Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Adaptive modal gain controlling for a high-efficiency cylindrical vector beam fiber laser

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We propose and experimentally demonstrate an ytterbium-doped fiber laser emitting the single high-order cylindrical vector beams with a high efficiency and a high modal purity based on adaptive modal gain control. By the combination of a high-order pump with a self-designed ytterbium-ring doped fiber, modal dependent gain was tailored and specific transverse mode can be selected in the laser cavity. A model based on multimode propagation-rate equations is built up to demonstrate the behaviors of transverse mode competition in the fiber laser. Modal dependent gain of high-order mode pump are simulated numerically, which agree well with our experiment results. The slope efficiency of the fiber laser reaches 79.61% with a low threshold of 47.73mw. The purity of the generated high-order CVBs are in excess of 95%. Such a strategy enables the controllability of modal gain in a fiber laser and reveals the potential to offer a new and promising way to achieve a high-power fiber laser with an arbitrary single high-order transverse modes output.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

In the past decades, a renewed interest in the transverse mode output in optical fiber laser, including cylindrical vector beams (CVBs) [14] and optical vortex beams (OVBs) [5], was sparked owing to their unique optical properties and application. CVBs are laser beams with cylindrical polarization symmetry [1]. The CVBs featuring excellent polarization and spatially symmetry, have a wide range of application such as optical trapping [6], high-resolution metrology [7], surface plasmon excitation [8], electron acceleration [9] and material processing [10]. Recently, attention has been drawn to the high order CVBs due to their properties under high order azimuthal and radial nodes which have potential application in scaling the transmission capacity of optical communication [11] and high power amplifier system. D. Lin demonstrate that CVB can obtain more gain than fundamental mode in a master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) system. This is mainly due to the significantly larger effective mode area of high-order mode which counteract variety of nonlinear process [12]. The high-order CVBs may be a significant step towards high power fiber amplifier.

Motivated by the demands of practical applications, several methods to generate CVBs in free space and optical fibers have been proposed, which can be generally classified into the passive and active categories. The former points to the conversion of an incoming Gaussian beam into CVBs outside laser cavity by various spatial-variant components such as spatial light modulator (SLM) [13], geometric phase plates (q-plates) [14] and meta-materials [15] are generally required. The active CVBs generation denotes direct oscillation of vector mode in a laser resonator forced by an intra-cavity mode converter including fiber offset splicing technique [16], long period grating [34], few mode fiber Bragg grating [17] and mode selective coupler [1821] and so on. Recently, attention has been drawn to the amplifications and generations of the high order CVBs [2226].

Careful control over mode-dependent gain (MDG) of multimode fiber amplifier is necessary to ensure all signal modes are launched with optimal power in mode-division multiplexing (MDM) transmission [27]. From another point of view, control of MDG provide an efficient and simple way to generate specific vector beams in a fiber laser. MDG is mainly determined by three factors: (a) the concentration profile of the active dopant ions, (b) the transverse intensity profile of the pump, and (c) the transverse intensity profiles of the signal [28]. Hence, it is possible to obtain specific CVBs output by controlling the mode content of the pump and concentration profile of the doped fiber. Z. Lin and M. Tang, published theoretical work on a fiber laser generating CVBs based on a doughnut-shaped doping profile few-mode fiber [29]. In 2018, T. Wang proposed a wavelength-division-multiplexing mode selective (WDM-MSC), which improve efficient spatial overlapping between pump and signal transverse modes and generate CVBs in the end [16]. However, generation of higher order CVBs with a general theoretical model of a fiber laser based on adaptive modal gain control have not been reported.

In this work, we demonstrate a fiber laser emitting high-efficiency 2nd CVBs with the control of MDG. A self-designed Ytterbium-ring doped fiber (Yb-RDF) and high-order mode pump are employed to control the MDG for mode selection. Since the propagation modes have different intensity distribution over the cross-section of the Yb-RDF, we analyze the modes competition based on multimode rate equations presented in [30]. The numerical and experimental results demonstrate the feasibility of MDG control by Yb-RDF and LP21 mode pump. The high purity of 2nd CVB denotes that LP01 and LP11 was depressed well by mode competition within laser cavity. The experimental result also demonstrate an arbitrary single transverse mode fiber laser can be achieved when the suitable of pump mode and fiber design is selected based on the theoretical model.

2. Theory of adaptive modal gain controlling

In the paper, we designed and fabricated the Yb-RDF has the profile shown in Fig. 1, where the ytterbium-doped region is located in a ring-core fiber (RCF). The index profile of RCF (Fig. 1) has a characteristic high-index and low-index ring that serves to achieve vector mode splitting. The doped region is located in the high-index ring. The refractive index profile as a function of the distance r from the center of the core, is given by:

$$n(r) = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} {n_0},0 \le r < {R_{in}}\\ {n_{high}},{R_{in}} \le r < {R_a}({\textrm{Yb}}\textrm{ - doped}{\textrm{Region}})\\ {n_{low}},{R_a} \le r < {R_b}\\ {n_0},{R_b} \le r < {R_{clad}} \end{array} \right.$$

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Ytterbium-ring doped fiber

Download Full Size | PDF

We assume a weakly guiding few mode fiber where the modes are well approximated by linearly polarized (LP) modes. The LP mode group includes spatially degenerate modes HE and EH mode. There are four non-degenerate eigen-modes of fibers (TE01, TM01, HE21 odd and HE21 even) representing the 1st order CVB modes. The other four eigen-modes (EH11 odd, EH11 even, HE31 odd and HE31 even) represents the 2nd order CVB modes. Thus, CVB modes can be obtained by adjusting the polarization state of a fiber laser emitting LP mode. In the paper, we have targeted the generation of 2nd order CVB modes. The modal analysis of the fiber are performed by solving wave propagation equation using the finite element.

When analyzing the transverse mode competition in the multimode fiber lasers, it is necessary to present the gain distribution in the transverse direction of the fiber. Each transverse mode has individual field intensity distribution, which interacts with the population inversion and shares it. In the competition by sharing the population inversion, the transverse mode which obtains enough gains will be excited and output. The schematic of our fiber laser with a typical linear cavity is shown in Fig. 2. To obtain high-order vector beam output, we chose LP21 mode as pump mode in the paper. In our research, we assume a two-level system where the amplified spontaneous emission (ASE), the cross-coupling between modes and loss are neglected for simplicity. Considering the interactions between the active dopant and each potential transverse mode, the population inversion distribution is not constant in the transverse direction any more. Based on the rate equations presented in [31], the model we developed here to describe the transverse mode competition in multimode fiber laser can be expressed by the following space-dependent and time dependent steady rate equations:

$$\frac{{{N_2}(r,\varphi, z)}}{{{N_0}}} = \frac{{\sum\limits_i {\frac{{[P_{pi}^ + (z) + P_{pi}^ - (z)]{\sigma _{ap, i}}{\Gamma _{pi}}(r,\varphi )}}{{h{\nu _p}}}} + \sum\limits_j {\frac{{[P_{sj}^ + (z) + P_{sj}^ - (z)]{\sigma _{as, i}}{\Gamma _{sj}}(r,\varphi )}}{{h{\nu _s}}}} }}{{\sum\limits_i {\frac{{[P_{pi}^ + (z) + P_{pi}^ - (z)]{\sigma _{ep, i}}{\Gamma _{pi}}(r,\varphi )}}{{h{\nu _p}}}} + \frac{1}{\tau } + \sum\limits_j {\frac{{[P_{sj}^ + (z) + P_{sj}^ - (z)]{\sigma _{es, j}}{\Gamma _{sj}}(r,\varphi )}}{{h{\nu _s}}}} }}$$
$$\pm \frac{{dP_{pi}^ \pm (z)}}{{dz}} = \left\{ {\int\limits_0^{2\pi } {\int\limits_{{R_{\textrm{i}n}}}^{{R_a}} {[{\sigma_{eq}}{N_2}(r,\varphi, z) - {\sigma_{ap}}{N_1}(r,\varphi, z)]{\Gamma _{pi}}(r,\varphi )rdrd\varphi } } } \right\}P_{pi}^ \pm (z) - {\alpha _{pi}}P_{pi}^ \pm (z)$$
$$\pm \frac{{dP_{sj}^ \pm (z)}}{{dz}} = \left\{ {\int\limits_0^{2\pi } {\int\limits_{{R_{\textrm{i}n}}}^{{R_a}} {[{\sigma_{es}}{N_2}(r,\varphi, z) - {\sigma_{as}}{N_1}(r,\varphi, z)]{\Gamma _{si}}(r,\varphi )rdrd\varphi } } } \right\}P_{sj}^ \pm (z) - {\alpha _{sj}}P_{sj}^ \pm (z)$$

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Schematic of fiber laser

Download Full Size | PDF

Where $h$ is Plank constant; $\tau$ is the spontaneous lifetime of the upper lasing level; ${\nu _p}$ and ${\nu _s}$ are pump and signal frequencies; ${N_2}(r,\varphi, z)$ are population densities of the lower and upper lasing levels at the position; ${N_0}(r,\varphi )$ is the doping concentration distribution which is constant along the fiber axis and has a radial symmetry; $P_{pi}^ + (z)$ and $P_{pi}^ - (z)$ are the pump powers of the ${i^{th}}$ transverse mode in the forward and backward directions, respectively; $P_{sj}^ + (z)$ and $P_{sj}^ - (z)$ are the signal powers of the ${j^{th}}$ transverse mode in the forward and backward directions, respectively; ${\sigma _{ap}}$ (${\sigma _{ep}}$) and ${\sigma _{as}}({\sigma _{es}})$ are the pump absorption (emission) and signal absorption(emission) cross section, respectively; ${\alpha _{pi}}$ and ${\alpha _{sj}}$ are the pump and signal of the ${i^{th}} {j^{th}}$ mode loss factors; ${\Gamma _{pi}}(r,\varphi )$ and ${\Gamma _{si}}(r,\varphi )$ are the pump and signal of the ${i^{th}}$ ${j^{th}}$ mode power filling distributions which can be expressed as follows:

$${\Gamma _{pi}}(r,\varphi ) = \frac{{{\psi _i}(r,\varphi )}}{{\int\limits_0^{2\pi } {\int\limits_{{R_{\textrm{i}n}}}^{{R_a}} {r{\psi _i}(r,\varphi )drd\varphi } } }}$$
$${\Gamma _{si}}(r,\varphi ) = \frac{{{\psi _j}(r,\varphi )}}{{\int\limits_0^{2\pi } {\int\limits_{{R_{\textrm{i}n}}}^{{R_a}} {r{\psi _j}(r,\varphi )drd\varphi } } }}$$
Where ${\psi _{i, j}}(r,\varphi )$ denotes the ${i^{th}} {j^{th}}$ mode envelope;

The boundary and initial conditions in this model is given by

$$P_{pi}^ + (z = 0) = {P_{pi}}$$
$$P_{si}^ + (z = 0) = {R_1}({\lambda _i}){P^{- }}_{si}(\textrm{z} = 0)$$
$$P_{si}^ - (z = L) = {R_2}{P^{+}}_{si}(\textrm{z} = L)$$
Where and ${R_2}$ are the reflectivity of the FM-FBG and broadband reflector, respectively. And L is the length of the YDF. Equations (2)–(4) can be solved by using the standard fourth-order Runge-Kutta method given initial conditions for pump and signal power [28]. Gains and noise figures for all signal modes may similarly be calculated.

The quality of the match between signal and pump intensity profiles which can be evaluated by the overlap integral:

$${\eta _{pj, si}} = \int\limits_0^{2\pi } {\int\limits_{{R_{\textrm{i}n}}}^{{R_a}} {rdrd\varphi {\Gamma _{pi}}(r,\varphi ){\Gamma _{sj}}(r,\varphi )} }$$
Then, we optimized the parameters of the fiber, including ${n_{high}}$, ${n_{low}}$, ${R_{in}}$, ${R_a}$ and ${R_b}$, to guarantee the largest gain of LP21 mode. The modal characteristics of the RCF is theoretically analyzed by full vector finite element method. The optimal refractive index distribution across the center of the ring-core fiber is shown in Fig. 3(a). Comparing with the cladding, the refractive index difference of the central region, ring-core, and bound layer are about 0, 0.025, and −0.004, respectively. The annular ring core have high refractive index and the center region have a low refractive. The bound layer with a low refractive index is designed to resist the perturbations and bending loss. At 976 nm and 1060 nm, the RCF supports four LP modes (LP01, LP11, LP21, LP31) with high effective index difference (>10−3), which including 14 vector modes (2 modes in LP01, 4 modes LP11 with high effective index difference (>10−4), 4 modes LP21 with low effective index difference (<10−5), and LP31 mode not shown). The annular ring core with the nhigh index is uniformly doped with Ytterbium as an active fiber. Figures 3(b)–3(d) shows the gain experienced by each signal mode when pumping in the LP01, p, LP11, p and LP21, p modes. It can be seen that the gain distribution of LP01, s, LP11, s and LP21, s mode are quite different due to different intensity distribution of pump modes in the transverse directions of the fiber. And the power LP21, p was continually adjusted to maintain a 2 dB difference between the gains of LP21, s and LP01, s, LP11, s.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a) The RIP of the ring-core fiber overlaid with the normalized signal intensity profile of supported modes. (b-d) Modal gain of each signal modes at 1060nm varied with 976 nm pump powers in (b) LP01, p (c) LP11, p (d) LP21, p

Download Full Size | PDF

The model in the manuscript was built up to demonstrate the behaviors of a fiber laser with multimode competition. As is shown in Fig. 4, we summarize the three pump LP modes and their corresponding numerical calculation MDG for all LP mode in the fiber into three groups. The pump power was set as 200 mw that is same in the following experiment. As is shown in Fig. 4, the desired LP21 mode will get the highest gain which come from two main factors: (a) the special designs of the active fiber, (b) the optimal selection of the transverse intensity of the pump. The difference value of MDG between LP21 mode and the adjacent two mode was 3 dB. The LP21 mode can extract the population inversion most effectively. The adjacent modes will see an unsaturated gain coefficient that is far below the peak gain. Thus, the gain of the two mode are not too far above threshold of a laser, they cannot oscillate. Then the only LP21 mode will oscillate in the cavity due to the mode competition. By adjusting the PC in the laser cavity, the ideal polarization state of 2nd CVBs can be obtained.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. The distribution of MDG of three LP signal modes with three LP pump modes.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Experimental setup and results

According to the theory illustrated in section 2, an experiment setup to generate the 2nd order CVB was proposed. The experimental setup is given in Fig. 5 schematically, where a 50-cm-long Yb-RDF is used as gain fiber. The measured absorption coefficient of the home-made active fiber is ∼31 dB/m at 976 nm. The pump source is fiber coupled 976 nm laser diode, and a mode converter based on a vortex phase plate (VPP, u7155E RPC Photonics) is used to transform the spatial mode of the pump into LP21 mode. Then, the pump laser is coupled into the annular doped Yb-RDF fiber’s core with a coupling efficiency of about 60%. The focal length of L1 and L2 are 75 cm and 150 cm respectively. The distance between VPP and the lens L1 is 150 cm. The cavity of the fiber laser comprise a fiber cleavage plane and a few mode fiber Bragg gratings (FM-FBG) written on the home-mad RCF. The FMFBG fabricated in the RCF serve as the highly reflective mirror (reflectivity 93% around 1061.3 nm). The end of the Yb-RDF was cleaved to be flat, yielding a 4% Fresnel reflection coefficient. The laser cavity was formed between the FM-FBG and the end of the Yb-RDF. The FM-FBG are written on the ring-core few mode photosensitive fiber with initial periods of 361 nm, and the reflection spectra are shown in Fig. 6(a). The three peaks in the reflection spectra od the two FMFBGs indicate three kinds of reflection among different order modes. From the left peak to the right peak represents the LP21, LP11, LP01 mode reflection respectively. The laser spectrum shows that the laser oscillate at 1061.3 nm with 3 dB bandwidth of 0.1 nm and a signal-to-background ratio of more than 60 dB. The center wavelength of the laser coincides with the self-coupling reflection peak of the LP21 mode, which indicates the high-order LP21 modes oscillation in the laser cavity. In the experiment, it can be observed that the fiber laser can still operate in LP21 mode stably with fiber bending and perturbations.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Schematic illustration of the fiber laser

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. (a) Measured spectra of the FM-FBG. The pink line are the reflection spectra of the FMFBG. The blue line shows that the optical spectrum of the output laser. (b) Optical output power versus absorbed pump power. The solid red line is a linear fit for the output over the threshold.

Download Full Size | PDF

After passing through a 2nd order VPP, the pump light is converted into 2nd order CVBs and coupled into RCF by a collimator. Then the pump light is converted to the LP21mode in the fiber. The intensity profiles of the pump LP21 mode are captured at the end of the RCF using the CCD camera when the spatial mode coupled into a passive RCF (as shown in Fig. 7(a)). The fiber laser can operate at vector fiber mode i.e. CVB by adjusting the intra-cavity PC. The doughnut-shaped pattern of CVB laser can maintain with the increase of pump power (as is shown in Figs. 7(b)–7(d). The output power versus absorbed pump power of the fiber laser is shown in Fig. 6(b). The threshold of laser is as low as 47.73mw. The output of CVBs increase linearly above threshold pump powers and the slope efficiency of the fiber laser is 79.61% respect to absorbed pump power. By using a dichromic mirror, we measured the residual power ratio compared to the fiber laser emission. The residual pump power is quite weak to be 3%. Thus, the absorbed is almost the same with the launched pump power. The maximum output power is 89.6mw at a pump power of 172mw. Owing to the high modal gain difference between LP21 and other modes and passive mode selection of laser resonator, the output doughnut mode has negligible intensity at beam center and no concentric outside the beam, which reveals the high purity of the output CVBs. Using the method described in [11], the mode purities of CVBs with 2nd order are measured to be 96.3%. The 2nd order CVB mode purity was tested by the coupled energy of the detected beams into a two-mode fiber. When the laser operate at a stable 2nd order CVB mode, we obtain 1.1mw output from the two-mode fiber with the launched power 30mw. There is a little coupling loss when the hybrid mode of LP01 and LP11 coupled into the two-mode fiber. Thus, we estimated the mode purity of the 2nd order CVB to be 96.3%.

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. (a) Intensity profiles of the pump LP21 modes captured at the end of the fiber. Intensity profiles of 2nd order laser CVB output versus pump power (b) 40mw (c) 70mw (d) 180mw

Download Full Size | PDF

The CVBs has good modal symmetry that could be recognized from Fig. 8. The polarization states of the output CVB beams can be confirmed by inserting and rotating a linear polarizer between the collimator and the CCD camera. Intensity distributions of the beam after passing through the linear polarizer at four different orientations are shown in the Figs. 8(b)–8(e), revealing the cylindrical polarization distribution of the generated laser beams. More generally and interestingly, tuning the intra-cavity PC will enable generation of all the states on a high-order Poincaré sphere [32]. Comparing to the relevant previous research [33,34], the high-order mode pump allow the fiber laser have higher slope efficiency and high flexibility. In future work, we intend to generalize the present scheme to be applied to efficient generation of higher-order CVB laser and CVBs amplifier. Moreover, comparing to the mode select technique based on the polarization dependence of FMFBG, this operating mechanism is not sensitive to polarization. Thus, the fiber laser has high stability to the environment.

 figure: Fig. 8.

Fig. 8. (a) Intensity profiles of the 2nd order CVBs without a polarizer and (b)–(e) after passing through a linear polarizer with four transmission axis orientations denoted by the white arrows.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In summary, we experimentally demonstrate a Yb-fiber laser generating second-order CVBs with high efficiency and low threshold, in which a combination of high-order mode pump and annular doping was used to the oscillation of cylindrical vector modes with adaptive modal gain control. Benefiting from the pump mode and doping region of active fiber, the fiber laser power reached 172mw with a high slope efficiency of ∼79.61%. The attractiveness of such approach is linked to its ability to be scaled up for generating single higher order CVBs with high efficiency. Owing to the flexible controllability of modal gain inside the laser cavity, it is possible for using such setup to perform arbitrary CVBs. It is important to note that our setup only perform second-order CVBs due to the unique fiber design and pump mode (see section 2). A high-efficiency fiber laser emitting single high-order mode output can be achieved through adaptive design of fiber and selection of pump modes. Moreover, high-order mode pump modes potentially enable key application in high-efficiency CVBs fiber amplifier and high-dimension entanglement source. In general, the simple and efficient setup opens the opportunity to drastically reduce the energy consumption compared to classical CVBs fiber laser. These characteristics may enable the present technique to play a key role in the advent spatial division multiplexing (SDM) system and high power fiber laser system.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61675188); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0401901).

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Prof. Baosen Shi, Dr. Zhiyuan Zhou, Dr. Yinhai Li, Dr. Shilong Liu, Dr. Shikai Liu and Dr. Chen Yang for helpful discussion. We also thank Rui Zhang and Jingqin Su in Jiangsu Hengtong Optical Fiber Technology Com. Ltd. for the fabrication of the fiber.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Q. Zhan, “Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to applications,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 1(1), 1–57 (2009). [CrossRef]  

2. G. Volpe and D. Petrov, “Generation of cylindrical vector beams with few-mode fibers excited by Laguerre–Gaussian beams,” Opt. Commun. 237(1-3), 89–95 (2004). [CrossRef]  

3. R. Chen, J. Wang, X. Zhang, A. Wang, H. Ming, F. Li, D. Chung, and Q. Zhan, “High efficiency all-fiber cylindrical vector beam laser using a long-period fiber grating,” Opt. Lett. 43(4), 755–758 (2018). [CrossRef]  

4. Y. Zhou, K. Yan, R. Chen, C. Gu, L. Xu, A. Wang, and Q. Zhan, “Resonance efficiency enhancement for cylindrical vector fiber laser with optically induced long period grating,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 110(16), 161104 (2017). [CrossRef]  

5. W. Zhang, L. Huang, K. Wei, P. Li, B. Jiang, D. Mao, F. Gao, T. Mei, G. Zhang, and J. Zhao, “High-order optical vortex generation in a few-mode fiber via cascaded acoustically driven vector mode conversion,” Opt. Lett. 41(21), 5082–5085 (2016). [CrossRef]  

6. T. A. Nieminen, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Forces in optical tweezers with radially and azimuthally polarized trapping beams,” Opt. Lett. 33(2), 122–124 (2008). [CrossRef]  

7. Y. Kozawa, D. Matsunaga, and S. Sato, “Superresolution imaging via superoscillation focusing of a radially polarized beam,” Optica 5(2), 86–92 (2018). [CrossRef]  

8. A. Bouhelier, F. Ignatovich, A. Bruyant, C. Huang, G. Colas des Francs, J. C. Weeber, A. Dereux, G. P. Wiederrecht, and L. Novotny, “Surface plasmon interference excited by tightly focused laser beams,” Opt. Lett. 32(17), 2535–2537 (2007). [CrossRef]  

9. D. N. Gupta, N. Kant, D. E. Kim, and H. Suk, “Electron acceleration to GeV energy by a radially polarized laser,” Phys. Lett. A 368(5), 402–407 (2007). [CrossRef]  

10. V. G. Niziev and A. V. Nesterov, “Influence of beam polarization on laser cutting efficiency,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 32(13), 1455–1461 (1999). [CrossRef]  

11. W. Qiao, T. Lei, Z. Wu, S. Gao, Z. Li, and X. Yuan, “Approach to multiplexing fiber communication with cylindrical vector beams,” Opt. Lett. 42(13), 2579–2582 (2017). [CrossRef]  

12. D. lin, N. Baktash, S. Alam, and D. J. Richardson, “106W, picosecond Yb-doped fiber MOPA system with a radially polarized output beam,” Opt. Lett. 43(20), 4957–4960 (2018). [CrossRef]  

13. D. Flamm, C. Schulze, D. Naidoo, S. Schröter, A. Forbes, and M. Duparré, “All-digital holographic tool for mode excitation and analysis in optical fibers,” J. Lightwave Technol. 31(7), 1023–1032 (2013). [CrossRef]  

14. C. Yang, Z. Y. Zhou, Y. Li, Y. H. Li, S. L. Liu, S. K. Liu, Z. H. Xu, G. C. Guo, and B. S. Shi, “Nonlinear frequency conversion and manipulation of vector beams in a Sagnac loop,” Opt. Lett. 44(2), 219–222 (2019). [CrossRef]  

15. B. Ndagano, I. Nape, M. A. Cox, C. Rosales-Guzman, and A. Forbes, “Creation and detection of vector vortex modes for classical and quantum communication,” J. Lightwave Technol. 36(2), 292–301 (2018). [CrossRef]  

16. K. Yan, J. Lin, Y. Zhou, C. Gu, L. Xu, A. Wang, P. Yao, and Q. Zhan, “Bi2Te3 based passively Q-switched fiber laser with cylindrical vector beam emission,” Appl. Opt. 55(11), 3026–3029 (2016). [CrossRef]  

17. H. Li, K. Yan, Y. Zhang, C. Gu, P. Yao, L. Xu, R. Zhang, and J. Su, “Low-threshold high-efficiency all-fiber laser generating cylindrical vector beams operated in LP11 mode throughout the entire cavity,” Appl. Phys. Express 11(12), 122502 (2018). [CrossRef]  

18. T. Wang, F. Shi, Y. Huang, J. Wen, Z. Luo, F. Pang, T. Wang, and X. Zeng, “High-order mode direct oscillation of few-mode fiber laser for high-quality cylindrical vector beams,” Opt. Express 26(9), 11850–11858 (2018). [CrossRef]  

19. N. K. Viswanathan and V. V. G. Inavalli, “Generation of optical vector beams using a two-mode fiber,” Opt. Lett. 34(8), 1189–1191 (2009). [CrossRef]  

20. S. Pidishety, S. Pachava, P. Gregg, S. Ramachandran, G. Brambilla, and B. Srinivasan, “Orbital angular momentum beam excitation using an all-fiber weakly fused mode selective coupler,” Opt. Lett. 42(21), 4347–4350 (2017). [CrossRef]  

21. S. Pidishety, B. Srinivasan, and G. Brambilla, “All-fiber fused coupler for stable generation of radially and azimuthally polarized beams,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29(1), 31–34 (2017). [CrossRef]  

22. Y. Zhao, J. Fan, H. Shi, Y. Li, Y. Song, and M. Hu, “Intracavity cylindrical vector beam generation from all-PM Er-doped mode-locked fiber laser,” Opt. Express 27(6), 8808–8818 (2019). [CrossRef]  

23. Y. Jung, Q. Kang, R. Sidharthan, D. Ho, S. Yoo, P. Gregg, S. Ramachandran, S.-U. Alam, and D. J. Richardson, “Optical Orbital Angular Momentum Amplifier Based on an Air-Hole Erbium-Doped Fiber,” J. Lightwave Technol. 35(3), 430–436 (2017). [CrossRef]  

24. S. Pidishety, S. Zhu, Y. Feng, B. Srinivasan, and J. Nilsson, “Raman amplification of optical beam carrying orbital angular momentum in a multimode step-index fiber,” Opt. Lett. 44(7), 1658–1661 (2019). [CrossRef]  

25. S. Zhu, S. Pidishety, Y. Feng, S. Hong, J. Demas, R. Sidharthan, S. Yoo, S. Ramachandran, B. Srinivasan, and J. Nilsson, “Multimode-pumped Raman amplification of a higher order mode in a large mode area fiber,” Opt. Express 26(18), 23295–23304 (2018). [CrossRef]  

26. Q. Kang, P. Gregg, Y. Jung, E. L. Lim, S. Alam, S. Ramachandran, and D. J. Richardson, “Amplification of 12 OAM Modes in an air-core erbium doped fiber,” Opt. Express 23(22), 28341–28348 (2015). [CrossRef]  

27. M. Gong, Y. Yuan, C. Li, P. Yan, H. Zhang, and S. Liao, “Numerical modeling of transverse mode competition in strongly pumped multimode fiber lasers and amplifiers,” Opt. Express 15(6), 3236–3246 (2007). [CrossRef]  

28. N. Bai, E. Ip, T. Wang, and G. Li, “Multimode fiber amplifier with tunable modal gain using a reconfigurable high-order mode pump,” Opt. Express 19(17), 16601–16611 (2011). [CrossRef]  

29. Z. Lin, A. Wang, L. Xu, B. Sun, C. Gu, and H. Ming, “Analysis of generating cylindrical vector beams using a few-mode fiber Bragg grating,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(22), 3540–3544 (2012). [CrossRef]  

30. M. Tang, H. Li, L. Huang, M. Cao, Y. Mi, L. Wu, and G. Ren, “Erbium-ring-doped fiber laser for transverse vector modes output,” Opt. Laser Technol. 115, 233–238 (2019). [CrossRef]  

31. I. Kelson and A. A. Hardy, “Strongly pumped fiber lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 34(9), 1570–1577 (1998). [CrossRef]  

32. G. Milione, H. I. Sztul, D. A. Nolan, and R. R. Alfano, “Higher-order Poincaré sphere, Stokes parameters, and the angular momentum of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(5), 053601 (2011). [CrossRef]  

33. B. Sun, A. Wang, L. Xu, C. Gu, Z. Lin, H. Ming, and Q. Zhan, “efficiency and bandwidth of the mode converter,” Opt. Lett. 37(4), 464–466 (2012). [CrossRef]  

34. T. Liu, S.-P. Chen, and J. Hou, “Selective transverse mode operation of an all-fiber laser with a mode-selective fiber Bragg grating pair,” Opt. Lett. 41(24), 5692–5695 (2016). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Ytterbium-ring doped fiber
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Schematic of fiber laser
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) The RIP of the ring-core fiber overlaid with the normalized signal intensity profile of supported modes. (b-d) Modal gain of each signal modes at 1060nm varied with 976 nm pump powers in (b) LP01, p (c) LP11, p (d) LP21, p
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The distribution of MDG of three LP signal modes with three LP pump modes.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Schematic illustration of the fiber laser
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. (a) Measured spectra of the FM-FBG. The pink line are the reflection spectra of the FMFBG. The blue line shows that the optical spectrum of the output laser. (b) Optical output power versus absorbed pump power. The solid red line is a linear fit for the output over the threshold.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. (a) Intensity profiles of the pump LP21 modes captured at the end of the fiber. Intensity profiles of 2nd order laser CVB output versus pump power (b) 40mw (c) 70mw (d) 180mw
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. (a) Intensity profiles of the 2nd order CVBs without a polarizer and (b)–(e) after passing through a linear polarizer with four transmission axis orientations denoted by the white arrows.

Equations (10)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

n ( r ) = { n 0 , 0 r < R i n n h i g h , R i n r < R a ( Yb  - doped Region ) n l o w , R a r < R b n 0 , R b r < R c l a d
N 2 ( r , φ , z ) N 0 = i [ P p i + ( z ) + P p i ( z ) ] σ a p , i Γ p i ( r , φ ) h ν p + j [ P s j + ( z ) + P s j ( z ) ] σ a s , i Γ s j ( r , φ ) h ν s i [ P p i + ( z ) + P p i ( z ) ] σ e p , i Γ p i ( r , φ ) h ν p + 1 τ + j [ P s j + ( z ) + P s j ( z ) ] σ e s , j Γ s j ( r , φ ) h ν s
± d P p i ± ( z ) d z = { 0 2 π R i n R a [ σ e q N 2 ( r , φ , z ) σ a p N 1 ( r , φ , z ) ] Γ p i ( r , φ ) r d r d φ } P p i ± ( z ) α p i P p i ± ( z )
± d P s j ± ( z ) d z = { 0 2 π R i n R a [ σ e s N 2 ( r , φ , z ) σ a s N 1 ( r , φ , z ) ] Γ s i ( r , φ ) r d r d φ } P s j ± ( z ) α s j P s j ± ( z )
Γ p i ( r , φ ) = ψ i ( r , φ ) 0 2 π R i n R a r ψ i ( r , φ ) d r d φ
Γ s i ( r , φ ) = ψ j ( r , φ ) 0 2 π R i n R a r ψ j ( r , φ ) d r d φ
P p i + ( z = 0 ) = P p i
P s i + ( z = 0 ) = R 1 ( λ i ) P s i ( z = 0 )
P s i ( z = L ) = R 2 P + s i ( z = L )
η p j , s i = 0 2 π R i n R a r d r d φ Γ p i ( r , φ ) Γ s j ( r , φ )
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.