Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Mid-infrared Raman lasers and Kerr-frequency combs from an all-silica narrow-linewidth microresonator/fiber laser system

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Mid-infrared (mid-IR) lasers have great applications in bio-molecular sensing due to strong vibrational fingerprints in this wavelength range. However, it is a huge challenge to realize mid-IR lasers in conventional silica materials. Here, we demonstrate the generation of mid-IR Raman lasers and Kerr-frequency combs from an all-silica microresonator/fiber laser system. A single wavelength narrow-linewidth laser at ∼2 µm is first realized by using an ultrahigh Q-factor silica whispering-gallery-mode (WGM) microresonator as mode-selection mirror, and thulium-doped silica fiber as gain medium. Due to the strong intensity enhancement in the microresonator itself, multiple third-order nonlinear optical effects are observed, which include stimulated Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman scattering, and (cascaded) four-wave-mixing (FWM). The stimulated Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman scattering shift the initial 2 µm narrow-linewidth laser to as far as ∼2.75 µm and ∼1.56 µm, respectively. While the cascaded FWM helps to form a Kerr-frequency comb with a broad bandwidth of ∼900 nm and a mode spacing of twice of the microresonator free-spectral-range. This work offers a simple and effective route to realize all-silica mid-IR lasers based on enhanced optical nonlinearity in WGM microresonators.

© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Fiber lasers operating in the mid-infrared (mid-IR) spectral range are of great interest due to their potential applications in biological tissue ablation, defense, spectroscopy and remote sensing [13]. Compared with conventional solid-state or gas lasers, fiber lasers are more compact in volume and more flexible and thus easier for delivery to the focusing location and target. In the past decades, silica fiber lasers have obtained great success in the near-IR wavelength range, due to its extreme-low transmission loss in one hand and in the other hand to the great gain efficiency of rare-earth ions such as ytterbium (Yb), erbium (Er) and thulium (Tm) in the silica glass host. The available silica fiber laser wavelengths are limited to the emission bands suitable for lasing of the rare-earth ions. An effective route to break this limit is to resort to nonlinear optical effects such as stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), Kerr-nonlinearity induced four-wave mixing (FWM) or supercontinuum generation. However, due to the sharply increasing transmission loss beyond 2 µm and the limited nonlinear optical gain in conventional silica fibers, it is a huge challenge to realize a fiber laser at > 2 µm without additional efforts. One effort has been applied to silica-based germanium (Ge) doped fibers, in which superior Raman, Kerr-nonlinearity gain and mid-IR transmission help to generate Raman lasers beyond 2.4 µm [4], and to broaden supercontinuums towards 3 µm [5]. Other efforts have been applied to silica-based photonic-crystal or hollow-core fibers, where air- or gas-filled, delicate designed microstructures strongly increase the optical nonlinearity [6,7]. Even though these two methods have shown good performances, the first one have to rely on fiber gratings or mirrors at the desired wavelength to match the Raman gain bandwidth which might not be commercially available, the second one have to rely on a short-pulsed pump laser to enhance the optical nonlinearity.

Instead of resorting to delicate optical fibers with increased optical nonlinearity as mentioned above, another efficient route might resort to extremely-low optical nonlinear conversion threshold in microresonators, such as ultrahigh Q-factor WGM microresonators. Benefiting from high Q-factor resonance and low-mode volume (V)-enhanced optical nonlinear interaction (Q2∕V) in WGM microresonators [8,9], a varity of nonlinear optical phenomena have been observed with low thresholds including SRS [1020] and FWM [2132]. The low threshold lasing in WGM microresonator also benefits from the fact that a single WGM is pumped using a tunable single frequency laser. This in turn limits the wavelength range of WGM lasing by the pump wavelength itself. Thus, significant progresses are mostly made in the visible and near-IR wavelength range, where tunable single frequency pump lasers are easily available. Nevertheless, the drawback is still there because relying on a tunable single frequency pump laser is conflicting to low-cost and user-friendly applications in the future. This is very the case in the mid-IR wavelength range [2633], where the available tunable single frequency lasers are rare and relatively expensive. One smart solution to resolve this problem is injection locking, where the narrow linewidth Rayleigh backscattering signal from a microresonator is injected to a gain fiber or semiconductor chip to realize a single frequency lasing [3437]. In a recent progress, a distributed feedback (DFB) semiconductor laser at 2.05 µm was reported [36] by using crystalline microresonator as the feedback element.

In this work, we demonstrated for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, Raman lasers and Kerr-frequency combs from near-IR to mid-IR spectral range generated from a compact all-silica narrow-linewidth microresonator/fiber laser at ∼2 µm. The high Q-factor microresonator (here, silica microsphere) is employed not only as a mode reflector for the Tm3+-doped fiber lasing, but also as a nonlinear initiator for the production of Raman lasing or FWM. The fiber lasing pumped, microresonator initiated, first-order Raman Stokes laser at ∼2.17 µm and anti-Stokes laser at ∼1.82 µm, second-order Raman Stokes laser at ∼2.43 µm and anti-Stokes laser at ∼1.67 µm, as well as third-order Raman Stokes laser at ∼2.75 µm and anti-Stokes laser at ∼1.56 µm were observed, respectively. Furthermore, a 1.98 µm-centered Kerr-frequency combs with bandwidth ∼900 nm was also achieved. Benefiting from the optical nonlinearity enhancement and anomalous dispersion in the microresonator, the nonlinear conversion threshold for generating stimulated anti-Stokes Raman scattering (SARS) or FWM is reduced to milliwatt range.

2. Theoretical analysis and calculations

The circulating optical intensity in an ultrahigh-Q WGM microresonator is given by $I = {P_{in}}({\lambda }/2\pi n)(Q/{V_{eff}})$[8], where Pin is the coupled input power, λ is the resonant wavelength, n is the effective infractive index, Veff is the effective mode volume. Considering a silica microsphere resonator (n = 1.45) with a diameter of 150 µm, Q-factor of 108 at λ = 2.0 µm, the effective mode volume is approximately 1.45×10−14 m3. With Pin = 1 mW coupled into the microresonator, one can have a circulating intensity I of ∼6.1 W/λ2. It thus gives a great enhancement to generate nonlinear optical effects such as SRS and FWM in the microresonator.

SRS is a fundamental inelastic scattering process which transfers energy from pump photons to Stokes and anti-Stokes photons through optical phonons [38]. As shown in right upper part of Fig. 1(a), pump photons are coupled into a microresonator, where the enhanced circulating optical intensity helps to generate Stokes and anti-Stokes photons through SRS. Intuitively, a Stokes photon (green) is generated from a lower virtual state to the vibrational state, while the anti-Stokes photon (violet) is generated from a higher virtual state to the ground state, where two pump photons (red) are consumed as illustrated in Fig. 1(b). When Stimulated Stokes Raman scattering appears alone, it is a pure gain process, whose phase matching is automatically realized. However, it is not the case anymore when anti-Stokes Raman scattering appears in the meantime. The coupling between anti-Stokes and Stokes waves might have to rely on the FWM process. It thus turns to a phase matching process [1720]. The field amplitudes obey the set of time-domain coupled equations [38]

$$\frac{{d{A_S}}}{{dt}} ={-} {\alpha _S}{A_S} + {\kappa _S}A_a^ \ast {e^{i\Delta \omega t}}{e^{i\Delta l\varphi }}, $$
$$\frac{{d{A_a}}}{{dt}} ={-} {\alpha _a}{A_a} + {\kappa _a}A_S^ \ast {e^{i\Delta \omega t}}{e^{i\Delta l\varphi }}, $$
with ${{\alpha }_\textrm{j}} \propto \textrm{i}{{\chi }_{R}}\textrm{(}{{\omega }_{j}}\textrm{)}{|{{A_{P}}} |^\textrm{2}}$, ${{\kappa }_{j}} \propto \textrm{i}{{\chi }_{F}}\textrm{(}{{\omega }_{j}}\textrm{)}{|{{A_{P}}} |^\textrm{2}}$ are nonlinear absorption and coupling coefficients, respectively. Here, j = S, a or P represents Stokes, anti-Stokes wave, or pump wave, respectively. ${{\chi }_{R}}$ and ${{\chi }_{\textrm{F }}}$ are respective Raman and FWM susceptibility. $\Delta {\omega }\; = \; 2\omega _P\; - \; \omega _S\; - \; \omega _a$ and $\Delta l\; = \; 2l_P\; - \; l_S\; - \; l_a$ are the deviation from the energy and momentum conservation, respectively, with ωj the resonant angular frequency, and lj the angular quantum number of a WGM in the microresonator (φ is the angular angle). In a WGM microresonator, $\Delta l\; = \; 0$ is intrinsically fulfilled with frequency spacing of single or multiple free spectral ranges (FSRs), while $\Delta {\omega }\; = \; 0$ is not. The latter one is realized by the management of dispersion and control of pump-related Kerr-nonlinearity.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Theoretical analysis and calculations of microresonator-based Raman and Kerr-frequency combs generation. (a) The schematic diagram of the microresonator-based Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman, Kerr-frequency combs generation process. (b) The energy diagram for Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman generation processes. (c) Calculated dispersion of a silica microsphere (diameter of ∼146 µm) from 1.0 to 3.0 µm.

Download Full Size | PDF

Similar as the generation of Stokes and anti-Stokes waves simultaneously with phase matching condition, FWM is a pure optical parametric oscillation (OPO) process, where two pump photons are annihilated with the generation of a pair of signal and idler photons in the meantime [38]. If the process is highly efficient and there are excess photons, then additional sidebands can be generated through the secondary FWM processes, thus resulting in a Kerr-frequency comb. More details on generating Kerr-frequency combs by exploring FWM could be referred to [39,40]. The schematic diagram of the microresonator-based Kerr-frequency combs generation process is described in right lower part of Fig. 1(a).

From the above analysis, dispersion plays an important role in both the generation of anti-Stokes waves and Kerr-frequency combs. The dispersion of microresonator mainly contains material dispersion and geometric dispersion, we combine them to simulate the ΔFSR (variation of FSR) variation with different wavelength. Here, we define the dispersion D2/2π= ΔFSR/2π to denote the difference between the adjacent FSR. This is commonly used for analyzing the dispersion in microresonators,

$$FS{R_{l,l + 1}} = |{{\omega_{n,m,l,p}} - {\omega_{n,m,l + 1,p}}} |, $$
$${{{D_2}} / {2\mathrm{\pi}}} = {{\Delta FSR} / {2\mathrm{\pi}}} = {{({FS{R_{l + 1,l}} - FS{R_{l,l - 1}}} )} / {2\mathrm{\pi}}}, $$
where n is the radial mode number, m is the azimuthal mode number, l is the former mentioned angular mode number and p is a coefficient related to the polarization. Furthermore, the approximate resonance frequency of a mode with given angular mode number is given by
$${\omega _{n,m,l,p}} = \frac{c}{{{n_a}R}}\left[ \begin{array}{l} \frac{{l + 1/2}}{N} - \frac{{\textrm{t}_n^0}}{N}{\left( {\frac{{l + 1/2}}{2}} \right)^{1/3}} + \frac{{ - p}}{{\sqrt {{N^2} - 1} }}\\ + {\left( {\frac{{l + 1/2}}{2}} \right)^{ - 1/3}}\frac{{{{\textrm{(t}_n^0)}^2}}}{{20N}} + O{\left( {\frac{{l + 1/2}}{2}} \right)^{ - 2/3}} \end{array} \right]. $$

In this equation R is the radius of the spherical microresonator, N is the relative index of refraction N = na/ns (na is index of the medium outside the microresonator), $\textrm{t}_{n}^\textrm{0}$ is the nth zero solution of the Airy function $\textrm{Ai(t}_{n}^\textrm{0}\textrm{)}$ (and corresponds to the nth-order Radial mode).

For most dielectric optical materials, the wavelength dependence of the refractive index can be approximated by Sellmeier equation

$$n{(\lambda )^2} = 1 + \sum\limits_i {\frac{{{A_i} \cdot {\lambda ^2}}}{{{\lambda ^2} - B_i^2}}}. $$

The Sellmeier coefficients Ai and Bi are usually given for wavelength λ in units of µm and the leading terms in silica for the wavelength range 0.21 µm < λ < 3.71 µm are A1 = 0.6961663, A2 = 0.4079426, A3 = 0.8974794, B1 = 0.0684043, B2 = 0.1162414 and B3 = 9.896161. Based on the formula (3)∼(6), taking into account of a silica microsphere with diameter of ∼146 µm used in our experiment, the theoretical analysis of the microsphere with its dispersion properties is shown in Fig. 1(c). Figure 1(c) shows D2/2π varies from 0 to 108 MHz between 1.58 and 3.0 µm, revealing a group velocity dispersion (GVD) that is anomalous over this wavelength range. This offers a possibility that uses the self- (cross-) phase modulation induced by the pump light to compensate the phase mismatch so that both the anti-Stokes Raman or pure FWM process can be efficiently generated.

3. Experimental setup

The experimental setup of the proposed all-silica narrow-linewidth microresonator/fiber laser is schematically shown in Fig. 2(a). The pumping source is a continuous-wave (CW) laser operating at ∼1560 nm wavelength after being amplified by an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) to an output power of up to ∼2 W. A high-concentration Tm3+-doped fiber (Nufern SM-TSF-5/125, length: 23 cm, core/cladding: 5.5/125 µm, core NA: 0.24) is employed as the 2 µm-wavelength gain medium and its absorption coefficient at 1560 nm is ∼340 dB/m. As depicted by the partial energy-level diagram of Tm3+-ions in silica fiber in the inset of Fig. 2(b), it indicates that the generated laser at ∼2 µm is in correspondence to 3F43H6 transition (solid red arrow). Either 3H63F4 (∼1.56 µm, solid black arrow) or 3H63H4 (0.8 µm, solid gray arrow) transitions can be employed as the pumping [41]. Here, we select the former one due to the availability of this laser. To form the Fabry-Pérot fiber cavity, a fiber Bragg grating (FBG) is used as the input mirror, and a fiber-taper-coupled WGM microresonator is used as the output mirror. The fiber Bragg grating (FBG) has a center reflection wavelength of 1980.6 nm and with a 3-dB bandwidth of ∼1.7 nm. The transmission spectrum of it is shown in Fig. 2(c), where the highest reflectivity is ∼99% (−20 dB). The microresonator in our experiment is a silica microsphere with diameter of ∼146 µm. It is fabricated by melting a standard silica fiber (Corning SMF-28) tip using a CO2 laser, whose microscopic image is depicted in Fig. 2(d). To couple light into and out of the microsphere, a fiber taper with a thinnest diameter of 1–2 µm is used to couple with the microsphere. To control light polarization in the fiber cavity, a fiber polarization controller (FPC-100, OZ optics) is inserted. In the end, the length of the fiber cavity is 3.3 m between the FBG and the microsphere.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) The experimental schematic for the all-silica narrow-linewidth microresonator/fiber laser system at ∼2 µm. (b) The partial energy-level diagram of Tm3+-ions in silica fiber. The red arrow is the laser emission wavelength, the gray and black solid arrow are the potential pump wavelengths, and the gray dashed arrow illustrates the fast non-radiative relaxation between 3H4 and 3F4 level. (c) The transmission spectrum of the FBG. (d) The microscopic image of the silica microsphere in experiment.

Download Full Size | PDF

The reflection from the microsphere is due to the modal coupling between clockwise and anticlockwise WGMs induced by intracavity Rayleigh scattering [4244], which is a unique feature of ultrahigh-Q WGM microresonators. Due to the lack of a tunable single frequency laser at ∼2 µm in our laboratory, the Q-factor of the microsphere around 2 µm can’t be estimated directly. We evaluate the quality of the fabricated microresonator indirectly by resorting to an 1550 nm tunable single frequency laser. It gave a Q-factor of ∼2×108 around 1550 nm for the microsphere used in this experiment. And the reflectivities from certain WGMs could be more than 30%. This is a crucial precondition for application as a mode reflection mirror. The reflection is not only sensitive to the coupling condition between the microresonator and the fiber taper, but also to the polarization states. Since the Tm3+-doped silica fiber can provide enough gain to compensate the total laser cavity loss, the narrow-linewidth laser at ∼2 µm is first expected in the laser system.

4. Experimental results and discussion

4.1. Narrow-linewidth ∼2 µm laser

The results of the all-silica narrow-linewidth microresonator/fiber laser at ∼2 µm are shown in Fig. 3. As shown in Fig. 3(a), the output optical spectrum with a center wavelength of ∼1979.93 nm is measured with an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA, Model: Bristol 721, Resolution bandwidth: 12 GHz) and the pump power at 1560 nm is ∼0.95 W. The signal to noise ratio of the spectrum is slightly higher than 10 dB, which is mainly limited by the OSA noise floor and the optical power collected by the OSA. The linewidth of this laser is measured by employing the self-heterodyne method at zero frequency with 1.2 km-delayed fiber (Corning SMF-28) [4547]. The experimental measurement (blue solid line), fitting curve (red solid line), and the equipment background noise (black dashed line) are shown in Fig. 3(b), respectively. A simplified Lorentzian model was used to fit the line-shape of the experimental data, which gives a 3-dB linewidth of ∼9 MHz. This linewidth can be reduced in the future by utilizing a microresonator with higher quality factor, a FBG with narrower bandwidth, and by improving the stability of the microresonator/fiber-taper coupling system. Moreover, the output power of the lasing versus pump power is shown in Fig. 3(c). It can be deduced that the threshold of the narrow-linewidth laser is ∼0.87 W by linearly fitting the experimental data, the total output power is more than 15 mW and the slope efficiency is ∼4.2%. This low slope efficiency might result from the low optical reflectivity of the microresonator mirror.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. The experimental results of the all-silica narrow-linewidth microresonator/fiber laser at ∼2 µm. (a) A typical optical output spectrum of the narrow-linewidth laser with a center wavelength of ∼1979.93 nm. (b) The linewidth measurement of the narrow-linewidth laser with a RBW of 100 kHz by employing a self-heterodyne method. The blue solid line is the experimental data, the red solid line is the fitting line and the black dashed line is the background noise floor of the instrument. (c) Output power of the narrow-linewidth laser versus pump power.

Download Full Size | PDF

4.2. Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers

By optimizing the fiber polarization as well as the microresonator/fiber taper coupling condition, the Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers are both achieved in the mean time once the newly generated ∼1980nm laser is beyond the Raman lasing threshold. The coupling between the microresonator and the fiber taper is optimized by finely tuning the gap between the microresonator and fiber taper using a nano-translation stage. An optimum coupling condition helps a lot in reaching a broadband nonlinear optical spectrum. Moreover, in order to reduce the optical loss of silica-fiber at > 2 µm waveband, we tried to shorten the length of fiber taper at the laser output port after the microsphere. As shown in Fig. 4(a)-Fig. 4(c), the spectra of first- to third-order Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers are measured with the pump power of 1.41, 1.78, 1.98 W, respectively. The Raman frequency shifts (RFSs) between adjacent order Stokes lines can be calculated by the formula Δν=c/λn-c/λn+1. As depicted in Fig. 4(a)-Fig. 4(c), the cascaded RFSs are about 13, 14, 14 THz, respectively. The RFSs are different because silica has a large Raman gain bandwidth ranging from 0∼40 THz [38], and the Raman gain peak in silica is mainly located from 12 to 15 THz. The measured RFSs here are in good agreement with this expected Raman gain values for silica, confirming that the observed behavior is due to Raman scattering. The threshold pump power is evaluated when each order Raman laser is firstly observed on the OSA. Using this method, the thresholds for the three-order Raman laser are estimated to be 1.31, 1.76, 1.92 W, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. The optical spectra of the Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers under different pump powers. (a) The optical spectra of one-order Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers under pump power of 1.41 W. (b) The optical spectra of two-order Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers under pump power of 1.78 W. (c) The optical spectra of three-order Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers under pump power of 1.98 W.

Download Full Size | PDF

As shown in Fig. 4(a), the first-order Raman Stokes laser at ∼2.17 µm and anti-Stokes laser at ∼1.82 µm are observed when the pump power is 1.41 W. And the total output power is measured to be ∼10.3 mW. When the pump power is increased to be ∼1.78 W, Fig. 4(b) depicted that the second-order Raman Stokes laser at ∼2.43 µm and anti-Stokes laser at ∼1.67 µm can be excited, with a total output power of ∼17.2 mW. Interestingly, when the pump power is increased to be 1.98 W, the third-order Raman Stokes laser at ∼2.75 µm and anti-Stokes laser at ∼1.56 µm can be achieved, and the spectrum is illustrated in Fig. 4(c). The generation of ∼2.75 µm Raman Stokes laser seems counterintuitive due to high optical loss in silica material at mid-IR waveband. However, we clearly observed the third-order Raman Stokes laser at ∼2.75 µm reproducibly. In order to explain this, we analyze it from a simple Raman laser threshold model [1013]. Here, we only consider the simplest case that the third order Raman Stokes laser is pumped from the second-order Raman Stokes laser, and do not consider the coupling between other Stokes lines or coupling between Stokes and anti-Stokes lines. The threshold pump power for the next-order Raman Stokes laser can be derived as [1013]

$${P_{\textrm{th}}} = \frac{{{\pi ^2}n_{eff}^2}}{{{\lambda _P}{\lambda _R}}}\frac{{{V_{eff}}}}{{\varGamma Bg}}{Q_{\textrm{e},P}}{\left( {\frac{1}{{{Q_{T,P}}}}} \right)^2}\frac{1}{{{Q_{T,R}}}}, $$
where neff is the effective refractive index, Veff is the effective optical mode volume, λP and λR are the pump and Raman wavelengths, Γ is the overlap factor between the optical mode and the Raman mode (∼1), B is a correction factor of the circulating power due to internal backscattering (0.5–1) and g is the Raman gain coefficient. The extrinsic loss of the cavity for the pump mode is Qe,P, which is predominantly the coupling loss between the fiber taper and the microresoantor. QT,P and QT,R are quality factors of the mircoresonator for the pump mode and Raman mode, respectively. Based on the formula (7), the threshold power of the third-order Raman Stokes laser can be calculated. First, we have neff ∼1.43, g ∼0.8×10−11 m/W, Veff ∼1.454×104 µm3, λP ∼2.43 µm, λR ∼2.75 µm directly from characteristics of silica and from experimental observations. Because we have no chance to measure the related Q values experimentally at the moment, we choose to refer to the material loss of silica [4850]. According to the optical transmission losses in silica in the mid-IR wavelength range (here, we consider 2.43 µm and 2.75 µm), the material absorption-loss limited Q values at 2.43 µm and 2.75 µm are 1.54×107 and 2.64×106, respectively [51]. For a conservative estimation, we chose QT,P ∼1×107 and QT,R ∼1×106 together with Qe,P ∼1.6×107, Γ ∼1 and B ∼1 in a relative ideal experimental condition. Finally, we estimated an optical pump threshold of 0.86 mW for the third-order Raman Stokes line pumped from its second-order Raman Stokes line. The second-order Raman Stokes laser power at ∼2.43 µm can be estimated to be ∼1.5 mW by considering the relative power in the spectrum and the total output power. It is thus potentially high enough to generate the third-order Raman Stokes line at ∼2.75 µm. We also want to mention that the third-order anti-Stokes line could be mixed with the residual pump at 1.56 µm in some coupling conditions.

In our experiment, the first-order Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers are observed with a pump power ranging from ∼1.31 to ∼1.74 W. Within this pump power range, the first-order Raman anti-Stokes laser power versus pump power is shown in Fig. 5(a), and it follows a second order dependence as expected [18]. Moreover, the linear power correlation between the first-order Raman anti-Stokes laser and the Stokes laser is also shown in Fig. 5(b).

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. (a) Dependence of the first-order Raman anti-Stokes emission power on the input power. (b) Dependence of the first-order Raman anti-Stokes emission power on the first-order Raman Stokes emission power.

Download Full Size | PDF

4.3. Kerr-frequency combs

In this part, we demonstrate generation of Kerr-frequency combs in the microresonator/fiber laser system. As we have shown in the theoritical background, the microresonator used in our experiment has anomalous dispersion at wavelengths in the mid-IR range. The first pair of Kerr sidebands would be generated where the Kerr parametric gain is balanced with the optical loss and the phase mismatch is compensated by self- and cross-phase modulation induced nonlinear frequency pulling. The cascaded sidebands would be subsequently generated with similar processes which not only receive energy from the “pump” (here is the 1.98 µm laser), but also from former generated sidebands. The final comb is realized until the necessary pump power and phase matching are not enough any more.

Figure 6 shows the evolution of a comb from only one pair of sidebands (Fig. 6(a)) to a comb with bandwidth of ∼900 nm (Fig. 6(f)), where the corresponding pump powers are 1.52, 1.57, 1.63, 1.75, 1.82 W and 1.87 W at 1560 nm, respectively. At the beginning of the comb generation, as shown in Fig. 6(a), there are only two Kerr sidebands which are located on the both sides of the center wavelength at ∼1980.88 nm. As the pump power is increased to 1.57 W, the Kerr-nonlinearity is enhanced, and two pair of sidebands are generated in total as depicted in Fig. 6(b). Similarly, we see at least three pairs of Kerr sidebands in Fig. 6(c), and at least seven pairs of Kerr sidebands in Fig. 6(d). By further increasing the pump power, typical Kerr-comb spectra are broadened from near-IR (1600 nm) to mid-IR (> 2400 nm), as shown in Fig. 6(e) and 6(f), respectively.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. The evolution of Kerr-frequency combs under different pump power. (a)–(f) Optical spectra of the microresonator-based Kerr-frequency combs under pump power of 1.52 W, 1.57 W, 1.63 W, 1.75 W, 1.82 W and 1.87 W, respectively. And the mode spacing between adjacent main comb teeth is 2 FSRs.

Download Full Size | PDF

It is worth noting that the mode spacing between adjacent main comb teeth is 2 FSRs in all spectra in Fig. 6. In general, the mode spacing could be changed by changing the pump detuning, polarization and pump power when using a tunable single frequency pump source [39,40]. In our case, the “pump” power at 1.98 µm is changed with the 1560 nm pump power sent to the fiber cavity. The detuning between the “pump” and the resonance is resulted from a thermal stability in the microresonator. In this situation, the thermal-effect and Kerr-nonlinearity induced resonance frequency shift is going towards a steady state when the “pump” induced heating is well dissipated to the microresonator and further to the environment [52]. The mode spacing is not changed in our cases means that these steady states might result in similar detunings in our microresonator. A fast scanning of the pump power (1560 nm) or the polarization in the fiber cavity might break one steady state to reach another so that the mode spacing can be changed in the future. It is interesting to mention that the comb in Fig. 6(e) most likely resides in the initial state of chaotic comb [53,54]. Because soliton combs are shown to have more and more applications in the past years, starting from a comb state like the one shown in Fig. 6(e), it is possible to realize a soliton comb by further optimize our system in the future, as the one shown in a similar work in [55]. By further increasing the pump power, the comb bandwidth does not increase significantly after 1.87 W as shown in Fig. 6(f). This means it has reached a limit where the Kerr-nonlinear gain can not further compensate the optical losses beyond this bandwidth in the microresonator. Besides, some relatively weak peaks appear around the main comb teeth in Fig. 6(e) and 6(f), which are probably generated from higher-order WGMs or different polarization modes of the microresonator. It is also worth noting that Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lines are not observed during the generation of Kerr-frequency combs. This is probably because the pump induced gain is not enough to drive these two nonlinear processes simultaneously.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have proposed and experimentally demonstrated an all-silica narrow-linewidth microresonator/fiber laser at 2 µm directly pumped by a laser at ∼1.56 µm. The maximum output power of narrow-linewidth laser is more than 15 mW with a slope efficiency of 4.2% and a linewidth of ∼9 MHz. The ultrahigh Q-factor silica-microsphere is not only employed as a reflection mirror for the thulium-doped fiber lasing but also as an initiator of nonlinear optical effects that introduces SRS, SARS and FWM subsequently. By controlling the coupling condition between the fiber taper and microresonator, optimizing the fiber polarization states, as well as the pump power, first-order Raman Stokes laser at ∼2.17 µm and anti-Stokes laser at ∼1.82 µm, second-order Raman Stokes laser at ∼2.43 µm and anti-Stokes laser at ∼1.67 µm, as well as third-order Raman Stokes at ∼2.75 µm and anti-Stokes laser at ∼1.56 µm could be achieved. Moreover, Kerr-frequency combs with bandwidth of ∼900 nm and center wavelength of 1.98 µm are also realized in the experiment. This self-injection locking method gets rid of expensive tunable pump sources in the mid-IR wavelength. By further exploring this laser system as done in a most recent work [55], even a turnkey soliton comb is possible in the future. To this end, several measures could be taken in the future, i.e. using a low-noise pump source at 1560 nm (including feedback loops for current/power locking), preparing isolated environment for microresonator/fiber-taper coupling, and using high dynamic signal-to-noise-ratio optical spectrum analyzer for spectrum analysis, etc.

This ultra-high Q factor microresonator initiated nonlinear frequency conversion from near-IR to mid-IR greatly extends the lasing wavelength in this all-silica hybrid laser system. Specially, it demonstrates a method to solve a problem long reside in conventional all-silica fiber lasers that is super hard to generate laser wavelengths beyond 2 µm except to resort to other highly nonlinear materials or novel fiber structures [47]. The generation of Raman laser at 2.75 µm seems counter-intuitive in this all-silica structure, but it in turn shows the powerfulness of the ultrahigh Q-factor silica microresonator, in which the threshold power for nonlinear conversion is greatly reduced even in the mid-IR wavelength range. More interestingly, this wavelength is in the emission range of an Er3+-doped ZBLAN fiber [2], and thus can be power amplified for future applications.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11674269, 61975167).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. A. Schliesser, N. Picqué, and T. Hänsch, “Mid-infrared frequency combs,” Nat. Photonics 6(7), 440–449 (2012). [CrossRef]  

2. S. D. Jackson, “Towards high-power mid-infrared emission from a fibre laser,” Nat. Photonics 6(7), 423–431 (2012). [CrossRef]  

3. S. Duval, M. Bernier, V. Fortin, J. Genest, Mi. Piché, and R. Vallée, “Femtosecond fiber lasers reach the mid-infrared,” Optica 2(7), 623–626 (2015). [CrossRef]  

4. H. Jiang, L. Zhang, and Y. Feng, “Silica-based fiber Raman laser at > 2.4 µm,” Opt. Lett. 40(14), 3249–3252 (2015). [CrossRef]  

5. M. Zhang, E. Kelleher, T. Runcorn, V. Mashinsky, O. Medvedkov, E. Dianov, D. Popa, S. Milana, T. Hasan, Z. Sun, F. Bonaccorso, Z. Jiang, E. Flahaut, B. Chapman, A. Ferrari, S. Popov, and J. Taylor, “Mid-infrared Raman-soliton continuum pumped by a nanotube-mode-locked sub-picosecond Tm-doped MOPFA,” Opt. Express 21(20), 23261–23271 (2013). [CrossRef]  

6. A. Savchenkov, D. Nodop, C. Jauregui, D. Schimpf, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, “Efficient high-power generation of visible and mid-infrared light by degenerate four-wave-mixing in a large-mode-area photonic-crystal fiber,” Opt. Lett. 34(22), 3499–3501 (2009). [CrossRef]  

7. Y. Cui, W. Huang, Z. Wang, M. Wang, Z. Zhou, Z. Li, S. Gao, Y. Wang, and P. Wang, “4.3 µm fiber laser in CO2-filled hollow-core silica fibers,” Optica 6(8), 951–954 (2019). [CrossRef]  

8. K. J. Vahala, “Optical microcavities,” Nature 424(6950), 839–846 (2003). [CrossRef]  

9. A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, D. Strekalov, M. Mohageg, V. S. Ilchenko, and L. Maleki, “Low Threshold Optical Oscillations in a Whispering Gallery Mode CaF2 Resonator,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(24), 243905 (2004). [CrossRef]  

10. S. Spillane, T. J. Kippenberg, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultralow-threshold Raman laser using aspherical dielectric microcavity,” Nature 415(6872), 621–623 (2002). [CrossRef]  

11. B. Min, T. J. Kippenberg, and K. J. Vahala, “Compact, fiber-compatible, cascaded Raman laser,” Opt. Lett. 28(17), 1507–1509 (2003). [CrossRef]  

12. T. J. Kippenberg, S. Spillane, D. K. Armani, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultralow-threshold microcavity Raman laser on a microelectronic chip,” Opt. Lett. 29(11), 1224–1226 (2004). [CrossRef]  

13. T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, B. Min, and K. J. Vahala, “Theoretical and Experimental Study of Stimulated and Cascaded Raman Scattering in Ultrahigh-Q Optical Microcavities,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 10(5), 1219–1228 (2004). [CrossRef]  

14. F. Vanier, M. Rochette, N. Godbout, and Y. Peter, “Raman lasing in As2S3 high-Q whispering gallery mode resonators,” Opt. Lett. 38(23), 4966–4969 (2013). [CrossRef]  

15. B. Li, W. Clements, X. Yu, K. Shi, Q. Gong, and Y. Xiao, “Single nanoparticle detection using split-mode microcavity Raman lasers,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111(41), 14657–14662 (2014). [CrossRef]  

16. D. H. Leach and R. K. Chang, “Stimulated anti-Stokes Raman scattering in microdroplets,” Opt. Lett. 17(6), 387–389 (1992). [CrossRef]  

17. D. Farnesi, F. Cosi, C. Trono, and G. C. Righini, “Stimulated anti-Stokes Raman scattering resonantly enhanced in silica microspheres,” Opt. Lett. 39(20), 5993–5996 (2014). [CrossRef]  

18. S. Soltani, V. M. Diep, R. Zeto, and A. M. Armani, “Stimulated Anti-Stokes Raman Emission Generated by Gold Nanorod Coated Optical Resonators,” ACS Photonics 5(9), 3550–3556 (2018). [CrossRef]  

19. H. Choi, D. Chen, F. Du, R. Zeto, and A. Armani, “Low threshold anti-Stokes Raman laser on-chip,” Photonics Res. 7(8), 926–932 (2019). [CrossRef]  

20. H. Jung, Z. Gong, X. Liu, X. Guo, C. Zou, and H. X. Tang, “Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman scatterings from frequency comb lines in poly-crystalline aluminum nitride microring resonators,” Opt. Express 27(16), 22246–22253 (2019). [CrossRef]  

21. P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator,” Nature 450(7173), 1214–1217 (2007). [CrossRef]  

22. X. Xue, F. Leo, Y. Xuan, J. Jaramillo-Villegas, P. Wang, D. Leaird, M. Erkintalo, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, “Second-harmonic-assisted four-wave mixing in chip-based microresonator frequency comb generation,” Light: Sci. Appl. 6(4), e16253 (2017). [CrossRef]  

23. G. Lin, A. Coillet, and Y. K. Chembo, “Nonlinear photonics with high-Q whispering-gallery-mode resonators,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 9(4), 828–890 (2017). [CrossRef]  

24. A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, L. Razzari, D. Moss, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, Y. K. Chembo, T. Hansson, S. Wabnitz, P. Del’Haye, X. Xue, A. M. Weiner, and R. Morandotti, “Micro-combs: A novel generation of optical sources,” Phys. Rep. 729, 1–81 (2018). [CrossRef]  

25. H. Chen, Q. Ji, H. Wang, Q. Yang, Q. Cao, Q. Gong, X. Yi, and Y. F. Xiao, “Chaos-assisted two-octave-spanning microcombs,” Nat. Commun. 11(1), 2336 (2020). [CrossRef]  

26. C. Wang, T. Herr, P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, J. Hofer, R. Holzwarth, T. Hänsch, N. Picqué, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Mid-infrared optical frequency combs at 2.5 µm based on crystalline microresonators,” Nat. Commun. 4(1), 1345 (2013). [CrossRef]  

27. K. Luke, Y. Okawachi, M. R. E. Lamont, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “Broadband mid-infrared frequency comb generation in a Si3N4 microresonator,” Opt. Lett. 40(21), 4823–4826 (2015). [CrossRef]  

28. A. G. Griffith, R. K. W. Lau, J. Cardenas, Y. Okawachi, A. Mohanty, R. Fain, Y. H. Lee, M. Yu, C. T. Phare, C. B. Poitras, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “Silicon-chip mid-infrared frequency comb generation,” Nat. Commun. 6(1), 6299 (2015). [CrossRef]  

29. A. G. Griffith, M. Yu, Y. Okawachi, J. Cardenas, A. Mohanty, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “Coherent mid-infrared frequency combs in silicon-microresonators in the presence of Raman effects,” Opt. Express 24(12), 13044–13050 (2016). [CrossRef]  

30. M. Yu, Y. Okawachi, A. G. Griffith, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Mode-locked mid-infrared frequency combs in a silicon microresonator,” Optica 3(8), 854–860 (2016). [CrossRef]  

31. S. A. Miller, M. Yu, X. Ji, A. G. Griffith, J. Cardenas, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “Low-loss silicon platform for broadband mid-infrared photonics,” Optica 4(7), 707–712 (2017). [CrossRef]  

32. M. Yu, Y. Okawachi, A. Griffith, N. Picqué, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Silicon-chip-based mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy,” Nat. Commun. 9(1), 1869 (2018). [CrossRef]  

33. C. Lecaplain, C. Javerzac-Galy, M. Gorodetsky, and T. Kippenberg, “Mid-infrared ultra-high-Q resonators based on fluoride crystalline materials,” Nat. Commun. 7(1), 13383 (2016). [CrossRef]  

34. K. Kieu and M. Mansuripur, “Fiber laser using a microsphere resonator as a feedback element,” Opt. Lett. 32(3), 244–246 (2007). [CrossRef]  

35. C. Guo, K. Che, H. Xu, P. Zhang, D. Tang, C. Ren, Z. Luo, and Z. Cai, “Generation of optical frequency combs in a fiber-ring/microresonator laser system,” Opt. Lett. 41(11), 2576–2579 (2016). [CrossRef]  

36. E. Dale, M. Bagheri, A. B. Matsko, C. Frez, W. Liang, S. Forouhar, and L. Maleki, “Microresonator stabilized 2 µm distributed feedback GaSb-based diode laser,” Opt. Lett. 41(23), 5559–5562 (2016). [CrossRef]  

37. S. Jiang, C. Guo, K. Che, Z. Luo, T. Du, H. Fu, H. Xu, and Z. Cai, “Visible Raman and Brillouin lasers from a microresonator/ZBLAN-fiber hybrid system,” Photonics Res. 7(5), 566–572 (2019). [CrossRef]  

38. Robert Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 3th ed. (Academic, 2008).

39. Y. K. Chembo, D. Strekalov, and N. Yu, “Spectrum and Dynamics of Optical Frequency Combs Generated with Monolithic Whispering Gallery Mode Resonators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(10), 103902 (2010). [CrossRef]  

40. T. Herr, K. Hartinger, J. Riemensberger, C. Y. Wang, E. Gavartin, R. Holzwarth, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Universal formation dynamics and noise of Kerr-frequency combs in microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 6(7), 480–487 (2012). [CrossRef]  

41. S. D. Jackson, “Cross relaxation and energy transfer upconversion processes relevant to the functioning of 2 µm Tm3+-doped silica fibre lasers,” Opt. Commun. 230(1-3), 197–203 (2004). [CrossRef]  

42. D. Weiss, V. Sandoghdar, J. Hare, V. Lefèvre-Seguin, J. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Splitting of high-Q Mie modes induced by light backscattering in silica microspheres,” Opt. Lett. 20(18), 1835–1837 (1995). [CrossRef]  

43. M. L. Gorodetsky, A. D. Pryamikov, and V. S. Ilchenko, “Rayleigh scattering in high-Q microspheres,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 17(6), 1051–1057 (2000). [CrossRef]  

44. T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala, “Modal coupling in traveling-wave resonators,” Opt. Lett. 27(19), 1669–1671 (2002). [CrossRef]  

45. T. Okoshi, K. Kikuchi, and A. Nakayama, “Novel method for high resolution measurement of laser output spectrum,” Electron. Lett. 16(16), 630–631 (1980). [CrossRef]  

46. L. E. Richter, H. I. Mandelberg, M. S. Kruger, and P. A. Mcgrath, “Linewidth determination from self-heterodyne measurements with subcoherence delay times,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 22(11), 2070–2074 (1986). [CrossRef]  

47. H. Ludvigsen, M. Tossavainen, and M. Kaivola, “Laser linewidth measurements using self-homodyne detection with short delay,” Opt. Commun. 155(1-3), 180–186 (1998). [CrossRef]  

48. T. Izawa and N. Shibata, “Optical attenuation in pure and doped fused silica in the ir wavelength region,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 31(1), 33–35 (1977). [CrossRef]  

49. A. Savchenkov, V. Ilchenko, A. Matsko, and L. Maleki, “Kilohertz optical resonances in dielectric crystal cavities,” Phys. Rev. A 70(5), 051804 (2004). [CrossRef]  

50. J. Swiderski, “High-power mid-infrared supercontinuum sources: Current status and future perspectives,” Prog. Quantum Electron. 38(5), 189–235 (2014). [CrossRef]  

51. M. Gorodetsky, A. Savchenkov, and V. Ilchenko, “Ultimate Q of optical microsphere resonators,” Opt. Lett. 21(7), 453–455 (1996). [CrossRef]  

52. T. Carmon, L. Yang, and K. J. Vahala, “Dynamical thermal behavior and thermal self-stability of microcavities,” Opt. Express 12(20), 4742–4750 (2004). [CrossRef]  

53. C. Bao, P. Liao, A. Kordts, M. Karpov, M. Pfeiffer, L. Zhang, Y. Yan, G. Xie, Y. Cao, A. Almaiman, M. Ziyadi, L. Li, Z. Zhao, A. Mohajerin-Ariaei, S. Wilkinson, M. Tur, M. Fejer, T. J. Kippenberg, and A. Willner, “Demonstration of optical multicasting using Kerr frequency comb lines,” Opt. Lett. 41(16), 3876–3879 (2016). [CrossRef]  

54. C. Joshi, J. Jang, K. Luke, X. Ji, S. Miller, A. Klenner, Y. Okawachi, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, “Thermally controlled comb generation and soliton modelocking in microresonators,” Opt. Lett. 41(11), 2565–2568 (2016). [CrossRef]  

55. B. Shen, L. Chang, J. Liu, H. Wang, Q. Yang, C. Xiang, R. Wang, J. He, T. Liu, W. Xie, J. Guo, D. Kinghorn, L. Wu, Q. Ji, T. J. Kippenberg, K. Vahala, and J. E. Bowers, “Integrated turnkey soliton microcombs,” Nature 582(7812), 365–369 (2020). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Theoretical analysis and calculations of microresonator-based Raman and Kerr-frequency combs generation. (a) The schematic diagram of the microresonator-based Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman, Kerr-frequency combs generation process. (b) The energy diagram for Stokes and anti-Stokes Raman generation processes. (c) Calculated dispersion of a silica microsphere (diameter of ∼146 µm) from 1.0 to 3.0 µm.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) The experimental schematic for the all-silica narrow-linewidth microresonator/fiber laser system at ∼2 µm. (b) The partial energy-level diagram of Tm3+-ions in silica fiber. The red arrow is the laser emission wavelength, the gray and black solid arrow are the potential pump wavelengths, and the gray dashed arrow illustrates the fast non-radiative relaxation between 3H4 and 3F4 level. (c) The transmission spectrum of the FBG. (d) The microscopic image of the silica microsphere in experiment.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The experimental results of the all-silica narrow-linewidth microresonator/fiber laser at ∼2 µm. (a) A typical optical output spectrum of the narrow-linewidth laser with a center wavelength of ∼1979.93 nm. (b) The linewidth measurement of the narrow-linewidth laser with a RBW of 100 kHz by employing a self-heterodyne method. The blue solid line is the experimental data, the red solid line is the fitting line and the black dashed line is the background noise floor of the instrument. (c) Output power of the narrow-linewidth laser versus pump power.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The optical spectra of the Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers under different pump powers. (a) The optical spectra of one-order Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers under pump power of 1.41 W. (b) The optical spectra of two-order Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers under pump power of 1.78 W. (c) The optical spectra of three-order Raman Stokes and anti-Stokes lasers under pump power of 1.98 W.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. (a) Dependence of the first-order Raman anti-Stokes emission power on the input power. (b) Dependence of the first-order Raman anti-Stokes emission power on the first-order Raman Stokes emission power.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. The evolution of Kerr-frequency combs under different pump power. (a)–(f) Optical spectra of the microresonator-based Kerr-frequency combs under pump power of 1.52 W, 1.57 W, 1.63 W, 1.75 W, 1.82 W and 1.87 W, respectively. And the mode spacing between adjacent main comb teeth is 2 FSRs.

Equations (7)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

d A S d t = α S A S + κ S A a e i Δ ω t e i Δ l φ ,
d A a d t = α a A a + κ a A S e i Δ ω t e i Δ l φ ,
F S R l , l + 1 = | ω n , m , l , p ω n , m , l + 1 , p | ,
D 2 / 2 π = Δ F S R / 2 π = ( F S R l + 1 , l F S R l , l 1 ) / 2 π ,
ω n , m , l , p = c n a R [ l + 1 / 2 N t n 0 N ( l + 1 / 2 2 ) 1 / 3 + p N 2 1 + ( l + 1 / 2 2 ) 1 / 3 (t n 0 ) 2 20 N + O ( l + 1 / 2 2 ) 2 / 3 ] .
n ( λ ) 2 = 1 + i A i λ 2 λ 2 B i 2 .
P th = π 2 n e f f 2 λ P λ R V e f f Γ B g Q e , P ( 1 Q T , P ) 2 1 Q T , R ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.