Abstract

Raman spectroscopy is a useful tool for obtaining biochemical information from biological samples. However, interpretation of Raman spectroscopy data in order to draw meaningful conclusions related to the biochemical make up of cells and tissues is often difficult and could be misleading if care is not taken in the deconstruction of the spectral data. Our group has previously demonstrated the implementation of a group- and basis-restricted non-negative matrix factorization (GBR-NMF) framework as an alternative to more widely used dimensionality reduction techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA) for the deconstruction of Raman spectroscopy data as related to radiation response monitoring in both cellular and tissue data. While this method provides better biological interpretability of the Raman spectroscopy data, there are some important factors which must be considered in order to provide the most robust GBR-NMF model. We here evaluate and compare the accuracy of a GBR-NMF model in the reconstruction of three mixture solutions of known concentrations. The factors assessed include the effect of solid versus solutions bases spectra, the number of unconstrained components used in the model, the tolerance of different signal to noise thresholds, and how different groups of biochemicals compare to each other. The robustness of the model was assessed by how well the relative concentration of each individual biochemical in the solution mixture is reflected in the GBR-NMF scores obtained. We also evaluated how well the model can reconstruct original data, both with and without the inclusion of an unconstrained component. Overall, we found that solid bases spectra were generally comparable to solution bases spectra in the GBR-NMF model for all groups of biochemicals. The model was found to be relatively tolerant of high levels of noise in the mixture solutions using solid bases spectra. Additionally, the inclusion of an unconstrained component did not have a significant effect on the deconstruction, on the condition that all biochemicals in the mixture were included as bases chemicals in the model. We also report that some groups of biochemicals achieve a more accurate deconstruction using GBR-NMF than others, likely due to similarity in the individual bases spectra.

© 2023 The Author(s)

Application of non-negative matrix factorization to multispectral FLIM data analysis

Paritosh Pande, Brian E. Applegate, and Javier A. Jo
Biomed. Opt. Express 3(9) 2244-2262 (2012)

Comparison of principal component analysis and biochemical component analysis in Raman spectroscopy for the discrimination of apoptosis and necrosis in K562 leukemia cells

Yi Hong Ong, Mayasari Lim, and Quan Liu
Opt. Express 20(20) 22158-22171 (2012)

Continuum removal for ground-based LWIR hyperspectral infrared imagery applying non-negative matrix factorization

Bardia Yousefi, Saeed Sojasi, Clemente Ibarra Castanedo, Xavier P. V. Maldague, Georges Beaudoin, and Martin Chamberland
Appl. Opt. 57(21) 6219-6228 (2018)

Recovering fluorescent spectra with an RGB digital camera and color filters using different matrix factorizations

Juan L. Nieves, Eva M. Valero, Javier Hernández-Andrés, and Javier Romero
Appl. Opt. 46(19) 4144-4154 (2007)

Raman active components of skin cancer

Xu Feng, Austin J Moy, Hieu T. M. Nguyen, Jason Zhang, Matthew C. Fox, Katherine R. Sebastian, Jason S. Reichenberg, Mia K. Markey, and James W. Tunnell
Biomed. Opt. Express 8(6) 2835-2850 (2017)