Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Theoretical analysis of graded-index topological resonator for improved sensing performance

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this manuscript, what we believe to be a novel hyperbolic-graded topological nano-photonic resonator structure is proposed to excite robust topological edge states. The graded refractive index is realized by considering a porous silicon material having a deliberately modulated local refractive index. The introduction of grading effectively modifies its dispersion characteristics leading to distinctive topological properties. This results in excitation of a topologically protected edge state (TES) having significantly higher interface electric field intensity at an operational wavelength of 1521 nm. Additionally, the impact of interface layer thicknesses on the excitation of these TES is thoroughly investigated. Finally, the structure’s capability to be used as a refractive index sensor is also demonstrated. The analytical results demonstrate an average sensitivity of 852.14 nm/RIU, coupled with a quality factor of 4019.23 and a figure of merit (FOM) of 1277.13 RIU−1. With its remarkable performance metrics, the proposed device holds significant promise for accurately detecting and sensing biochemical samples with very high efficiency.

© 2024 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Topological insulators have garnered significant attention due to their unique ability to excite topologically protected edge states (TES) [1,2]. These states have shown robustness against disturbances and can enhance light-matter interactions, making them applicable in various fields [3]. Recently, nanophotonic devices such as optical waveguides, nanoparticles and one-dimensional photonic crystal (1D-PhC) structures have been investigated for their potential to excite these edge states [4,5,6]. Here, 1D-PhC structures being particularly promising due to their design flexibility and ease of fabrication and characterization [79]. Considering two 1D-PhCs having overlapped photonic bandgaps and opposite Zak phase results in band inversion at a considered operating wavelength [10]. This facilitates the excitation of TES at the inversion wavelength. Recently, this concept has been utilized to excite Tamm plasmon polaritons (TPP) modes and Fano resonance [11,12]. Based on this, a 1D-PhC-based TES is utilized to design a refractive index sensor having 254.5 nm/RIU sensitivity [13], which can be improved to 616 nm/RIU using functional materials [14]. Furthermore, a polarization independent sensor having 60°/RIU (70°/RIU) for TM (TE) polarized light is also reported [15]. This concept has also been utilized to develop a low threshold optical bistability [16].

The performance of these structures can further be improved by considering the gradient refractive index profile. The quest for cutting-edge and precise sensing technologies has led to the development of innovative sensors based on graded index photonic crystal (GPhC). These 1D-GPhC structures are designed considering multi-layers having gradual refractive index variation along the fixed thickness or thickness gradient at a constant refractive index [17,18]. The existing research on 1D-GPhCs has primarily focused on bandgap engineering for linear, sawtooth and exponential-graded index materials [19,20]. But very few literatures have been available on the advancement of 1D-GPhC structures that integrate materials with hyperbolic graded index. The hyperbolic variations of refractive indices in PhC structures hold great potential for integrating optical devices, offering novel and intriguing effects. The gradual change in refractive index, combines the benefits of other graded configurations. This provides precise control over mode confinement, significantly reduced interface losses and dispersion management. Nonetheless, it’s worth noting that the topological characteristics of hyperbolic graded photonic crystals (HGPhCs) remain unexplored till lately. Leveraging the HGPhC structure to excite topologically protected edge states (TES), holds the promise of significantly enhancing sensing performance due to the combination of graded refractive index and topological properties. This offers improved control over dispersion characteristics and enhance the electric field intensity at the interface, leading to more efficient interactions between light and matter. Further investigation and validation studies are necessary to fully understand the potential of these techniques.

To address this gap, the current study presents a novel approach using a hyperbolic-graded one-dimensional photonic crystal (1D-PhC) to excite the TES. The study optimizes two distinct HGPhC structures made from porous silicon, specifically aligning their optical thicknesses to create overlapping photonic bandgaps (PBG) with opposing topological characteristics, specifically the Zak Phase. As a result, TES are excited, exhibiting significantly higher electric field intensity at an operational wavelength of 1521 nm. Additionally, the research explores the impact of varying interface layer thicknesses on the excitation of TES. Finally, the research demonstrates the structure’s potential as a refractive index sensor, employing cholesterol as an analyte. The analytical results showcase an average sensitivity of 852.14 nm/RIU, a quality factor of 4019.23, and a figure of merit (FOM) of 1277.13 RIU−1. Importantly, the proposed structure offers a 489% increase in sensitivity, a remarkable 28166% improvement in FOM, and a substantial 16358% enhancement in quality factor when compared to previous approaches [21].

2. Theoretical analysis and design

The schematic of the proposed 1D-GPhC structure with hyperbolic grading is shown in Fig. 1. Here, two 1D-PhC structures PhC1 (substrate $\left| {{\left( {n_{A1},\,n_{{\rm B1}}} \right)}^7} \right|$ Air) and PhC2 (substrate $\left| {{\left( {n_{B2},\,n_{{\rm A2}}} \right)}^7} \right|$ Air) made of the same material of silicon (having RI (3.45)) are considered and represented in Fig. 1(a) and Fig. 1(b).

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic representation of proposed (a) Graded index PhC1 structure, (b) Graded index PhC2 structure, and (c) Corresponding photonic band gap.

Download Full Size | PDF

A BK7 prism of refractive index 1.515 is used as a substrate to couple the incident light [22]. The porosity is introduced to obtain the desired refractive index profile in different layers. The layer thicknesses are optimized to have overlapped photonic bandgaps (PBG). The PhC1 comprises step index material ‘B1’ having low refractive index (nB1) of 1.6 (with 80% porosity), while material ‘A1’ is considered as a hyperbolic graded high refractive index (nA1) ranging from 1.6 (with 80% porosity) to 3.45 (with 0% porosity) as shown in Fig. 1(a). Similarly, PhC2 comprises step index material ‘B2’ having low refractive index (nB2) of 1.8 (with 70% porosity), while material ‘A2’ is considered as a hyperbolic graded high refractive index (nA2) ranging from 1.8 (with 70% porosity) to 3.45 (with 0% porosity) as shown in Fig. 1(b).

The graded index profile can be obtained by introducing the porosity within the material. This also enables effective infiltration of analytes. A layer’s porosity (P) can be analytically calculated using Eq. (1) [23].

$$P = \; \frac{{({n_p^2 - n_{ds}^2} )({n_a^2 - 2n_{ds}^2} )}}{{({n_p^2 + 2n_{ds}^2} )({n_a^2 + n_{ds}^2} )}}$$

In Eq. (1), the refractive indices np, na, and nds represent the refractive indices of the porous material, air/analytes, and dense material, respectively. The effective RI of high-index material in PhC1 is considered the average RI (1.6 to 3.45), while the effective RI of high-index material in PhC2 is considered the average RI (1.8 to 3.45). The hyperbolic refractive index of material ‘A’ along the layer thickness from the starting point (d(0)) to the final point (d(y)) is calculated using $\textrm{}{n_H}(y )= \frac{{{n_i}}}{{1 - \alpha y}}$ [24]. Here, the hyperbolic grading parameter ‘$\alpha$’ is determined as $\alpha = [({n_f} - {n_{i\textrm{}}})/({n_f}.d)]\textrm{}$ having ‘ni’ as the initial refractive index, ‘nf’ as the final refractive index and ‘D’ is the physical thickness of the layer. The electric field distribution along the plane perpendicular to the hyperbolic grading layer’s surface is calculated using Eq. (2) to Eq. (4).

$${E_H}(y )= \; \sqrt {{\beta _H}} \; ({{A_H}\cos ({mlog({{\beta_H}} )} )+ {B_H}\sin ({mlog({{\beta_H}} )} )} ).\; $$
$${\beta _H} = 1 - \alpha \times x.$$
$${m^2} = \; {\left( {\frac{{\omega {n_i}}}{{C\alpha }}} \right)^2} - 0.25. $$
Where AH and BH are hyperbolic graded index layer constants. At normal incidence angle, the propagation wave vector is presented by the variable $\beta _{\rm H}$, having ‘$\omega$’ as the angular frequency and ‘C’ as the velocity of light.

2.1 Topological effect and sensing application

Topological resonating states can be realized at junction of two 1D-PhC structures exhibiting overlapping photonic bandgaps, each possessing distinct topological properties or Zak phases. The optimized physical thicknesses DA1 (153 nm), DB1 (242 nm), DA2 (148 nm), and DB2 (215 nm) results in an overlapped PBG of width 556 nm (from 1270 nm to 1826nm) which is shown in Fig. 1(c). Moreover, the contrasting Zak phase nature further increases the probability of exciting a topological resonating state at the interface of structure. The hyperbolic graded topological 1D-PhC structure made of combined PhC1 and PhC2 structures to excite the TES is shown in Fig. 2(a).

$$\theta _n^{Zak} = \mathop \smallint \nolimits_{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{${ - \pi }$} \!\mathord{/ {\vphantom {{ - \pi } \Lambda }}}\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{$\Lambda $}}}^{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{$\pi $} \!\mathord{/ {\vphantom {\pi \Lambda }}}\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{$\Lambda $}}} \left[ {i\mathop \smallint \limits_{unit\textrm{ }cell} dz\textrm{}\varepsilon (z )u_{n,k}^\mathrm{\ast }(z ){\partial_k}{u_{n,k}}(z )} \right]dk$$

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) Schematics of proposed hyperbolic graded topological structure, and (b) Corresponding reflectance spectrum having TES and TRS.

Download Full Size | PDF

The Zak phase typically takes quantized values of 0 or $\pi$ and can be computed using the eigen-frequency band of the 1D-PhC, as given in Eq. (5) [25]. In this context, the dielectric function is represented as $\varepsilon (z ),\; $ the wave vector is indicated as ‘k’ and the eigenfunction of the nth band Bloch electric field is denoted as ${u_{n,k}}(z )$. Hence, computing the Zak phase for each individual photonic band gap (PBG) imparts topological characteristics. This results in excitation of TES at 1521 nm, which is shown by black dotted lines in Fig. 2(b). The robustness of this TES stems from its intrinsic excitement due to the topological characteristics of the structure, and it remains unaffected by minor perturbations in the surrounding environment. Initially, the impact of incidences angle on electric field confinement at the interface is analyzed and is shown in Fig. 3. The structure shows the maximum electric field confinement of around 0.807 × 106 V/m at normal incidence, which increases to 2.16 × 106 V/m at 20-degree incidence angle.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Normalized electric field distribution along the length of the device.

Download Full Size | PDF

High electric field confinement observed in topological structures has versatile applications, such as in laser cavities, waveguides, and optical switches. While the TES remains unaffected by its surrounding perturbations, the combination of two adjacent interface layers leads to the creation of a hyperbolic graded topological resonator. This topological resonator structure is subsequently employed for sensing applications. The enhanced E-field intensity within the resonator facilitates superior light-matter interaction, leading to improved sensitivity [26,27]. Furthermore, the E-field intensity remains nearly constant across different infiltrated analyte concentrations in the topological cavity structure, highlighting the robustness of the excited topological resonance state. The topological cavity is formed by combining two interface layers. Initially, the cavity thickness (DL) is set at 457 nm, which is the combined value of DB1 (242 nm) and DB2 (215 nm) and the considered refractive index is the average of two interface layers (nD = 1.6941). This results in the excitation of topological resonating state (TRS) at 1766nm, which is shown in Fig. 2(b).

The excited resonance mode is highly dependent on cavity thickness. Thus, the analysis is extended to see the impact of cavity thickness on the excitation characteristics of the TRS, which is shown in Fig. 4. Increasing the cavity thickness from 1.0DL to 4.0DL leads to the excitation of resonating TRS within wavelength range of 1600 nm to 2300 nm. The structure shows resonating TRS excitation at 1766nm, 2057nm, 1710nm, 1919nm, 1681 nm, 1837nm, and 1663 nm operating wavelengths for corresponding defect layer thicknesses of 1.0DL, 1.5DL, 2.0DL, 2.5DL, 3.0DL, 3.5DL, and 4.0DL, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4. Additionally, the proposed structure shows a very narrow FWHM of less than 0.5 nm, thus showing its potential in tunable sensing and filter applications [28]. This provides an added advantage of increased defect layer thickness to enhance light-matter interaction hence sensitivity.

For sensing applications, the cavity is infiltrated with the chosen analyte, which, in this research, is cholesterol. The experimentally verified refractive index of cholesterol, which varies with concentration, is utilized for the sensing analysis [29]. By gradually increasing the cholesterol concentration in 20 mg/dl increments, the refractive index spans from the normal range (200 mg/dl) to the high-risk range (280 mg/dl), and the resulting shift in the resonant wavelength is examined. This give the average refractive index of around 2.49, 2.62, 2.80, 3.06, 3.23, and 3.47 for corresponding cholesterol concentration of 200 mg/dl, 220 mg/dl, 240 mg/dl, 260 mg/dl, and 280 mg/dl, respectively. The structure exhibits the excitation of a topological resonating state at an operating wavelength of 2352 nm when the infiltration contains 200 mg/dl (within the normal range) of cholesterol concentration. This increases to 2901 nm for 280 mg/dl cholesterol concentration as depicted in Fig. 5(a)

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Cavity thickness dependent resonance wavelength variations in hyperbolic graded topological resonator.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Reflectance response of hyperbolic graded topological structure “Substrate|(nA1, nB1)6 | nA1|D|nA2|(nB2, nA2)6|Air” for DL defect layer thickness at varying incidence angles of (a) 0-degree, and (b) 20-degree.

Download Full Size | PDF

Increasing the incidence angle results in blue shift in TRS wavelength. For 20-degree incidence angle, the proposed structure excitation of TRS at 2313 nm and 2871 nm operating wavelength for 200 mg/dl and 280 mg/dl cholesterol concentration as shown in Fig. 5(b). This results in average sensitivity ($s = \Delta \lambda /\Delta N$) of around 740 nm/RIU and 755 nm/RIU at 0-degree and 20-degree incidence angle for cavity thickness of DL [30]. It’s worth noting that the sensitivity is also influenced by the thickness of the cavity layer [31]. Therefore, the analysis is further extended, and the sensor performance is compared with varying the cavity layer width from 1.0DL to 4.0 DL at the angle of incidence of 0-degree and 20-degree and corresponding sensitivity is recorded. Figure 6, shows the comparative sensitivity analysis at both the incidence angles and four different cavity thicknesses. At a 0-degree incidence angle, the defect layers with thicknesses of 1.0DL, 2.0DL, 3.0DL and 4.0DL exhibit average sensitivities of approximately 740 nm/RIU, 781 nm/RIU, 812 nm/RIU and 839 nm/RIU respectively. When the incidence angle is increased to 20 degrees, the average sensitivities for the same defect layer thicknesses improve to 755 nm/RIU, 802 nm/RIU, 829 nm/RIU and 852 nm/RIU, respectively. This gives the maximum quality Factor ($Q = \lambda R/FWHM$) of 4019.23 and a figure of merit ($FOM = S/FWHM$) of 1277.13 RIU−1 at 20-degree incidence angle for 4.0DL cavity thickness. Finally, a proposed structure’s sensing performance is compared with the recently reported values and is documented in Table 1. This demonstrates that the performance of the proposed biosensor surpasses that of current biosensing research endeavors, as indicated by its superior average sensitivity, FOM, and quality factor. Moreover, the structure can easily be fabricated using stain-etching and anodization techniques [3234].

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparative performance analysis with recently reported results

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Comparative sensitivity analysis of four different cavity thicknesses at 0-degree and 20-degree incidence angle.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Conclusions

This paper focuses on exciting topological protected edge states using hyperbolic-graded photonic crystal structure. The proposed structure utilizes two connected photonic crystal structures having overlapping bandgaps and opposite Zak phases. By incorporating a hyperbolic graded refractive index profile, the dispersion characteristics of the device are effectively modified. The combination of two interface layer results in excitation of a topological resonance state within the photonic bandgap. The reflectance spectrum is analyzed using the finite element method. Remarkably, the proposed graded topological structure exhibits a sensitivity of 852 nm/RIU and an impressive FOM of 1277 RIU−1. Overall, the proposed device holds great promise for highly efficient and accurate detection and sensing of cholesterol concentration.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the research funding to the Innovative Technologies Laboratories (ITL) at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. X. Qi and S. Zhang, “Topological insulators and superconductors,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 83(4), 1057–1110 (2011). [CrossRef]  

2. V. Dal Lago, M. Atala, and L. E. F. Foa Torres, “Floquet topological transitions in a driven one-dimensional topological insulator,” Phys. Rev. A 92(2), 023624 (2015). [CrossRef]  

3. B. Wang, T. Chen, and X. Zhang, “Observation of novel robust edge states in dissipative non-hermitian quantum walks,” Laser & Photonics Rev. 14(7), 2000092 (2020). [CrossRef]  

4. A. K. Goyal, A. Kumar, and Y. Massoud, “Performance Analysis of Heterostructure-Based Topological Nanophotonic Sensor,” Sci. Rep. 13(1), 19415 (2023). [CrossRef]  

5. M. Xiao, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, “Surface impedance and bulk band geometric phases in one-dimensional systems,” Phys. Rev. X 4(2), 021017 (2014). [CrossRef]  

6. C. W. Ling, M. Xiao, C. T. Chan, et al., “Topological edge plasmon modes between diatomic chains of plasmonic nanoparticles,” Opt. Express 23(3), 2021–2031 (2015). [CrossRef]  

7. A. K. Goyal and J. Saini, “Performance analysis of bloch surface wave-based sensor using transition metal dichalcogenides,” Appl. Nanosci. 10(11), 4307–4313 (2020). [CrossRef]  

8. A. K. Goyal, J. Saini, and Y. Massoud, “Performance Analysis of Organic Material Assisted Dynamically Tunable Excitation of Optical Tamm State,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 55(6), 563 (2023). [CrossRef]  

9. K. Ratra, M. Singh, and A. K. Goyal, “Design and Analysis of Omni-directional Solar Spectrum Reflector using One-dimensional Photonic Crystal,” J. Nanophoton. 14(02), 1 (2020). [CrossRef]  

10. W. S. Gao, M. Xiao, C. T. Chan, et al., “Determination of zak phase by reflection phase in 1d photonic crystals,” Opt. Lett. 40(22), 5259–5262 (2015). [CrossRef]  

11. M. Su, Kangsen Li, Chaofeng Wang, et al., “Tamm-plasmon-polariton biosensor based on one-dimensional topological photonic crystal,” Results Phys. 48, 106454 (2023). [CrossRef]  

12. Z. E. A. Mohamed, S. Elshahat, A. M. Abd-Elnaiem, et al., “Sensing performance of Fano resonance induced by the coupling of two 1D topological photonic crystals,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 55(11), 943 (2023). [CrossRef]  

13. Y. M. Qing, H. F. Ma, L. W. Wu, et al., “Manipulating the light-matter interaction in a topological photonic crystal heterostructure,” Opt. Express 28(23), 34904–34915 (2020). [CrossRef]  

14. S. Elshahat, I. Abood, M. S. M. Esmail, et al., “One-dimensional topological photonic crystal mirror heterostructure for sensing,” Nanomaterials 11(8), 1940 (2021). [CrossRef]  

15. M. Su, C. Wang, K. Li, et al., “Polarization-independent and ultra-sensitive biosensor with a one-dimensional topological photonic crystal,” Opt. Express 30(23), 42415–42429 (2022). [CrossRef]  

16. X. Long, Y. Bao, H. Yuan, et al., “Low threshold optical bistability based on topological edge state in photonic crystal heterostructure with dirac semimetal,” Opt. Express 30(12), 20847–20858 (2022). [CrossRef]  

17. F. Gaufillet and E. Akmansoy, “Metallic graded photonic crystals for graded index lens,” Appl. Phys. A 109(4), 1071–1074 (2012). [CrossRef]  

18. D. Das, J. Saini, A. K. Goyal, et al., “Exponentially index modulated nanophotonic resonator for high-performance sensing applications,” Sci. Rep. 13(1), 1431 (2023). [CrossRef]  

19. B. K. Singh, V. Bambole, S. Tiwari, et al., “Photonic band gap consequences in one-dimensional exponential graded index photonic crystals,” Optik 240, 166854 (2021). [CrossRef]  

20. B. K. Singh, M. K. Chaudhari, and P. C. Pandey, “Photonic and omnidirectional band gap engineering in one-dimensional photonic crystals consisting of linearly graded index material,” J. Lightwave Technol. 34(10), 2431–2438 (2016). [CrossRef]  

21. S. Edappadikkunnummal, R. Chembra Vasudevan, S. Dinesh, et al., “Detection of hemoglobin concentration based on defective one-dimensional photonic crystals,” Photonics 9(9), 660 (2022). [CrossRef]  

22. A. K. Goyal and Y. Massoud, “Interface Edge Modes Confinement in Dielectric Based Quasi-Periodic Photonic Crystal Structure,” Photonics 9(10), 676 (2022). [CrossRef]  

23. W.-J. Chen, R.-Y. Zhang, M.-L. Chang, et al., Topological Properties of Photonic Crystals (world scientific, 2020), chap. Chapter 5, pp. 243–279.

24. B. K. Singh, V. Bambole, V. Rastogi, et al., “Multi-channel photonic bandgap engineering in hyperbolic graded index materials embedded one-dimensional photonic crystals,” Opt. Laser Technol. 129, 106293 (2020). [CrossRef]  

25. V. A. Markel, Compendium on Electromagnetic Analysis (World Scientific, 2020).

26. A. K. Goyal, D. Divyanshu, and Y. Massoud, “Excitation of optical tamm state for photonic spin hall enhancement,” Sci. Rep. 14(1), 175 (2024). [CrossRef]  

27. A. K. Goyal, M. Husain, and Y. Massoud, “Analysis of interface mode localization in disordered photonic crystal structure,” J. Nanophoton. 16(04), 046007 (2022). [CrossRef]  

28. A. K. Goyal, A. Kumar, and Y. Massoud, “Performance Analysis of DAST Material-Assisted Photonic-Crystal-Based Electrical Tunable Optical Filter,” Crystals 12(7), 992 (2022). [CrossRef]  

29. A. N. Dhinaa and P. K. Palanisamy, “Z-scan technique for measurement of total cholesterol and triglycerides in blood,” J. Innov. Opt. Health Sci. 02(03), 295–301 (2009). [CrossRef]  

30. A. K. Goyal, A. Kumar, and Y. Massoud, “Thermal Stability Analysis of Surface Wave Assisted Bio-Photonic Sensor,” Photonics 9(5), 324 (2022). [CrossRef]  

31. A. K. Goyal, “Design Analysis of One-dimensional Photonic Crystal Based Structure for Hemoglobin Concentration Measurement,” PIER-M 97, 77 (2020). [CrossRef]  

32. P. C. Searson and J. M. Macaulay, “The fabrication of porous silicon structures,” Nanotechnology 3(4), 188–191 (1992). [CrossRef]  

33. K.W. Kolasinski, (2014)., “Porous Silicon Formation by Stain Etching.,” In: L. Canham, (eds) Handbook of Porous Silicon. Springer, Cham.

34. О. Kuntyi, G. Zozulya, and M. Shepida, “Porous Silicon Formation by Electrochemical Etching,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2022(1482877), 1–15 (2022). [CrossRef]  

35. A. Panda and P. D. Pukhrambam, “Study of metal-porous gan-based 1d photonic crystal tamm plasmon sensor for detection of fat concentrations in milk,” in Micro and Nanoelectronics Devices, Circuits and Systems, T. R. Lenka, eds. (Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2023), pp. 415–425.

36. F. Segovia-Chaves and H. Vinck-Posada, “Superconductor–semiconductor one-dimensional photonic crystal using a cancer cell as a defect layer,” Optik 224, 165465 (2020). [CrossRef]  

37. K. M. Abohassan, H. S. Ashour, and M. M. Abadla, “Tunable wide bandstop and narrow bandpass filters based on one-dimensional ternary photonic crystals comprising defects of silver nanoparticles in water,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids 161, 110484 (2022). [CrossRef]  

38. S. Khani and M. Hayati, “Optical biosensors using plasmonic and photonic crystal band-gap structures for the detection of basal cell cancer,” Sci. Rep. 12(1), 5246 (2022). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of proposed (a) Graded index PhC1 structure, (b) Graded index PhC2 structure, and (c) Corresponding photonic band gap.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Schematics of proposed hyperbolic graded topological structure, and (b) Corresponding reflectance spectrum having TES and TRS.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Normalized electric field distribution along the length of the device.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Cavity thickness dependent resonance wavelength variations in hyperbolic graded topological resonator.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Reflectance response of hyperbolic graded topological structure “Substrate|(nA1, nB1)6 | nA1|D|nA2|(nB2, nA2)6|Air” for DL defect layer thickness at varying incidence angles of (a) 0-degree, and (b) 20-degree.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Comparative sensitivity analysis of four different cavity thicknesses at 0-degree and 20-degree incidence angle.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparative performance analysis with recently reported results

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

P = ( n p 2 n d s 2 ) ( n a 2 2 n d s 2 ) ( n p 2 + 2 n d s 2 ) ( n a 2 + n d s 2 )
E H ( y ) = β H ( A H cos ( m l o g ( β H ) ) + B H sin ( m l o g ( β H ) ) ) .
β H = 1 α × x .
m 2 = ( ω n i C α ) 2 0.25.
θ n Z a k = π / π Λ Λ π / π Λ Λ [ i u n i t   c e l l d z ε ( z ) u n , k ( z ) k u n , k ( z ) ] d k
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.