Abstract
All photonic switching architectures require control information to be injected into the nodes of the network fabric to permit appropriate routing of the traffic. A typical photonic switch (Fig. 1-4) consists of nodes arranged in stages (node-stages) which are separated by optical links (link-stages). Every node in every node-stage must have control signals routed into it in addition to the data inputs and data outputs, and depending on the reconfiguration rate of the network, the aggregate bit-rate of the control inputs entering a node-stage can sometimes be as high as the aggregate bit-rate of the data passing through a node-stage. Thus, it should be apparent that the problem of control injection is not at all a trivial problem. Control injection is an important aspect of photonic switches that should probably by given more attention, because the manner in which control is injected into the network has a large effect on the performance and operating capabilities of the network. This paper will study these effects for four different control injection schemes: 1) distributed control scheme with self-routing packet headers, 2) centralized control scheme with self-routing packet headers, 3) centralized control scheme with spatial light modulators (SLMs), and 4) centralized control with direct node injection.
© 1991 Optical Society of America
PDF ArticleMore Like This
Daniel J. Blumenthal
ThY28 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1990
R. M. Fortenberry, W. L. Ha, and R. S. Tucker
ThA2 Photonic Switching (PS) 1991
W. L. Ha, Ft. M. Fortenberry, G. M. Wluka, and R. S. Tucker
WD3 Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 1991