Abstract
We compared the mean normalized water-leaving radiances () of two in-water optical profilers, a compact optical profiling system (C-OPS) and a HyperPro II Optical Profiler (HP2), with modeled at five stations in Monterey Bay, California. Although C-OPS and HP2 s were mostly within one standard deviation, C-OPS and modeled showed the lowest absolute percent differences ( for most wavelengths) at four of the stations. We attribute this to C-OPS’s high vertical resolution (), which is important for detecting changes in optical layers and for measuring the upper 0–0.5 m of the water column. HP2’s low vertical resolution (), low signal-to-noise ratio, and inability to measure the upper 0–0.5 m are problematic in Monterey Bay. Although a significant component of the differences between C-OPS and HP2 likely stems from fluctuating water mass’s inherent optical properties, the 25% error in s processed from HP2 casts, compared to for C-OPS, is also important.
© 2019 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Jesse T. Bausell and Raphael M. Kudela
Opt. Express 29(15) 24010-24024 (2021)
Eurico J. D'Sa, Richard L. Miller, and Carlos Del Castillo
Appl. Opt. 45(28) 7410-7428 (2006)
Øyvind Frette, Jakob J. Stamnes, and Knut Stamnes
Appl. Opt. 37(36) 8318-8326 (1998)