Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group
  • Journal of Lightwave Technology
  • Vol. 41,
  • Issue 20,
  • pp. 6608-6614
  • (2023)

Comparison of Amplitude-Frequency Response Characteristics Between DCM and Arctan Algorithms in φ-OTDR

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

In phase-sensitive optical time-domain reflectometry ( $\varphi$ -OTDR) systems, DCM and Arctan demodulation algorithms are typically used to recover the information on vibration events along the fiber. The amplitude-frequency response characteristics of the DCM and Arctan algorithms are investigated and compared using a 3×3 coupler demodulation technique. We first testify the demodulation capability of the DCM and Arctan algorithms through experiments in $\varphi$ -OTDR. Then the amplitude-frequency response ranges of the two algorithms are analyzed according to the demodulated phase error distribution from both the experiment and simulation. It is shown that the Arctan algorithm has a wider amplitude-frequency range than the DCM algorithm. The phase error generation mechanism is also investigated and we find that, in a noise-free condition, the phase errors still appear with use of the DCM algorithm, which cannot be explained by the general perspective that the phase errors arise from the sensitivity of the differential operator to noise. For both algorithms the phase error is related to the amplitude (D) and frequency (f) of the vibration signal, and pulse repetition frequency ( ${f}_{\text{pulse}}$ ). When the phase error tolerance is less than 0.1, the expression of the amplitude-frequency response characteristic of DCM algorithm is $5.7({D + 1})f \leq {f}_{\text{pulse}}$ , whereas that of the Arctan algorithm is $2Df \leq {f}_{\text{pulse}}$ .

PDF Article
More Like This
Distributed dynamic strain sensing in coherent Φ-OTDR with a pulse conversion algorithm

Heng Qian, Bin Luo, Haijun He, Yin Zhou, Xihua Zou, Wei Pan, and Lianshan Yan
Opt. Lett. 46(7) 1668-1671 (2021)

Quantitative demodulation of distributed low-frequency vibration based on phase-shifted dual-pulse phase-sensitive OTDR with direct detection

Shuaiqi Liu, Liyang Shao, Fei-Hong Yu, Weijie Xu, Mang I. Vai, Dongrui Xiao, Weihao Lin, Jie Hu, Fang Zhao, Guoqing Wang, Weizhi Wang, Huanhuan Liu, Perry P. Shum, and Feng Wang
Opt. Express 30(6) 10096-10109 (2022)

Long-distance Φ-OTDR with a flexible frequency response based on time division multiplexing

Shuai Li, Zengguang Qin, Zhaojun Liu, Wenchen Yang, Shuai Qu, Zequn Wang, and Yanping Xu
Opt. Express 29(21) 32833-32841 (2021)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.