Abstract

Two commonly used envelope representations of an electromagnetic field are compared. The analytic signal representation is shown to be preferable in that it leads to a more slowly varying envelope.

© 1981 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
OSA Recommended Articles
Diffraction of electromagnetic waves by plane metallic gratings using a minimum boundary error approach

H. A. Kalhor, N. Eshragh, and Ch. Muhammad Aslam
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71(7) 902-903 (1981)

Coupling of two cylindrical guided waves in optical waveguide Bragg grating lenses

Gen-ichi Hatakoshi and Shun-ichi Tanaka
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71(1) 121-123 (1981)

Resolving power of time-reversed wave-front imaging devices

J. Hubbard
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71(8) 1029-1032 (1981)

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Equations (23)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription