Abstract
In this work we present a study of nonlinear optical properties in organic materials (hibiscus sabdariffa). Our results demonstrate that the medium exhibits a highly nonlocal nonlinear response. We show preliminary numerical results of the transmittance as nonlocal response by considering, simultaneously, the nonlinear absorption and refraction in media. Numerical results are accord to measurement obtained by Z- scan technique where we observe large phase shifts. We also analyze the far field diffraction ring patterns of the sample.
© 2014 Optical Society of America
1. Introduction
Nonlinear optical effects are the result of interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter at very high intensities, causing a change in their optical properties. A large number of materials with nonlinear response have been investigated such as gold nanoparticles [1], silver nanoparticles [2], hybrid materials [3,4], liquid crystals, organic dyes [5,6], etc., determining whether its answer is local or nonlocal. Nonlocal response occurs when nonlinear mechanism involve transport processes such as heat conduction in materials with thermal nonlinearities, drift or diffusion of electric charges in photorefractive media by long-range forces or interaction of several bodies. In particular, organic medium with nonlinear optical response have gained great interest due to low cost, compatibility and high nonlinear response. The origin of this nonlinearity can be attributed to the molecular reorientation induced by light, electronic excitation or thermal effects. There are several techniques for the measurement of optical properties [7]. In particular, due to easy implementation, the Z-scan technique originally proposed by Sheik-Bahae et al. [8–10] has been used to obtain the sign and magnitude of change in nonlinear refractive index and nonlinear absorption. In this technique, the transmittance is measured to far field along optical axis as function of the sample position z with respect to the minimum radius of Gaussian beam (closed Z-scan). When the medium has a refractive nonlinear response, in the transmittance curves is generated a peak-valley or valley-peak for a negative or positive nonlinear response respectively. Nevertheless, for nonlocal nonlinear media [1, 2, 5, 11–13], Bahae model cannot be applied; since it is only valid for local media with phase changes less than π [11]. In particular, in this paper we present a study of Hibiscus Sabdariffa due to high nonlinearity. Previous investigations have reported the magnitude of nonlinear refraction index for phase changes less than π/4 [14]. However, we observed a phase change major than π/4 using closed Z-scan technique and generating self-diffraction rings (self-phase modulation), which indicate a phase change bigger than 2π. Since we observed in the experiments nonlinear absorption, we required a theoretical model that allows us to perform adjustments to the experimental curves with large phase changes and nonlocal response in the simultaneous presence of both nonlinear refraction and nonlinear absorption. Hence, we used output field of a medium with nonlinear absorption and refraction given by [9], where we introduced nonlocal response using the same proposal given by [15, 16]. The experimental curves are in agreement with the theoretical results, indicating that the medium has a high nonlinear nonlocal response.
2. Mathematical model
Our calculations are based on the model reported by García-Ramírez et. al. [15, 16], which calculates the far-field intensity distribution of a Gaussian beam propagating in a nonlocal nonlinear thin medium. They consider a Gaussian beam with amplitude of the form,
where A0 is the amplitude constant, minimum radio of the beam, , is the wavelength, z is the propagation direction, is the phase delay relative to the plane wave, ω(z) y R(z) are the width and radio of the beam respectively. When a beam illuminates the sample, the output electric field is,where is the nonlinear phase change and r is spatial coordinate. Equation (2) represents the electric field at the output and depends on initial electric field modified by a phase change, decreasing in amplitude due to linear absorption of the medium. The nonlinear phase is [16],with where represents the maximum phase change on-axis; is the maximum phase change at , is the Rayleigh range; is the effective length; a is the linear absorption coefficient and L is the thickness of the cell. Equation (3) represents the nonlinear phase change with local or nonlocal response through the parameter m: if m < 2 the phase change extends beyond the Gaussian intensity distribution; if m > 2, the phase change is less than Gaussian intensity distribution, as a result the response of material in both cases is nonlocal. Only for m = 2 the phase change is very close to Gaussian intensity distribution, then it is considered local response. From the curves obtained by Z-scan in nonlocal nonlinear media purely refractive, it is possible to fit numerically the experimental results with large change phase in the absence of nonlinear absorption [16].Nonetheless, there are materials with nonlocal response and nonlinear absorption. In this work, Hibiscus Sabdariffa was characterized and nonlinear absorption was observed. The electric field was analyzed at the output in Eq. (7) with the model of [9, 10]. The locality or nonlocality is represented by m parameter, in the exponent value of the squared electric field module.
We defined the ratio between nonlinear phase changes refractive and absorptive as, where is the phase change due to nonlinear absorption. Experimentally, R is helpful when nonlinear refraction and absorption are simultaneously present in a media. The Eq. (7) is numerically solved by following the procedure described by García-Ramírez et. al. [15, 16]. Thus, the detection to far field, with and without nonlinear absorption, is calculated using the Fourier transform of Eqs. (2) and (7) respectively. Previous studies have emphasized the refraction phenomenon, and absorption is only mentioned or it is neglected. In this work, we analyzed both effects making an emphasis on the refractive phenomenon.Figure 1 shows theoretical curves of Z-scan with nonlinear refraction and absorption, for three different media: two with nonlocal response and one with local response, considering a phase change due to nonlinear absorption () and two phase change. The first condition happens when, (R = 6.28), the curves have a moderately suppressed peak and enhanced valley in the three media (see Fig. 1(a)). For a local medium the distance of peak (p) to reference value (r) denoted by is smaller than the distance of reference value of valley (v) denoted by , i.e., which indicates the presence of nonlinear absorption [17]. According to García-Ramírez et. al. [15, 16], m = 1 represents a strong nonlocal nonlinearity; m = 2 local nonlinearity, and m = 4 weak nonlocal nonlinearity. The second condition occurs when (R = 47.123), then, as it is shown in Fig. 1(b). Although nonlinear absorption is present in the medium, the decrease of the maximum peak is not a must. Thus, when then the predominant phenomenon is the nonlinear refraction. When then the predominant phenomenon is the nonlinear absorption. This occurs in the three media despite the peak-valley distance () is different for each medium.
Figure 2 shows the theoretical curves for a local medium (m = 2) and for a strong nonlocal medium (m = 1) with at different values of . Three cases were observed for the two media. For a local medium [see Fig. 2(a)]; first, with phase changes of and , nonlinear absorption predominates. Second, when , a balance between nonlinear absorption and refraction exists (). Third, when , nonlinear refraction predominates. For a nonlocal medium (see Fig. 2(b)); first, when , nonlinear absorption predominates. Second, when , a balance between nonlinear absorption and refraction exists (ΔTr-v » ΔTp-r). Third, with , , nonlinear refraction predominates.
Hence, we can say that the transmittance at the output of sample depends on the medium and the parameters and . Figure 3 shows the transmittance as function of y for a local medium (m = 2) and for a nonlocal highly medium (m = 1) in z = 0. If absorption and refraction are small, we have a high transmittance because the optical response is nearly linear. If the absorption is small and refraction increases, the transmittance decreases. Due to large phase change, the valley (minimum) is broadening [see Figs. 1(b)-2(a)] in . Another interesting case is observed when the refraction is small and absorption increases; then, transmittance decreases. If the refraction and absorption increases, the transmittance tends to increase to a saturation point. This behavior can be used to optical limiting. For nonlocal media we observed the same behavior (see Fig. 3(b)), even though the transmittance value decays faster than a local medium (see Fig. 1(a) with m = 1 and m = 2 in ).
3. Experimental setup
Figure 4 shows absorption spectrum of Hibiscus Sabdariffa. For wavelengths in the visible region, maximum absorption occurs at 540 nm. In our experiments we used a cw Ar laser source at 514 nm of wavelength of variable power and with a spot of minimum radius of.
Hibiscus Sabdariffa is a flower which contains different organic compounds [18]. The extracts were obtained by following a method reported in [19] and filtered to eliminate residual solids. The nonlinear optical properties of hibiscus sabdariffa were studied with Z-scan technique. The experimental setup is showed in Fig. 5. The sample (S) is moved around of the minimum radius of the Gaussian beam () obtained with a lens of focal length 7.5 cm. The transmittance at the output of the sample is captured with a photodetector on the optical axis (opening closed) to the far field.
Figure 6 shows the Z-scan curve with 1 mW of power. Transmittance value far from the minimum radius is below unity (approximately 0.5), indicating that the light transmitted in the linear regime is approximately 50% of the incident light; this is due to the strong linear absorption of the sample. For this laser power nonlinear absorption is not observed, since the incident intensity is not enough to excite the medium. We show numerical fit using the Eq. (7) with nonlocality m = 0.4 corresponding to a strong nonlocal response, with maximum phase change of and (negligible). This fit agrees with the results obtained in Eq. (3) due to this equation describes the refractive response of the sample without nonlinear absorption. We obtained a value of .
However, when we increased the power of the laser beam incident in the medium (experimental measurements were made for six different powers), the presence of nonlinear absorption was observed when we performed the experiment with open aperture Z-scan and was calculated for each case, using Eq. (7) with. Subsequently, we used again the output field given by Eq. (7), for the curves obtained experimentally with closed aperture Z-scan, due to the presence of both nonlinear refraction and nonlinear absorption. We can observe in Fig. 7, the experimental curves of Z-scan have good fit to the theoretical curves with m = 0.4, indicating that the medium has a high nonlocal response. The experimental results are consistent with theoretical results.
In this curves we observed atypical and asymmetrical configurations. These indicate the nonlinear refraction in the sample is related to a strong nonlocal nonlinear process of thermal origin. With this methodology we can determine the magnitude of the nonlinear refraction index of the medium at different power of Hibiscus Sabdariffa. We found that the order is 10−10 m2/W.
Figure 8 shows the increment of the magnitude of regarding the induced power in the medium. Afterwards, the increment is slow and it shows a tendency to a saturation point.
It is well known that the nonlinear refraction index induced by thermal effects is obtained in a theoretical way: studying thermal effects of laser. The relation between the nonlinear refractive index (n2) and the thermal-optic coefficient is given by [11,13] ; where dn/dT is the refractive index ratio regarding temperature T, is thermal conductivity, α is the linear absorption and is the minimum radius of the Gaussian beam. If we consider that the energy absorbed by the sample produces its own heating, the value of was calculated and it was obtained 0.0064 m/W.
4. Self-phase modulation
Changes in nonlinear refractive index due to intensity produce a distortion of wave-front and alter the transverse phase of the beam, generating spatial self-phase modulation when . This is seen as a diffraction pattern, which depends on the intensity for a local medium, where the number of rings is related to the maximum phase shift [20]. Still, it does not apply for nonlocal media [15]. For the detection of the intensity distribution to far field, we used the array shown in Fig. 5, where instead of a photodetector, we placed a CCD camera. The images are recorded and their transversal sections are shown in Fig. 9 for different powers. The images are generated when the sample is placed in the negative curvature radius of the beam. We can observe that when the power increases, the number of the rings increases too; nevertheless, it is not proportional to the power. When the characterization of the medium was performed by Z-scan, high nonlinear response was obtained. Therefore, a greater number of diffraction rings would be expected. However, we noted a few rings. For example, when we induced a power of 4mw to medium, we observed only a spot with a concentric tenuous ring, which does not match with the Z-scan curve obtained in Fig. 7(a). These results also show nonlinear refraction and absorption. The rings of SPM are weakened due to absorption in the medium with respect to a purely refractive medium. These results indicate that nonlinear absorption and nonlocal response are present in the medium. In Fig. 9(f) we can see the diffraction pattern becomes asymmetric due to the convection effect generated in the medium by a thermal effect [21]. It is important to note that the SPM effect is evident in Z-scan curve [Fig. 7(f)], where we observed peaks in the experimental and theoretical curve. These peaks correspond to the phase change of the dependent beam of Z position.
4. Conclusions
We have found out that Hibiscus Sabdariffa shows a high nonlocal response of 10−10 m2/W order and strong nonlocal response given by m = 0.4. This nonlocal response agrees with the thermal effect, which is the nonlinear origin and it is numerical considered as a nonlocal process. Our numerical analysis present three interesting cases in Z-scan curves: a) absorption predominates over refraction, b) refraction predominates over absorption, and c) absorption and refraction are balanced. In this analysis, we demonstrate that there is not necessarily a decrease in the peak and a widening valley when absorption and refraction are simultaneously present. Another evidence of nonlinear absorption is shown in SPM. The generated number of concentric rings is smaller than those obtained in purely refractive local media. The Hibiscus nonlinearity is an indication of a promising material for nonlinear applications at low power.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported partially Guanajuato University-DAIP No. 217/2013, 223/2013 and PIFI-2013. D. R. M. acknowledges to Guanajuato University and CONACyT through grant 165483.
References and links
1. L. Sarkhosh, H. Aleali, R. Karimzadeh, and N. Mansour, “Large thermally induced nonlinear refraction of gold nanoparticles stabilized by cyclohexanone,” Phys. Status Solidi A 207(10), 2303–2310 (2010). [CrossRef]
2. R. Zamiri, R. Parvizi, A. R. Sadrolhosseini, G. Zamiri, M. Darroudi, and M. S. Husin, “Investigation on nonlinear-optical properties of palm oil/silver nanoparticles,” J. Euro. Opt. Soc. Rap. Public. 7, 12020 (2012). [CrossRef]
3. M. Trejo Durán, J. A. Andrade Lucio, A. Martínez Richa, R. Vera Graziano, and V. M. Castaño, “Self-diffracting effects in hybrid materials,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(9), 091112 (2007). [CrossRef]
4. X. L. Zhang, X. Zhao, Z. B. Liu, Y. S. Liu, Y. S. Chen, and J. G. Tian, “Enhanced nonlinear optical properties of graphene-oligothiophene hybrid material,” Opt. Express 17(26), 23959–23964 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. S. Pramodini, P. Poornesh, and K. K. Nagaraja, “Thermally induced nonlinear optical response and optical power limiting of acid blue 40 dye,” Curr. Appl. Phys. 13(7), 1175–1182 (2013). [CrossRef]
6. A. Y. Fuh, H. C. Lin, T. S. Mo, and C. H. Chen, “Nonlinear optical property of azo-dye doped liquid crystals determined by biphotonic z-scan technique,” Opt. Express 13(26), 10634–10641 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. R. K. Choubey, S. Medhekar, R. Kumar, S. Mukherjee, and S. Kumar, “Study of nonlinear optical properties of organic dye by z-scan technique using He-Ne laser,” J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 25(3), 1410–1415 (2014). [CrossRef]
8. M. Sheik-Bahae, A. A. Said, and E. W. Van Stryland, “High-sensitivity, single-beam n2 measurements,” Opt. Lett. 14(17), 955–957 (1989). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. M. Sheik Bahae, A. A. Said, T. H. Wei, D. J. Hagan, and E. W. Van Stryland, “Sensitive measurement of optical nonlinearities using a single beam,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 26(4), 760–769 (1990). [CrossRef]
10. E. W. Van Stryland and M. Sheik-Bahae, “Z-scan measurements of optical nonlinearities,” in, Characterization Techniques and Tabulations for Organic Nonlinear Materials, M. G. Kuzyk and C. W. Dirk, ed. (CRC Press, 1998).
11. R. Karimzadeh, H. Aleali, and N. Mansour, “Thermal nonlinear refraction properties of Ag2S semiconductor nanocrystals with its application as a low power optical limiter,” Opt. Commun. 284(9), 2370–2375 (2011). [CrossRef]
12. F. L. S. A. Cuppo, A. M. F. Neto, S. L. Gómez, and P. Palffy Muhoray, “Thermal-lens model compared with the Sheik-Bahae formalism in interpreting z-scan experiments on Iyotropic liquid crystals,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19(6), 1342–1348 (2002). [CrossRef]
13. F. Z. Henari, S. Cassidy, K. E. Jasim, and A. A. Dakgel, “Nonlinear refractive index measurements of curcumin with cw laser,” J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater. 22(2), 1350017 (2013). [CrossRef]
14. F. Z. Henari and A. Al-Saie, “Nonlinear refractive index measurements and self-action effects in Roselle- Hibiscus Sabdariffa solutions,” Laser Phys. 16(12), 1664–1667 (2006). [CrossRef]
15. E. V. Ramirez, M. L. Carrasco, M. M. Otero, S. C. Cerda, and M. D. Castillo, “Far field intensity distributions due to spatial self phase modulation of a Gaussian beam by a thin nonlocal nonlinear media,” Opt. Express 18(21), 22067–22079 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. E. V. García Ramírez, M. L. Arroyo Carrasco, M. M. Méndez Otero, E. Reynoso Lara, S. Chavez Cerda, and M. D. Iturbe Castillo, “Z-scan and spatial self-phase modulation of a Gaussian beam in a thin nonlocal nonlinear media,” J. Opt. 13(8), 085203 (2011). [CrossRef]
17. M. R. Rashidian Vaziri, “Z-scan theory for nonlocal nonlinear media with simultaneous nonlinear refraction and nonlinear absorption,” Appl. Opt. 52(20), 4843–4848 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. P. U. Rao, “Nutrient composition and biological evaluation of mesta (Hibiscus Sabdariffa) seeds,” Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 49(1), 27–34 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. O. Carvajal-Zarrabal, P. M. Hayward-Jones, Z. Orta-Flores, C. Nolasco-Hipólito, D. M. Barradas-Dermitz, M. G. Aguilar-Uscanga, and M. F. Pedroza-Hernández, “Effect of Hibiscus Sabdariffa L. dried calyx ethanol extract on fat absorption-excretion, and body weight implication in rats,” J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2009, 394592 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. Y. R. Shen, The Principles of Nonlinear Optics (Wiley classics library, 2003), Chap. 17.
21. R. Karimzadeh and M. Arshadi, “Thermal lens measurement of the nonlinear phase shift and convection velocity,” Laser Phys. 23(11), 115402 (2013). [CrossRef]