Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

WO3/Pt/PEG/SiO2 porous film for hydrogen sensing by the sol-gel method

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Tungsten oxide (${{\rm WO}_3}$) has been widely used in hydrogen sensing due to its stable chemical properties and high oxygen vacancy diffusion coefficient. However, the response of pure ${{\rm WO}_3}$ to hydrogen is slow, and doping is an effective way to improve the hydrogen sensing performance of ${{\rm WO}_3}$ materials. In this paper, ${{\rm WO}_3}/{\rm Pt}/{\rm PEG}/{{\rm SiO}_2}$ porous film was prepared by the sol-gel method using tungsten powder, ${{\rm H}_2}{{\rm O}_2}$ and ${{\rm C}_2}{{\rm H}_5}{\rm OH}$ as precursors, polyethylene glycol (PEG) as the pore-forming agent, and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as the ${{\rm SiO}_2}$ source material. The sensing properties of the ${{\rm WO}_3}$ composite for hydrogen were characterized by a transmission optical fiber hydrogen sensing system made at home. The process parameters such as water bath time, aging time, W:PEG ratio, and W:TEOS ratio were optimized to improve the sensitivity and response time of the sensing film. The experimental results indicate that the sensitivity is 15.68%, the average response time is 45 s, and the repeatability is up to 98.74% in 16 consecutive tests. The linearity index ${{\rm R}^2}$ is 0.9946 within the hydrogen concentration range of 5000 ppm to 50,000 ppm. The film responds only to ${{\rm H}_2}$ when the concentration of interfering gases (${{\rm CH}_4}$, CO, ${{\rm CO}_2}$) is 2000 ppm. The hydrogen sensing performance of the optimized film is significantly improved compared with that of the undoped film.

© 2024 Optica Publishing Group

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Ultra-high sensitive optical fiber hydrogen sensor using self-referenced demodulation method and WO3-Pd2Pt-Pt composite film

Jixiang Dai, Wen Peng, Gaopeng Wang, Feng Xiang, Yuhuan Qin, Min Wang, Yutang Dai, Minghong Yang, Hui Deng, and Pengcheng Zhang
Opt. Express 25(3) 2009-2015 (2017)

Microstructured FBG hydrogen sensor based on Pt-loaded WO3

Xian Zhou, Yutang Dai, Joseph Muna Karanja, Fufei Liu, and Minghong Yang
Opt. Express 25(8) 8777-8786 (2017)

Pt nanoparticles encapsulated in mesoporous tungsten oxide to enhance the repeatability of a FBG hydrogen sensor

Shiwen Yang, Gaopeng Wang, Feng Xiang, Yuhuan Qin, Jixiang Dai, and Minghong Yang
Opt. Mater. Express 8(6) 1493-1504 (2018)

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (15)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Preparation process of ${{\rm WO}_3}/{\rm Pt}/{\rm PEG}/{{\rm SiO}_2}$ porous composite film.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Transmission optical fiber hydrogen sensing system.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Sensitivity and response time at different water bath times.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Sensitivity and response time at different aging times.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Sensitivity and response time at different W:PEG molar ratios.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. SEM images of films with (a) W:PEG = 1:0, (b) W:PEG = 1:0.1, (c) W:PEG = 1:0.3, and (d) W:PEG = 1:0.5.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. (a) EDS mapping of ${{\rm WO}_3}/{\rm Pt}$ film, (b) EDS mapping of ${{\rm WO}_3}/{\rm Pt}/{\rm PEG}$ film.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. (a) XRD patterns of ${{\rm WO}_3}/{\rm Pt}$ film, (b) XRD patterns of ${{\rm WO}_3}/{\rm Pt}/{\rm PEG}$ film.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. Sensitivity and response time at different W:TEOS molar ratios.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10. (a) SEM images of ${{\rm WO}_3}/{\rm Pt}$ films, (b) SEM images of ${{\rm WO}_3}/{\rm Pt}/{\rm TEOS}$, (c) EDS mapping of white masses, (d) XRD patterns of films with different W:TEOS molar ratios.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11. Principle of TEOS reaction with tungstic acid.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 12. Reaction mechanism of the hydrogen-sensitive film.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 13. Film repeatability response curve.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 14. (a) Film response curves at different concentrations, (b) linearity of the hydrogen detection system.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 15. (a) Film response curves at different gases, (b) rate of the response amplitude of different gases.

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

S = V 1 V 0 V 1 / C ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.