Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Real-time frequency-to-time mapping based on spectrally-discrete chromatic dispersion

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Traditional photonics-assisted real-time Fourier transform (RTFT) usually suffers from limited chromatic dispersion, huge volume, or large time delay and attendant loss. In this paper we propose frequency-to-time mapping (FTM) by spectrally-discrete dispersion to increase frequency sensitivity greatly. The novel media has periodic ON/OFF intensity frequency response while quadratic phase distribution along disconnected channels, which de-chirps matched optical input to repeated Fourier-transform-limited output. Real-time FTM is then obtained within each period. Since only discrete phase retardation rather than continuously-changed true time delay is required, huge equivalent dispersion is then available by compact device. Such FTM is theoretically analyzed, and implementation by cascaded optical ring resonators is proposed. After a numerical example, our theory is demonstrated by a proof-of-concept experiment, where a single loop containing 0.5-meters-long fiber is used. FTM under 400-MHz unambiguous bandwidth and 25-MHz resolution is reported. Highly-sensitive and linear mapping is achieved with 6.25 ps/MHz, equivalent to ~4.6 × 104-km standard single mode fiber. Extended instantaneous bandwidth is expected by ring cascading. Our proposal may provide a promising method for real-time, low-latency Fourier transform.

© 2017 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Acquirement of radio frequency (RF) or microwave spectrum information is fundamental in many fields such as wireless communication, radar, and electronic warfare. Real time operation is critical for military applications, which is now widely obtained by high-speed digitalization and following fast Fourier transform (FFT). However, the observation bandwidth is typically limited by analog to digital converter (ADC) as well as digital processing capacity, so people turn to photonics-assisted spectrum analysis approaches for further extended bandwidth and acquisition frame rate [1]. For example, huge-bandwidth ADC can be achieved by optical ultrafast sampling [2] or time stretch [3], but massive data still consume intolerant digital processing delay. The photonic compressive sampling cuts down the measurements, which can only deal with spectrally sparse signals [4,5]. Mapping the frequency information to other physical quantity for direct and more convenient measurement attracts many interests, for example, the frequency-to-power mapping (FPM) [6–8]. In order to correctly map multiple input RF carrier, an optical channelizer is usually employed before mapping [9,10]. Since optical-filter-based channelization has limited resolution (~GHz), further improvement needs additional implementation such as digitalization and processing [11,12].

Frequency to time mapping (FTM), also called analog real-time Fourier transform (RTFT), is an effective RF spectrum acquirement method [13–18]. The variation of optical intensity with time at the output of optical RTFT is proportional to the power spectrum of RF signal launched at the input, so that broadband spectrum can be read directly by high-speed ADC or modern oscilloscope, saving large computation resources. FTM is typically realized by second-order chromatic dispersion. Through electro-optic modulator, a long, chirped pulse is frequency-shifted by input RF signal. The dispersion, on one hand, shifts the pulse delay according to its frequency shift, and, on the other hand, de-chirps and compresses the pulse so that pulses with different delays can be distinguished by oscilloscope [the principle is shown in Fig. 1(a)]. Though photonic devices, such as optical fiber and fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs), have provided much larger amounts of dispersion over broader spectral bandwidth than RF ones, dispersive RF FTM still suffers from limited dispersion value achieved in practical transparent media. For example, in order to distinguish two RF tones where frequency difference is 25 MHz, the dispersion should be as large as 1 × 105 ps/nm, corresponding to more than 5800-km standard single mode fiber (SSMF), if the de-chirped pulse is 20 ps long (which is almost the highest time resolution of commercial real-time oscilloscope). A few approaches were proposed to solve the problem. In [19], broadband optical source and optical dispersion were used to equivalently achieve large microwave dispersion. In [20], without enlarged dispersion, ultra-short optical pulses after de-chirping were employed while auto-correlation detection was used to distinguish them instead of conventional oscilloscope. Time stretch was also proposed for superb time-resolved detection after regular-dispersion-based FTM [21].

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Comparison between pulse de-chirping by continuous dispersion and by discrete dispersion. In discrete one, quadratic-phase-distributed but intensity-sliced frequency response results in periodic output of de-chirped pulse.

Download Full Size | PDF

Reference [22] demonstrated an inspired solution for equivalent ultra-large dispersion and kilohertz RTFT resolution. By an active fiber cavity with frequency shifted feedback (FSF), a set of optically-carried signal replicas are simultaneously shifted in time and in frequency. At the cavity output all the replicas are summed together, which maps the frequency spectrum of the input signal, following exactly the mathematical definition of Fourier transform. Extremely large equivalent dispersion was achieved to shift the output optical pulse by around 30 ps when RF carrier was under deviation as small as 30 kHz. However, the active cavity contains lossy frequency shifter and optical amplifier, which limits its free spectral range (FSR) as well as unambiguous RTFT bandwidth. Besides, the in-loop accumulated amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise may show impact on RTFT performance.

In this paper we propose a novel spectrally-discrete chromatic dispersion media for real-time Fourier transform. Such media has periodical ON/OFF intensity frequency response, while its phase response is the same or approximately the same as the traditional like fiber. We show in theory that discrete dispersion can also de-chirp and compress the matched chirped optical pulse, while in time domain periodically outputting transform-limited pulses. FTM can then be achieved during each period. Then we propose that such discrete dispersion can be implemented simply by cascaded ring resonators. FTM performance is studied numerically. In experiment, one passive fiber ring, with FSR around 400 MHz, is employed and FTM with resolution around 25 MHz is achieved. Highly-linear and unambiguous FTM is observed within 400-MHz bandwidth under 20 GHz. Possible advantages over continuous dispersion as well as active FSF loop are discussed.

2. Principle

Figure 1(a) shows the continuous-dispersion-based RTFT. Time-limited RF signal, x(t), is firstly carried by a chirped optical carrier [which could be achieved, in practice, by carrier-suppressed single-side-band (CS-SSB) modulation], then passes dispersive media defined by its frequency response, exp(iβ2Ω2/2), where Ω is the angular frequency offset from the center carrier. When the optical carrier chirp matches dispersion as exp(it2/2β2), the output optical waveform is then proportional to X, the Fourier transform of x, since

[x(t)exp(it2/2β2)]F1exp(iβ2Ω2/2)X(t/β2)exp(it2/2β2)
Here means convolution, and F -1 means inverse Fourier transform. Detailed derivation of Eq. (1) can be found in Eq. (18) of ref [13]. and Eq. (9) of ref [23]. The physics behind is straightforward. Assume two RF pulses separated by Δf is input, and then their delay difference after dispersion is Δt=2πβ2Δf. The FTM bandwidth, BFTM, is determined by observation window of oscilloscope, TOSC, i.e. BFTM=TOSC/(2πβ2). Since observation time window is usually quite large, BFTM is actually limited by CS-SSB modulation bandwidth which can be tens of GHz. FTM resolution, RBW, is determined by duration of de-chirped transform-limited pulse, which is inversely proportional to the intercepted optical bandwidth after electro-optical modulation, BO. As a result,
RBW=1/(2πβ2BO)
Resolution is usually low due to the limited dispersion as well as oscilloscope bandwidth.

In this paper, we replace the above continuous dispersion by its spectrally-discrete version, as shown in Fig. 1(b). Mathematically, the original pure-phase frequency response is periodically intensity-modulated by kP(Ωk2πFSRDD) where FSRDD is the free spectral range of comb filter, and P(Ω) describes one passband. Expression inside F -1 in the first line of Eq. (3) describes the frequency response of discrete dispersion. Such discretization results in periodic appearance of X in time domain, since

[x(t)exp(it2/2β2)]F1exp(iβ2Ω2/2)kP(Ωk2πFSRDD)[X(t/β2)exp(it2/2β2)]F1kP(Ωk2πFSRDD)kp(k/FSRDD)X[(tk/FSRDD)/β2]exp[i(tk/FSRDD)2/2β2]
where p=F -1P. Equation (3) shows RTFT is observed within each of its period, 1/FSRDD. Different from continuous-dispersion-based FTM, such periodic output sets limited TOSC=1/FSRDD, as well as an unambiguous bandwidth, which is BFTM=1/(2πβ2FSRDD). That is, once the input RF is out of BFTM, the output is mapped to the neighbor period and is mistaken for another frequency.

Note in an ideal discrete dispersion described by Eq. (3), each passband inside still follows the dispersive phase response. For easy implementation, we further propose that the discrete dispersion could be approximated by a comb filter with quadratic phase retardation distribution among separated passbands, since exp(iβ2Ω2/2)kP(Ωk2πFSRDD)kexp[iβ2(k2πFSRDD)2/2]P(Ωk2πFSRDD). That is, phase retardation at each passband center is designed, instead of detailed dispersive curve in each passband. Assume

M=BFTM/FSRDD
while set M an integer. According to BFTM=1/(2πβ2FSRDD), the equivalently achieved dispersion and discrete phase retardation at each passband center, kFSRDD is
β2=M/(2πBFTM2),andϕk=kMπ+πk2/M
, respectively. Note the prefix kMπ is for simple mathematics in the following. When M is even kMπ is equivalent to zero, otherwise kMπ is equivalent to kπ which corresponds to a fixed delay of 1/2FSRDD.

Advantage of our proposal is the much smaller volume and possible integrated implementation of large chromatic dispersion, because the discrete phase response as shown in Eq. (3) could be approached without real dispersion. We here propose that such comb filter could be achieved by ring combinations. In the simplest case, i.e. M=1, the discrete dispersion degenerates into a pure-intensity comb filter with uniform phase response φk0 among each channel, which could be an optical ring resonator with FSR of BFTM. When M>1 phase retardation in Eq. (5) will be repeated every M channels since exp(iφk+M)=exp(iφk). As a result, such response could be obtained by several combined ring resonators. All rings have the same FSR as BFTM, while their resonant frequency and phase retardation are controlled independently: for the mth group of channels, m[1,  M], the center is at fm=m/MBFTM, and all have uniform phase retardation as mMπ+πm2/M. The rings can be either in parallel or in series. Figure 2 shows a design example where 2M resonators are employed and the mth couple is used to realize the mth group of channels.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 A comb filter example based on optical ring resonators which could approximate the desired discrete dispersion by individual phase control instead of huge-volume real dispersion. fm is the resonant frequency of the corresponding ring.

Download Full Size | PDF

As mentioned, we design the discrete phase retardation at each passband center while let the detailed dispersive curve in each passband alone, so that comb filter by rings is an approximation to ideal sliced dispersion in Eq. (3). Single channel, P(Ω), should then have narrow enough bandwidth so that the comb filter is able to precisely approach the target under given input. In other words, though the whole comb functions as dispersion, its single channel deviates far away from each slice [as shown in Fig. 3(b)], so that signal spectrum variation within channel bandwidth cannot be distinguished even though a higher RBW is calculated under extra optical bandwidth, BO, according to Eq. (2). As a result, channel bandwidth, defined as RBW here, sets the best available resolution of the proposed FTM, which could be achieved when BO and duration of input chirp pulse, TO, are larger than

BO=BFTM2/(MRBW),andTO=1/RBW
respectively, according to Eqs. (2) and (5). Equation (6) gives the general rule to design a discrete-dispersion-based FTM, while Eq. (5) shows the discrete phase retardation and equivalent dispersion one can obtain. Equation (6) also shows the tradeoff between RTFT performance (unambiguous bandwidth BFTM and resolution RBW) and implementation difficulty (optical source as well as oscilloscope bandwidth BO and device complexity M). Our proposal provides a way to improve the RTFT performance or to reduce the chirping and observation bandwidth by increased M, which could be realized by advanced optical integration technology. As a comparison, increased time-bandwidth product (i.e. BFTM/RBW) requires extra-large observation bandwidth in ref [22].

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) Simulated power transmission spectrum of the proposed ring-based discrete dispersion shown in Fig. 2. (b) Blue line: the corresponding phase response; red dot: wrapped phase retardation at each transmission peak; red dotted line: wrapped quadratic fit.

Download Full Size | PDF

As a numerical example, here we design an FTM with BFTM=5 GHz and RBW=50 MHz. Forty rings are combined as Fig. 2 so that M=20. According to Eq. (5) the equivalent dispersion is about 1.27 × 105 ps2, corresponding to SSMF of 5800 km around. The required bandwidth of input chirped optical pulse is 25 GHz, according to Eq. (6), and its duration is 20 ns. A rectangle time window is employed. For such bandwidth, the chirping could be achieved electronically through frequency multiplexing or broadband arbitrary waveform generator (AWG) directly, which is then followed by CS-SSB opto-electronic modulation on a continuous-wave (CW) light. Such generation is easy to implement and the resulted chirped pulse could have full duty-cycle under long duration, which may benefit RTFT of infinitely-long input signal [22].

We assume rings are loss-free, and loop delay is 200 ps for all. Cross power ratio of all couplers between ring and straight bus waveguide is 4.8%, and round-trip phase of each ring and phase shifter in each pair are adjusted so that all transmission peaks are correctly located both in frequency and in phase according to Eq. (5). The ring combination is simulated, and its frequency response within BFTM, i.e. of successive M channels, is shown in Fig. 3(a). 3-dB bandwidth of each channel, i.e. the designed RBW, is 50 MHz. In Fig. 3(b), though nonlinear phase responses are found in all channels, which are individually far from the wanted dispersion, the discrete phase retardation at each peak fits the desired quadratic curve well.

In simulation, input pulse is firstly frequency shifted randomly within [0, BFTM], and then passes through the rings. Output waveforms in time domain are plotted together and shown in Fig. 4. The black line in Fig. 4(b) corresponds to non-shifted input. Periodic output with power fading on both sides is observed, and the period is M/BFTM=4 ns as predicted by Eq. (3). One period is zoomed in and plotted in Fig. 4(c), where each color corresponds to a specific frequency shift. Nearly uniform intensity is obtained. Output delay offsets from non-frequency-shifted one are calculated, and the frequency-dependent time delay is plotted in Fig. 4(c). The delays are in precise proportion to the preset 16 random frequency shifts from 0 to BFTM, and the slope is 0.8 ps/MHz. At the minimum shift of 50 MHz, the output waveform is shown in Fig. 4(a), together with the non-shifted one. The pulse interval from peak to peak is exactly 40 ps while each pulse duration is also 40 ps around (i.e. 1/BO). We then conclude that the resolution of FTM is the preset value of 50 MHz.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Simulated FTM through the proposed ring-based FTM. (a) Output waveform under zero (black line) and 50-MHz frequency shift (dark blue line). (b) Periodic FTM output. (c) Zoom in of one period; waveform with different color corresponds to specific frequency shift. (d) The calculated frequency to delay mapping (colorful dots) and theory prediction (red line).

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Experiment result

A proof-of-concept experiment is carried out based on a single ring, i.e. M=1. In this case the comb filter has constant phase retardation among passbands. FTM is explained by Eq. (3): the comb filter could be seen equivalently as a continuous-dispersion media with β2=1/(2πBFTM2), which is then cascaded by the same constant-phase comb filter. The former performs the FTM and the latter periodically outputs the result. Experiment setup is shown in Fig. 5, and key performance, such as mapping slope, unambiguous bandwidth, as well as mapping resolution is measured.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Experiment setup. e-AWG: electronic AWG; e-LO: electronic local oscillation; RF amp: RF amplifier; PM: phase modulator; OC: optical coupler; OSC: real-time oscilloscope; red line: optical fiber; blue line: electronic cable. Inset shows the measured power transmission of the passive fiber loop.

Download Full Size | PDF

The passive loop is a 0.5-meter-long single mode fiber with delay around 2.5 ns, which is connected with optical in- and output through two 90/10 2 × 2 optical couplers. Accordingly, the unambiguous FTM bandwidth is BFTM400 MHz, and the achieved dispersion is β2106 ps2, equivalent to ~4.6 × 104-km SSMF. The measured 3-dB bandwidth of single transmission peak is RBW25 MHz. Based on Eq. (6), the required optical bandwidth, BO, for input chirping should be larger than 6.4 GHz, duration, TO, should be larger than 40 ns, and its chirping rate is 160 MHz/ns. In our setup, chirping, centered at fc=7 GHz, is provided by an electronic AWG (Tektronix, AWG70001A), and the output is Reexp(i2πfct+it2/2β2), 20 nst20 ns. Sampling rate is 45 GS/s. AWG output is up-converted to 24 GHz by an electronic mixer and local oscillation (LO), power amplified, and phase modulates a CW lightwave (AOI, D5572XOPB16, linewidth is about 30 kHz). The desired chirped optical pulse is then obtained after a single-sideband filter (Finisar Waveshaper, 1000S). The chirped pulse is power-divided, and one part is CS-SSB modulated by RF signal to be Fourier-transformed, which is coupled with the other un-modulated part under proper power. The latter, without frequency shift, offers a zero-frequency reference after FTM. The coupled lightwave, passing through single-loop FTM, is opto-electronically converted by a high-speed photo detector (PD, DSC30S) and is received by a real-time oscilloscope (Agilent, DSO91204A).

The desired frequency-dependent time delay is observed by oscilloscope when single RF tone with four different frequencies (20.16 GHz, 20.08 GHz, 20.00 GHz, and 19.92 GHz, respectively) is input. The results are shown in Fig. 6(a), without average. Under each input, the output waveform contains periodic sequence of two pulses. The stronger one corresponds to the un-modulated input (“reference” pulse), while the weaker one corresponds to the frequency-shifted part (“FTM” pulse). Period of the two pulses is 2.5 ns, consistent with our theory. Within one period, time interval between two pulses increases when the driving frequency changes monotonically, which illustrates FTM. Note that without any active control, the total phase retardation of long fiber loop is unstable, which randomly drifts between 0 to 2π. As a result, the output waveform drifts too in time domain. However, “reference” pulse acts as benchmark so that the input frequency is mapped to delay offset from “reference” pulse rather than absolute time position. Within 400 MHz, the mapping is plotted in the last line of Fig. 6(b) without ambiguity. Excellent linearity is found with slope of 6.25 ps/MHz, which agrees with the designed β2.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 (a) Output waveforms when single RF tone with four different frequencies around 20 GHz is input. “Reference” pulses are aligned in time. No averaging is performed. (b) Measured driving-frequency-dependent time delay (dots) of the “FTM” pulse offset from “reference” pulse. Line: theoretical prediction. Four sub-plots show FTM at different unambiguous 400-MHz bandwidth.

Download Full Size | PDF

If input frequency is out of the 400-MHz window, the tracked “FTM” pulse also moves out of the 2.5-ns time window but a new “FTM” pulse enters from the other side. Such periodic FTM could be observed within the whole RF-optic modulation bandwidth. Figure 6(b) shows FTMs around 20 GHz, 15 GHz, 10 GHz, and baseband 0 GHz. Four sub-plots show FTM at different unambiguous 400-MHz bandwidth. In each frequency window, one can observe the same mapping slope and good linearity. Note at low frequency our CS-SSB modulation does not work well and two sidebands are input into FTM loop at the same time. As a result, the unambiguous bandwidth is reduced by half (i.e. 200 MHz).

In Fig. 7(a), three driving frequency as close as 25 MHz (10.125 GHz, 10.15 GHz and 10.175 GHz) are input in turn, and the corresponding output waveforms are plotted together. Note all “reference” pulses are aligned. One can see that duration of each “FTM” pulse is around 150 ps (1/BO=156.25 ps), while their separation is 156.25 ps according to linear fitting of Fig. 6(b). Three “FTM” pulses are clearly distinguished, and the resolution of our FTM is around 25 MHz, matching the theoretically predicted value (RBW, single channel bandwidth). Such resolution can be found at each unambiguous window, for example, at 15.3 GHz, 18.1 GHz, and 20.1 GHz, as shown in Figs. 7(b, c) and 7(d), respectively.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 Output waveforms when three driving frequencies, separated by 25 MHz, are input individually. “Reference” pulses are aligned in time. No averaging is performed.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In summary, we proposed a novel RF-to-time mapping based on comb filter with spectrally-discrete dispersion. Experimentally, with a single fiber ring resonator, we achieved real-time FTM under 400-MHz unambiguous bandwidth, high linearity of 6.25 ps/MHz, and 25-MHz resolution. Compared with traditional continuous-dispersion-based FTM, our proposal provides much larger dispersion with compact size, e.g. β2106 ps2 (equivalent to ~4.6 × 104-km SSMF) with only 0.5-meter-long fiber loop in our proof-of-concept experiment. Instantaneous bandwidth or equivalent dispersion could be further extended by cascading more ring resonators. A numerical example was then studied, where compact property could be preserved since phase retardation instead of true time delay is controlled. Compared with existing equivalent dispersion scheme such as that by frequency shift feedback loop, our proposal employs simple passive cavity so that more compact device could be achieved, avoiding accumulated in-loop noise. Further, capability to integrate lots of rings could reduce the required optical bandwidth as well as the difficulty during final real-time observation.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61625104, 61671071, 61471065).

References and links

1. J. Capmany and D. Novak, “Microwave photonics combines two worlds,” Nat. Photonics 1(6), 319–330 (2007). [CrossRef]  

2. G. C. Valley, “Photonic analog-to-digital converters,” Opt. Express 15(5), 1955–1982 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. Y. Han and B. Jalali, “Photonic Time-Stretched Analog-to-Digital Converter: Fundamental Concepts and Practical Considerations,” J. Lightwave Technol. 21(12), 3085–3103 (2003). [CrossRef]  

4. T. P. McKenna, M. D. Sharp, D. G. Lucarelli, J. A. Nanzer, M. L. Dennis, and T. R. Clark, “Wideband photonic compressive sampling analog-to-digital converter for RF spectrum estimation,” 2013 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (OFC/NFOEC), Anaheim, CA, 2013, pp. 1–3. [CrossRef]  

5. H. Nan, Y. Gu, and H. Zhang, “Optical Analog-to-Digital Conversion System Based on Compressive Sampling,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 23(2), 67–69 (2011). [CrossRef]  

6. H. Chi, X. Zou, and J. Yao, “An approach to the measurement of microwave frequency based on optical power monitoring,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 20(14), 1249–1251 (2008). [CrossRef]  

7. J. Zhou, S. Fu, P. P. Shum, S. Aditya, L. Xia, J. Li, X. Sun, and K. Xu, “Photonic measurement of microwave frequency based on phase modulation,” Opt. Express 17(9), 7217–7221 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. L. A. Bui, M. D. Pelusi, T. D. Vo, N. Sarkhosh, H. Emami, B. J. Eggleton, and A. Mitchell, “Instantaneous frequency measurement system using optical mixing in highly nonlinear fiber,” Opt. Express 17(25), 22983–22991 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. S. T. Winnall, A. C. Lindsay, M. W. Austin, J. Canning, and A. Mitchell, “A microwave channelizer and spectroscope based on an integrated optical Bragg-grating Fabry-Perot and integrated hybrid Fresnel lens system,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 54(2), 868–872 (2006). [CrossRef]  

10. W. Wang, R. Davis, T. Jung, R. Lodenkamper, L. Lembo, J. Brook, and M. Wu, “Characterization of a coherent optical RF channelizer based on a diffraction grating,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 49(10), 1996–2001 (2001). [CrossRef]  

11. C. Wang and J. P. Yao, “Ultrahigh-resolution photonic-assisted microwave frequency identification based on temporal channelization,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 61(12), 4275–4282 (2013). [CrossRef]  

12. X. Xie, Y. Dai, K. Xu, J. Niu, R. Wang, L. Yan, and J. Lin, “Broadband photonic RF channelization based on coherent optical frequency combs and I/Q demodulators,” IEEE Photonics J. 4(4), 1196–1202 (2012). [CrossRef]  

13. T. Jannson, “Real-time Fourier transformation in dispersive optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. 8(4), 232–234 (1983). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. Y. Park, T. J. Ahn, J. C. Kieffer, and J. Azaña, “Optical frequency domain reflectometry based on real-time Fourier transformation,” Opt. Express 15(8), 4597–4616 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. D. R. Solli, J. Chou, and B. Jalali, “Amplified wavelength-time transformation for real-time spectroscopy,” Nat. Photonics 2(1), 48–51 (2008). [CrossRef]  

16. J. Azaña and M. A. Muriel, “Real-time optical spectrum analysis based on the time-space duality in chirped fiber gratings,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 36(5), 517–526 (2000). [CrossRef]  

17. K. Goda and B. Jalali, “Dispersive Fourier transformation for fast continuous single-shot measurements,” Nat. Photonics 7(2), 102–112 (2013). [CrossRef]  

18. C. Zhang, X. Wei, M. E. Marhic, and K. K. Y. Wong, “Ultrafast and versatile spectroscopy by temporal Fourier transform,” Sci. Rep. 4(1), 5351 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. Y. Park and J. Azaña, “Ultrahigh dispersion of broadband microwave signals by incoherent photonic processing,” Opt. Express 18(14), 14752–14761 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. R. E. Saperstein, D. Panasenko, and Y. Fainman, “Demonstration of a microwave spectrum analyzer based on time-domain optical processing in fiber,” Opt. Lett. 29(5), 501–503 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. Y. Duan, L. Chen, H. Zhou, X. Zhou, C. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Ultrafast electrical spectrum analyzer based on all-optical Fourier transform and temporal magnification,” Opt. Express 25(7), 7520–7529 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. H. Chatellus, L. Cortés, and J. Azaña, “Optical real-time Fourier transformation with kilohertz resolutions,” Optica 3(1), 1–8 (2016). [CrossRef]  

23. J. Howe and C. Xu, “Ultrafast optical signal processing based upon space–time dualities,” J. Lightwave Technol. 24(7), 2649–2662 (2006). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Comparison between pulse de-chirping by continuous dispersion and by discrete dispersion. In discrete one, quadratic-phase-distributed but intensity-sliced frequency response results in periodic output of de-chirped pulse.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 A comb filter example based on optical ring resonators which could approximate the desired discrete dispersion by individual phase control instead of huge-volume real dispersion. fm is the resonant frequency of the corresponding ring.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Simulated power transmission spectrum of the proposed ring-based discrete dispersion shown in Fig. 2. (b) Blue line: the corresponding phase response; red dot: wrapped phase retardation at each transmission peak; red dotted line: wrapped quadratic fit.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Simulated FTM through the proposed ring-based FTM. (a) Output waveform under zero (black line) and 50-MHz frequency shift (dark blue line). (b) Periodic FTM output. (c) Zoom in of one period; waveform with different color corresponds to specific frequency shift. (d) The calculated frequency to delay mapping (colorful dots) and theory prediction (red line).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Experiment setup. e-AWG: electronic AWG; e-LO: electronic local oscillation; RF amp: RF amplifier; PM: phase modulator; OC: optical coupler; OSC: real-time oscilloscope; red line: optical fiber; blue line: electronic cable. Inset shows the measured power transmission of the passive fiber loop.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 (a) Output waveforms when single RF tone with four different frequencies around 20 GHz is input. “Reference” pulses are aligned in time. No averaging is performed. (b) Measured driving-frequency-dependent time delay (dots) of the “FTM” pulse offset from “reference” pulse. Line: theoretical prediction. Four sub-plots show FTM at different unambiguous 400-MHz bandwidth.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Output waveforms when three driving frequencies, separated by 25 MHz, are input individually. “Reference” pulses are aligned in time. No averaging is performed.

Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

[ x( t )exp( i t 2 / 2 β 2 ) ] F 1 exp( i β 2 Ω 2 /2 ) X( t/ β 2 )exp( i t 2 / 2 β 2 )
RBW=1/ ( 2π β 2 B O )
[ x( t )exp( i t 2 / 2 β 2 ) ] F 1 exp( i β 2 Ω 2 /2 ) k P( Ωk2 πFSR DD ) [ X( t/ β 2 )exp( i t 2 / 2 β 2 ) ] F 1 k P( Ωk2 πFSR DD ) k p( k/ FSR DD )X[ ( tk/ FSR DD )/ β 2 ]exp[ i ( tk/ FSR DD ) 2 / 2 β 2 ]
M= B FTM / FSR DD
β 2 =M/ ( 2π B FTM 2 ) , and ϕ k =kMπ+ π k 2 /M
B O = B FTM 2 / ( MRBW ) , and T O =1/ RBW
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.