Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

On-off near-infrared absorbance based on thermal-responsive plasmonic coupling in vanadium dioxide arrays for thermochromic windows

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Vanadium dioxide (VO2) emerges as an attractive plasmonic material due to its unique reversible thermal-responsive phase transition and the promising application in energy-saving smart windows. Here, by optimizing the geometry of VO2 nano-cylinder arrays, we demonstrate a significant performance enhancement for energy-efficient thermochromic windows. Such a performance enhancement relies on the on-off behavior of plasmonic resonance in the extremely high packing density of VO2 nano-cylinder arrays. Different from the typical plasmonic material, silver, VO2 nano-cylinders are characterized to have strong absorbance in near-infrared spectrum with significantly weaker plasmonic coupling to their neighbors, making them suitable to be arranged with a high packing density. The VO2 nano-cylinder arrays exhibit a 160% luminous transmittance increment, comparing to a flat film with the same solar modulation of ∼10%. The work provides a better understanding of the plasmonic behavior on phase-change VO2 and an efficient method to enhance smart window performance.

© 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Plasmonic materials have been attracting a long-lasting research interest due to their great potential in diverse applications [13]. Active control of the plasmon resonance is a burgeoning subfield and relatively challenging [1,4,5]. Vanadium dioxide (VO2) has emerged as a unique active plasmonic material due to its reversibly temperature-dependent crystal phase transition between the low-temperature monoclinic (M) state and the high-temperature rutile (R) state [613]. To the best of our knowledge, VO2 is the only material that has been revealed with such crystal phase transition among the huge library of plasmonic materials. Our previous work has proven that the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) on VO2 nanoparticles (NPs) is quenched on its M state and arises on its R state [1416]. Besides, the LSPR position is strongly related to the NP size, [14] the surrounding dielectrics, [14,15] and the distance between two NPs [15].

The unique LSPR on VO2 also broadens the applications of plasmonic materials to the thermochromic energy-efficient smart windows [10,1721]. It is demonstrated that the LSPR VO2 can enhance the performance of thermochromic windows through shifting the thermal-induced transmittance contrast to shorter wavelength, [14] which possesses dense solar energy [19]. Also, the free-standing VO2 NPs with LSPR can be incorporated into soft or elastomer matrixes for the integration with other cutting-edge technologies, such as with the kirigami or the bio-inspired reconfigurable mechanical metamaterials [15,22].

With the progress achieved, the investigation of plasmonic VO2 is still in an early stage. Here, we investigate the plasmonic coupling effect of VO2, compare it with one of the most-studied plasmonic material Ag, and further explore its application in thermochromic windows via a 3D finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. Different from Ag, the plasmonic coupling in VO2 is characterized by strong absorbance in the NIR region and displays relatively lower sensitivity to the distance among crystals. We further optimize the cylinder arrays for thermochromic windows, which exhibits a 160% increment of luminous transmittance (Tlum) with the same solar modulation (ΔTsol) of ∼10%, comparing to unstructured flat VO2 films.

2. Method

A three-dimensional finite difference time domain (3D FDTD) method was performed using Lumerical FDTD Solutions to simulate the optical property in the plasmonic VO2 nanocylinder arrays. A total-field scattered-field (TFSF) source was applied in the simulation with a simulation region of 500 nm × 500 nm × 500 nm. The perfectly matched layers were defined as boundary conditions. A fine mesh size of 0.5 nm × 0.5 nm × 0.5 nm was used. For the far-field spectra, the scattering and absorption spectra of a single VO2 NP (M/R) with a diameter of 100 nm in PDMS medium was simulated. For the near-field responses, the electric field distribution of the single NP (M/R) at the resonance wavelength was simulated. The optical dielectric constant of VO2 is taken from previous reports [23].

3. Result and discussion

Hexagonal VO2 nano-cylinder arrays on quartz substrates are applied in the 3D FDTD method, as shown in Fig. 1(a). The model is characterized by three parameters, the diameter (d) and height (h) of each cylinder as well as the periodicity (p) of the arrays, described as the distance of two adjacent nano-cylinders. These parameters are deliberately adjusted in the simulation. To burst the on-off plasmonic resonance behavior of the VO2 nano-cylinder arrays, it is natural to use the VO2 nano-cylinder arrays with a high packing density (high filling ratio, d/h). However, for plasmonic resonators with noble metals, the high packing density may introduce strong plasmonic coupling between nano-cylinders and shift the resonance peak position significantly [24]. In this case, we first checked the plasmonic coupling behavior between VO2 nano-cylinders to gain knowledge of whether they are suitable to be densely arranged.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the hexagonal VO2 cylinder arrays on quartz substrates. The structure is characterized by cylinder diameter (d), periodicity (p), and height (h), illustrating in the top- (x-y) and side-views (x-z). (b) Calculated E-field (x-y) of two adjacent high-temperature VO2 (R) cylinders with a gap of 10 nm. (c) The E/Eo intensity analysis of VO2 (R) alone the cylinder-gap-cylinder direction, indicating as the dashed line in (b). Analysis of the same configuration based on Ag is presented as a reference.

Download Full Size | PDF

The plasmonic coupling effect is investigated using two adjacent cylinders. Under a gap of 10 nm, it is observed in Fig. 1(b) a strong electric field (E-field) in the gap of two VO2 (R) cylinders, while the intensity is relatively weak in VO2 (M) (Supplement 1, Fig. S1). The temperature-dependent on-off phenomenon is similar to the LSPR on VO2 reported in previous work [14,15]. The intensity in the gap is much higher than that on the surface of the cylinder, which indicates a strong plasmonic coupling effect in the 10-nm gap. To further understand the coupling effect, the Ag is applied to the same 10-nm gap model (Supplement 1, Fig. S2) and the E-field is compared with that of VO2 (R) in Fig. 1(c). The E-field intensity is analyzed alone in the cylinder-gap-cylinder direction, indicated as the blue line in Fig. 1(b). Comparing to Ag, the VO2 (R) shows a much weaker E-field intensity in both the gap and the cylinder surface. The result indicates the plasmonic coupling on VO2 (R) is significantly weak than the typical plasmonic material Ag, while is nearly negligible on VO2 (M).

To further understand the coupling effect, the scattering and absorbance spectra are calculated with a gradual increment of a gap from 10 to 40 nm. As shown in Fig. 2(a), it is observed that the plasmonic coupling of VO2 (R) mainly represents the absorbance but is dominated by scattering for Ag (Supplement 1, Fig. S3). Besides, the plasmonic coupling is observed as the red-shift in VO2 (R) absorbance and Ag scattering spectra as the gap decreases. However, the peak position of VO2 (R) is only observed with a shift of 0.06 eV (from ∼0.94 to ∼1.0 eV) that is smaller than the Ag case, ∼0.28 eV from ∼1.75 to ∼2.03 eV as shown in Fig. 2(b). The result suggests that the plasmon coupling in VO2 (R) exhibits relatively less sensitivity to the gap change, which also indicates the weak plasmonic coupling for VO2 (R). Such a weak plasmonic coupling makes the high packing density of VO2 nano-cylinder arrays possible.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) Absorbance (abs.) and scattering (scat.) spectra of two adjacent VO2 cylinders with gaps of 10, 20, 30, and 40 nm. (b) Analysis of gap-dependent plasmonic shifts of VO2 (R) and Ag. (c) Transmittance spectra of cylinder arrays of the high-temperature VO2 (R) (solid lines) and the low-temperature VO2 (M) (dash lines). The d varies from 100 to 180 nm and the p and h are fixed at 200 and 50 nm, respectively. (d) Analysis of the Tlum and ΔTsol based on the spectra in (c).

Download Full Size | PDF

The VO2 cylinder array with a high packing density is a promising candidate for energy-efficient smart window application. The basic principle fulfills the energy-saving function is to reduce the indoor solar irradiation only on hot days with elevated temperature [17,19]. Thus two parameters Tlum and ΔTsol are used to assess the performance and can be calculated by

$${T_{lum}} = \frac{{\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{380}^{780} {\varphi _{lum}}(\lambda )\; T(\lambda )d\lambda }}{{\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{380}^{780} {\varphi _{lum}}(\lambda )d\lambda }}$$
$${T_{sol}} = \frac{{\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{250}^{2500{\; }} {\varphi _{sol}}(\lambda ){\; }T(\lambda )d\lambda }}{{\mathop \smallint \nolimits_{250}^{2500} {\varphi _{sol}}(\lambda )d\lambda }}$$
$$\Delta {T_{sol}} = \; {T_{sol, 95^oC}} - {T_{sol,25^oC}}$$
where T (λ) denotes spectral transmittance, φlum (λ) is the standard luminous efficiency function of photopic vision in the wavelength range of 380–780 nm, and φsol (λ) is the solar irradiance spectrum in the range of 250-2500 nm.

We investigate the effect of the filling factor by changing d while fixing the p at 200 nm and h at 50 nm. Transmittance spectra of the cylinder arrays are presented with d changing from 100 to 180 nm, as shown in Fig. 2(c). The transmittance valley of VO2 (R) shifts gradually to a longer wavelength under an increasing d, which is aligned with the red-shift of LSPR observed on NPs with bigger sizes [14]. The Tlum and ΔTsol are analyzed based on these spectra, showing in Fig. 2(d). The analysis suggests under an increasing d, the Tlum decreases from ∼91% to ∼57%, while the ΔTsol increases under an increasing d from ∼5% to ∼13% on a 180-nm array.

Under the same filling factor, the change of p also affects the performance. The h is fixed at 50 nm, the ratio of d/p is fixed for a fixing fill factor, and the p is tuned from 40 to 200 nm. The transmittance spectra of cylinder arrays with d/p = 0.9 are calculated for both high-temperature VO2 (R) and low-temperature VO2 (R) in Supplement 1, Fig. S4, respectively. It is observed similar transmittance before ∼750 nm (UV-Visible region), while displays distinct contrast after ∼750 nm (NIR region), which is the typical modulation region of VO2 as reported previously [14,15]. Strong transmittance valley is observed on VO2 (R) in NIR region due to its plasmonic-induced strong absorbance. Transmittance spectra of the arrays are further calculated with d/p = 0.8/0.7/0.6 (Supplement 1, Fig. S4) and the analysis of Tlum and ΔTsol is plotted in Fig. 3(a) and (b), respectively. It shows under different ration of d/p, all arrays display a similar trend that is a decreased Tlum and an increased ΔTsol for arrays with larger p. Besides, the decreased ratio of d/p (filling factor) leads to enhanced Tlum and a decreased ΔTsol. Thus, the highest Tlum of ∼92% is observed on the array (d/p = 0.6 and p = 40 nm), accompanying with the lowest ΔTsol of ∼3.5%. It is known that there is a trade-off between the Tlum and ΔTsol for VO2-based thermochromic windows [19]. The trade-off behavior is mostly attributed to the quantity changes of VO2 crystals. Increasing VO2 quantity promotes the ΔTsol, while reduces the Tlum in most cases due to the strong absorbance of VO2 in the visible region. For example, it is observed that the sample with d/p ratio of 0.9 displays a lower Tlum (Fig. 3(a)) and a higher ΔTsol (Fig. 3(b)) than the sample with d/p ratio of 0.6.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a-b) Analysis of the (a) Tlum and (b) ΔTsol of the cylinder arrays with variable p from 40-200 nm and d/p from 0.6-0.9, based on the transmittance results in Supplement 1, Fig. S4. The d/p is fixed at 0.9 and h is 50 nm. (c-d) Analysis of the (c) Tlum and (d) ΔTsol of the cylinder arrays with variable h from 50-200 nm and d from 24-36 nm, based on the transmittance results in Supplement 1, Fig. S5. The p and d are fixed at 40 and 36 nm, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

The effect of h is further investigated, where the p and d are fixed at 40 and 36 nm, respectively. The height is tuned from 50 to 200 nm and the corresponding transmittance spectra are recorded in Supplement 1, Fig. S5a for high-temperature VO2 (M) and Supplement 1, Fig. S5b for low-temperature VO2 (R). Similar to the result of the filling factor effect, transmittance valley shows in the NIR region due to the plasmon-induced strong absorbance, and there is negligible change in the UV-visible region but huge contrast in the NIR spectrum. Transmittance spectra of the arrays are further calculated with d = 32/28/24 nm (Supplement 1, Fig. S5) and the analysis of Tlum and ΔTsol is plotted in Fig. 3(c) and (d), respectively. It is observed that the increasing h leads to decreasing Tlum and increasing ΔTsol in all arrays. The decreased p leads to a decreased filling factor, thus promoting the Tlum and reducing the ΔTsol. The array with the highest ΔTsol of ∼20% is observed with a low Tlum of ∼40%.

The VO2 preparation condition is relatively harsh due to the existence of various polymorphs and several oxidization states of vanadium. [25] To our knowledge, it is extremely challenging to experimentally produce the VO2 arrays with well-controlled morphology on such a small scale (24-36 nm) through conventional sol-gel or wet-chemistry methods [3,6,9]. Nanoscale lithography is a potential method to achieve such uniform nanostructures, while further improvement is necessary to reduce the defects, such as the domain boundaries, for large-scale production [14,20]. Other methods such as precise nanoscale assembly are also promising, [26] while have rarely been reported for VO2 nanocrystals.

The array structure is demonstrated to significantly promote the performance of smart window applications. The Tlum and ΔTsol of flat VO2 films are analyzed based on their transmittance spectra of film thickness from 50 to 250 nm (Supplement 1, Fig. S6). Increasing the thickness is observed with a decreasing Tlum. The results of flat films are plotted as reference together with the performance of Tlum and ΔTsol of cylinder array structures (Fig. 4). The results are obtained from Fig. 3 and indicated as the trend line of an increasing d/p from 0.6 to 0.9, as well as trend lines of the heigh effects on samples with a fixed d of 24, 28, 32, and 36 nm. It is observed the array structure exhibits simultaneously much higher Tlum and ΔTsol than those of the flat films. At the same ΔTsol of, for example, ∼10%, the array structure exhibits a Tlum of ∼79% that is 160% higher than the Tlum (∼30%) of the flat film.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Comparison of the cylinder arrays with the flat VO2 films in respective of the thermochromic performance of Tlum and ΔTsol. The flat VO2 films are calculated with thickness from 50-250 nm showing in Supplement 1, Fig. S6. The dash lines and shadow areas are guides for illustrations.

Download Full Size | PDF

The critical transition temperature (τc) of pristine VO2 is ∼65 °C, which is slightly higher than the demand in practical energy-saving windows (∼40-50 °C). Methods to decreasing the τc are variable through the introduction of dopants, [2730] size-effect, [31,32] lattice strain, [33,34] and so on [35,36]. These methods commonly accompany the electronic properties change, leading to the change of optical properties of VO2. Thus, the performance of Tlum and ΔTsol may vary when to lower the τc, and the study here may serve as general guidance for the performance of VO2 cylinder arrays.

Besides, the hysteresis affects the thermochromic and the energy-saving performances for VO2-based windows in a real application. This is because the VO2 has two stable states with different transmittances at an intermediate transition temperature when the hysteresis exists: one state on the heating process and the other one on the cooling process, which usually displays a relative higher transmittance than the heating-process state. These intermediate states affect the energy-saving performance of VO2-based smart windows in practical applications, while studies on the point are rare and extremely complex. The investigations have to consider the temperature variation of the local environment in practical, which are different from cases to cases and determined by numerous parameters, such as the climates, the building/windows orientations, the window constructions, and so on. In general, it is preferred to have a narrow hysteresis and a low τc for most cases. One of the promising methods is the introduction of tungsten dopants that is reported to achieve a narrower hysteresis and a lower τc simultaneously [29].

4. Conclusion

In summary, we investigate the plasmonic coupling effect of VO2 and optimize the performance of VO2 cylinder arrays for energy-efficient thermochromic windows via the 3D FDTD method. The plasmonic coupling effect displays an “on” state on VO2 (R) and an “off” state on VO2 (M). Compared with the Ag, the plasmonic coupling in VO2 is characterized as strong absorbance in the NIR region with relatively weak intensity insensitive to the gap change. We further demonstrate the cylinder array is a promising candidate for thermochromic windows, which exhibits a 160% enhancement of Tlum under the same ΔTsol of ∼10%, comparing to unstructured flat VO2 films. The work provides a better understanding of the plasmonic properties in the phase transition of VO2 and an efficient method for performance-enhanced thermochromic windows.

Funding

National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme; Minister of Education Singapore Tier 1 RG86/20 and RG103/19; Singapore International Joint Research Institute.

Acknowledgments

Y. Long thanks to the funding support by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme; Minister of Education Singapore Tier 1 RG86/20 and RG103/19; Singapore International Joint Research Institute.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Supplemental document

See Supplement 1 for supporting content.

References

1. N. Jiang, X. Zhuo, and J. Wang, “active plasmonics: principles, structures, and applications,” Chem. Rev. 118(6), 3054–3099 (2018). [CrossRef]  

2. A. Agrawal, S. H. Cho, O. Zandi, S. Ghosh, R. W. Johns, and D. J. Milliron, “localized surface plasmon resonance in semiconductor nanocrystals,” Chem. Rev. 118(6), 3121–3207 (2018). [CrossRef]  

3. X. Liu and M. T. Swihart, “Heavily-doped colloidal semiconductor and metal oxide nanocrystals: an emerging new class of plasmonic nanomaterials,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(11), 3908–3920 (2014). [CrossRef]  

4. Q. Hao, W. Li, H. Xu, J. Wang, Y. Yin, H. Wang, L. Ma, F. Ma, X. Jiang, O. G. Schmidt, and P. K. Chu, “VO2/TiN plasmonic thermochromic smart coatings for room-temperature applications,” Adv. Mater. 30(10), 1705421 (2018). [CrossRef]  

5. W. Lu, N. Jiang, and J. Wang, “Active electrochemical plasmonic switching on polyaniline-coated gold nanocrystals,” Adv. Mater. 29(8), 1604862 (2017). [CrossRef]  

6. Y. Zhou, A. Huang, Y. Li, S. Ji, Y. Gao, and P. Jin, “Surface plasmon resonance induced excellent solar control for VO2@SiO2 nanorods-based thermochromic foils,” Nanoscale 5(19), 9208–9213 (2013). [CrossRef]  

7. K. Nishikawa, Y. Kishida, K. Ito, S.-I. Tamura, and Y. Takeda, “Near-infrared localized surface plasmon resonance of self-growing W-doped VO2 nanoparticles at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 111(19), 193102 (2017). [CrossRef]  

8. J. Liang, J. Guo, Y. Zhao, T. Su, and Y. Zhang, “The effects of surface plasmon resonance coupling effect on the solar energy modulation under high transmittance of VO2 nanostructure,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 199(1), 1–7 (2019). [CrossRef]  

9. S. Dou, J. Zhao, W. Zhang, H. Zhao, F. Ren, L. Zhang, X. Chen, Y. Zhan, and Y. Li, “A universal approach to achieve high luminous transmittance and solar modulating ability simultaneously for vanadium dioxide smart coatings via double-sided localized surface plasmon resonances,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12(6), 7302–7309 (2020). [CrossRef]  

10. S. Long, X. Cao, R. Huang, F. Xu, N. Li, A. Huang, G. Sun, S. Bao, H. Luo, and P. Jin, “Self-template synthesis of nanoporous VO2-based films: localized surface plasmon resonance and enhanced optical performance for solar glazing application,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(25), 22692–22702 (2019). [CrossRef]  

11. H. Luo, B. Wang, E. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Sun, Q. Li, S. Fan, C. Cheng, and K. Liu, “Phase-transition modulated, high-performance dual-mode photodetectors based on WSe2/VO2 heterojunctions,” Appl. Phys. Rev. 6(4), 041407 (2019). [CrossRef]  

12. C. Cheng, D. Fu, K. Liu, H. Guo, S. Xu, S.-G. Ryu, O. Ho, J. Zhou, W. Fan, W. Bao, M. Salmeron, N. Wang, C. P. Grigoropoulos, and J. Wu, “Directly metering light absorption and heat transfer in single nanowires using metal–insulator transition in VO2,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 3(3), 336–341 (2015). [CrossRef]  

13. K. Liu, S. Lee, S. Yang, O. Delaire, and J. Wu, “Recent progresses on physics and applications of vanadium dioxide,” Mater. Today 21(8), 875–896 (2018). [CrossRef]  

14. Y. Ke, X. Wen, D. Zhao, R. Che, Q. Xiong, and Y. Long, “Controllable fabrication of two-dimensional patterned VO2 nanoparticle, nanodome, and nanonet arrays with tunable temperature-dependent localized surface plasmon resonance,” ACS Nano 11(7), 7542–7551 (2017). [CrossRef]  

15. Y. Ke, Y. Yin, Q. Zhang, Y. Tan, P. Hu, S. Wang, Y. Tang, Y. Zhou, X. Wen, S. Wu, T. J. White, J. Yin, J. Peng, Q. Xiong, D. Zhao, and Y. Long, “Adaptive thermochromic windows from active plasmonic elastomers,” Joule 3(3), 858–871 (2019). [CrossRef]  

16. N. Wang, M. Duchamp, C. Xue, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, G. Liu, and Y. Long, “Single-crystalline W-doped VO2 nanobeams with highly reversible electrical and plasmonic responses near room temperature,” Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3(15), 1600164 (2016). [CrossRef]  

17. Y. Ke, C. Zhou, Y. Zhou, S. Wang, S. H. Chan, and Y. Long, “Emerging thermal-responsive materials and integrated techniques targeting the energy-efficient smart window application,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(22), 1800113 (2018). [CrossRef]  

18. Y. Ke, J. Chen, G. Lin, S. Wang, Y. Zhou, J. Yin, P. S. Lee, and Y. Long, “Smart windows: electro-, thermo-, mechano-, photochromics, and beyond,” Adv. Energy Mater. 9(39), 1902066 (2019). [CrossRef]  

19. Y. Cui, Y. Ke, C. Liu, Z. Chen, N. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Zhou, S. Wang, Y. Gao, and Y. Long, “Thermochromic VO2 for energy-efficient smart windows,” Joule 2(9), 1707–1746 (2018). [CrossRef]  

20. Y. Ke, S. Ye, P. Hu, H. Jiang, S. Wang, B. Yang, J. Zhang, and Y. Long, “Unpacking the toolbox of two-dimensional nanostructures derived from nanosphere templates,” Mater. Horiz. 6(7), 1380–1408 (2019). [CrossRef]  

21. Y. Zhou, S. Wang, J. Peng, Y. Tan, C. Li, F. Y. C. Boey, and Y. Long, “Liquid thermo-responsive smart window derived from hydrogel,” Joule 4(11), 2458–2474 (2020). [CrossRef]  

22. Y. Ke, Q. Zhang, T. Wang, S. Wang, N. Li, G. Lin, X. Liu, Z. Dai, J. Yan, J. Yin, S. Magdassi, D. Zhao, and Y. Long, “Cephalopod-inspired versatile design based on plasmonic VO2 nanoparticle for energy-efficient mechano-thermochromic windows,” Nano Energy 73, 104785 (2020). [CrossRef]  

23. N. R. Mlyuka, G. A. Niklasson, and C. G. Granqvist, “Thermochromic VO2-based multilayer films with enhanced luminous transmittance and solar modulation,” Phys. Status Solidi A 206(9), 2155–2160 (2009). [CrossRef]  

24. N. J. Halas, S. Lal, W.-S. Chang, S. Link, and P. Nordlander, “Plasmons in strongly coupled metallic nanostructures,” Chem. Rev. 111(6), 3913–3961 (2011). [CrossRef]  

25. C. Wu, F. Feng, and Y. Xie, “Design of vanadium oxide structures with controllable electrical properties for energy applications,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 42(12), 5157–5183 (2013). [CrossRef]  

26. D. V. Talapin, E. V. Shevchenko, M. I. Bodnarchuk, X. Ye, J. Chem, and C. B. Murray, “Quasicrystalline order in self-assembled binary nanoparticle superlattices,” Nature 461(7266), 964–967 (2009). [CrossRef]  

27. Y. F. Gao, C. X. Cao, L. Dai, H. J. Luo, M. Kanehira, Y. Ding, and Z. L. Wang, “Phase and shape controlled VO2 nanostructures by antimony doping,” Energy Environ. Sci. 5(9), 8708–8715 (2012). [CrossRef]  

28. N. R. Mlyuka, G. A. Niklasson, and C. G. Granqvist, “Mg doping of thermochromic VO2 films enhances the optical transmittance and decreases the metal-insulator transition temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(17), 171909 (2009). [CrossRef]  

29. M. Liu, B. Su, Y. V. Kaneti, Z. Chen, Y. Tang, Y. Yuan, Y. Gao, L. Jiang, X. Jiang, and A. Yu, “Dual-phase transformation: spontaneous self-template surface-patterning strategy for ultra-transparent VO2 solar modulating coatings,” ACS Nano 11(1), 407–415 (2017). [CrossRef]  

30. N. Shen, S. Chen, Z. Chen, X. Liu, C. Cao, B. Dong, H. Luo, J. Liu, and Y. Gao, “The synthesis and performance of Zr-doped and W–Zr-codoped VO2 nanoparticles and derived flexible foils,” J. Mater. Chem. A 2(36), 15087–15093 (2014). [CrossRef]  

31. L. Dai, C. Cao, Y. Gao, and H. Luo, “Synthesis and phase transition behavior of undoped VO2 with a strong nano-size effect,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95(2), 712–715 (2011). [CrossRef]  

32. R. Lopez, T. E. Haynes, L. A. Boatner, L. C. Feldman, and R. F. Haglund, “Size effects in the structural phase transition of VO2 nanoparticles,” Phys. Rev. B 65(22), 224113 (2002). [CrossRef]  

33. J. Jian, X. Wang, S. Misra, X. Sun, Z. Qi, X. Gao, J. Sun, A. Donohue, D. G. Lin, V. Pol, J. Youngblood, H. Wang, L. Li, J. Huang, and H. Wang, “Broad range tuning of phase transition property in VO2 through metal-ceramic nanocomposite design,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 29(36), 1903690 (2019). [CrossRef]  

34. J. Q. Wu, Q. Gu, B. S. Guiton, N. P. de Leon, O. Y. Lian, and H. Park, “Strain-induced self organization of metal-insulator domains in single-crystalline VO2 nanobeams,” Nano Lett. 6(10), 2313–2317 (2006). [CrossRef]  

35. K. Appavoo, D. Y. Lei, Y. Sonnefraud, B. Wang, S. T. Pantelides, S. A. Maier, and R. F. Haglund, “Role of defects in the phase transition of VO2 nanoparticles probed by plasmon resonance spectroscopy,” Nano Lett. 12(2), 780–786 (2012). [CrossRef]  

36. Y. Chen, S. Zhang, F. Ke, C. Ko, S. Lee, K. Liu, B. Chen, J. W. Ager, R. Jeanloz, V. Eyert, and J. Wu, “Pressure–temperature phase diagram of vanadium dioxide,” Nano Lett. 17(4), 2512–2516 (2017). [CrossRef]  

Supplementary Material (1)

NameDescription
Supplement 1       Supplemental Document for Manuscript

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the hexagonal VO2 cylinder arrays on quartz substrates. The structure is characterized by cylinder diameter (d), periodicity (p), and height (h), illustrating in the top- (x-y) and side-views (x-z). (b) Calculated E-field (x-y) of two adjacent high-temperature VO2 (R) cylinders with a gap of 10 nm. (c) The E/Eo intensity analysis of VO2 (R) alone the cylinder-gap-cylinder direction, indicating as the dashed line in (b). Analysis of the same configuration based on Ag is presented as a reference.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Absorbance (abs.) and scattering (scat.) spectra of two adjacent VO2 cylinders with gaps of 10, 20, 30, and 40 nm. (b) Analysis of gap-dependent plasmonic shifts of VO2 (R) and Ag. (c) Transmittance spectra of cylinder arrays of the high-temperature VO2 (R) (solid lines) and the low-temperature VO2 (M) (dash lines). The d varies from 100 to 180 nm and the p and h are fixed at 200 and 50 nm, respectively. (d) Analysis of the Tlum and ΔTsol based on the spectra in (c).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a-b) Analysis of the (a) Tlum and (b) ΔTsol of the cylinder arrays with variable p from 40-200 nm and d/p from 0.6-0.9, based on the transmittance results in Supplement 1, Fig. S4. The d/p is fixed at 0.9 and h is 50 nm. (c-d) Analysis of the (c) Tlum and (d) ΔTsol of the cylinder arrays with variable h from 50-200 nm and d from 24-36 nm, based on the transmittance results in Supplement 1, Fig. S5. The p and d are fixed at 40 and 36 nm, respectively.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Comparison of the cylinder arrays with the flat VO2 films in respective of the thermochromic performance of Tlum and ΔTsol. The flat VO2 films are calculated with thickness from 50-250 nm showing in Supplement 1, Fig. S6. The dash lines and shadow areas are guides for illustrations.

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

T l u m = 380 780 φ l u m ( λ ) T ( λ ) d λ 380 780 φ l u m ( λ ) d λ
T s o l = 250 2500 φ s o l ( λ ) T ( λ ) d λ 250 2500 φ s o l ( λ ) d λ
Δ T s o l = T s o l , 95 o C T s o l , 25 o C
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.