Abstract
This paper proposes a terahertz absorber with a simple four-layered structure that can be dynamically switched between broadband and triple-band by controlling the chemical potential of graphene. The proposed absorber owns broadband absorption in the frequency range from 5.28 THz to 7.86 THz with the corresponding absorption efficiency above 90%, when the chemical potential of graphene is 150 meV. By increasing the chemical potential of graphene to 550 meV, the broadband absorption splits into triple-band absorption, with the peak locating at 5.39 THz, 7.01 THz and 8.1 THz, respectively. Detailed investigation shows that the broadband absorption should originate from magnetic resonance, Fabry-Pérot cavity resonance and surface plasmon polariton. The triple-band absorption should arise from the combination of Fabry-Pérot cavity resonance and surface plasmon polariton. Additionally, both broadband absorption and triple-band absorption are insensitive to the incident polarization. This tunable and bifunctional metamaterial structure shows a great potential in terahertz applications, such as detectors, modulators and sensors.
© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement
1. Introduction
Electromagnetic waves in terahertz (THz) frequencies have attracted increasing interest due to its potential in fields such as communications, radar, astronomy, biological detection, and security inspection [1–5]. Perfect absorption of THz wave is of great significance in terahertz detectors, sensors and cloaking [6–9]. An ideal absorber is a device that can provide adequate, controllable, and selective absorption of THz wave, by strengthening the interaction between electromagnetic waves and objects, and realizing the energy conversion of radiant energy. As a basic component of many applications, the structure of absorber should be relatively simple and easy to integrate with other devices and materials to achieve various functions. Since Landy et al. [10] proposed the first perfect absorber based on metamaterials in 2008, metamaterials have been considered one of the best choices for perfect electromagnetic wave absorption [11–16]. In order to realize dynamically tunable terahertz absorber based on metamaterials, functional materials have been incorporated into the structure. These functional materials include two-dimensional materials like graphene [17–24] and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) [25], phase change materials like vanadium dioxide (VO2) [26–29] and chalcogenide GeSbTe [30], and photosensitive semiconductors like GaAs [31]. The conductivities of these functional materials can be modulated by applying voltage, heat or light, which in turn affects their optical properties, enabling the dynamically tuning of the absorption peak frequencies or absorption efficiencies of the designed absorbers. Despite these marvelous achievements, most works mentioned above either focused on narrowband absorption or broadband absorption. In order to achieve the miniaturization of modern systems, a single device integrated with multi-function is highly desirable. Interestingly, Zhang et al. [32–35] have designed THz bifunctional devices based on graphene and VO2, in which the functionality of the devices can be switched by the conductivity of VO2.
In this paper, we propose a dynamically switchable terahertz absorber with a relatively simple four-layered structure of metal-dielectric-graphene-dielectric. By modulating the chemical potential of graphene layer, the proposed absorber can switch between broadband absorption and triple-band absorption. The distributions of magnetic field, electric field and current density are investigated to elucidate the underlying mechanism of the absorption. Furthermore, the effects of the angle of incident and the angle of polarization on the absorption performance are also discussed.
2. Structure and simulation setup
The schematic of the proposed THz absorber is illustrated in Fig. 1, which is a four-layered structure of metal-dielectric-graphene-dielectric from bottom to top. The metal substrate is composed of a silver ground plane with silver gratings periodically arranged along x-axis on top. The graphene layer is sandwiched between polyvinylidene fluoride binary polymer (P(VDF-TrFE)). The geometrical dimensions of the unit cell are t1 = 7 µm, t2 = 13.5 µm, t3 = 23 µm, t4 = 10 µm, w1 = 94 µm and w2 = 53 µm, respectively. The thickness of the graphene is 3.4 nm, which is about ten times of monolayer [36].
The performance of the designed absorber is numerically investigated with finite element method (FEM) simulation tool. Periodical boundary conditions are applied to x and y directions, and perfectly matched layer is used in z direction. The graphene layer is defined as a boundary with thickness of 3.4 nm, and transition boundary condition is applied.
The relative permittivity of Ag in teraherz regime can be described by Drude model as following [37]: ${\varepsilon _{Ag}} = 1 - \frac{{\omega _p^2}}{{{\omega ^2} - i\gamma }}$, where ω is the angular frequency of incident wave, ωp is the plasma frequency with a value of 1.37036×1016 rad/s and γ is the damping constant with a value of 1.71732×1016 rad/s. The thickness of the bottom Ag groud plane is set to 10 µm, which is far greater than the skin depth, to avoid any electromagnetic wave transmission. The dielectric layer P(VDF-TrFE) shows low loss at THz band and its relative permittivity is set to 2.2 [38]. The relative permittivity of graphene εG in teraherz regime can be calculated by ${\varepsilon _G} = 1 + \frac{{i{\sigma _G}}}{{\omega {\varepsilon _0}{t_G}}}$, where σG is the surface conductivy of graphene, ε0 is vaccum dielectric constant, and tG is the thickness of graphene layer. The surface conductivity of graphene σG can be derived from Kubo formula, which has intraband and interband contributions [39,40].
The plane of incident is the xoz plane. The angle between the incident wave vector and the normal direction of the xoy plane is the incident angle θ, which is set to 0 by default. That is, the electromagnetic wave is normal incident. The amplitude of magnetic field of the incident wave is set as ${H_x} ={-} 1\ast sin\mathrm{\Phi }$, ${H_y} = 1\ast cos\mathrm{\Phi }$, ${H_z} = 0$, where Φ is the incident polarization angle. The default polarization of the electromagnetic wave is set to transverse magnetic (TM) mode, that is $\mathrm{\Phi } = 0^\circ $. By increasing Φ from 0° to 90°, the polarization direction of the incident wave rotates clockwise on the xoy plane, and the TM wave gradually changes to transverse electric (TE) wave.
The absorption efficiency A can be calculated by the following equation: $A(\omega )= 1 - {|{{S_{11}}(\omega )} |^2} - {|{{S_{21}}(\omega )} |^2}$, where S11 and S21 are reflection parameter and transmission parameter, respectively. As the thickness of Ag ground plane is far greater than the skin depth, ${|{{S_{21}}(\omega )} |^2}$ equals zero.
3. Results and discussion
The absorption spectra of the proposed absorber with chemical potential of graphene μC from 150 meV to 650 meV is shown in Fig. 2. As the chemical potential of graphene increases, the absorption spectrum splits from broadband absorption into triple-band absorption. The overall trend of the full width at half maximum of the absorption peak is narrowing with the increasing of μC. This may be attributed to the fact that as the chemical potential increases, the carrier concentration on the graphene layer increases significantly, and the plasmon resonance frequency brought about by it also increases, resulting in a blue shift of the absorption spectrum. Meanwhile, the increase in electrical conductivity reduces the loss and improves its quality factor, resulting in a narrowing of the absorption spectra. A wide absorption frequency range from 5.28 THz to 7.83 THz is achieved with ${\mu _C} = 150\;{meV}$, and the corresponding absorption efficiency is above 90%. When increasing μC to 550 meV, three absorption bands with the peak locating at 5.39 THz, 7.01 THz and 8.1 THz are obtained, and the absorption rate are 97.6%, 98.3% and 82.9%, respectively.
The absorber can localize the incident electromagnetic wave at a limited position inside the device, so that the electromagnetic radiant energy can be effectively converted into other forms of energy through thermal loss of the material or the generation of carriers. Several methods can be adopted to generate localized field, like Fabry-Pérot (F-P) cavity resonance [41–43], magnetic resonance [17,25] and surface plasmon polariton [44,45], which can be used alone or jointly [46,47]. In order to elucidate the physical mechanism of the absorption spectra, the distributions of electric field, current density and magnetic field for frequencies at which absorption efficiencies reaching the local maximum values are rigorously investigated. For broadband absorption spectra with μC of 150 meV, five frequencies at which S11 parameter reaches its local minimum values are selected according to ${S_{11}}$ spectra, as shown in Fig. 3. For frequencies of 5.52 THz, 5.78 THz and 7.67 THz, magnetic field distributions and the corresponding current density distributions are depicted in Fig. 3(a), (b), and (e). The magnetic field intensity is indicated by color, and the direction and magnitude of current density is indicated by arrows. Significant localized magnetic field enhancement can be observed in the circular currents, indicating that the main absorption mechanism is magnetic resonance at these frequencies [17]. For frequencies at 6.52 THz and 7.06 THz, the electric field distributions are plotted in Fig. 3(c) and (d), with color for intensity and arrows for directions. It can be concluded that the strong absorption at 6.52 THz originates from F-P cavity resonance between graphene layer and the raised metal, as indicated by the white dotted boxes. Besides, SPP at the upper surface of hollowed metal, with positive and negative signs indicating the direction of the localized electric field introduced by SPP, is another reason for the strong absorption. For frequency of 7.06 THz, the absorption is the joint effects of F-P cavity resonance between graphene layer and the raised metal, indicating by the white dotted boxes, and SPP at the sidewalls of the hollowed metal, indicating by positive and negative signs.
The electric field distribution for triple-band absorption with μC of 550 meV is depicted in Fig. 4, with color for intensity and arrows for directions. For the first absorption peak at 5.39 THz, the electric field is mainly confined in the cavity between graphene layer and hollowed metal, forming F-P cavity resonance. Weak SPP can also be observed at the graphene layer above the raised metal. For the second peak, which locates at 7.01 THz, the electric field distribution shows that the absorption mechanism is primarily F-P cavity resonance between graphene layer and raised metal, and secondarily SPPs at the upper surface of graphene layer and hollowed metal surface. As shown in Fig. 4(c), the third absorption peak at 8.1 THz should originate from both F-P cavity resonance between graphene layer and hollowed metal and SPPs at raised metal surface.
The influence of the polarization of incident wave on the performance of the proposed absorber is also studied. Figure 5(a) and (b) show the broadband absorption and triple-band absorption spectra as a function of the incident polarization angle, respectively. As the incident wave changes from TM polarization to TE polarization, the central frequencies show very slightly blueshift and the absorption efficiencies present small variation for both conditions. It can be concluded that both broadband absorption and triple-band absorption can be considered as polarization-independent though the structure of the proposed absorber is not rotationally symmetric.
To further investigate the influence of incident angles on the performance of the absorber under TM polarization, the absorption spectra with different incident angles are plotted in Fig. 6. The proposed absorber is sensitive to the incident angle of electromagnetic wave. When the incident angle is less than 15 degrees, the broadband absorption maintains stable. As the incident angle increases, the broadband absorption spectra are gradually blue-shifted, and the absorption peak efficiency fluctuates greatly, as shown in Fig. 6(a). For triple-band absorption, the absorption spectra show obvious distortion once the incident angle is larger than 10 degrees, as depicted in Fig. 6(b). Hence the absorber can maintain proper function under small incident angles less than 10 degrees.
4. Conclusion
We have proposed and demonstrated a THz absorber which can simultaneously achieve broadband absorption and triple-band absorption, depending on the chemical potential of graphene. The absorber consists of a simple four-layered structure, from bottom to top are the patterned metal substrate, a flexible dielectric layer, a graphene layer and a flexible dielectric layer. When the chemical potential of graphene is 150 meV, the design serves as a broadband absorber, with absorption efficiency over 90% from 5.28 THz to 7.86 THz. The electric and magnetic field distributions indicate that the broadband absorption arises from the combination of magnetic resonance, F-P cavity resonance and SPP. By increasing the chemical potential of graphene to 550 meV, the broadband absorption can be switched to triple-band absorption, with the absorption peaks locating at 5.39 THz, 7.01 THz and 8.1 THz, respectively. Detailed investigation shows that the triple-band absorption should originate from F-P cavity resonance and SPP. Besides, the absorption characteristics of broadband and narrowband are almost unaffected by the polarization of incident light, but sensitive to the incident angles larger than 10 degrees.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61971208, 62164013); Yunnan Fundamental Research Project (202101AU070153); Yunnan Reserve Talents of Young and Middle-aged Academic and Technical Leaders (Shen Tao, 2019HB005); Yunnan Young Top Talents of Ten Thousands Plan (Shen Tao, Zhu Yan, Yunren Social Development No. 2018 73); Major Science and Technology Projects in Yunnan Province (202002AB080001-8).
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data availability
Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
1. M. Tonouchi, “Cutting-edge terahertz technology,” Nat. Photonics 1(2), 97–105 (2007). [CrossRef]
2. J. F. Federici, B. Schulkin, F. Huang, D. Gary, R. Barat, F. Oliveira, and D. Zimdars, “THz imaging and sensing for security applications—explosives, weapons and drugs,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20(7), S266–S280 (2005). [CrossRef]
3. S. Koenig, D. Lopez-Diaz, J. Antes, F. Boes, R. Henneberger, A. Leuther, A. Tessmann, R. Schmogrow, D. Hillerkuss, and R. Palmer, “Wireless sub-THz communication system with high data rate,” Nat. Photonics 7(12), 977–981 (2013). [CrossRef]
4. S. J. Oh, S.-H. Kim, K. Jeong, Y. Park, Y.-M. Huh, J.-H. Son, and J.-S. Suh, “Measurement depth enhancement in terahertz imaging of biological tissues,” Opt. Express 21(18), 21299–21305 (2013). [CrossRef]
5. S. Liu, J. Hu, Y. Zhang, Z. Zheng, Y. Liu, R. Xu, and Q. Xue, “1 THz micromachined waveguide band-pass filter,” J. Infrared, Millimeter, Terahertz Waves 37(5), 435–447 (2016). [CrossRef]
6. Z. Hamzavi-Zarghani, A. Yahaghi, L. Matekovits, and A. Farmani, “Tunable mantle cloaking utilizing graphene metasurface for terahertz sensing applications,” Opt. Express 27(24), 34824–34837 (2019). [CrossRef]
7. W. Xu, L. Xie, and Y. Ying, “Mechanisms and applications of terahertz metamaterial sensing: a review,” Nanoscale 9(37), 13864–13878 (2017). [CrossRef]
8. J. Grant, I. Escorcia-Carranza, C. Li, I. J. McCrindle, J. Gough, and D. R. Cumming, “A monolithic resonant terahertz sensor element comprising a metamaterial absorber and micro-bolometer,” Laser Photonics Rev. 7(6), 1043–1048 (2013). [CrossRef]
9. D. Spirito, D. Coquillat, S. L. De Bonis, A. Lombardo, M. Bruna, A. C. Ferrari, V. Pellegrini, A. Tredicucci, W. Knap, and M. S. Vitiello, “High performance bilayer-graphene terahertz detectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104(6), 061111 (2014). [CrossRef]
10. N. I. Landy, S. Sajuyigbe, J. J. Mock, D. R. Smith, and W. J. Padilla, “Perfect metamaterial absorber,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(20), 207402 (2008). [CrossRef]
11. W. W. Meng, J. Lv, L. Zhang, L. Que, Y. Zhou, and Y. Jiang, “An ultra-broadband and polarization-independent metamaterial absorber with bandwidth of 3.7 THz,” Opt. Commun. 431, 255–260 (2019). [CrossRef]
12. W. Pan, X. Yu, J. Zhang, and W. Zeng, “A broadband terahertz metamaterial absorber based on two circular split rings,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 53(1), 1–6 (2017). [CrossRef]
13. P. Yu, L. V. Besteiro, Y. Huang, J. Wu, L. Fu, H. H. Tan, C. Jagadish, G. P. Wiederrecht, A. O. Govorov, and Z. Wang, “Broadband metamaterial absorbers,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(3), 1800995 (2019). [CrossRef]
14. A. Elsharabasy, M. Bakr, and M. J. Deen, “Wide-angle, wide-band, polarization-insensitive metamaterial absorber for thermal energy harvesting,” Sci. Rep. 10(1), 16215 (2020). [CrossRef]
15. M. Yan, “Metal–insulator–metal light absorber: a continuous structure,” J. Opt. 15(2), 025006 (2013). [CrossRef]
16. C. Shi, X. Zang, Y. Wang, L. Chen, B. Cai, and Y. Zhu, “A polarization-independent broadband terahertz absorber,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105(3), 031104 (2014). [CrossRef]
17. C. Wu, Y. Fang, L. Luo, K. Guo, and Z. Guo, “A dynamically tunable and wide-angle terahertz absorber based on graphene-dielectric grating,” Mod. Phys. Lett. B 34(27), 2050292 (2020). [CrossRef]
18. M. Amin, M. Farhat, and H. Bağcı, “An ultra-broadband multilayered graphene absorber,” Opt. Express 21(24), 29938–29948 (2013). [CrossRef]
19. F. Moradiani, A. Farmani, M. Yavarian, A. Mir, and F. Behzadfar, “A multimode graphene plasmonic perfect absorber at terahertz frequencies,” Phys. E 122, 114159 (2020). [CrossRef]
20. Y. Cai, Y. Guo, Y. Zhou, X. Huang, G. Yang, and J. Zhu, “Tunable dual-band terahertz absorber with all-dielectric configuration based on graphene,” Opt. Express 28(21), 31524–31534 (2020). [CrossRef]
21. H. Xiong, Q. Ji, T. Bashir, and F. Yang, “Dual-controlled broadband terahertz absorber based on graphene and Dirac semimetal,” Opt. Express 28(9), 13884–13894 (2020). [CrossRef]
22. S. Biabanifard, M. Biabanifard, S. Asgari, S. Asadi, and C. Mustapha, “Tunable ultra-wideband terahertz absorber based on graphene disks and ribbons,” Opt. Commun. 427, 418–425 (2018). [CrossRef]
23. M. Huang, Y. Cheng, Z. Cheng, H. Chen, X. Mao, and R. Gong, “Based on graphene tunable dual-band terahertz metamaterial absorber with wide-angle,” Opt. Commun. 415, 194–201 (2018). [CrossRef]
24. L. Liu, W. Liu, and Z. Song, “Ultra-broadband terahertz absorber based on a multilayer graphene metamaterial,” J. Appl. Phys. 128(9), 093104 (2020). [CrossRef]
25. Y. Zhong, Y. Huang, S. Zhong, T. Lin, M. Luo, Y. Shen, and J. Ding, “Tunable terahertz broadband absorber based on MoS2 ring-cross array structure,” Opt. Mater. 114, 110996 (2021). [CrossRef]
26. H. Zhang, F. Ling, and B. Zhang, “Broadband tunable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on vanadium dioxide and Fabry-Perot cavity,” Opt. Mater. 112, 110803 (2021). [CrossRef]
27. Y. Zhao, Q. Huang, H. Cai, X. Lin, and Y. Lu, “A broadband and switchable VO2-based perfect absorber at the THz frequency,” Opt. Commun. 426, 443–449 (2018). [CrossRef]
28. Z. Ren, L. Cheng, L. Hu, C. Liu, C. Jiang, S. Yang, Z. Ma, C. Zhou, H. Wang, and X. Zhu, “Photoinduced Broad-band Tunable Terahertz Absorber Based on a VO2 Thin Film,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12(43), 48811–48819 (2020). [CrossRef]
29. Y. Zhang, P. Wu, Z. Zhou, X. Chen, Z. Yi, J. Zhu, T. Zhang, and H. Jile, “Study on temperature adjustable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on vanadium dioxide,” IEEE Access 8, 85154–85161 (2020). [CrossRef]
30. G. Linyang, M. Xiaohui, C. Zhaoqing, X. Chunlin, L. Jun, and Z. Ran, “Tunable a temperature-dependent GST-based metamaterial absorber for switching and sensing applications,” J. Mater. Res. Technol. 14, 772–779 (2021). [CrossRef]
31. L. Yang, H. Wang, X. Ren, X. Song, M. Chen, Y. Tong, Y. Ye, Y. Ren, S. Liu, and S. Wang, “Switchable terahertz absorber based on metamaterial structure with photosensitive semiconductor,” Opt. Commun. 485, 126708 (2021). [CrossRef]
32. M. Zhang and Z. Song, “Terahertz bifunctional absorber based on a graphene-spacer-vanadium dioxide-spacer-metal configuration,” Opt. Express 28(8), 11780–11788 (2020). [CrossRef]
33. W. Liu and Z. Song, “Terahertz absorption modulator with largely tunable bandwidth and intensity,” Carbon 174, 617–624 (2021). [CrossRef]
34. M. Zhang and Z. Song, “Switchable terahertz metamaterial absorber with broadband absorption and multiband absorption,” Opt. Express 29(14), 21551–21561 (2021). [CrossRef]
35. W. Liu, J. Xu, and Z. Song, “Bifunctional terahertz modulator for beam steering and broadband absorption based on a hybrid structure of graphene and vanadium dioxide,” Opt. Express 29(15), 23331–23340 (2021). [CrossRef]
36. L. Falkovsky and S. Pershoguba, “Optical far-infrared properties of a graphene monolayer and multilayer,” Phys. Rev. B 76(15), 153410 (2007). [CrossRef]
37. L. Huang, G. Hu, C. Deng, Y. Zhu, B. Yun, R. Zhang, and Y. Cui, “Realization of mid-infrared broadband absorption in monolayer graphene based on strong coupling between graphene nanoribbons and metal tapered grooves,” Opt. Express 26(22), 29192–29202 (2018). [CrossRef]
38. M. Bai, M. Poulsen, A. Sorokin, S. Ducharme, C. Herzinger, and V. Fridkin, “Infrared spectroscopic ellipsometry study of vinylidene fluoride (70%)-trifluoroethylene (30%) copolymer Langmuir–Blodgett films,” J. Appl. Phys. 94(1), 195–200 (2003). [CrossRef]
39. M. Jablan, H. Buljan, and M. Soljačić, “Plasmonics in graphene at infrared frequencies,” Phys. Rev. B 80(24), 245435 (2009). [CrossRef]
40. J. Horng, C.-F. Chen, B. Geng, C. Girit, Y. Zhang, Z. Hao, H. A. Bechtel, M. Martin, A. Zettl, and M. F. Crommie, “Drude conductivity of Dirac fermions in graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 83(16), 165113 (2011). [CrossRef]
41. Y. Zhu, P. Yu, E. Ashalley, T. Liu, F. Lin, H. Ji, J. Takahara, A. Govorov, and Z. Wang, “Planar hot-electron photodetector utilizing high refractive index MoS2 in Fabry–Pérot perfect absorber,” Nanotechnology 31(27), 274001 (2020). [CrossRef]
42. M. Furchi, A. Urich, A. Pospischil, G. Lilley, K. Unterrainer, H. Detz, P. Klang, A. M. Andrews, W. Schrenk, and G. Strasser, “Microcavity-integrated graphene photodetector,” Nano Lett. 12(6), 2773–2777 (2012). [CrossRef]
43. J. Kim, H. Oh, B. Kang, J. Hong, J.-J. Rha, and M. Lee, “Broadband visible and near-infrared absorbers implemented with planar nanolayered stacks,” ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3(3), 2978–2986 (2020). [CrossRef]
44. K. A. Willets and R. P. Van Duyne, “Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and sensing,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58(1), 267–297 (2007). [CrossRef]
45. W. Withayachumnankul, C. M. Shah, C. Fumeaux, B. S.-Y. Ung, W. J. Padilla, M. Bhaskaran, D. Abbott, and S. Sriram, “Plasmonic resonance toward terahertz perfect absorbers,” ACS Photonics 1(7), 625–630 (2014). [CrossRef]
46. S. Shu and Y. Y. Li, “Triple-layer Fabry–Perot/SPP aluminum absorber in the visible and near-infrared region,” Opt. Lett. 40(6), 934–937 (2015). [CrossRef]
47. Y. Zhao, Z. Li, Q. Li, K. Wang, J. Gao, K. Wang, H. Yang, X. Wang, T. Wang, and Y. Wang, “Tunable Perfect Absorption Structures Based on Cavity Coupling and Plasmon Hybrid Mode,” IEEE Photonics J. 13(2), 1–9 (2021). [CrossRef]