Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group
  • Applied Spectroscopy
  • Vol. 44,
  • Issue 9,
  • pp. 1521-1533
  • (1990)

Determination of Thallium, Manganese, and Lead in Food and Agricultural Standard Reference Materials by Electrothermal Atomizer Laser-Excited Atomic Fluorescence and Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Slurry Sampling

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Electrothermal atomizer laser-excited atomic fluorescence spectrometry (ETA LEAFS) and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETA AAS) have been compared for the determination of three elements in National Institute of Standards and Technology food and agricultural standard reference materials with dissolved and slurried samples. Advantages of slurry sampling include reduced sample preparation and a reduced risk of contamination. ETA LEAFS is an extremely sensitive technique, with detection limits one to four orders of magnitude more sensitive than ETA AAS. Using the front-surface illumination approach, this paper reports the first application of a modern, unmodified graphite tube furnace for the determination of manganese, thallium, and lead in biological materials by ETA LEAFS. Thallium was determined by ETA LEAFS at levels one to two orders of magnitude below the ETA AAS detection limit. The determinations done by ETA LEAFS with the use of either dissolved or slurry sampling agreed well with the certified values, with typical analytical RSDs between 3 and 10%. These precisions were similar to the precisions of the ETA AAS measurements. For ETA AAS, the sizes of the background signals reported in the literature are often about the same order of magnitude as the analytical signal. In this work, the sizes of the background signals for ETA LEAFS were shown to be negligible relative to the fluorescence signals for most samples investigated. The relatively small size for the ETA LEAFS background signals, when compared to ETA AAS background signals, indicates that background correction errors are less likely, and that stringent specifications might be unnecessary for ETA LEAFS background correction instrumentation.

PDF Article
More Like This
Shooting slurries with laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: sampling is the name of the game

Daniel Michaud, Eric Proulx, Jean-Guy Chartrand, and Louis Barrette
Appl. Opt. 42(30) 6179-6183 (2003)

Elemental analysis of slurry samples with laser induced breakdown spectroscopy

Kemal E. Eseller, Markandey M. Tripathi, Fang-Yu Yueh, and Jagdish P. Singh
Appl. Opt. 49(13) C21-C26 (2010)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.