectrum spans over $300~\text {nm}$ and covers the visible wavelength range. (d) Integrated dispersion for another mode family. Several AMXs are observed over the wavelength scan range. The pump wavelength is highlighted in yellow. (e) Primary comb lines occur at $\sim 30~\text {nm}$ away from the pump wavelength. (f) A broadband frequency comb spanning more than $200~\text {nm}$.

Download Full Size | PDF

In order to better understand primary comb generation in the presence of multiple AMXs for a particular pump wavelength, a numerical simulation was performed using the Lugiato-Lefever equation [2,58,59] (see Supplement 1, section 2 for more details). The integrated dispersion is determined using a simplified two-parameter model [20] from experimental data [Fig. 2(e)] and is shown in Fig. 4(a). A strong AMX is present at $\mu =20$ and a weak AMX exists at $\mu =5$. A resonance is pumped at $780~\text {nm}$ with $50~\text {mW}$. Figure 4(b) shows the primary comb lines which agree with the strong AMX location ($\mu =20$). It was found that adjusting modal coupling strengths results in different comb generation dynamics (see Supplement 1, section 4 for more details). For example, from the simulation, by increasing the coupling strength for the weak perturbation, the primary comb lines may appear at both weak and strong AMX locations.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Numerical simulation on primary comb. (a) Simulation of the integrated dispersion. Simulation parameters are described in the main text. A simple two-parameter model is used [20]. The pump mode, and weak and strong mode location are highlighted in orange, yellow, and green, respectively. (b) Primary comb line generation. The primary comb is generated where the stronger AMX happens (highlighted in green).

Download Full Size | PDF

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, we generated optical frequency combs in water with a microtoroid resonator using an AMX approach. Although this demonstration is limited by naturally occurring AMXs and a few comb lines observed, it suggests that one optical resonator may function as both a spectrometer and a biosensor without building additional structures. By introducing a Pound-Drever-Hall (PDH) locking mechanism, improving the mechanical stability, and controlling temperature of the device via a thermoelectric cooler (TEC) in liquid, we believe a broadband and low phase noise frequency comb (or dark soliton) can be generated with a proper choice of pumping power and detuning [40]. A further investigation on AMXs was performed in air when there were multiple AMXs for a pump’s mode family. It was found that if multiple AMXs are present, they compete with each other and the primary comb line location may be determined by the intermodal coupling strength. A broadband optical frequency comb spanning $300~\text {nm}$ was generated with the aid of a strong AMX far away from the pump wavelength in the visible to NIR regime in air. We note that the binding of molecules on the toroid could affect frequency comb generation dynamics, but this effect might be minimized in case the frequency shift caused by a particle binding (about 5 MHz for a particle size of 100 nm) is much smaller than the FSR of the resonator (200 GHz) in this study [10]. This study suggests a path for a new multi-functional photonic device that may detect and identify a single molecule of interest in both gas and liquid.

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM137988); National Science Foundation (1842045).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dalziel J. Wilson for helpful reading of the manuscript.

Disclosures

J.S.: Femtorays Technologies (I)

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Supplemental document

See Supplement 1 for supporting content.

References

1. T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala, “Kerr-Nonlinearity Optical Parametric Oscillation in an Ultrahigh- Q Toroid Microcavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(8), 083904 (2004). [CrossRef]  

2. T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kondratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Temporal solitons in optical microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 8(2), 145–152 (2014). [CrossRef]  

3. T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, “Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators,” Science 361(6402), eaan8083 (2018). [CrossRef]  

4. A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Photonic-chip-based frequency combs,” Nat. Photonics 13(3), 158–169 (2019). [CrossRef]  

5. E. Ozgur, K. E. Roberts, E. O. Ozgur, A. N. Gin, J. R. Bankhead, Z. Wang, and J. Su, “Ultrasensitive Detection of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Using Frequency Locked Microtoroid Optical Resonators,” Anal. Chem. 91(18), 11872–11878 (2019). [CrossRef]  

6. C. Li, L. Chen, E. McLeod, and J. Su, “Dark mode plasmonic optical microcavity biochemical sensor,” Photonics Res. 7(8), 939 (2019). [CrossRef]  

7. L. Chen, C. Li, Y.-M. Liu, J. Su, and E. McLeod, “Simulating robust far-field coupling to traveling waves in large three-dimensional nanostructured high-Q microresonators,” Photonics Res. 7(9), 967 (2019). [CrossRef]  

8. J. Su, “Label-Free Single Exosome Detection Using Frequency-Locked Microtoroid Optical Resonators,” ACS Photonics 2(9), 1241–1245 (2015). [CrossRef]  

9. S. Suebka, P.-D. Nguyen, A. Gin, and J. Su, “How Fast It Can Stick: Visualizing Flow Delivery to Microtoroid Biosensors,” ACS Sens. 6(7), 2700–2708 (2021). [CrossRef]  

10. J. Su, A. F. Goldberg, and B. M. Stoltz, “Label-free detection of single nanoparticles and biological molecules using microtoroid optical resonators,” Light: Sci. Appl. 5(1), e16001 (2016). [CrossRef]  

11. J. Su, “Label-free Single Molecule Detection Using Microtoroid Optical Resonators,” J. Vis. Exp. 106, e53180 (2015). [CrossRef]  

12. S. Hao and J. Su, “Noise-Induced Limits of Detection in Frequency Locked Optical Microcavities,” J. Lightwave Technol. 38(22), 6393–6401 (2020). [CrossRef]  

13. I. Coddington, N. Newbury, and W. Swann, “Dual-comb spectroscopy,” Optica 3(4), 414 (2016). [CrossRef]  

14. M. Yu, Y. Okawachi, A. G. Griffith, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Microresonator-based high-resolution gas spectroscopy,” Opt. Lett. 42(21), 4442–4445 (2017). Publisher: Optical Society of America. [CrossRef]  

15. A. Dutt, C. Joshi, X. Ji, J. Cardenas, Y. Okawachi, K. Luke, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “On-chip dual-comb source for spectroscopy,” Sci. Adv. 4(3), e1701858 (2018). [CrossRef]  

16. N. Riesen, W. Q. Zhang, and T. M. Monro, “Dispersion in silica microbubble resonators,” Opt. Lett. 41(6), 1257 (2016). [CrossRef]  

17. N. Riesen, W. Q. Zhang, and T. M. Monro, “Dispersion analysis of whispering gallery mode microbubble resonators,” Opt. Express 24(8), 8832 (2016). [CrossRef]  

18. S. Fujii and T. Tanabe, “Dispersion engineering and measurement of whispering gallery mode microresonator for Kerr frequency comb generation,” Nanophotonics 9(5), 1087–1104 (2020). [CrossRef]  

19. M. H. P. Pfeiffer, C. Herkommer, J. Liu, T. Morais, M. Zervas, M. Geiselmann, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Photonic Damascene Process for Low-Loss, High-Confinement Silicon Nitride Waveguides,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24(4), 1–11 (2018). [CrossRef]  

20. T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. Jost, I. Mirgorodskiy, G. Lihachev, M. Gorodetsky, and T. Kippenberg, “Mode Spectrum and Temporal Soliton Formation in Optical Microresonators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(12), 123901 (2014). [CrossRef]  

21. Y. Yang, X. Jiang, S. Kasumie, G. Zhao, L. Xu, J. M. Ward, L. Yang, and S. N. Chormaic, “Four-wave mixing parametric oscillation and frequency comb generation at visible wavelengths in a silica microbubble resonator,” Opt. Lett. 41(22), 5266 (2016). [CrossRef]  

22. Y. Zhao, X. Ji, B. Y. Kim, P. S. Donvalkar, J. K. Jang, C. Joshi, M. Yu, C. Joshi, R. R. Domeneguetti, F. A. S. Barbosa, P. Nussenzveig, Y. Okawachi, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Visible nonlinear photonics via high-order-mode dispersion engineering,” Optica 7(2), 135 (2020). [CrossRef]  

23. J. Ma, L. Xiao, J. Gu, H. Li, X. Cheng, G. He, X. Jiang, and M. Xiao, “Visible Kerr comb generation in a high-Q silica microdisk resonator with a large wedge angle,” Photonics Res. 7(5), 573 (2019). [CrossRef]  

24. R. R. Domeneguetti, Y. Zhao, X. Ji, M. Martinelli, M. Lipson, A. L. Gaeta, and P. Nussenzveig, “Parametric sideband generation in CMOS-compatible oscillators from visible to telecom wavelengths,” Optica 8(3), 316 (2021). [CrossRef]  

25. X. Jin, J. Wang, M. Wang, Y. Dong, F. Li, and K. Wang, “Dispersion engineering of a microsphere via multi-layer coating,” Appl. Opt. 56(28), 8023 (2017). [CrossRef]  

26. M. Wang, X. Jin, F. Li, B. Cai, and K. Wang, “Whispering-gallery modes in a triple-layer-coated microsphere resonator for refractive index sensors,” Opt. Commun. 427, 70–78 (2018). [CrossRef]  

27. J. Riemensberger, K. Hartinger, T. Herr, V. Brasch, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Dispersion engineering of thick high-Q silicon nitride ring-resonators via atomic layer deposition,” Opt. Express 20(25), 27661 (2012). [CrossRef]  

28. N. Riesen, S. Afshar V., A. François, and T. M. Monro, “Material candidates for optical frequency comb generation in microspheres,” Opt. Express 23(11), 14784 (2015). [CrossRef]  

29. T. Carmon, H. G. L. Schwefel, L. Yang, M. Oxborrow, A. D. Stone, and K. J. Vahala, “Static Envelope Patterns in Composite Resonances Generated by Level Crossing in Optical Toroidal Microcavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(10), 103905 (2008). [CrossRef]  

30. A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, W. Liang, V. S. Ilchenko, D. Seidel, and L. Maleki, “Kerr frequency comb generation in overmoded resonators,” Opt. Express 20(24), 27290 (2012). [CrossRef]  

31. X. Xue, Y. Xuan, C. Wang, P.-H. Wang, Y. Liu, B. Niu, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, “Thermal tuning of Kerr frequency combs in silicon nitride microring resonators,” Opt. Express 24(1), 687 (2016). [CrossRef]  

32. M. Karpov, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, J. Liu, A. Lukashchuk, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Photonic chip-based soliton frequency combs covering the biological imaging window,” Nat. Commun. 9(1), 1146 (2018). [CrossRef]  

33. E. Nazemosadat, A. Fülöp, Ó. B. Helgason, P.-H. Wang, Y. Xuan, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, E. Silvestre, A. M. Weiner, and V. Torres-Company, “Switching dynamics of dark-pulse Kerr frequency comb states in optical microresonators,” Phys. Rev. A 103(1), 013513 (2021). [CrossRef]  

34. Y. Liu, Y. Xuan, X. Xue, P.-H. Wang, S. Chen, A. J. Metcalf, J. Wang, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, “Investigation of mode coupling in normal-dispersion silicon nitride microresonators for Kerr frequency comb generation,” Optica 1(3), 137 (2014). [CrossRef]  

35. X. Xue, Y. Xuan, P.-H. Wang, Y. Liu, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, “Normal-dispersion microcombs enabled by controllable mode interactions: Normal-dispersion microcombs,” Laser Photonics Rev. 9(4), L23–L28 (2015). [CrossRef]  

36. S. A. Miller, Y. Okawachi, S. Ramelow, K. Luke, A. Dutt, A. Farsi, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “Tunable frequency combs based on dual microring resonators,” Opt. Express 23(16), 21527 (2015). [CrossRef]  

37. H. Lee, T. Chen, J. Li, K. Y. Yang, S. Jeon, O. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, “Chemically etched ultrahigh-Q wedge-resonator on a silicon chip,” Nat. Photonics 6(6), 369–373 (2012). [CrossRef]  

38. S. H. Lee, D. Y. Oh, Q.-F. Yang, B. Shen, H. Wang, K. Y. Yang, Y.-H. Lai, X. Yi, X. Li, and K. Vahala, “Towards visible soliton microcomb generation,” Nat. Commun. 8(1), 1295 (2017). [CrossRef]  

39. H. Wang, Y.-K. Lu, L. Wu, D. Y. Oh, B. Shen, S. H. Lee, and K. Vahala, “Dirac solitons in optical microresonators,” Light: Sci. Appl. 9(1), 205 (2020). [CrossRef]  

40. X. Xue, Y. Xuan, Y. Liu, P.-H. Wang, S. Chen, J. Wang, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, “Mode-locked dark pulse Kerr combs in normal-dispersion microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 9(9), 594–600 (2015). [CrossRef]  

41. S. Kim, K. Han, C. Wang, J. A. Jaramillo-Villegas, X. Xue, C. Bao, Y. Xuan, D. E. Leaird, A. M. Weiner, and M. Qi, “Dispersion engineering and frequency comb generation in thin silicon nitride concentric microresonators,” Nat. Commun. 8(1), 372 (2017). [CrossRef]  

42. P. Del’Haye, O. Arcizet, M. L. Gorodetsky, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Frequency comb assisted diode laser spectroscopy for measurement of microcavity dispersion,” Nat. Photonics 3(9), 529–533 (2009). [CrossRef]  

43. T. Chen, H. Lee, and K. J. Vahala, “Thermal stress in silica-on-silicon disk resonators,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(3), 031113 (2013). [CrossRef]  

44. D. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip,” Nature 421(6926), 925–928 (2003). [CrossRef]  

45. J. Ma, X. Jiang, and M. Xiao, “Kerr frequency combs in large-size, ultra-high-Q toroid microcavities with low repetition rates [Invited],” Photonics Res. 5(6), B54 (2017). [CrossRef]  

46. S. Zhang, J. M. Silver, T. Bi, and P. Del’Haye, “Spectral extension and synchronization of microcombs in a single microresonator,” Nat. Commun. 11(1), 6384 (2020). [CrossRef]  

47. X. Yi, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, M.-G. Suh, and K. Vahala, “Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a high-Q silica microresonator,” Optica 2(12), 1078 (2015). [CrossRef]  

48. G. Lin, K. Saleh, R. Henriet, S. Diallo, R. Martinenghi, A. Coillet, and Y. K. Chembo, “Wide-range tunability, thermal locking, and mode-crossing effects in Kerr optical frequency combs,” Opt. Eng. 53(12), 122602 (2014). [CrossRef]  

49. S. M. Spillane, T. J. Kippenberg, O. J. Painter, and K. J. Vahala, “Ideality in a Fiber-Taper-Coupled Microresonator System for Application to Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(4), 043902 (2003). [CrossRef]  

50. F. Monifi, S. K. Ozdemir, J. Friedlein, and L. Yang, “Encapsulation of a Fiber Taper Coupled Microtoroid Resonator in a Polymer Matrix,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 25(15), 1458–1461 (2013). [CrossRef]  

51. T. Carmon, L. Yang, and K. J. Vahala, “Dynamical thermal behavior and thermal self-stability of microcavities,” Opt. Express 12(20), 4742 (2004). [CrossRef]  

52. T. Herr, K. Hartinger, J. Riemensberger, C. Y. Wang, E. Gavartin, R. Holzwarth, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Universal formation dynamics and noise of Kerr-frequency combs in microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 6(7), 480–487 (2012). [CrossRef]  

53. B. Y. Kim, Y. Okawachi, J. K. Jang, M. Yu, X. Ji, Y. Zhao, C. Joshi, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Turn-key, high-efficiency Kerr comb source,” Opt. Lett. 44(18), 4475 (2019). [CrossRef]  

54. J. Su, “Portable and sensitive air pollution monitoring,” Light: Sci. Appl. 7(1), 3 (2018). [CrossRef]  

55. J. K. Jang, Y. Okawachi, M. Yu, K. Luke, X. Ji, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Dynamics of mode-coupling-induced microresonator frequency combs in normal dispersion,” Opt. Express 24(25), 28794 (2016). [CrossRef]  

56. M.-G. Suh, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, X. Yi, and K. J. Vahala, “Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy,” Science 354(6312), 600–603 (2016). [CrossRef]  

57. M. Yu, Y. Okawachi, A. G. Griffith, N. Picqué, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Silicon-chip-based mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy,” Nat. Commun. 9(1), 1869 (2018). [CrossRef]  

58. Y. K. Chembo and C. R. Menyuk, “Spatiotemporal Lugiato-Lefever formalism for Kerr-comb generation in whispering-gallery-mode resonators,” Phys. Rev. A 87(5), 053852 (2013). [CrossRef]  

59. J. Hu, J. He, J. Liu, A. S. Raja, M. Karpov, A. Lukashchuk, T. J. Kippenberg, and C.-S. Brès, “Reconfigurable radiofrequency filters based on versatile soliton microcombs,” Nat. Commun. 11(1), 4377 (2020). [CrossRef]  

Supplementary Material (1)

NameDescription
Supplement 1       Supplementary Material

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Experimental Setup. An external cavity diode laser (ECDL) is amplified by a tapered amplifier (TA) and pumped into a cavity. A polarization controller (PC) is used to excite either the TE or TM mode family. Laser wavelength scanning is calibrated using a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI). The calibration and transmission data are received by photodetectors (PDs) and monitored using a data acquisition (DAQ) system or an oscilloscope (OSC). The spectrum was simultaneously measured using an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA). (b) Schematic of the sample chamber. Inset: microscope image of the microcavity. (c) Q-factor measurement in air for a microtoroid. The frequency axis is calibrated by a MZI of $FSR_{MZI}\approx 17.5~\text {MHz}$. The loaded Q-factor of the fundamental mode was $\sim 1\times 10^8$. (d) Representative example of the calibrated spectrum scan. (e) Linewidth measurement for the same toroid in water. Typically, the quality factor drops by around a factor of 2. For simplicity, the linewidth of the left peak is used for the Q-factor estimation.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Dispersion measurement and frequency comb generation in water. (a) Deviation of the resonance frequencies, $\omega _\mu =\omega _0+D_1\mu +\frac {1}{2}D_2\mu ^2+\ldots$, from an equidistant frequency grid ($\omega _0+D_1\mu$) and $\mu$ is the relative mode number, where $D_1=2\pi \times FSR$ with respect to a pump mode ($\mu _0$). Each dot on the plot related to an eigenfrequency ($\omega _\mu$) of the cavity. A particular mode family is represented as a line that consists of colored dots corresponding to measured Q-factors on a logarithmic scale. The dot color may be used to identify a particular mode family because a mode family has similar Q. The integrated dispersion, $D_{int}=\omega _\mu -\omega _0-D_1\mu =\frac {1}{2}D_2\mu ^2+\ldots$, describes normal dispersion with $D_2/2\pi =-1.1877~\text {MHz}$ (red solid line; higher-order terms are ignored). Black solid lines are drawn to visualize higher order mode families and AMXs. The AMX can be easily observed because it significantly alters eigenfrequencies, degrades the Q-factor (shown by the dot color) and transmission depth of the resonances (not shown here). The pump wavelength and AMX location is highlighted in orange and green, respectively. (b) Generated frequency comb in water when the mode indicated in (a) is pumped. The primary comb is located at the wavelength where the AMX happens (highlighted in green). (c) The integrated dispersion for a mode family with a $D_2/2\pi \sim -0.5158~\text {MHz}$. The pump wavelength and AMX location is highlighted in orange and green, respectively. (d) Generated frequency comb in water by pumping the mode shown in (c). The primary comb is located at the wavelength where the AMX happens (highlighted in green). (e) The integrated dispersion for a mode family where AMXs are considerably strong and dispersion cannot be measured precisely. The pump wavelength and AMX location is highlighted in orange and green, respectively. (f) The generated frequency comb when the mode indicated in (e) is pumped.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Measured dispersion and generated frequency comb in air. (a) Integrated dispersion of a mode family where only a weak modal coupling is present in the scan range. The pump wavelength is highlighted in orange. The dot color represents the quality factor in a logarithmic scale and helps to trace a mode family as shown in (a) and (d). (b) Primary comb lines appear beyond the wavelength scan range from the blue-detuned side. When multiple AMXs exist for the mode family, the primary comb does not appear at the closest AMX location but rather might be dependent on coupling power between the modes. (c) A broadband frequency comb generated as the laser scans from short to long wavelengths. The spectrum spans over $300~\text {nm}$ and covers the visible wavelength range. (d) Integrated dispersion for another mode family. Several AMXs are observed over the wavelength scan range. The pump wavelength is highlighted in yellow. (e) Primary comb lines occur at $\sim 30~\text {nm}$ away from the pump wavelength. (f) A broadband frequency comb spanning more than $200~\text {nm}$.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Numerical simulation on primary comb. (a) Simulation of the integrated dispersion. Simulation parameters are described in the main text. A simple two-parameter model is used [20]. The pump mode, and weak and strong mode location are highlighted in orange, yellow, and green, respectively. (b) Primary comb line generation. The primary comb is generated where the stronger AMX happens (highlighted in green).
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.