Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Optical design considerations of rear-side dielectric for higher efficiency of PERC solar cells

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Higher reflectance of the rear-side dielectric stack, at the wavelength of the laser source used for ablation, reduces laser-induced damage and improves the open-circuit voltage of PERC silicon solar cells. The understanding of this correlation increases the working window of cost-effective nanosecond laser ablation of the rear-side dielectric for higher-efficiency industrial PERC-like solar cells.

© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Due to the excellent control of the rear-side recombination losses and enhanced longer wavelength photon absorption [1–4], the passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) silicon (Si) solar cell is predicted to become the dominant cell technology for mass production in the coming years [5,6]. Moreover, the preference of directly employing high throughput industrial laser machines, to ablate precise laser contact openings in the dielectric layers for metallization contact, over techniques such as lithography or mechanical scribing has further accelerated this trend.

To maximize the power conversion gains from a PERC solar cell, it is vital to consider three main factors, namely (1) the recombination losses at the rear-side Si/ dielectric interface, (2) the internal reflectivity of infrared light at the rear-side dielectric/ metal interface and (3) the metal recombination losses at the laser contact openings, as illustrated in Fig. 1.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Cross-sectional schematic of mc-Si PERC solar cell with (1) rear-side Si/dielectric interface, (2) internal reflectivity of rear-side dielectric/metal interface and (3) rear-side Si/metal interface.

Download Full Size | PDF

With reference to the aforementioned point (2), PERC solar cells with various rear-side dielectric passivation schemes were studied to improve the external quantum efficiency (EQE) at wavelengths between ~900 nm to 1180 nm [7,8]. It was also reported that a 160 nm thick capping silicon nitride (SiNx) film over a 15 nm alumina (AlOx) on a flat yet highly scattering rear surface of the Si solar cell can improve Lambertian reflection, giving a current gain of up to 1.0 mA/cm2 [9]. In addition, it has been reported that the PERC cell efficiency decreases linearly when the laser irradiation energy increased [10]. While it has been demonstrated that femtosecond (fs) laser ablation in the gentle regime is able to obtain high-efficiency PERC Si solar cells [11], it is also important to consider the high cost to deploy fs laser ablation for industrial mass production. Thus, this paper explores an optical constraint approach to design a multi-layer rear-side dielectric stacks to synergistically improve the near infra-red (NIR) absorption of the multicrystalline silicon (mc-Si) absorber and also to mitigate laser-induced damage caused by the nanosecond laser ablation at the laser contact openings. Based on the aforementioned optical constraints, the OPAL 2 simulation program [12] was used to compute the optical reflectance of the multi-layer dielectric stack to obtain a higher reflectance at the wavelength of the laser ablation source and lower reflectance in the NIR region. A total of four different groups of rear-side multi-layer dielectric stacks were computed using OPAL 2, as follows:

  • (i) G1 – 18 nm AlOy / 85 nm SiNx (n = 1.85) / 60 nm SiOz;
  • (ii) G2 – 18 nm AlOy / 85 nm SiNx (n = 2.05) / 60 nm SiOz;
  • (iii) G3 – 18 nm AlOy / 95 nm SiNx (n = 2.05);
  • (iv) G4 – 18 nm AlOy / 105 nm SiNx (n = 2.05),

    where n is the refractive index of the dielectric and x, y and z are the non-stoichiometric indices of the dielectrics. There are three main motivations for selecting these four groups of multi-layer dielectric stacks:

    • 1. Firstly, the comparison between G1 and G2 is to evaluate whether the refractive indices of the SiNx layer will affect the reflectance profile of the multi-layer dielectric stack and its corresponding PERC cell performance.
    • 2. Secondly, the comparison between G2 and G3 is to help evaluate whether increasing the SiNx thickness by 10 nm (i.e. more hydrogen reservoir in a thicker SiNx layer) have any significant impact on the corresponding cell performance.
    • 3. Thirdly, the comparison between G3/G4 and G1/G2 is to help evaluate the effect of using a SiOx capping layer to reduce the reflectance near the target wavelength of laser source (i.e. 532 nm) on the PERC cell performance.

2. Experimental details

2.1 Solar cell fabrication

The substrates used were 156.7 mm by 156.7 mm, 185 µm thick, solar-grade p-type mc-Si wafers with nano-spherical surface texture using the SERIS developed nanotexture solution [13]. The nanotextured mc-Si wafers sequentially underwent a standard RCA (Radio Corporation of America) clean 1 and 2, and a 2% hydrofluoric (HF) acid dip. The single-sided n-type emitter was formed using POCl3 diffusion on the nanotextured surface with a silicon nitride (SiNx) masked rear surface that was previously planarized using alkaline potassium hydroxide (KOH). This 160 nm SiNx masking layer was deposited using an inline plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) tool (MAiA) from Meyer Burger, Germany. Both the phosphosilicate glass and rear-side SiNx mask were simultaneously removed in heated 10% HF solution. The final emitter sheet resistance after this 10% HF step was 105 ± 5 Ω/□. The rear surface was passivated with one of the aforementioned PECVD stacks, followed by a 64 nm SiNx / 87 nm SiOz PECVD stack deposited on the front-side nanotextured surface. The rear-side dielectric stack was subsequently ablated using a nanosecond green laser (532 nm) from Innolas Solutions, Germany, using a fixed average laser power of 4 W. The rear laser pattern was chosen to be a narrow continuous line pattern with line width of 33 µm and a pitch of 0.9 mm. The laser ablated wafers were then screen printed with a full-area aluminium (Al) paste on the rear side, while the front-side metallization grid consists of 106 fingers (45 µm wide) and 5 floating busbars (800 µm wide) using two different silver pastes. The samples were sequentially fired using an industrial firing furnace at a peak temperature of 740°C.

2.2 Characterization

The reflectance spectrum of the different rear-side dielectric stacks was measured using a UV–Vis–NIR spectrometer to determine the weighted average reflectance (WAR) for the wavelength range 900 to 1200 nm. The electrical performance of the cells was characterized to assess the impact of the various rear-side dielectric stacks. Specifically, the 1-Sun and dark current-voltage (JV) characteristics were measured at SERIS using a calibrated LED based solar simulator from WaveLabs. The external quantum efficiency (EQE) of the solar cells was also measured at short-circuit condition, using a spectrometer from Bentham. In addition, the effective electron diffusion length in the base region of these cells was calculated based on a SERIS-developed short-circuit current loss analysis method [14,15]. Photoluminescence (PL) imaging at open-circuit condition was also performed on these solar cells. Lastly, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging was performed on the cells after metallization and firing to assess the characteristics of the local back surface field (LBSF) at the rear-side Si/metal interface within the laser contact opening.

3. Results and discussion

UV-Vis-NIR reflectance measurements were performed before laser ablation on the four groups with different rear-side dielectric stacks and their corresponding weighted average reflectance (WAR) calculated, as illustrated in Fig. 2. WAR is defined as the solar weighted reflectance in accordance to the incident photon flux of the AM 1.5G solar spectrum. As mentioned earlier, the four groups of rear-side dielectric stacks were designed in such a manner that they have different reflectance values at the laser ablation wavelength of 532 nm, with the constraint that their WAR in the 900 - 1200 nm wavelength range is similar. It should be highlighted that adding an additional silicon oxide (SiOz) layer reduces the reflectance at 532 nm, which consequently increases the laser power absorption by the triple-layer dielectric stack, as compared to a double-layer dielectric stack. Based on their reflectance value at 532 nm, a simple calculation of the absorbed laser power revealed that G4 has a ~29% reduction of absorbed laser power, as compared to G2. In addition, the calculated WAR values of G1 are approximately 16.20%, whereas the WAR value of G2G4 ranges between 15.37 and 15.70%.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 UV-Vis-NIR reflectance curves of the four different rear-side dielectric stacks and their corresponding WAR values in the 900 - 1200 nm wavelength range. The green dashed line at 532 nm indicates the target wavelength of laser ablation source.

Download Full Size | PDF

The electrical parameters of the mc-Si PERC solar cells from the four groups were measured at 1-Sun (AM 1.5G) illumination, as shown in Fig. 3. It is worth highlighting that G3 and G4 yielded a higher open-circuit voltage (Voc) of ~3 mV and higher short-circuit current density (Jsc) of ~0.3 mA/cm2, when compared to G1 and G2. This gain in cell performance corroborates well with the aforementioned example whereby the reduction in absorbed laser power by G4, as compared to G2, could possibly moderate the laser-induced damage at the laser contact openings during the nanosecond laser ablation. The WAR value for the 900 - 1200 nm wavelength range of the rear-side dielectric stack does not have significant impact on the electrical parameter of the cells. For example, although both G2 and G3 have similar WAR values of 15.47% and 15.70% respectively, but G3 has ~0.25% (absolute) higher cell efficiency than G2. Furthermore, both G3 and G4 yielded similar cell efficiencies even though their WAR values are similar. Hence, it is evident that the approach to evaluate the reflectance of the rear-side dielectric stack at the wavelength of the laser ablation source while keeping the NIR reflectance of the four groups similar has merit. In addition, a statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, with α = 0.05, showing that variations in thickness (e.g. 95 nm to 105 nm for G3 and G4, respectively) or refractive index (e.g. n = 1.85 to n = 2.05 for G1 and G2, respectively) of the rear-side capping SiNx do not increase the Jsc significantly.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 The measured electrical 1-Sun parameters of the mc-Si PERC solar cells with different rear-side dielectric stacks.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 4 shows the measured external quantum efficiencies of the mc-Si PERC cells with different rear-side dielectric stacks. These results corroborate the Jsc gain shown in Fig. 3. Moreover, the effective electron diffusion length (Leff) in the base region of these cells from the four groups was calculated, based on short-circuit current loss analysis method developed at SERIS [15]. The results are as follows:

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The measured external quantum efficiencies of the mc-Si PERC solar cells with different rear-side dielectric stacks at short-circuit condition.

Download Full Size | PDF

  • (i) Leff G1 = 745 μm;
  • (ii) Leff G2 = 783 μm;
  • (iii) Leff G3 = 879 μm;
  • (iv) Leff G4 = 958 μm.

Figure 5 depicts photoluminescence (PL) images of the cells from the different groups. The PL intensity is influenced by the effective minority carrier lifetime which is affected by both the bulk and surface quality of the mc-Si wafer, and in turn alludes to the voltage potential of the solar cell. All else constant, the higher PL counts for G3 and G4 compared to G1 and G2 indicate a reduction in laser-induced damage. The results correlate well to the measured open-circuit voltages of the mc-Si PERC cells (see Fig. 3). In addition, the grain distribution characteristic of the sister cells is also revealed in Fig. 5.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 The photoluminescence maps of the mc-Si PERC solar cells with different rear-side dielectric stacks at open-circuit condition.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 6 shows SEM images of mc-Si PERC solar cells from the four different groups. It is clearly evident from these images that the LBSF thickness increases with increasing reflectance at the laser wavelength of 532 nm, which explains the higher Voc of their respective groups, as shown in Fig. 3. It has been reported that the relatively steady energy injection from a nanosecond laser pulse can transmit energy through the passivation dielectrics with large optical bandgap. The transmitted energy is mostly absorbed by the Si underlying the dielectrics and can lead to the melting of the Si [16]. Another study reported that it is important to manage the laser-induced damage in the Si so as to minimize the thickness of the amorphous Si layer formed, which could in turn affect the Al/Si alloying process during the metallization firing step, and hence negatively affect the PERC cell efficiency [10]. Therefore, the higher reflectance of the rear-side dielectric stack at the laser wavelength could reduce the transmitted laser energy to the underlying Si and increase the thickness of the LBSF layer, which in turn would give higher PERC solar cell efficiency.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 SEM images of the mc-Si PERC solar cells with different rear-side dielectric stacks, showing different LBSF thicknesses at the laser contact openings.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated that by tuning the rear-side dielectric stack to achieve a higher reflectance at the wavelength of the nanosecond laser source used for laser ablation can reduce the laser-induced damage, as indicated by higher Voc and higher PL counts for mc-Si PERC solar cells, which is beneficial to attain higher cell efficiency. Moreover, a current loss analysis and SEM images of these mc-Si PERC cells with higher reflectance at the laser ablation wavelength reveal a thicker LBSF layer and a longer Leff in the base region. Our results thus demonstrate the feasibility to increase the working window for nanosecond laser ablation of the rear-side dielectric passivation of mc-Si PERC solar cells. Optimization of the rear-side dielectric schemes to increase the Lambertian reflection and to reduce the laser-induced damage is expected to further improve the efficiency of industrial mc-Si PERC solar cells.

Funding

National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore’s National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB), National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, Clean Energy Research Programme project grants.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Rolf Stangl, Dr. Vinodh Shanmugam, Dr. Jidong Long, Dr. Xin Zheng, Dr. Puqun Wang, and Mr. Jaffar Yacob Ali from SERIS’ Silicon Materials and Cells Cluster for offering constructive suggestions.

References

1. A. W. Blakers, A. Wang, A. M. Milne, J. Zhao, and M. A. Green, “22.8% efficient silicon solar cell,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 55(13), 1363–1365 (1989). [CrossRef]  

2. W. Brendle, V. X. Nguyen, A. Grohe, E. Schneiderlöchner, U. Rau, G. Palfinger, and J. H. Werner, “20·5% efficient silicon solar cell with a low temperature rear side process using laser-fired contacts,” Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 14(7), 653–662 (2006). [CrossRef]  

3. B. Hoex, J. Schmidt, R. Bock, P. P. Altermatt, M. C. M. Sanden, and W. M. M. Kessels, “M. D., and G. L. J., “Excellent passivation of highly doped p-type Si surfaces by the negative-charge-dielectric Al2O3,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(11), 112107 (2007). [CrossRef]  

4. J. Rentsch, H.-P. Sperlich, N. Kohn, D. Kania, P. Saint-Cast, C. Schetter, M. Hofmann, and R. Preu, “Industrial Deposition of PECVD AlOx for Rear Passivation of PERC Type mc-Si Solar Cells,” in 25th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition / 5th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 6–10 September 2010, Valencia, Spain, (Valencia, Spain, 2010), pp. 1715 - 1718.

5. M. A. Green, “The Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC): From conception to mass production,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 143, 190–197 (2015). [CrossRef]  

6. M. Fischer "International Technological Roadmap for Photovoltaic (ITRPV)," (2018).

7. S. Gatz, J. Müller, T. Dullweber, and R. Brendel, “Analysis and Optimization of the Bulk and Rear Recombination of Screen-Printed PERC Solar Cells,” Energy Procedia 27, 95–102 (2012). [CrossRef]  

8. Z. Xia, Y. Gao, L. Tao, X. Li, Z. Yang, R. Sidhu, J. Dong, H. Qiao, K. Teng, B. Zhang, and G. Xing, “Rear side dielectrics choices in PERC solar cells,” in 2013 IEEE 39th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2013), 1781–1783. [CrossRef]  

9. T. Lauermann, B. Fröhlich, G. Hahn, and B. Terheiden, “Design considerations for industrial rear passivated solar cells,” in 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2012), 001710–001715. [CrossRef]  

10. M. Kim, D. Kim, D. Kim, and Y. Kang, “Impact of laser pulse width on laser ablation process of high performance PERC cells,” Sol. Energy 110, 208–213 (2014). [CrossRef]  

11. J. M. Yacob Ali, V. Shanmugam, A. Khanna, P. Wang, N. Balaji, R. V. Tabajonda, D. J. Perez, A. G. Aberle, and T. Mueller, “Analysis of nanosecond and femtosecond laser ablation of rear dielectrics of silicon wafer solar cells,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 192, 117–122 (2019). [CrossRef]  

12. K. R. McIntosh and S. C. Baker-Finch, “OPAL 2: Rapid optical simulation of silicon solar cells,” in 2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2012), 000265–000271. [CrossRef]  

13. Y. Huang, P. C. Ang, and J. Li, “20% Multicrystalline silicon PERC-solar cells, based on a low-cost wet-chemical nano-texturing method,” in 12th SNEC,International Photovoltaic Power Generation and Smart Energy Conference & Exhibition, 2018)

14. P. A. Basore, “Extended spectral analysis of internal quantum efficiency,” in Conference Record of the Twenty Third IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1993 (Cat. No.93CH3283–9), 1993), 147–152. [CrossRef]  

15. J. Wong, S. Duttagupta, R. Stangl, B. Hoex, and A. G. Aberle, “A Systematic Loss Analysis Method for Rear-Passivated Silicon Solar Cells,” IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 5(2), 619–626 (2015). [CrossRef]  

16. M. Kim, S. Park, and D. Kim, “Highly efficient PERC cells fabricated using the low cost laser ablation process,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 117, 126–131 (2013). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Cross-sectional schematic of mc-Si PERC solar cell with (1) rear-side Si/dielectric interface, (2) internal reflectivity of rear-side dielectric/metal interface and (3) rear-side Si/metal interface.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 UV-Vis-NIR reflectance curves of the four different rear-side dielectric stacks and their corresponding WAR values in the 900 - 1200 nm wavelength range. The green dashed line at 532 nm indicates the target wavelength of laser ablation source.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The measured electrical 1-Sun parameters of the mc-Si PERC solar cells with different rear-side dielectric stacks.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The measured external quantum efficiencies of the mc-Si PERC solar cells with different rear-side dielectric stacks at short-circuit condition.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 The photoluminescence maps of the mc-Si PERC solar cells with different rear-side dielectric stacks at open-circuit condition.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 SEM images of the mc-Si PERC solar cells with different rear-side dielectric stacks, showing different LBSF thicknesses at the laser contact openings.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.