Abstract
We present an explicit sech-squared-soliton solution associated with the optical Pockels effect, achieved through the generation of the frequency combs via parametric down-conversion in optical microresonators with quadratic nonlinearity. This soliton contrasts the parametric sech-soliton describing the half-harmonic field in the limit of the large index mismatch, and associated with the cascaded-Kerr effect. We predict differences in the spectral profiles and powers of the Pockels and cascaded-Kerr solitons, and report that the pump power threshold of the former agree with the recent experimental observations.
Published by The Optical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.
1. Introduction
Nonlinear and quantum optics in ring microresonators have been attracting a great deal of attention over the past decades [1]. In particular, the frequency comb generation and soliton photonics in microresonators are reaching unprecedented levels of practical relevance [2]. The most ubiquitous microresonator solitons remain the dissipative version of the Kerr solitons, which, thanks to the small losses of modern microresonators, remain well approximated by the fundamental bright solitons of the Nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation [2–4].
The second-order, $\chi ^{(2)}$, nonlinearity has always been a viable alternative to the Kerr one. The $\chi ^{(2)}$ microresonators have the potential to extend comb generation to new wavelengths, elevate dispersion constraints, and reduce power requirements [5]. Using of the $\chi ^{(2)}$ response comes, however, with the caveats of the need to care about the phase and group velocity matching to take full advantage of it. One of the recent highlights in this area was the result by Bruch and colleagues [6] demonstrating the solitons due to parametric down-conversion in an integrated $\chi ^{(2)}$ microresonator. A sufficiently comprehensive list of references on the solitons in $\chi ^{(2)}$ resonators can be found in [7]. For further recent and historic theoretical contributions on the bright and dark solitons due to parametric-down conversion see, e.g., Refs. [8–17].
While Ref. [6] has used, or perhaps even coined, the term ’Pockels solitons’, it is also known that the impact of the $\chi ^{(2)}$ nonlinearity on the refractive index change depends on how well the index matching between the pump and either half- or second-harmonic is arranged. In the mismatched limit, the $\chi ^{(2)}$ susceptibility starts mimicking the Kerr effect, which could be called the cascaded-Kerr nonlinearity, see, e.g., [7]. Thus, the transition between the Pockels and the cascaded-Kerr solitons is a problem that requires further considerations. Our focus here is on the bright soliton pulses. It is known that, in the phase-mismatched cascaded-Kerr limit, the $\chi ^{(2)}$ microresonator model can be reduced to the parametric NLS equation [8,9], which has the sech-soliton solution [8,9,17–20]. One outstanding problem would be finding the solution for the bright parametric solitons in the practically important case of the phase-matched resonators.
Any intense intra-resonator waveform produces the nonlinear shift of the resonance frequencies. For the Kerr or Kerr-like solitons, this shift is naturally expected to be proportional to the power. This work aims to demonstrate that, in the phase-matched microresonator parametric-down conversion, there exists an explicit bright soliton solution producing the nonlinear resonance shift proportional to the field amplitude, i.e., like should be expected in the optical Pockels effect. The spatial profile of this soliton is given by the sech-squared function, unlike the sech-profile of the Kerr soliton. We note before proceeding, that the optical Pockels effect discussed below should be distinguished from the voltage controlled one, which is broadly used in Pockels cells, and as a frequency comb generation tool [21,22].
2. Model
Our model of the multi-mode half-harmonic generation in a microresonator follows the approach of Ref. [7]. The fundamental (pump) field, ’f’, is spectrally centred around the pump laser frequency, $\omega _p$, and the half-harmonic field, ’h’, is around $\omega _p/2$. The fields and detunings are defined as
Dispersion engineering is important for any type of modelocking, including the soliton modelocking. We set $D_{1\textrm {f}, 1\textrm {h}}/2\pi$ as the repetition-rate (free-spectral-ranges, FSR), and $D_{2\textrm {f}, 2\textrm {h}}$ as the dispersion parameters having units of Hz [7]. The FSR difference, $D_{1\textrm {f}}-D_{1\textrm {h}}$, scales inversely with $R$, while $D_{2\textrm {f}, 2\textrm {h}}\sim 1/R^{2}$ [23]. Therefore going from the mm to 10’s of micron radii leads to the relative reduction of the impact of the FSR difference on the dynamics, $|D_{1\textrm {f}}-D_{1\textrm {h}}|/|D_{2\textrm {f}}|\sim R$. The group-velocity matching can be implemented either across the zero-dispersion point for the modes of the same family or, for the same signs of $D_{2\textrm {f},2\textrm {h}}$, using the different mode families and the avoided mode-crossings, see, e.g., [24–27]. Applications of the quasi-phase matching [28,29] and optical fibres [30–32] offer further avenues for dispersion engineering in $\chi ^{(2)}$ resonators. In order to derive transparent analytical results for Pockels solitons, we consider the case of the FSR, i.e., group velocity, matching, $D_{1\textrm {f}}=D_{1\textrm {h}}=D_1$, for the same dispersion signs, i.e., $D_{2\textrm {f}}/D_{2\textrm {h}}>0$. The case of the opposite dispersion signs, $D_{2\textrm {f}}/D_{2\textrm {h}}<0$, is also proceedable analytically, but for the reasons of brevity we prefer to keep this work focused on the former.
Transforming to the rotating frame of reference, $\theta =\vartheta -D_1 t$, the equations for $\psi _{\textrm {f},\textrm {h}}$ are [7]
While the results derived below could be a guideline for a range of devices, our choice of parameters for the numerical estimates is geared towards the integrated resonators as used in Ref. [6]. Namely, we assume $\kappa _{\textrm {f},\textrm {h}}/2\pi =100$MHz, $D_{1\textrm {f},1\textrm {h}}/2\pi =300$GHz, $D_{2\textrm {f},2\textrm {h}}/2\pi =30$MHz, $\gamma _{\textrm {f},\textrm {h}}/2\pi =500$MHz/$\sqrt {\textrm {W}}$, and $\eta =1/2$. The linewidth here is two orders of magnitudes larger than in the high-Q bulk resonator samples [1], this explains relatively high pump power, ${{\cal W}}=80$mW, required to generate solitons in Ref. [6]. The sech-squared soliton derived below fits well into the above range of the parameter values, while the sech one requires even higher input powers ${{\cal W}}\sim 1$W. This is because the Pockels nonlinear response is achieved under the phase matching conditions, i.e., $|\varepsilon |/\kappa _{\textrm {h}}\sim 1$, while the sech-soliton is associated with the cascaded-Kerr nonlinear response triggered for $|\varepsilon |/\kappa _{\textrm {h}}\sim 10^{2}$. The large $|\varepsilon |$ lead to the inefficient conversion and push the soliton thresholds up.
3. Sech-squared soliton: Pockels regime
To find the Pockels soliton we first neglect the loss terms by assuming $|\delta |\gg \kappa _{\textrm {h}}$, $|2\delta -\varepsilon |\gg \kappa _{\textrm {f}}$. Practically, it suffices to take $|\delta |/\kappa _{\textrm {h}}\sim 10$ and $|\varepsilon |/\kappa _{\textrm {h}}\lesssim 1$. Then, Eq. (3) become
The soliton solution is sought in the form
so that the half-harmonic pulse has the vanishing background and the fundamental has the finite one. Here, the soliton profile $\psi (\theta )$, the phase $\phi$, the dimensionless constant $B$, and the background field $H$, should be determined. We note that the existence of the zero solution (vanishing background) for $\psi _{\textrm {h}}$ also holds for the full model, see Eq. (3).We substitute Eq. (6) in Eq. (5), and separate the real and imaginary parts. The first outcomes of this procedure are the explicit expressions for the soliton background
and for the phase, $\phi =\pm \pi /2$. The $\phi =-\pi /2$ makes the soliton part of $\psi _{\textrm {f}}$ in Eq. (6b) to be in-phase with the background field, which is known to correspond to the always unstable soliton family. The $\phi =\pi /2$ solution is $\pi$-out-of-phase with the background and is a largely stable one [15,19].The further result of the substitution is a pair of the differential equations for $\psi$,
$\psi$ in Eq. (9) must simultaneously solve Eqs. (8b) and (8a), which requires acknowledging the following conditions
We first look into how the peak power of the sech-squared soliton scales with the detuning by taking the important practical case of the exact phase matching, $\varepsilon =0$. Fixing dispersions to comply with Eq. (10), $D_{2\textrm {f}}/D_{2\textrm {h}}=2$, is a soft assumption to make for the sake of dealing with a transparent analytical solution. For $\delta /\kappa _{\textrm {h}} =10$, the peak soliton power in the fundamental and half-harmonic fields are
The total power and the spectrum of the half-harmonic component of the sech-squared Pockels soliton are
4. Limits of existence of the sech-squared solitons
Accepting a small level of complication of the algebra as a necessity lets us to trace the effects of the so far neglected loss terms. This needs to be limited by the half-harmonic loss, $\kappa _{\textrm {h}}$, which, however, reveals the net effect well, and allows to remain within the comfortably transparent analytical considerations. Equation (5) is now replaced with
Equations (6), (14), (15) lead to the refreshed system for $\psi$
The soliton solution of Eq. (16b) is then,
5. Sech soliton: cascaded-Kerr regime
The parametric sech-solitons in resonators [8,17] are like the ones previously found in a few other physical contexts, see, e.g., Refs. [17–20]. They can be derived via the reduction of Eq. (3) to the parametric NLS equation. The reduction starts from the assumption that the resonator is pumped well away from the resonance, $|\varepsilon |\gg |\delta |$, while the half-harmonic is generated close to the resonance. This practically inefficient phase-mismatched arrangement allows to approximately resolve Eq. (3b) with
The total power and spectrum for the cascaded-Kerr solitons are
6. Pump power threshold: Sech-squared vs sech solitons
Retaining the $\kappa _{\textrm {h}}$-loss term in Eq. (21), leads to the substitution $\delta \to \bar \delta =\delta \pm \sqrt {\kappa _{\textrm {f}}^{2}\gamma _{\textrm {h}}^{2}{{\cal H}}^{2}/\kappa _{\textrm {h}}^{2}\varepsilon ^{2}-1}$ in Eq. (22). Plots of the soliton power, that account (blue) and disregard (red) $\kappa _{\textrm {h}}$, are shown in Fig. 2(b). Because of the dominance of the index-matching parameters $\varepsilon$ in this regime, the square-root is independent from $\delta$. The existence of the cascaded-Kerr soliton requires ${{\cal H}}>{{\cal H}}_\textrm {cKerr}=|\varepsilon |\kappa _{\textrm {h}}/\gamma _{\textrm {h}}\kappa _{\textrm {f}}$, i.e., the laser power is
If $\varepsilon =0$, or $|\varepsilon |\ll |\delta |$, then the Pockels soliton given by Eqs. (17), (18) exists for the much smaller threshold powers determined by the detuning,
7. Summary
We have elaborated the explicit sech-squared Pockels solitons describing the soliton regime of the phase and group velocity matched parametric down-conversion in microresonators with either normal or anomalous dispersion. We have compared these solitons with the cascaded-Kerr sech-solitons existing away from the phase-matching condition and revealed the differences in (i) the values of the threshold powers, see Eqs. (26), (27), (ii) scaling of the soliton power with the detuning parameter, see Fig. 2, and (iii) how the Pockels-soliton spectra deviate from the triangular spectra of the sech-solitons, see Fig. 1 and, cf., Eqs. (13) and (25). The sech and sech-squared shapes of the half-harmonic field are embedded, as the two limit cases, inside the wider and numerically accessible family of the bright soliton solutions, see, e.g., [6,8,9,14–16].
Funding
Russian Science Foundation (17-12-01413-Π).
Disclosures
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Data availability
No data files are associated with this manuscript.
References
1. D. V. Strekalov, C. Marquardt, A. B. Matsko, H. G. L. Schwefel, and G. Leuchs, “Nonlinear and quantum optics with whispering gallery resonators,” J. Opt. 18(12), 123002 (2016). [CrossRef]
2. T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, “Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microresonators,” Science 361(6402), eaan8083 (2018). [CrossRef]
3. T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kondratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Temporal solitons in optical microresonators,” Nat. Photonics 8(2), 145–152 (2014). [CrossRef]
4. C. Milian and D. V. Skryabin, “Soliton families and resonant radiation in a micro-ring resonator near zero group-velocity dispersion,” Opt. Express 22(3), 3732 (2014). [CrossRef]
5. D. V. Skryabin and I. Breunig, “Moulding light on a ring,” Commun. Phys. 4(1), 158 (2021). [CrossRef]
6. A. W. Bruch, X. Liu, Z. Gong, J. B. Surya, M. Li, C. L. Zou, and H. Tang, “Pockels soliton microcomb,” Nat. Photonics 15(1), 21–27 (2021). [CrossRef]
7. D. V. Skryabin, “Coupled-mode theory for microresonators with quadratic nonlinearity,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37(9), 2604 (2020). [CrossRef]
8. A. Villois, N. Kondratiev, I. Breunig, D. N. Puzyrev, and D. V. Skryabin, “Frequency combs in a microring optical parametric oscillator,” Opt. Lett. 44(18), 4443 (2019). [CrossRef]
9. P. Parra-Rivas, L. Gelens, and F. Leo, “Localized structures in dispersive and doubly resonant optical parametric oscillators,” Phys. Rev. E 100(3), 032219 (2019). [CrossRef]
10. I. Ricciardi, S. Mosca, M. Parisi, F. Leo, T. Hansson, M. Erkintalo, P. Maddaloni, P. De Natale, S. Wabnitz, and M. De Rosa, “Optical Frequency Combs in Quadratically Nonlinear Resonators,” Micromachines 11(2), 230 (2020). [CrossRef]
11. E. V. Podivilov, B. I. Sturman, and I. Breunig, “Frequency comb solutions for driven chi(2) optical microresonators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 37(11), 3316 (2020). [CrossRef]
12. P. Parra-Rivas, L. Gelens, T. Hansson, S. Wabnitz, and F. Leo, “Frequency comb generation through the locking of domain walls in doubly resonant dispersive optical parametric oscillators,” Opt. Lett. 44(8), 2004 (2019). [CrossRef]
13. A. Sheng, C. Xi, Z. Yang, X. Jiang, and G. He, “Quadratic Soliton Combs in Doubly Resonant Dispersive Optical Parametric Oscillators,” IEEE Photonics J. 12(2), 1–7 (2020). [CrossRef]
14. K. Staliunas and V. J. Sanchez-Morcillo, “Localized structures in degenerate optical parametric oscillators,” Opt. Commun. 139(4-6), 306–312 (1997). [CrossRef]
15. D. V. Skryabin, “Instabilities of cavity solitons in optical parametric oscillators,” Phys. Rev. E 60(4), R3508–R3511 (1999). [CrossRef]
16. D. V. Skryabin and A. R. Champneys, “Walking cavity solitons,” Phys. Rev. E 63(6), 066610 (2001). [CrossRef]
17. S. Longhi, “Localized structures in optical parametric oscillation,” Phys. Scr. 56(6), 611–618 (1997). [CrossRef]
18. J. W. Miles, “Parametrically excited solitary waves,” J. Fluid Mech. 148, 451–460 (1984). [CrossRef]
19. S. Fauve and O. Thual, “Solitary waves generated by subcritical instabilities in dissipative systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 64(3), 282–284 (1990). [CrossRef]
20. I. V. Barashenkov, M. M. Bogdan, and V. I. Korobov, “Stability Diagram of the Phase-Locked Solitons in the Parametrically Driven, Damped Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation,” Europhys. Lett. 15(2), 113–118 (1991). [CrossRef]
21. A. Rueda, F. Sedlmeir, M. Kumari, G. Leuchs, and H. G. L. Schwefel, “Resonant electro-optic frequency comb,” Nature 568(7752), 378–381 (2019). [CrossRef]
22. A. Parriaux, K. Hammani, and G. Millot, “Electro-optic frequency combs,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 12(1), 223 (2020). [CrossRef]
23. C. Milian, A. V. Gorbach, M. Taki, A. V. Yulin, and D. V. Skryabin, “Solitons and frequency combs in silica microring resonators: Interplay of the Raman and higher-order dispersion effects,” Phys. Rev. A 92(3), 033851 (2015). [CrossRef]
24. J. Schollhammer, M. A. Baghban, and K. Gallo, “Modal birefringence-free lithium niobate waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 42(18), 3578 (2017). [CrossRef]
25. L. Cai, A. V. Gorbach, Y. Wang, H. Hui, and W. Ding, “Highly efficient broadband second harmonic generation mediated by mode hybridization and nonlinearity patterning in compact fiber-integrated lithium niobate nano-waveguides,” Sci. Rep. 8(1), 12478 (2018). [CrossRef]
26. J. Y. Chen, Y. M. Sua, H. Fan, and Y. P. Huang, “Modal phase matched lithium niobate nanocircuits for integrated nonlinear photonics,” OSA Continuum 1(1), 229 (2018). [CrossRef]
27. L. Fan, C.-L. Zou, R. Cheng, X. Guo, X. Han, Z. Gong, S. Wang, and H. X. Tang, “Superconducting cavity electro-optics: A platform for coherent photon conversion between superconducting and photonic circuits,” Sci. Adv. 4(8), eaar4994 (2018). [CrossRef]
28. M. Jankowski, C. Langrock, B. Desiatov, A. Marandi, C. Wang, M. Zhang, C. R. Phillips, M. Loncar, and M. M. Fejer, “Ultrabroadband nonlinear optics in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides,” Optica 7(1), 40 (2020). [CrossRef]
29. R. Wolf, Y. Jia, S. Bonaus, C. S. Werner, S. J. Herr, I. Breunig, K. Buse, and H. Zappe, “Quasi-phase-matched nonlinear optical frequency conversion in on-chip whispering galleries,” Optica 5(7), 872 (2018). [CrossRef]
30. M. Bache, H. Nielsen, J. Laegsgaard, and O. Bang, “Tuning quadratic nonlinear photonic crystal fibers for zero group-velocity mismatch,” Opt. Lett. 31(11), 1612 (2006). [CrossRef]
31. C. F. O’Donnell, S. C. Kumar, T. Paoletta, and M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, “Widely tunable femtosecond soliton generation in a fiber-feedback optical parametric oscillator,” Optica 7(5), 426 (2020). [CrossRef]
32. A. Roy, S. Jahani, C. Langrock, M. Fejer, and A. Marandi, “Spectral phase transitions in optical parametric oscillators,” Nat. Commun. 12(1), 835 (2021). [CrossRef]
33. Y. N. Karamzin and A. P. Sukhorukov, “Mutual focusing of intense light-beams in media with quadratic nonlinearity,” Zh. Exp. Teor. Fiziki 68(3), 834 (1975); Sov. Phys. JETP 41(3), 414 (1975); http://jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_041_03_0414.pdf (see text after Eq. (43)).
34. M. J. Werner and P. D. Drummond, “Simulton solutions for the parametric amplifier,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10(12), 2390 (1993). [CrossRef]
35. A. V. Buryak, P. Di Trapani, D. V. Skryabin, and S. Trillo, “Optical solitons due to quadratic nonlinearities: from basic physics to futuristic applications,” Phys. Rep. 370(2), 63–235 (2002). [CrossRef]
36. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic Press, 2007).
37. Y. He, Q.-F. Yang, J. Ling, R. Luo, H. Liang, M. Li, B. Shen, H. Wang, K. Vahala, and Q. Lin, “A self-starting bi-chromatic LiNbO3 soliton microcomb,” Optica 6(9), 1138 (2019). [CrossRef]
38. Z. Gong, X. Liu, Y. Xu, and H. X. Tang, “Near-octave lithium niobate soliton microcomb,” Optica 7(10), 1275 (2020). [CrossRef]
39. M. Yu, Y. Okawachi, R. Cheng, C. Wang, M. Zhang, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Loncar, “Raman lasing and soliton mode-locking in lithium niobate microresonators,” Light: Sci. Appl. 9(1), 9 (2020). [CrossRef]
40. M. Nie, Y. Xie, and S. W. Huang, “Deterministic generation of parametrically driven dissipative Kerr soliton,” Nanophotonics 10(6), 1691–1699 (2021). [CrossRef]