Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Surface plasmon dynamics in arrays of subwavelength holes: the role of optical interband transitions

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Using femtosecond optical spectroscopy, we study the ultrafast dynamics of the surface plasmon polaritons in gold arrays of subwavelength holes. A large time dependent spectral broadening and shift of the surface plasmon resonances are reported. The experimental results are modeled by the diffraction of a transverse electromagnetic field through the nanostructure, taking into account both the electron dynamics near the interband transitions and the Drude-like conductivity of the metal. Our analysis, using either a theoretical or an experimentally determined dielectric function of gold, suggests that the losses propagation in plasmonic devices is strongly influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic electron scattering mechanisms.

©2008 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

In the last ten years, periodic arrays of sub-wavelength patterns in metallic films have lead to numerous experimental and theoretical works because of their interesting optical properties [1–8] and their potential applications in nanodevices [9–11]. In such nanostructured films surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) can be resonantly excited for particular optical wavelengths depending on the geometrical parameters of the nanostructures as well as on the dielectric function of the metal [12–16]. From a general point of view one can envisage using plasmonic devices either by taking advantage of their enhanced local field effects or by propagating the surface plasmons over distances large enough to make active integrated devices. In that latter case it is necessary that the (SPP) be preserved from intrinsic or extrinsic sources of damping. It is therefore an important issue to study the decay of surface plasmons in a patterned array and to model their corresponding dynamical behavior using a realistic metallic dielectric function. It is the purpose of this article to perform such dynamical studies inspired by the large number of works that have been performed in metallic nanoparticles using femtosecond optical spectroscopy.

Noble metal nanoparticles are archetype systems to study the static and dynamical properties of surface plasmons [17–25]. Even though in the dipolar approximation propagating modes are not relevant for nanoparticles, the analogy with the (SPP) dynamics in patterned arrays is straightforward. Indeed, for both systems the intraband and interband optical transitions are determinant to explain the detailed behavior of the plasmon resonances. For patterned structures, in addition to the characteristic properties of the metal supporting the nanostructure, one needs to incorporate a tractable diffraction model to explain the spectral (SPP) resonances as we have recently shown to explain the static properties of patterned arrays made in gold, silver and copper films [26–27]. In the present article, we focus our attention on the spectro-temporal dynamics of such periodic metallic nanostructures performing time-resolved femtosecond spectroscopy experiments. We also extend our preceding theoretical investigations, inspired from Darmanyan's work [28], to the dynamical case.

2. Experimental details

The time-resolved pump-probe measurements have been performed with a femtosecond Titanium Sapphire laser amplified at a repetition rate of 5 kHz and delivering pulses with 150 fs duration. The 400 nm pump is obtained by frequency doubling in a β-BaB2O4 crystal. The probe is a broadband continuum generated in a sapphire crystal. The frequency chirp of the probe is mainly compensated by a double pass in a pair of prisms and is less than 1fs/nm in the spectral region 500–600 nm. The residual chirp in the 600–800 nm range is de-convoluted from the spectro-temporal signals by using an appropriate conform transformation in the (λ, τ) plane, the coordinates λ and τ referring to the wavelength and delay between the pump and probe pulses [29]. The two beams are focused at normal incidence on the sample with a mean diameter of 50 μm, so that a given nanostructure (array of sub-wavelength holes with total dimensions of a few microns) is excited and probed uniformly. Each patterned array is then imaged on the entrance slit of a spectrometer, corrected from optical aberrations. The static light transmission T(λ) as well as the time dependent differential transmission spectra ∆T(λ, τ)/T(λ), defined as ∆T/T = (Tpump-on - Tpump-off)/Tpump-off are measured with a nitrogen cooled CCD camera.

The samples consist in arrays of subwavelength holes designed in a 250 nm gold film evaporated either on glass or Al2O3 substrates. The arrays have various periods a ranging from 150 to 350 nm. Their transmission spectra all exhibit two main peaks as shown for example in the inset of Fig. 1(a) for an array of gold on a glass substrate with the period a=350 nm. The peak at 660 nm corresponds to the (1, 0) surface plasmon polariton mode on the metal/substrate interface named in the following (1, 0)SS. The broader peak extending in the spectral region 500–600 nm results from a combination of both the (1, 0) order (SPP) on the air side and to the transmission properties specific to gold situated at 510 nm. As shown in our previous works [26–27], a transparency window occurs in that spectral range due to the interplay between the light absorption at the interband threshold (527 nm in gold), related to the excitation of the core level 3d electrons, and from the large reflectivity associated to the Drude-like metallic conductivity due to the conduction states.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a)Differential transmission of a gold nanostructures with the period a=350 nm. The density of excitation is 0.5 mJ.cm-2. Inset: Linear transmission of the corresponding nanostructure. (b)Spectrally resolved differential transmission for a pump-probe delay τ=0.9 ps.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Surface plasmon dynamics near the interband threshold

Figure 1(a) displays the differential transmission as a function of the delay τ for the probe wavelength λo=557 nm (vertical dotted line in the inset). For this measurement, a narrow spectral band is pre-selected in the continuum and is detected with a photomultiplier. The observed dynamics reveals the characteristic relaxation processes of metallic systems excited by femtosecond optical pulses. Initially the electrons thermalize to a hot distribution involving the Coulomb scattering between quasi-particles (electrons and holes). Correspondingly, the pump-probe signal builds up with a time constant which depends on the excess energy relative to the Fermi level [30–33]. In the present case, it is faster than the pump pulse duration. The exponential relaxation during the next few picoseconds is related to the cooling of the electrons distribution and the simultaneous heating of the lattice assisted by electron-phonon interactions. As it is well known, this dynamical process can be described by a two temperatures model [30, 34–35] for the electrons and the lattice. The corresponding relaxation time τe-l depends both on the strength of the electron-phonon coupling and on the density of laser excitation via the temperature dependent electronic specific heat. For the present density of excitation (Ipump=0.5 mJ.cm-2), the relaxation time is 1.4 ps. It increases linearly with Ipump in the explored density range (not shown in Fig. 1).

Figure 1(b) shows the spectrally resolved differential transmission, for a pump-probe delay τ = 0.9 ps. The energy density of the pump is 0.5 mJ.cm-2. Several interesting features are observed. First, the amplitude of the differential signal is larger than 20% near the interband transition wavelength whereas it is only of 3% in the spectral region corresponding to the (1, 0) order (SPP). This result clearly indicates that the induced change of transmission is mostly due to the modification of the dielectric function of gold near the interband transition from the d band to the Fermi level. In that spectral range it is therefore essential to consider the role played by the core electrons and not only the Drude-like metal conductivity if one is interested in describing correctly the propagation of the surface plasmon polaritons. The spectral shape of the differential transmission in the range 500–600 nm is characteristic of a spectral broadening of the (SPP) resonance. Such broadening mostly comes from the modification of the imaginary part of the complex dielectric function of the metal. In contrast, the spectral shape of ∆T/T in the range 620–750 nm is characteristic of a red shift as well as a weak broadening of the resonance associated to the excitation of the (SPP) on the substrate side. This behavior mainly implies a dynamical increase of the real part of the dielectric function in this spectral range.

The above experimental results stress out the key role played by the dielectric function of the metal if one is interested in propagating surface plasmon polaritons in active integrated plasmonic devices. To emphasize this statement, we have developed a comprehensive description of our dynamical results modeling the patterned arrays with different dielectric functions of gold. The main steps are the following. First we simplify the complicated two dimensional nanostructure considering a one dimensional array and we model the light diffraction within the so-called RCWA (rigorous coupled wave approximation). We previously reported such procedure to describe the static properties of gold, copper and silver arrays [26–27]. The next step is to introduce the time dependent dielectric function ε(λ,τ) of gold. We have used two different approaches. The first one, named hereafter εRPA, is based on the Lindhard theory [36] and the second one, named εexp, is based on the experimental determination of the dielectric function of gold.

The Lindhard dielectric function εRPA which we use is derived following our previous investigations of noble metal nanoparticles [18, 33]. It consists in considering two terms corresponding respectively to the conduction electrons, modeled by a Drude like dielectric function, and to the core electrons which can undergo interband transitions from the filled d-bands to the Fermi level. The temporal dependency of the dielectric function comes from the occupied electronic states at a given electronic temperature, which itself is calculated with the two temperatures model. In addition, a temperature dependent electron-electron scattering is provided by the Fermi liquid theory derived by Pines and Nozières [37].

The second time-dependent dielectric function εexp that we have used to model the dynamical spectrum of our nanostructures is obtained experimentally from the time-resolved differential spectra of the reflectivity and transmission measured on a 29 nm thin gold film. This standard approach is similar to the one developed by Rosei [38], describing thermo-modulation experiments on thin metallic films, except that the temperature variation stands for the one of the electrons excited by the femtosecond optical pulses. The real and imaginary parts of the differential dielectric functions that we have calculated and obtained experimentally are shown on Fig. 2. The experimental curves are given for a pump-probe time delay of 1.4 ps. In the case of the Lindhard dielectric function, it corresponds to an increase of the electronic temperature of 395 K.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Differential spectra of the real part (open symbols) and imaginary part (closed symbols) of the two dielectric functions εRPA (red color) and εexp (blue color). The experimental delay is fixed at τ=1.4 ps which corresponds to an electronic temperature of 695 K.

Download Full Size | PDF

The two time-dependent dielectric functions of gold εRPA(λ,τ) and εexp(λ,τ) have been introduced in our analytical model of diffraction to model the femtosecond dynamics of the gold nanostructures. Figure 3 represents differential spectra for the simplified one dimensional gold nanostructure with a period a = 350 nm calculated with εRPA (straight line) and εexp (dotted line). The pump-probe delay is τ=1.4 ps. The open circles corresponds to the measured differential transmission obtained with a two dimensional nanostructure having the same characteristics as in the modeling (periodicity and filling factor of the holes). The main spectral features are reproduced both with εRPA and εexp : the broadening in the 500–600 nm spectral region and the shift in the vicinity of the (1,0) surface plasmon polariton resonance. As mentioned above, it stresses the respective role of the imaginary and real part of the dielectric functions. Let us notice that the use of εexp gives a better result. It emphasizes the important role of extrinsic sources of damping, leading to electron scattering, absent in the modeling of εRPA.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Differential transmission spectrally resolved for a fixed delay τ=1.4 ps. The open circles represent the experimental measurement on the gold nanostructure. Theoretical dynamical spectrum calculated with the Lindhard dielectric function εRPA (dashed dotted line) and the experimental dielectric function εexp (full line).

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, our experimental study and modeling of the surface plasmon polariton dynamics in metallic films patterned with subwavelength holes demonstrates the key role played by the scattering of electrons. Intrinsically, such scattering events are particularly important near the interband optical transitions of the metal but they can also be accentuated by extrinsic sources of scattering like the structural inhomogeneities of the metal film or by defects in the patterned nanostructure induced by the Focused Ion Beam processing. These results are important for the development of active plamonic devices where the electron scattering, leading to a loss of coherence of the surface plasmon polaritons, should be minimized.

Acknowledgements

We thank the group of Prof. T. W. Ebbesen at the “Institut de Science et d'Ingénierie Supramoléculaires” for the sample design and patterning. We acknowledge the technical support of M. Albrecht, D. Acker and G. Versini at the “Institut de Physique et Chimie des Matériaux de Strasbourg”. This project has been carried out with the financial support of the “Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique” and the University Louis Pasteur in France.

References and links

1. T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, and P. A. Wolf, “Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays,” Nature (London) 391, 667–669 (1998). [CrossRef]  

2. H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, D. E. Grupp, T. W. Ebbesen, and H. J. Lezec, “Surface plasmons enhance optical transmission through subwavelength holes,” Phys. Rev. B 58, 6779–6782 (1998). [CrossRef]  

3. L. Martin-Moreno, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, H. J. Lezec, K. M. Pellerin, T. Thio, J. B. Pendry, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Theory of Extraordinary Optical Transmission through Subwavelength Hole Arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1114–1117 (2001). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. A. P. Hibbins, J. R. Sambles, and C. R. Lawrence, “Gratingless enhanced microwave transmission through a subwavelength aperture in a thick metal plate,” Appl. Phys. Lett 84, 4661–4663 (2002). [CrossRef]  

5. J. Gomez Rivas, C. Schotsch, P. Haring Bolivar, and H. Kurz, “Enhanced transmission of THz radiation through subwavelength holes,” Phys. Rev. B 68, 201306 (2003). [CrossRef]  

6. H. Cao and A. Nahata, “Resonantly enhanced transmission of terahertz radiation through a periodic array of subwavelength apertures,” Opt. Express 12, 1004–1010 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. M. M. J. Treacy, “Dynamical diffraction in metallic optical gratings,” Appl. Phys. Lett 75, 606–608 (1999). [CrossRef]  

8. Q. Cao and P. Lalanne, “Negative Role of Surface Plasmons in the Transmission of Metallic Gratings with Very Narrow Slits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 057403 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. D. S. Kim, S. C. Hohng, V. Malyarchuk, Y. C. Yoon, Y. H. Ahn, K. J. Yee, J. W. Park, J. Kim, Q. H. Park, and C. Lienau, “Microscopic Origin of Surface-Plasmon Radiation in Plasmonic Band-Gap Nanostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 143901 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. A. Dechant and A. Y. Elezzabi, “Femtosecond optical pulse propagation in subwavelength metallic slits,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 4678–4680 (2004). [CrossRef]  

11. A. Kubo, Y. S. Jung, H. K. Kim, and H. Petek, “Femtosecond microscopy of localized and propagating surface plasmons in silver gratings,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40, S259–S272 (2007). [CrossRef]  

12. K. J. Klein Koerkamp, S. Enoch, F. B. Segerink, N. F. van Hulst, and L. Kuipers, “Strong Influence of Hole Shape on Extraordinary Transmission through Periodic Arrays of Subwavelength Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 183901 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. J. Prikulis, P. Hanarp, L. Olofsson, D. Sutherland, and M. Käll, “Optical spectroscopy of nanometric holes in thin gold films,” Nanolett. 4, 1003–1007 (2004). [CrossRef]  

14. I. Avrutsky, Y. Zhao, and V. Kochergin, “Surface-plasmon-assisted resonant tunneling of light through a periodically corrugated thin metal film,” Opt. Lett. 25, 595–597 (2000). [CrossRef]  

15. A. Degiron, H. J. Lezec, W. L. Barnes, and T. W. Ebbesen, “Effects of hole depth on enhanced light transmission through subwavelength hole arrays,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4327–4329 (2002). [CrossRef]  

16. M. Beruete, M. Sorolla, I. Campillo, J. S. Dolado, L. Martin-Moreno, J. Bravo-Abad, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, “Enhanced millimeter-wave transmission through subwavelength hole arrays,” Opt. Lett. 29, 2500–2502 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. U. Kreibig and M. Vollmer, Optical Properties of Metal Clusters (Springer, Berlin, 1995).

18. J.-Y. Bigot, J.-C. Merle, O. Crégut, and A. Daunois, “Electron Dynamics in Copper Metallic Nanoparticles Probed with Femtosecond Optical Pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4702–4705 (1995). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. P. Perner, P. Bost, U. Lemmer, G. von Plessen, J. Feldmann, U. Becker, M. Menning, M. Schmitt, and H. Schmidt, “Optically induced damping of the surface plasmon resonance in gold colloids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2192–2195 (1997). [CrossRef]  

20. R. D. Averitt, S. L. Westcott, and N. J. Halas, “Ultrafast electron dynamic in gold nanoshells,” Phys. Rev. B 58, R10203–R10206 (1998). [CrossRef]  

21. V. Halté, J.-Y. Bigot, B. Palpant, M. Broyer, B. Prével, and A. Pérez, “Size dependence of the energy relaxation in silver nanoparticles embedded in dielectric matrices,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3799 (1999). [CrossRef]  

22. J. Lermé, B. Palpant, B. Prével, E. Cottancin, M. Pellarin, M. Treilleux, J.L. Vialle, A. Perez, and M. Broyer, Eur. Phys. J. D.4, 95–108 (1998). [CrossRef]  

23. H. Petek, H. Nagano, and S. Ogawa, “Hot-electron dynamics in copper revisited: The d-band effect,” Appl. Phys. B: Lasers and Optics 68, 369–375 (1999). [CrossRef]  

24. N. del Fatti, C. Flytzanis, and F. Vallée, “Ultrafast induced electron-surface scattering in a confined metallic system,” Appl. Phys. B: Lasers and Optics 68, 433–437 (1999). [CrossRef]  

25. Y. Hamanaka, N. Hayashi, and A. Nakamura, “Dispersion curves of complex third-order optical susceptibilities around the surface plasmon resonance in Ag nanocrystal-glass composites,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 1227–1232 (2003). [CrossRef]  

26. A. Benabbas, V. Halté, and J.-Y. Bigot, “Analytical model of the optical response of periodically structured metallic films,” Opt. Express 13, 8730–8745 (2005), http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-13-22-8730 [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. V. Halté, A. Benabbas, and J.-Y. Bigot, “Optical response of periodically modulated nanostructures near the interband transition threshold of noble metals,” Opt. Express 14, 2909–2920 (2006) http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-7-2909. [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. S. A. Damanyan and A. V. Zayats, “Light tunneling via resonant surface plasmon polariton states and the enhanced transmission of periodically nanostructured metal films: an analytical study,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 035424 (2003) S. A. Damanyan, M. Nevière, and A. V. Zayats, “Analytical theory of optical transmission through periodically structured metal films via tunnel-coupled surface polariton modes,” Phys. Rev. B 70, 075103 (2004). [CrossRef]  

29. S. A. Kovalenko, A. L. Dobryakov, J. Ruthmann, and N. P. Ernsting, “Femtosecond spectroscopy of condensed phases with chirped supercontinuum probing,” Phys. Rev. A 59, 2369–2384 (1999). [CrossRef]  

30. R. H. M. Groenenveld, R. Sprik, and A. Lagendijk, “Effect of a nonthermal electron distribution on the electron-phonon energy relaxation process in noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 45, 5079–5082 (1992). [CrossRef]  

31. W. S. Fann, R. Storz, H. W. K. Tom, and J. Bokor, “Direct measurement of nonequilibrium electron-energy distributions in subpicosecond laser-heated gold films,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2834–2837 (1992). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

32. C. K. Sun, F. Vallée, L. H. Acioli, E. P. Ippen, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Femtosecond-tunable measurement of electron thermalization in gold,” Phys. Rev. B 50, 15337–15348 (1994) [CrossRef]  

33. J. -Y. Bigot, V. Halté, J. -C. Merle, and A. Daunois, “Electron dynamics in metallic nanoparticles,” Chem. Phys. 251, 181–203 (2000). [CrossRef]  

34. G. L. Eesley, “Observation of Nonequilibrium Electron Heating in Copper,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2140–2143 (1983). [CrossRef]  

35. R. W. Schoenlein, W. Z. Lin, J. G. Fujimoto, and G. L. Eesley, “Femtosecond studies of nonequilibrium electronic processes in metals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1680–1683 (1987). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

36. H. Ehrenreich and M. H. Cohen, “Self-Consistent Field Approach to the Many-Electron Problem,” Phys. Rev. 115, 786–790 (1959). [CrossRef]  

37. D. Pines and P. Nozières, The Theory of Quantum Liquids (Benjamin, New York, 1966), Vol. 1.

38. R. Rosei and D. W. Lynch, “Thermomodulation Spectra of Al, Au, and Cu,” Phys. Rev. B 5, 3883–3894 (1972). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (3)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a)Differential transmission of a gold nanostructures with the period a=350 nm. The density of excitation is 0.5 mJ.cm-2. Inset: Linear transmission of the corresponding nanostructure. (b)Spectrally resolved differential transmission for a pump-probe delay τ=0.9 ps.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Differential spectra of the real part (open symbols) and imaginary part (closed symbols) of the two dielectric functions εRPA (red color) and εexp (blue color). The experimental delay is fixed at τ=1.4 ps which corresponds to an electronic temperature of 695 K.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Differential transmission spectrally resolved for a fixed delay τ=1.4 ps. The open circles represent the experimental measurement on the gold nanostructure. Theoretical dynamical spectrum calculated with the Lindhard dielectric function εRPA (dashed dotted line) and the experimental dielectric function εexp (full line).
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.