Table 1.
Transmission Rate for the Proposed NOT Logic Gate
Inputs | Input Port 3 | Control Port 1 | Control Port 2 | T | Output |
---|
Logic 0 | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | 1.509/0.35 | Logic 1 |
Logic 1 | ON (90°) | ON (0°) | ON (180°) | 0.054/0.35 | Logic 0 |
Table 2.
Values of Different Criteria Suggested to Design the NOT Logic Gate
Output Power (µW) | | | |
---|
|ON |
|OFF | CR | MD | IL |
---|
1.509 | 0.054 | 14.46 dB | 96.42 % | 1.78 dB |
Table 3.
Transmission Rate for the Proposed OR Logic Gate
Inputs | Input Port 1 | Input Port 2 | Control Port 3 | T | Output |
---|
0 | 0 | OFF (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.054/0.35 | 0 |
0 | 1 | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.718/0.35 | 1 |
1 | 0 | ON (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.717/0.35 | 1 |
1 | 1 | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | 2.136/0.35 | 1 |
Table 4.
Values of Different Criteria Suggested to Design the OR Logic Gate
Output Power (µW) | | | |
---|
|ON |
|OFF | CR | MD | IL |
---|
0.717 | 0.054 | 11.23 dB | 97.47 % |
|
Table 5.
Transmission Rate for the Proposed AND Logic Gate
Inputs | Input Port 1 | Input Port 2 | Control Port 3 | T | Output |
---|
0 | 0 | OFF (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.054/0.35 | 0 |
0 | 1 | OFF (0°) | ON (180°) | ON (0°) | 0.146/0.35 | 0 |
1 | 0 | ON (180°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.145/0.35 | 0 |
1 | 1 | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | 2.136/0.35 | 1 |
Table 6.
Values of Different Criteria Suggested to Design the AND Logic Gate
Output Power (µW) | | | |
---|
|ON |
|OFF | CR | MD | IL |
---|
2.136 | 0.146 | 11.65 dB | 97.47 % | 3.29 dB |
Table 7.
Transmission Rate for the Proposed XOR Logic Gate
Inputs | Input Port 1 | Input Port 2 | Control Port 3 | T | Output |
---|
0 | 0 | OFF (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.054/0.3 | 0 |
0 | 1 | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.718/0.3 | 1 |
1 | 0 | ON (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.717/0.3 | 1 |
1 | 1 | ON (0°) | ON (180°) | ON (90°) | 0.055/0.3 | 0 |
Table 8.
Values of Different Criteria Suggested to Design the XOR Logic Gate
Output Power (µW) | | | |
---|
|ON |
|OFF | CR | MD | IL |
---|
0.717 | 0.055 | 11.15 dB | 92.47 % |
|
Table 9.
Transmission Rate for the Proposed NAND Logic Gate
Inputs | Input Port 1 | Input Port 3 | Control Port 2 | T | Output |
---|
0 | 0 | OFF (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.377/0.35 | 1 |
0 | 1 | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.718/0.35 | 1 |
1 | 0 | ON (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 1.509/0.35 | 1 |
1 | 1 | ON (0°) | ON (90°) | ON (180°) | 0.054/0.35 | 0 |
Table 10.
Values of Different Criteria Suggested to Design the NAND Logic Gate
Output Power (µW) | | | |
---|
|ON |
|OFF | CR | MD | IL |
---|
0.377 | 0.054 | 8.43 dB | 96.42 % |
|
Table 11.
Transmission Rate for the Proposed NOR Logic Gate
Inputs | Input Port 1 | Input Port 3 | Control Port 2 | T | Output |
---|
0 | 0 | OFF (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.377/0.35 | 1 |
0 | 1 | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | ON (180°) | 0.145/0.35 | 0 |
1 | 0 | ON (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (180°) | 2.9 E-7/0.35 | 0 |
1 | 1 | ON (0°) | ON (90°) | ON (180°) | 0.054/0.35 | 0 |
Table 12.
Values of Different Criteria Suggested to Design the NOR Logic Gate
Output Power (µW) | | | |
---|
|ON |
|OFF | CR | MD | IL |
---|
0.377 | 0.145 | 4.14 dB | 99.99 % |
|
Table 13.
Transmission Rate for the Proposed XNOR Logic Gate
Inputs | Input Port 1 | Input Port 3 | Control Port 2 | T | Output |
---|
0 | 0 | OFF (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | 0.377/0.35 | 1 |
0 | 1 | OFF (0°) | ON (0°) | ON (180°) | 0.145/0.35 | 0 |
1 | 0 | ON (0°) | OFF (0°) | ON (180°) | 2.9 E-7/0.35 | 0 |
1 | 1 | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | ON (0°) | 2.136/0.35 | 1 |
Table 14.
Values of Different Criteria Suggested to Design the XNOR Logic Gate
Output Power (µW) | | | |
---|
|ON |
|OFF | CR | MD | IL |
---|
0.377 | 0.145 | 4.14 dB | 99.99 % |
|
Table 15.
Comparison of the Proposes Plasmonic Logic with the other Previous Work
Criteria | Software | Structure | Gates number | Suggested logic gates | Dimension | Wavelength | Dielectric | Noble material | Permittivity of the silver | Performance |
|
This Work | FEM | Elliptical resonator & plasmonic waveguides |
7 gates
| OR, XOR, NOT, AND, NAND, NOR, and XNOR |
|
850 nm
|
| Silver | Johnson and Christy data | T, CR, MD, and IL |
35%
|
[2] | FEM | Circular resonator & plasmonic waveguides | 7 gates | OR, NOR, NOT, AND, NAND, XOR, and XNOR |
| 1550 nm | Teflon | Silver | Johnson and Christy data | T and CR | 25% |
[11] | FEM | Circular resonator & plasmonic waveguides | 5 gates | NOT, AND, NAND, NOR, and EX-NOR |
| 1550 nm | – | Silver | Johnson and Christy data | T and CR | 26% |
[24] | FEM | Circular resonator & plasmonic waveguides | 5 gates | OR, NOR, AND, NAND, and NOT |
| 1550 nm | Silica | Silver | – | T and CR | 30% |
[7] | FEM | Circular resonator & plasmonic waveguides | 4 gates | Wire, NOT, swap, and Feynman |
| 1550 nm |
| Silver | – | T and CR | 40% |
[10] | – | Circular resonator & plasmonic waveguides | 7 gates | OR, AND, NOT, NOR, NAND, XOR, and XNOR |
| 1550 nm | Sapphire | Silver | – | T and CR | 50% |
[25] | – | Circular resonator & plasmonic waveguides | 7 gates | NOT, OR, AND, NOT, NAND, XOR, and XNOR |
| 900 nm and 1330 nm | Teflon | silver | Johnson and Christy data | T and CR | – |