Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

1.064-μm-band up-conversion single-photon detector

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Based on the technique of periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide, up-conversion single-photon detection at 1.064-μm is demonstrated. We have achieved a system photon detection efficiency of 32.5% with a very low noise count rate of 45 counts per second by pumping with a 1.55-μm-band single frequency laser using the long-wavelength pumping technique and exploiting volume Bragg grating as a narrow band filter. Replacing the volume Bragg grating with a combination of adequate dielectric filters, a detection efficiency of up to 38% with a noise count rate of 700 counts per second is achieved, making the overall system stable and practical. The up-conversion single-photon detector operating at 1.064 μm can be a promising robust counter and find usage in many fields.

© 2017 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Various single-photon detectors (SPDs) working at different spectral windows have been developed, including silicon avalanche photodiode (APD) [1–3], InGaAs/InP APDs [4, 5], superconducting SPD [6, 7], and up-conversion SPD [8, 9]. SPDs have extensive applications in quantum communication systems [10], optical time domain reflectrometry (OTDR) [11, 12], single-photon-level spectrometer [13, 14], high resolution imaging in astronomy [15] and so forth.

On the other hand, 1.064-μm band is useful in a wide range of applications, such as lidar [16], deep space optical communication [17, 18] and biomedical spectroscopy [19], because the corresponding commercial lasers have many advantages including high power, well-developed technology and compact configuration. The above applications usually need sensitive receivers since the back-scattered light is extremely weak. Therefore, SPDs operating at 1.064-μm band are much in demand.

However, the 1.064-μm band is an awkward detection band because it is at the low-response regime of both silicon and InGaAs/InP APDs. The bandgap of silicon is 1.12 eV, making the absorption and the photo-response curve decrease precipitously for wavelength around 1 μm, while InGaAs/InP APDs are generally designed for telecom band near 1.55 μm. All the traditional commercial detectors are reported with a detection efficiency (DE) of < 5% at 1.064 μm [20, 21]. In laboratories, an enhanced InGaAs/InP APD is reported with a DE of 10% and a noise count rate (NCR) of 1000 counts per second (cps) [22]. Nevertheless, the dead time of microsecond level limits the count rate.

The superconducting SPD using NbN nanowire has much better performance than the enhanced InGaAs/InP APD, reaching a DE of up to 78.3% with a NCR of 10 cps for a single-mode signal [23], and showing a DE of 20% and a NCR of 1000 cps for a multi-mode signal [24]. However, the need of cryogenic cooling and exquisite temperature control may limit its wide use for field implementation [23, 24].

Alternatively, up-conversion SPD is a promising technique to extend the detection range of well-developed silicon APD to near-infrared band, and therefore provides good performance in the 1.064-μm band while avoiding the shortcoming of superconducting SPD. In literature, an up-conversion system at 1.06-μm band was demonstrated with a NCR of 150 cps at the expense of DE [25] by using bulk crystal periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) device and 1.55-μm pulse pump. We can further improve the performance by using PPLN waveguide devices.

PPLN waveguide devices had been used for room-temperature up-conversion SPD for the communication wavelength signal around 1550 nm, showing a DE higher than 40% [26], a NCR as low as 100 cps [27], and a dead time of nanosecond level [28].

In our current work, we use PPLN waveguide devices for up-conversion SPD in the 1.064-μm band. The signal photons at 1.064 μm are launched into a reverse-proton-exchanged (RPE) PPLN waveguide, pumped by a 1.55-μm single frequency laser and up-converted to photons in the visible band that are then detected with silicon APD.

The key for high performance up-conversion SPD is obtaining ultra-low noise. The noises in waveguide devices mainly come from the spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC), spontaneous Raman scattering (SRS), parasitic noises caused by imperfect periodic poling structure and second and third harmonic generation (SHG and THG) when the strong pump goes through the waveguide. The long-wavelength pumping technique can eliminate the noise caused by SPDC and dramatically reduce the noise caused by SRS [29]. By using narrow-band filters, the SHG and THG of the pump can be blocked, and the remnant SRS noise and parasitic noises can be controlled because the noise count rate is proportional to the bandwidth of the filters [27, 30].

By pumping with a 1.55-μm single frequency laser and using volume Bragg grating (VBG) as a narrow-band filter, an up-conversion SPD working at free-running mode has showed an ultra-low NCR of 45 cps for the maximum DE of 32.5%.

2. Waveguide characterization and experimental setup

We fabricate RPE PPLN waveguides [31, 32] for sum-frequency generation (SFG) of 1.55-μm pump and 1.064-μm signal. The length of the waveguides is 52 mm and the length of the quasi-phase-matching (QPM) gratings with a QPM period of 10.2 μm is 48 mm. After fiber pigtailing for the input port, the total waveguide losses of the signal and the pump wavelengths are 1.9 dB and 3 dB, respectively. The propagation loss of the waveguides is measured with the Fabry-Perot fringe-contrast method [33] at 1.55 μm and with cut-off method at 1.064 μm. Both are measured to be ~0.18 dB/cm in the same batch of waveguides. By subtracting the propagation losses from the total losses, the fiber-pigtailing losses are ~1 dB and ~2.1 dB for the signal and the pump wavelengths, respectively. To minimize the loss of the detection system, the mode filter at the input port of the waveguides is specially designed to maximize the coupling with the HI1060 optical fiber on the one hand, and on the other hand, the input and output end faces of the waveguides are anti-reflection (AR) coated for both the signal and the sum-frequency wavelengths to eliminate the Fresnel reflection loss.

The SFG tuning curve [34] for a typical waveguide is shown in Fig. 1(a). The signal wavelength is fixed at 1.064 μm and the pump wavelength is swept around 1550 nm. The phase-matching wavelength is 1546.7 nm at room temperature with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 0.5 nm. The SFG photon conversion efficiency as a function of pump power [35] is shown in Fig. 1(b). The maximum conversion efficiency is obtained when the pump power at the input port of the waveguide’s pigtail is 85 mW, corresponding to a normalized conversion efficiency [26, 29] of 126%/(Wcm2).

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) Tuning curve; (b) Measured SFG photon conversion efficiency (black diamonds) and theoretical fit (red line).

Download Full Size | PDF

A schematic diagram of our experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) Schematic diagram of the up-conversion SPD at 1.064 μm. The waveguide output is filtered by (b) a VBG and a BPF or (c) four BPFs. EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; WDM, wavelength division multiplexer; PC, polarization controller; VOA, variable optical attenuator; BS, beam splitter; PM, power meter; AL, aspheric lens; DM, dichroic mirror; VBG, volume Bragg grating; M, mirror; BPF, band-pass filter; Si APD, silicon avalanche photodiode; MM fiber, multimode fiber.

Download Full Size | PDF

A continuous-wave (CW), tunable external cavity diode laser (ECDL) is utilized as the pump seed source. The seed is amplified by an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) which produces a maximum power of 200 mW at ~1.55 μm. Any unwanted photons at 1.064 μm and 0.631 μm generated in the EDFA are removed using a 1.064-μm/1.55-μm wavelength division multiplexer (WDM) with isolation of ~35 dB and a 0.631-μm/1.55-μm WDM with isolation of ~20 dB.

The 1.064-μm signal, which is one-million photons per second at the input port of the WDM with a power of −97.28 dBm, is provided by a single-frequency CW laser together with two variable optical attenuators [28]. A 1/99 beam splitter and a calibrated power meter are employed to monitor the input signal power.

As RPE waveguides support only TM-polarized modes, polarization controllers are used to adjust the polarization of both the signal and the pump beams. The single photon source is combined with the pump in a 1.064-μm/1.55-μm WDM whose output is connected to the fiber-pigtailed PPLN waveguide. The working temperature of the waveguide is kept at 38 °C by a thermoelectric cooling (TEC) system to maintain the phase-matching condition.

The up-converted photons and the remnant pump are collected by an AR-coated aspheric lens (AL), and then the remnant pump is removed by a dichroic mirror (DM).

The VBG-filtering scheme is shown in Fig. 2(b). A VBG with 85% reflection efficiency and 0.05-nm bandwidth in the 631-nm band can dramatically reduce the SRS noise and parasitic noises. A 631-nm band-pass filter (BPF) with 2.4-nm bandwidth is employed to block the SHG and THG of the pump and further suppress the parasitic noises. Then, the SFG photons are collected by an AR-coated AL. VBG-based up-conversion SPD has high performance while it may not be practical in field because VBG has critical position and angular tolerances, raising stability issues [27, 28].

The BPFs-filtering scheme is shown in Fig. 2(c). Four 631-nm BPFs are used to filter the noise photons generated by the strong pump, including the SHG and THG of the pump and the parasitic noises. Then, a 631-nm collimator and a piece of multimode fiber are used to collect the SFG photons. By optimizing the filtering system in this scheme with a special coating design, BPFs-based up-conversion SPD can form a robust all-fiber system and is easy to integrate [28].

Finally, the up-converted photons are detected by a silicon APD, which has a DE of approximately 70% at 631 nm and an intrinsic noise count rate of 20 cps.

3. Up-conversion single-photon detection performance

We tune the pump power and record the DE and NCR accordingly. The system DE is obtained by dividing the number of detected count rate after NCR subtraction by one million, which is the signal photon count rate before entering the WDM. Curves of DE and NCR versus pump power for the two different filtering schemes are shown in Fig. 3.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 DE (red line, triangle) and NCR (blue line, square) versus pump power with two different filtering schemes. (a) VBG filtering, (b) BPFs filtering.

Download Full Size | PDF

VBG has a filtering bandwidth much narrower than that of BPFs, therefore the VBG-based up-conversion SPD has an ultra-low NCR of 45 cps for the maximum DE of 32.5%. The greatest strength of our SPD is its low noise-equivalent-power (NEP) [26]. When the NCR is reduced to the silicon APD’s intrinsic count rate of 20 cps by lowering the pump power, the DE is still 26.5%, corresponding to a NEP of −143.5 dBm/Hz.

The ultra-low NCR of the VBG-based up-conversion SPD benefits from the great signal-pump frequency difference of 2946.9 cm1 and the narrow band filters. Large signal-pump frequency difference means very weak anti-Stokes SRS noise [29]. The narrow band filters can reduce the nonlinear noise efficiently without sacrificing DE. The noises from SHG and THG of the pump are removed by the BPF. In addition, by the narrow-band filtering of the VBG with a bandwidth of 0.05-nm at the 631-nm band, SRS noise and parasitic noise are greatly eliminated.

The BPFs-filtering scheme allows a higher DE at the cost of a higher NCR. The BPFs-filtering scheme has a maximum DE of 38% with a NCR of 700 cps, i.e. a NEP of −137.4 dBm/Hz. The filtering system in this scheme can be integrated as a fiber filter and make the overall system more stable and practical in field [28].

The measured DE is consistent with our estimations by combining the throughput of each component, as shown in Table 1. Combining with the silicon APD’s DE of ~70%, the theoretical DE of the VBG and BPFs filtering schemes are consistent with our experimental results.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Loss and throughput of the up-conversion SPD components

4. Conclusion

We have demonstrated an up-conversion detector for the 1.064-μm band using RPE PPLN waveguide. Two kinds of filtering schemes are investigated, achieving either ultra-low noise and adequately high DE for high-standard experimental demand or high DE with adequately low NCR for field use. It is conceivable that our up-conversion SPD at 1.064-μm has potential applications in many fields, such as single photon imaging, atmospheric research, and medical devices. In the following research, the 1.064-μm single photon detector would be applied in photon radar experiments for atmosphere visibility and wind speed detection.

Funding

This work has been supported by the National Fundamental Research Program (under Grant No. 2013CB336800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Chinese Academy of Science, SAICT Experts Program, and the 10000-Plan of Shandong Province.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Daiying Wei for the packaging of the waveguide, Yang Gao and Houchao Wang for the help in the fabrication process.

References and links

1. H. Dautet, P. Deschamps, B. Dion, A. D. Macgregor, D. Macsween, R. J. McIntyre, C. Trottier, and P. P. Webb, “Photon counting techniques with silicon avalanche photodiodes,” Appl. Opt. 32(21), 3894–3900 (1993). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. S. Cova, M. Ghioni, A. Lacaita, C. Samori, and F. Zappa, “Avalanche photodiodes and quenching circuits for single-photon detection,” Appl. Opt. 35(12), 1956–1976 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. M. Ghioni, A. Gulinatti, I. Rech, F. Zappa, and S. Cova, “Progress in silicon single-photon avalanche diodes,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 13(4), 852–862 (2007). [CrossRef]  

4. A. Lacaita, F. Zappa, S. Cova, and P. Lovati, “Single-photon detection beyond 1 µm: performance of commercially available InGaAs/lnP detectors,” Appl. Opt. 35(16), 2986–2996 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. A. Tosi, A. D. Mora, F. Zappa, and S. Cova, “Single-photon avalanche diodes for the near-infrared range: detector and circuit issues,” J. Mod. Opt. 56(2–3), 299–308 (2009). [CrossRef]  

6. B. Cabrera, R. M. Clarke, P. Colling, A. J. Miller, S. Nam, and R. W. Romani, “Detection of single infrared, optical, and ultraviolet photons using superconducting transition edge sensors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 73(6), 735–737 (1998). [CrossRef]  

7. G. N. Gol’tsman, O. Okunev, G. Chulkova, A. Lipatov, A. Semenov, K. Smirnov, B. Voronov, A. Dzardanov, C. Williams, and R. Sobolewski, “Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detector,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 79(6), 705–707 (2001). [CrossRef]  

8. P. Kumar, “Quantum frequency conversion,” Opt. Lett. 15(24), 1476–1478 (1990). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. A. P. Vandevender and P. G. Kwiat, “High efficiency single photon detection via frequency up-conversion,” J. Mod. Opt. 51(9–10), 1433–1445 (2004). [CrossRef]  

10. R. H. Hadfield, “Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications,” Nat. Photonics 3(12), 696–705 (2009). [CrossRef]  

11. B. F. Levine, C. G. Bethea, L. G. Cohen, J. C. Campbell, and G. D. Morris, “Optical time domain reflectometry using a photon-counting InGaAs/InP avalanche photodiode at 1.3 μm,” Electron. Lett. 21(2), 83–84 (1985). [CrossRef]  

12. M. Legré, R. Thew, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, “High resolution optical time domain reflectometer based on 1.55mum up-conversion photon-counting module,” Opt. Express 15(13), 8237–8242 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. Q. Zhang, C. Langrock, M. M. Fejer, and Y. Yamamoto, “Waveguide-based single-pixel up-conversion infrared spectrometer,” Opt. Express 16(24), 19557–19561 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. L. Ma, O. Slattery, and X. Tang, “Experimental study of high sensitivity infrared spectrometer with waveguide-based up-conversion detector,” Opt. Express 17(16), 14395–14404 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. J.-T. Gomes, L. Delage, R. Baudoin, L. Grossard, L. Bouyeron, D. Ceus, F. Reynaud, H. Herrmann, and W. Sohler, “Laboratory demonstration of spatial-coherence analysis of a blackbody through an up-conversion interferometer,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(14), 143904 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. M. Pfennigbauer and A. Ullrich, “Applicability of single photon detection for laser radar,” E&I Elektrotech. Inf. Tech. 124(6), 180–185 (2007). [CrossRef]  

17. K. Wilson and M. Enoch, “Optical communications for deep space missions,” IEEE Commun. Mag. 38(8), 134–139 (2000). [CrossRef]  

18. S. Vasile, M. S. Ünlü, and J. Lipson, “Challenges of developing resonant cavity photon-counting detectors at 1064 nm,” Proc. SPIE 7587, 75870T (2010). [CrossRef]  

19. H. Yamazaki, S. Kaminaka, E. Kohda, M. Mukai, and H. O. Hamaguchi, “The diagnosis of lung cancer using 1064-nm excited near-infrared multichannel Raman spectroscopy,” Radiat. Med. 21(1), 1–6 (2003). [PubMed]  

20. Excelitas Technologies, Canada, http://www.excelitas.com/Downloads/DTS_SPCM-AQRH.pdf.

21. I. D. Quantique, “Infrared single-photon counter,” http://www.photonicsolutions.co.uk/upfiles/id230-specs.pdf.

22. M. A. Itzler, X. D. Jiang, R. Ben-Michael, K. Slomkowski, M. A. Krainak, S. Wu, and X. L. Sun, “InGaAsP/InP avalanche photodetectors for non-gated 1.06 µm photon-counting receivers,” in Enabling Photonics Technologies for Defense, Security, and Aerospace Applications III, M. J. Hayduk, A. R. Pirich, P. J. Delfyett Jr., E. J. Donkor, J. P. Barrios, R. J. Bussjager, M. L. Fanto, R. L. Kaminski, G. Li, H. Mohseni, and E. W. Taylor, eds., Proc. SPIE 6572, 65720G (2007).

23. Y. Wang, H. Li, L. You, C. Lv, J. Huang, W. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Liu, Z. Wang, and X. Xie, “Broadband near-infrared superconducting nanowire single-photon detector with efficiency over 50%,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 27(4), 1–4 (2017).

24. L. Xue, Z. Li, L. Zhang, D. Zhai, Y. Li, S. Zhang, M. Li, L. Kang, J. Chen, P. Wu, and Y. Xiong, “Satellite laser ranging using superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors at 1064 nm wavelength,” Opt. Lett. 41(16), 3848–3851 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. H. Dong, H. Pan, Y. Li, E. Wu, and H. Zeng, “Efficient single-photon frequency upconversion at 1.06 μm with ultralow background counts,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 93(7), 071101 (2008). [CrossRef]  

26. C. Langrock, E. Diamanti, R. V. Roussev, Y. Yamamoto, M. M. Fejer, and H. Takesue, “Highly efficient single-photon detection at communication wavelengths by use of upconversion in reverse-proton-exchanged periodically poled LiNbO3 waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 30(13), 1725–1727 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. G. L. Shentu, J. S. Pelc, X. D. Wang, Q. C. Sun, M. Y. Zheng, M. M. Fejer, Q. Zhang, and J. W. Pan, “Ultralow noise up-conversion detector and spectrometer for the telecom band,” Opt. Express 21(12), 13986–13991 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. M. Y. Zheng, G. L. Shentu, F. Ma, F. Zhou, H. T. Zhang, Y. Q. Dai, X. Xie, Q. Zhang, and J. W. Pan, “Integrated four-channel all-fiber up-conversion single-photon-detector with adjustable efficiency and dark count,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87(9), 093115 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. J. S. Pelc, L. Ma, C. R. Phillips, Q. Zhang, C. Langrock, O. Slattery, X. Tang, and M. M. Fejer, “Long-wavelength-pumped upconversion single-photon detector at 1550 nm: performance and noise analysis,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21445–21456 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. P. S. Kuo, J. S. Pelc, O. Slattery, Y. S. Kim, M. M. Fejer, and X. Tang, “Reducing noise in single-photon-level frequency conversion,” Opt. Lett. 38(8), 1310–1312 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

31. K. R. Parameswaran, R. K. Route, J. R. Kurz, R. V. Roussev, M. M. Fejer, and M. Fujimura, “Highly efficient second-harmonic generation in buried waveguides formed by annealed and reverse proton exchange in periodically poled lithium niobate,” Opt. Lett. 27(3), 179–181 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

32. R. V. Roussev, C. Langrock, J. R. Kurz, and M. M. Fejer, “Periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide sum-frequency generator for efficient single-photon detection at communication wavelengths,” Opt. Lett. 29(13), 1518–1520 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

33. R. Regener and W. Sohler, “Loss in low-finesse Ti:LiNbO3 optical waveguide resonators,” Appl. Phys. B 36(3), 143–147 (1985). [CrossRef]  

34. H. Kamada, M. Asobe, T. Honjo, H. Takesue, Y. Tokura, Y. Nishida, O. Tadanaga, and H. Miyazawa, “Efficient and low-noise single-photon detection in 1550 nm communication band by frequency upconversion in periodically poled LiNbO3 waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 33(7), 639–641 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

35. All pump power mentioned below is measured at the input port of the waveguide’s pigtail.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (3)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) Tuning curve; (b) Measured SFG photon conversion efficiency (black diamonds) and theoretical fit (red line).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) Schematic diagram of the up-conversion SPD at 1.064 μm. The waveguide output is filtered by (b) a VBG and a BPF or (c) four BPFs. EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; WDM, wavelength division multiplexer; PC, polarization controller; VOA, variable optical attenuator; BS, beam splitter; PM, power meter; AL, aspheric lens; DM, dichroic mirror; VBG, volume Bragg grating; M, mirror; BPF, band-pass filter; Si APD, silicon avalanche photodiode; MM fiber, multimode fiber.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 DE (red line, triangle) and NCR (blue line, square) versus pump power with two different filtering schemes. (a) VBG filtering, (b) BPFs filtering.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Loss and throughput of the up-conversion SPD components

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.