Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Far-field mid-infrared microscopy via spatial frequency shifting of evanescent waves in photorefractive nematic liquid crystal

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Mid-infrared wavelength has unique advantages in revealing the nanostructures and molecular vibrational signatures. However, the mid-infrared subwavelength imaging is also limited by diffraction. Here, we propose a scheme for breaking the limitation in mid-infrared imaging. With the assistance of orientational photorefractive grating established in nematic liquid crystal, evanescent waves are efficiently shifted back into the observation window. The visualized propagation of power spectra in k-space also proves this point. The resolution has an improvement about 3.2 times higher than the linear case, showing potentials in various imaging areas, such as biological tissues imaging and label-free chemical sensing.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Microscopic imaging is one of the important means to reveal the microstructure and reaction kinetics [1]. Owe to the applicability in quantitative analysis of molecular vibrational signatures, mid-infrared light are widely used in biomedical tissue and chemical imaging [24]. Traditional imaging methods by converting mid-infrared information to visible or near-infrared ranges inevitably lead to the loss of image features [5,6]. However, the direct imaging in mid-infrared band is also severely limited by the optical transfer function (OTF). According to Rayleigh criterion and linear Abbe theory, the maximum resolution obtained by classical imaging systems is δ = 0.61λ/NA, where λ is the imaging wavelength and NA is effective numerical aperture [7]. Therefore, in scalar diffraction, only the low-order wavenumbers can be detected. Minimizing the focusing spot can only improve the resolution to half of the imaging wavelength. However, the Richards-Wolf’s vector diffraction theory proves that, the diffraction limit can be broken by optimizing the distributions of wave polarization, phase, amplitude, and even modes interactions [8]. That means, a reasonable nonlinear reconstruction can effectively decouple the superimposed diffracted images and recover it clearly [911].

Since the principle of nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy is proposed, various optical effects, such as saturated excitation of fluorescent molecules, acoustic phonons scattering, optical Kerr effect and polymer photorefractive, et al, have been investigated to generate the suitable nonlinearity [1216]. Although seemingly as the incremental versions of structured-illumination microscopy (SIM), their fundamentals are different. In SIM, the illumination frequency of structural grating is still limited by linear OTF, so the maximum resolution can only be doubled [17]. In contrast, the nonlinear resolutions are only affected by “soft” factors, such as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and optical stability [18,19]. Of course, not all classical nonlinear effects can yield the expected improvement. For example, the two-photon absorption fluorescence, as a quadratic nonlinearity, has no obvious resolution enhancement due to the twice linear excitations of the same fluorophore [20]. That is, only the higher-order nonlinearity with serial harmonics can infinitely extend the observed spectrum.

In this paper, we demonstrate a far-field mid-infrared super-resolution imaging method that relies on the frequency shifting of evanescently decaying waves. The process is based on the orientational photorefractive grating established in nematic liquid crystal (NLC). Attributed by the rod-like structure and photoinduced reorientation of molecules, the photorefractive grating equivalently produces an expanded nonlinearity (mathematically expansion with ±1st, ± 2nd… Taylor series), leading to the theoretically infinite improvement of imaging resolution [21,22]. In addition, due to the Freedericksz Transition, the intensity required for molecular reorientation is much lower than general photorefractive materials [23,24]. The discussion of imaging process is divided into three sections: the establishment of photorefractive grating in NLC, the spatial shifting of evanescent waves, and the image reconstruction via phase decoupling. The results are in good agreement with theoretical simulation, which indicates the effectiveness of subwavelengths extraction.

2. Establishment of photorefractive grating in NLC

The designed imaging set-up is shown in Fig. 1. The nematic liquid crystal 5CB: 2%MR (4'-n-pentyl-4-cyanobiphenyl, doped with C60) is used as the nonlinear medium. The long and short diameters of NLC molecules are 2.5 nm and 0.5 nm, respectively. Polarizabilities versus directions leads to the birefringence that benefits the regulation of refractive index. C60 are excited as the photosensitizer to enhance the photoconductivity [25]. In this way, the medium has a strong nonlinearity and diffraction efficiency. As the measured absorption of 5CB is strongest around 500 nm and almost transparent around 2.94 µm, beams with the two wavelengths are selected to writing the grating and imaging, respectively [26]. NLC with a thickness d ≈ 20 µm is placed between two indium-tin oxide-coated glass slides. Original orientations of molecules are set parallel to x direction by coating, in order to maximize the nonlinear response. First, an s-polarized diode-pumped laser at wavelength λ1 = 514.5 nm is divided into two beams I1 and I2, and then symmetrically irradiated onto NLC. Intensities of I1 and I2 are about 85 mW/cm2, and the angle between the two beams is θ ≈ 20°. They will be removed when the photorefractive grating is established. A p-polarization Er: YAG CW laser at wavelength λ2 = 2.94 µm and intensity 35 mW/cm2 irradiates the object and then focused onto the liquid crystal in near field. A piezo-actuated mirror (PAM) phase-shifts the reference beam with a step of λ2/4, and is used to calculate the absolute phase. A high-resolution cooled mid-infrared CCD captures the output images. A 3.5 V DC voltage is applied across the material to control the coupling gain [27]. Note that the voltage or room temperature should not be too high, otherwise the 5CB will become isotropic and decrease the nonlinearity [28].

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic of proposed imaging set-up. The photorefractive grating in NLC is written by beams I1 and I2 at wavelength 514.5 nm. Once the steady grating is established, the writing beams are removed. Another beam at wavelength 2.94 µm illuminates the object and then transmits through the NLC. Reference beam is phase-stepped by PAM and used to calculate the phase. NLC: nematic liquid crystal. PBS: polarization beam splitter. PAM: piezo-actuated mirror.

Download Full Size | PDF

It should be emphasized that the measured absorption coefficients of material for writing beams and imaging beam are α1= 40 mm-1 and α2 = 3 mm-1, respectively. Thus, the influence of imaging beam on grating formation is negligible. Rod-shaped molecules will undergo a periodic quadratic polarization along the major axis under the combined modulation of electric field and internal charge field. Electro-optical effects and birefringence both contribute to the reorientation, forming a phase grating at molecular level. Since the intensities of writing beams are equal, the grating fringes have no bend, which is important for modes shifting without introducing any external distortion. With the slow-varying approximation, the period Λ and diffraction efficiency η of the grating can be given as [25]

$$\Lambda = \frac{{{\lambda _1}}}{{2n\sin ({\theta /2} )}}\begin{array}{cc} ,&{} \end{array}\eta = \exp \left[ {\frac{{ - {\alpha_1}d}}{{\cos ({\theta /2} )}}} \right]{\sin ^2}\left[ {\frac{{\pi d\Delta n}}{{\lambda \cos ({\theta /2} )}}} \right], $$
respectively, where the spatial nonlinear refractive index is
$$\Delta n = \frac{{{\theta _{re}}{n_0}\Delta \varepsilon }}{{2{\varepsilon _0}}}\sin 2\beta. $$

Here, Δε is the anisotropic dielectric constant, θre is the reorientation angle of molecules, n0 is the linear refractive index, and β is the angle between molecule and incident beams. Since the dimensionless parameter Q = 2π1/n0Λ2 > 1, the grating operates in Raman-Nath regime [29]. As the constant application of voltage makes the doped molecules fixed on the substrate surface, the writing time of grating is about nanosecond, while the duration can be several months. Even the writing beams are removed, the molecules still preserve the polarized states [30].

3. Spatial shifting of evanescent modes

Before the reorientation of NLC molecules, the output images are simply a diffracted version of input, in which evanescent waves disappear. When the photorefractive grating is established, the multistage diffraction will convert the evanescent waves into propagation region. This makes the maximum detectable frequency much higher than linear case. For the grating with a period Λ, the distribution of dielectric constant meets the relation ε = ε0 + Δε·cos (2π/Λ·x). Raman-Nath diffraction theory indicates that the diffraction is in central symmetry. For simplicity, we can reasonably ignore the multiple reflections and backscattering, and only consider the forward scattering of object modes in z direction.

Since the wave interaction depends on the product of amplitudes, the weak coupling of high-frequencies are negligible. The approximation is valid, as kgk0k ± j, j = 1, 2, 3… can be always satisfied by controlling the incidence of writing beams, where kg = 2π/Λ, k0 = ω/c and k ± j are the vectors of grating, paraxial wave, and jth-order evanescent waves, respectively. Thus, there is no Bragg match between the imaging waves and grating. As shown in Fig. 2(a), in Raman-Nath diffraction regime, mode kj is simultaneously diffracted into the adaxial component kj-1 and the abaxial component kj + 1, namely, the “upshift” and “downshift”. As a result, part of modes transfer towards the paraxial region. With the approximation of amplitudes A0 >>Aj, the redistribution of Aj satisfies [31]

$$A_j^{^{\prime\prime}}(z )+ k_{zj}^2{A_j}(z )={-} \frac{{\Delta \varepsilon }}{{2{c^2}}}{\omega ^2}[{{A_{j - 1}}(z )+ {A_{j + 1}}(z )} ]\begin{array}{cc} ,&{} \end{array}k_{zj}^2 = {\varepsilon _0}{({\omega /c} )^2} - {({{k_j} + j{k_g}} )^2}. $$

Then, the efficiencies of “downshift” component diffracted from jth mode can be derived as

$${\eta _j} = \frac{{\; A_{j - 1}^\ast {A_{j - 1}}}}{{A_j^\ast {A_j}}} = \frac{{{t_0}\Delta \varepsilon }}{2}{\left( {\frac{\omega }{c}} \right)^2}{\left\{ {\left[ {{{\left( {\frac{\omega }{c}} \right)}^2}\varepsilon - {{({{k_g} + {k_j}} )}^2}} \right] \cdot ({2{k_g}{k_j} - k_g^2} )} \right\}^{ - 1/2}}, $$
where t0 is the linear transmission coefficient. In theory, the frequency shifting can occur in any high-frequencies. However, only the waves coupled into the paraxial region can contribute to the final imaging. With making ηj > 0, we can obtain the boundary condition of modes shifting
$$\frac{\omega }{c}\sqrt \varepsilon - {k_g} > {k_j} > {k_g}/2. $$

Obviously, the severely off-axis modes are difficult to be incorporated back into the paraxial region. Increasing the effective dielectric constant is beneficial to frequency shift, while increasing kg will squeeze the number of transferable modes. Series of evanescent waves will be coupled to the paraxial region and produce new modes like the beat-frequency. This process is depicted in Fig. 2(b). The observable spectrum expands in the form of kexpand = ∑kj, and the resolvable region increases to k0+ kexpand. Using the undepleted approximation of paraxial wave, the final detected intensity with averaging the background is [32]

$${\bar{I}_{out}} = |{\tilde{A}_0}{|^2} + {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^\infty {({{{\tilde{A}}_j}\eta_j^j} )} ^2}{e^{ - i \cdot j\frac{c}{\Lambda }t}}. $$

By placing an array lens on the focal plane, the DC term of Eq. (6) can be separated by a low-pass filter, and the oscillating term can be decoupled by an appropriate algorithm.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) Diffraction of high-order modes through the photorefractive grating. (b) Expansion of equivalent OTF. The black circle represents the original observation window. The dashed coils represent the extensions when the high-order modes are incorporated back into paraxial region.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Image reconstruction via phase decoupling

Reconstruction algorithm is such important as an unfavorable approach will produce unpredictable artifacts [33]. Spatial intensity received on CCD is the superposition of multiple image components, whose displacements corresponds to the modal shifts in k-space [34]. Only when the scaling factors are precisely determined, can the components be decoupled and moved back to real positions. We can decompose the phase shift into two parts: one is the linear phase shift for multi-diffracted orders, and another is the additional phase shift caused by nonlinear coupling. The four-frame phase-shift method with the step length set at λ2/4 is used to calculated the second part. In this way, the total phase shift of jth diffracted order can be given as

$${\varphi _j} ={-} \left[ {\frac{{{I_{s3}}(x,y) - {I_{s2}}(x,y)}}{{{I_{s1}}(x,y) - {I_{s0}}(x,y)}} + 2\pi \delta ({1 + 2{\xi_j}} )} \right], $$
where Is are the intensities with stepped phase-shift, δ≈10−2 depends on the nature of photorefractive material, and ξj is the intensity ratio of jth evanescent wave to paraxial wave. Besides, for the Raman-Nath diffraction, the scaling factors of image sizes must be considered as well [35]. It is known that the diffraction angles of adjacent orders are equal. For an imaging distance L and angle Δθ between adjacent diffracted orders, the size of image component varying from Hj to Hj-1 follows
$${\gamma _j} = \frac{{{H_{j - 1}}}}{{{H_j}}} = \frac{{\{{\tan [{{\theta_{j - 1}} + ({j - 1} )\Delta \theta } ]- \tan {\theta_{j - 1}}} \}L}}{{[{\tan ({{\theta_j} + j\Delta \theta } )- \tan {\theta_j}} ]L}} \approx \frac{{({j - 1} )\Delta \theta L}}{{j\Delta \theta L}} = \frac{{j - 1}}{j}. $$

For j ≥ 2, γj ≤ 1/2. Thus, except for ±1st modes, the diffracted image sizes of j ≥ 2 modes should be decreased for reconstruction. Although the theoretical shifts of modes are infinite, only the finite wavenumbers that exceed the noise level should be decoupled in practice. Thus, the observable modes mainly come from the paraxial waves and evanescent waves j = ±1, ± 2 orders.

5. Analysis of super-resolution imaging results

The theoretical resolution of reconstructed image can be closely expressed as

$${\lambda _{th}} = \frac{{{\lambda _2}}}{{2NA + 2{\lambda _2}/\Lambda }}$$

Taking the parameters n|| = 1.7, n= 1.5, NA = 1.4, the detectable resolution is 0.3213 µm, which is 3.268 times higher than the value of 1.05 µm in linear case. In order to verify the theory, we simulate the evolution of spectrum in k-space as Fig. 3 using finite-domain time-difference (FDTD) solution. Wave coupling is assumed to occur between the paraxial wave and evanescent waves of single beam. Meanwhile, the paraxial wave is undepleted in horizontal direction, and its amplitude component in vertical direction can be ignored. Optical response satisfies periodic boundary conditions in x direction and perfect matching layer (PML) condition in z direction. 5% Gaussian noise is added, and the data is averaged over several time periods. As shown in Fig. 3(a), only the paraxial wave is detected in linear imaging. When the ±1 modes are shifted to the paraxial region as Fig. 3(c), the observed frequency bound can reach 2k0, resulting in a doubled observation bandwidth as Fig. 3(d). Furthermore, under an appropriate nonlinearity, the ±1 and ±2 modes are both re-incorporated into the propagation at the distance about 6λ2. The transferred energy concentrates on the sidelobes near the axis. The results also show that the shifts of jth modes can improve the resolution by j times. Of course, considering the noise, we only simulate the j ≤ 2 modes here, so that the equivalent bandwidth is increased by about 3 times, which has a high consistency with the result of 3.268 times obtained by Eq. (9).

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a), (c), (e) Simulation of power spectra in phase space under improved imaging conditions, and (b), (d), (f) the corresponding OTFs. The dashed regions indicate the spatial shift of high-order modes, which corresponds to the extension of space spectra circled by red rings.

Download Full Size | PDF

In order to further demonstrate the resolution ability for multi-objects, the sample is prepared by depositing 300-nm-diameter monodisperse silicon-dioxide microspheres onto the cover glass. Since the self-fluorescence of sample is weak, it is the transmitted light that mainly contributes to imaging. Figure 4 shows part of reconstructed result intercepted from a region of 50 × 50 µm2. Gaussian noise is also added. In linear case, the resolution is about 1.05 µm, where the two spheres with a 600 nm center distance are imaged as a single bright spot. While under the nonlinear conditions, they can be distinguished. The improvement of resolution also can be read from the transect curves of intensity in Fig. 4(c), where the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of a single sphere is compressed from 1.10 µm to 350 nm. The enhancement of resolution is about 3.143 times, which is in good agreement with the calculation.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Comparison of (a) the linear imaging and (b) super-resolution imaging for multiple microspheres. Images of a single and two close-range balls are framed as the typical examples. (c) and (d) are the corresponding transverse intensities and spatial spectra (insets), respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

In addition, the influences of system parameters on imaging results are briefly analyzed. A convenient controllable parameter is the writing angle of beams I1 and I2, because the grating period directly affects the imaging resolution. As seen from Fig. 5, increasing the angle significantly enhances the imaging resolution. However, this comes at the expensive of the reduction of diffraction efficiency. At the same time, the increase of diffraction cascade will lead to an excessive modal coupling, which inevitably weakens the intensity of paraxial wave, as depicted in Figs. 3(c) and (e). The accumulating system noise are also detrimental to the contrast of reconstructed images. Therefore, the writing angle is set to about 20°, corresponding the resolution enhancement about 3.2 times and diffraction coefficient about 8%. This is an acceptable choice after all consideration.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Influences of writing angle on diffraction efficiency and resolution. Writing beams are injected with an angle about 20°. This is acceptable with considering the resolution and efficiency.

Download Full Size | PDF

6. Conclusion

In summary, we investigate a far-field mid-infrared microscopy method by utilizing the orientational photorefractive grating in NLC. Evanescent decaying waves can be redetected in the observation window through the spatial frequency shifting. This method provides a much higher resolution than conventional structured illumination microscopy. It is noteworthy that, for NLC, the resolution is on the order of several hundred nanometers due to the photorefractive response in Raman-Nath regime. Besides, the clearing point of 5CB, i.e., the nematic-to-isotropic phase transition temperature Tg, is about 35°, close to the imaging temperature of biological samples. When Tg is exceeded, 5CB will become isotropic. That means, the material should work at an ambient temperature between Tg and the melting point Tm (about 25°), which can benefit the imaging performance. We also note that, doped with some liquid crystal chemicals (with central bonds, such as fluorobenzene structure), may be expected to improve the clearing point and conducive to preserve the nematic state [36]. More or less, it provides a potential way for mid-infrared super-resolution imaging applications, such as highly sensitive thermal imaging, label-free chemical sensing, and non-invasive tissue microscopy.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2807703); National Natural Science Foundation of China (61905106); Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2019PF013, ZR2020QA077); High School Science and Technology Funding Planning Project of Shandong Province of China (J18KA222).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. V. Ntziachristos, “Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology,” Nat. Methods 7(8), 603–614 (2010). [CrossRef]  

2. R. Chikkaraddy, A. Xomalis, L. A. Jakob, and J. J. Baumberg, “Mid-infrared-perturbed molecular vibrational signatures in plasmonic nanocavities,” Light: Sci. Appl. 11(1), 19 (2022). [CrossRef]  

3. C. L. Evans and X. S. Xie, “Coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microscopy: chemical imaging for biology and medicine,” Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1(1), 883–909 (2008). [CrossRef]  

4. Y. Bai, J. Yin, and J. X. Cheng, “Bond-selective imaging by optically sensing the mid-infrared photothermal effect,” Sci. Adv. 7(20), eabg1559 (2021). [CrossRef]  

5. K. Aleshire, I. M. Pavlovetc, R. Collette, X. Kong, P. D. Rack, S. Zhang, D. J. Masiello, J. P. Camden, G. V. Hartland, and M. Kuno, “Far-field midinfrared super-resolution imaging and spectroscopy of single high aspect ratio gold nanowires,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117(5), 2288–2293 (2020). [CrossRef]  

6. S. Lal, S. Link, and N. J. Halas, “Nano-optics from sensing to waveguiding,” Nat. Photonics 1(11), 641–648 (2007). [CrossRef]  

7. Y. Kuznetsova, A. Neumann, and S. R. Brueck, “Imaging interferometric microscopy-approaching the linear systems limits of optical resolution,” Opt. Express 15(11), 6651–66663 (2007). [CrossRef]  

8. E. Richards and B. Wolf, “Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems. II. Structure of the image field in an aplanatic system,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 253(1274), 358–379 (1959). [CrossRef]  

9. M. E. Testorf and M. A. Fiddy, “Super-resolution imaging revisited,” Adv. Imag. Electron. Phys. 163, 165–218 (2010). [CrossRef]  

10. M. Paturzo, F. Merola, S. Grilli, S. De Nicola, S. Finizio, and P. Ferraro, “Super-resolution in digital holography by a two-dimensional dynamic phase grating,” Opt. Express 16(21), 17107–17118 (2008). [CrossRef]  

11. M. G. L. Gustafsson, “Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: widefield fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(37), 13081–13086 (2005). [CrossRef]  

12. S. Hell and J. Wichmann, “Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 19(11), 780–782 (1994). [CrossRef]  

13. L. Alekseyev, E. Narimanov, and J. Khurgin, “Super-resolution imaging via spatiotemporal frequency shifting and coherent detection,” Opt. Express 19(22), 22350–22357 (2011). [CrossRef]  

14. C. Barsi and J. W. Fleischer, “Nonlinear abbe theory,” Nat. Photonics 7(8), 639–643 (2013). [CrossRef]  

15. P. Dean, M. R. Dickinson, and D. P. West, “Full-field coherence-gated holographic imaging through scattering media using a photorefractive polymer composite device,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(3), 363–365 (2004). [CrossRef]  

16. J. Han, Q. Xu, J. Chen, and L. Zhu, “Nonlinear super-resolution imaging via orientationally enhanced photorefractive effect in polymer,” Opt. Lett. 46(10), 2441–2444 (2021). [CrossRef]  

17. R. Heintzmann and C. Cremer, “Laterally modulated excitation microscopy: improvement of resolution by using a diffraction grating,” Proc. SPIE 3568, 185–196 (1999). [CrossRef]  

18. T. A. Klar and S. W. Hell, “Sub-diffraction resolution in far-field fluorescence microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 24(14), 954–956 (1999). [CrossRef]  

19. P. Wang, M. N. Slipchenko, J. Mitchell, C. Yang, E. O. Potma, X. Xu, and J. Cheng, “Far-field Imaging of Non-fluorescent Species with Sub-diffraction Resolution,” Nat. Photonics 7(6), 449–453 (2013). [CrossRef]  

20. M. G. L. Gustafsson, “Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy,” J. Microsc. 198(2), 82–87 (2000). [CrossRef]  

21. E. V. Rudenko and A. V. Sukhov, “Optically induced spatial charge separation in a nematic and the resultant orientational nonlinearity,” JETP 105, 1621–1634 (1994).

22. I. C. Khoo, H. Li, and Y. Liang, “Observation of orientational photorefractive effects in nematic liquid crystals,” Opt. Lett. 19(21), 1723–1725 (1994). [CrossRef]  

23. G. P. Wiederrecht, “Photorefractive liquid crystals,” Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 31(1), 139–169 (2001). [CrossRef]  

24. I. C. Khoo, Liquid Crystals: Physical Properties and Nonlinear Optical Phenomena (Wiley and Sons, 1995).

25. H. Ono, T. Kawamura, N. M. Frias, K. Kitamura, N. Kawatsuki, and H. Norisada, “Photorefractive mesogenic composites,” Adv. Mater. 12(2), 143–146 (2000). [CrossRef]  

26. H. Gao, Y. Jiang, Z. Zhou, K. Gu, and D. Gong, “The dependence of orientational optical nonlinearity in dye-doped liquid-crystal films on the polarization direction of the recording beams,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 42(7), 651–656 (2006). [CrossRef]  

27. T. Kesti and A. Golemme, “Photorefractive nematic liquid crystals with gain of constant sign under alternating voltage,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88(1), 011917 (2006). [CrossRef]  

28. I. C. Khoo, M. V. Wood, M. Y. Shih, and P. H. Chen, “Extremely nonlinear photosensitive liquid crystals for image sensing and sensor protection,” Opt. Express 4(11), 432–442 (1999). [CrossRef]  

29. J. Feinberg, “Photorefractive nonlinear optics,” Phys. Today 41(10), 46–52 (1988). [CrossRef]  

30. H. Ono, T. Kawamura, N. Kawatsuki, and H. Norisada, “Intensity filtering of a two-dimensional optical image in high-performance photorefractive mesogenic composites,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 79(7), 895–897 (2001). [CrossRef]  

31. R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Academic, 2003).

32. E. Cuche, P. Marquet, and C. Depeursinge, “Simultaneous amplitude-contrast and quantitative phase-contrast microscopy by numerical reconstruction of Fresnel off-axis holograms,” Appl. Opt. 38(34), 6994–7001 (1999). [CrossRef]  

33. U. Schnars and W. Juptner, “Direct recording of holograms by a CCD target and numerical reconstruction,” Appl. Opt. 33(2), 179 (1994). [CrossRef]  

34. I. Yamaguchi and T. Zhang, “Phase-shifting digital holography,” Opt. Lett. 22(16), 1268–1270 (1997). [CrossRef]  

35. C. Lu, B. Christopher, and J. W. Fleischer, “Phase retrieval using nonlinear diversity,” Appl. Opt. 52(10), D92 (2013). [CrossRef]  

36. D. Pauluth and K. Tarumi, “Advanced liquid crystals for television,” J. Mater. Chem. 14(8), 1219–1227 (2004). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic of proposed imaging set-up. The photorefractive grating in NLC is written by beams I1 and I2 at wavelength 514.5 nm. Once the steady grating is established, the writing beams are removed. Another beam at wavelength 2.94 µm illuminates the object and then transmits through the NLC. Reference beam is phase-stepped by PAM and used to calculate the phase. NLC: nematic liquid crystal. PBS: polarization beam splitter. PAM: piezo-actuated mirror.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Diffraction of high-order modes through the photorefractive grating. (b) Expansion of equivalent OTF. The black circle represents the original observation window. The dashed coils represent the extensions when the high-order modes are incorporated back into paraxial region.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a), (c), (e) Simulation of power spectra in phase space under improved imaging conditions, and (b), (d), (f) the corresponding OTFs. The dashed regions indicate the spatial shift of high-order modes, which corresponds to the extension of space spectra circled by red rings.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Comparison of (a) the linear imaging and (b) super-resolution imaging for multiple microspheres. Images of a single and two close-range balls are framed as the typical examples. (c) and (d) are the corresponding transverse intensities and spatial spectra (insets), respectively.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Influences of writing angle on diffraction efficiency and resolution. Writing beams are injected with an angle about 20°. This is acceptable with considering the resolution and efficiency.

Equations (9)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

Λ = λ 1 2 n sin ( θ / 2 ) , η = exp [ α 1 d cos ( θ / 2 ) ] sin 2 [ π d Δ n λ cos ( θ / 2 ) ] ,
Δ n = θ r e n 0 Δ ε 2 ε 0 sin 2 β .
A j ( z ) + k z j 2 A j ( z ) = Δ ε 2 c 2 ω 2 [ A j 1 ( z ) + A j + 1 ( z ) ] , k z j 2 = ε 0 ( ω / c ) 2 ( k j + j k g ) 2 .
η j = A j 1 A j 1 A j A j = t 0 Δ ε 2 ( ω c ) 2 { [ ( ω c ) 2 ε ( k g + k j ) 2 ] ( 2 k g k j k g 2 ) } 1 / 2 ,
ω c ε k g > k j > k g / 2.
I ¯ o u t = | A ~ 0 | 2 + j = 1 ( A ~ j η j j ) 2 e i j c Λ t .
φ j = [ I s 3 ( x , y ) I s 2 ( x , y ) I s 1 ( x , y ) I s 0 ( x , y ) + 2 π δ ( 1 + 2 ξ j ) ] ,
γ j = H j 1 H j = { tan [ θ j 1 + ( j 1 ) Δ θ ] tan θ j 1 } L [ tan ( θ j + j Δ θ ) tan θ j ] L ( j 1 ) Δ θ L j Δ θ L = j 1 j .
λ t h = λ 2 2 N A + 2 λ 2 / Λ
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.