Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Wavelength-flattened directional couplers: a geometrical approach: erratum

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A statement about reciprocity was incorrect in Appl. Opt. 42, 7141 (2003) [CrossRef]  .

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group

I have recently realized that in my paper “Wavelength-flattened directional couplers: a geometrical approach” [1], I made a wrong statement about reciprocity of some of the transformations. On page 7142, the claim “It can be shown [2] that the time reversal combined to the unitarity condition implies ${{\textbf{U}}^\dagger} = {{\textbf{U}}^*}$” or, in other words, that the matrix ${\textbf{U}}$ must be symmetric, is incorrect. The demonstration in the cited reference [2] deals with the scattering matrix of reciprocal systems with uniform scalar permittivity and permeability, which indeed must be symmetric, and therefore of the form

$${\textbf{S}} = \left({\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{{s_{11}}}&\;\;{{s_{12}}}\\{{s_{12}}}&\;\;{{s_{22}}}\end{array}} \right).$$

Nevertheless, the matrices ${\textbf{U}}$ studied in the paper were not scattering matrices but transfer matrices instead. The transfer matrix ${\textbf{T}}$ associated to a scattering matrix ${\textbf{S}}$ can be easily derived as

$${\textbf{T}} = \frac{1}{{{s_{12}}}}\left({\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{\left| {\textbf{S}} \right|}&\;\;{{s_{22}}}\\{- {s_{11}}}&\;\;1\end{array}} \right),$$
($| {\textbf{S}} |$ being the determinant of matrix ${\textbf{S}}$) from which form it is clear that the reciprocity condition does not impose any particular symmetry to the transfer matrix ${\textbf{T}}$. Therefore, the choice $\xi = \pi /2$ in the original manuscript, cannot be justified based on reciprocity. As a matter of fact, when it comes to the Poincaré sphere for the polarisation states, there exist chiral materials which eigenmodes are the circular polarisation states, meaning that their associated transformation corresponds to a reciprocal rotation around ${S_3}$, with $\xi = 0$. On the other hand, we can still safely state that the eigenmodes of all standard directional couplers based on dielectric waveguides lay in the equator. This doesn’t mean that it is not possible to engineer reciprocal metamaterials whose eigenstates would lay outside the equator, unlike incorrectly implied by those statements in my original paper.

REFERENCES

1. M. Cherchi, “Wavelength-flattened directional couplers: a geometrical approach,” Appl. Opt. 42, 7141–7148 (2003). [CrossRef]  

2. H. A. Haus, Waves and Fields in Optoelectronics (Prentice Hall, 1984).

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

S = ( s 11 s 12 s 12 s 22 ) .
T = 1 s 12 ( | S | s 22 s 11 1 ) ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.