Abstract

We predict that a liquid crystal/silver nanoparticles mixture can be designed so that its effective ordinary and extraordinary permittivities have, in a frequency range, real parts of different signs. We exploit this result to design an optical switch obtained by sandwiching a few hundred nanometers thick slab of the proposed mixture between two silica layers. By resorting to full-wave simulations, we show that, by varying the direction of an externally applied electric field, the transmissivity of the structure can be switched between 0.02 and 0.4 at a wavelength close to the frequency range where the medium is indefinite. The device functionality physically stems from the fact that the orientation of the hyperbola characterizing extraordinary waves within the indefinite medium follows the applied electric field direction and therefore, if the hyperbola asymptote is nearly normal to the slab, full switch between evanescent and homogeneous propagating waves can be achieved within the medium.

©2011 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Within the rapidly growing field of metamaterials, indefinite media [1], or extremely anisotropic metamaterials characterized by principal permittivities having different signs, are attracting a considerable research interest mainly for the novel potentialities they provide for achieving efficient optical steering and manipulation. The hyperbolic dispersion relation characterizing extraordinary plane waves through indefinite (or hyperbolic) media is the main physical ingredient leading to unusual optical effects. Examples are negative refraction [24], which is due to the fact that the hyperbola curvature is opposite to that of the circumference of standard media, and hyperlensing [58], arising from to the medium ability of converting vacuum evanescent waves into homogeneous propagating waves [9] (as a consequence of the lack of evanescent waves along the hyperbola major axis). Extreme anisotropy also fundamentally affects the excitation of waves, impinging from vacuum, into an indefinite medium to the point that, by suitably changing the mutual geometric orientation between the hyperbola and the metamaterial interface, novel interesting effects as cancellation of reflection and transmission can be predicted [10]. Consequently, optical devices exploiting indefinite media have been proposed as, for instance, polarization beam splitters [11] and angular filters [12] which are based on the fact that transverse magnetic and transverse electric waves are characterized by different dispersive features (hyperbolic and standard behavior, respectively).

The condition of extreme anisotropy, where the principal permittivities have different signs, can be attained by resorting to suitable metal-dielectric nano-composites with a geometrical structure exhibiting at least one privileged direction. Exploiting the effective medium approach, it is possible to design the composite to show indefinite permittivity in a spectral range whose wavelengths are much greater than the nano-constituents size. Two relevant examples of such structured media are nanowire composites [1315] (typically silver nanowires embedded in an allumina membrane) and layered media [1619] (obtained by alternating metal and dielectric layers) whose privileged directions are, evidently, the nanowire and the stacking direction, respectively. Recently, it has been proposed that indefinite permittivity can even be observed in anisotropic natural materials as, for example, graphite [20] and strong anisotropic uniaxial crystals [21] which are shown to be indefinite in the ultraviolet (due to the hybrid electronic transitions) and the infrared region (due to the strong anisotropy of polar lattice vibrations), respectively.

Dynamic light manipulation is a key ingredient of photonics and therefore investigating tunable metamaterials is an essential task. Basically, it has been proposed that if the metamaterial constituents are immersed into a liquid crystal [22, 23] or the liquid crystal is used as one of the metamaterial constituents [2426], the overall refractive index can be controlled through an external electric field, even allowing the full switch of the refractive index sign. Remarkable is the situation where the liquid crystal [27, 28] hosts dispersed structured nanoparticles since the negative-zero-positive transition of the refractive index sign can be more simply achieved by suitably designing the nanoparticle properties (filling fraction, radius, etc.). Due to its efficiency and manufacturing simplicity, the liquid crystal/nanoparticles mixture has also been investigated by means of refined approaches accounting for the nonlocal and spatial inhomogeneities of the refractive index [29]. Although the present research interest in tunable metamaterials is rapidly growing, it should be stressed that, to the best of our knowledge, an externally driven metamaterial with indefinite permittivity has not been considered yet, not even in the wide and versatile research field of liquid crystal. An example of such an indefinite and tunable metamaterial is the main achievement of the present paper.

In this paper we consider a liquid crystal/silver nanoparticles mixture and we show that, by suitably choosing the volume filling fraction of the particles, the anisotropic effective medium theory predicts the existence of a spectral range where the permittivity tensor is indefinite. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, we theoretically discuss the first example of indefinite optical metamaterial which 1) is obtained by dispersing metal nanoparticles within an anisotropic matrix and 2) is tunable since, due to the presence of the liquid crystal, an external electric field is able to change its optical response. These achievements allow us to consider an active optical device obtained by sandwiching a 300 nm thick slab of the considered tunable indefinite medium between two 70 nm thick silica layers and operating in the presence of an externally applied electric field. Exploiting the effective medium theory, we show that, at optical wavelengths where the inner medium is indefinite, the slab is completely opaque if the electric field is orthogonal to its interfaces whereas it becomes gradually more transparent if the angle is increased. Such a behavior is physically due to the fact that the orientation of the hyperbola characterizing the dispersion relation of extraordinary waves through indefinite medium follows the direction of the applied electric field and therefore, when the hyperbola asymptote is close to be normal to the device interface, a switch between evanescent and propagating waves within the medium is achieved thus producing the change of the slab transmissivity. In order to prove that the considered medium does actually exhibit indefinite permittivity and that the considered device operates the predicted optical switch, we have performed full-wave (FDTD) simulations and evaluated the device transmissivity as a function of the wavelength and the applied electric field direction. We show that a spectral region where the device operates the switch exists and it is very close to that predicted by the effective medium theory and, most importantly, that, at a specific wavelength, the actual device transmissivity can be switched between 0.02 and 0.4 through the externally applied electric field. It should be stressed that such a variation of the transmissivity could not be achieved through conventional liquid crystal electro-optical switches of the same thickness L = 300 nm since such length is too small, at optical frequencies, to produce the required modal phase difference.

2. Liquid Crystal/silver nanoparticles mixture as a tunable indefinite medium

Consider a slab of thickness L with its interfaces orthogonal to the z-axis, filled with a nematic liquid crystal (LC) and sandwiched between to silica layers (see. Fig.1). If the surface region of the LC is weakly anchored to the silica walls (condition that can be achieved through suitable surface [30] and/or bulk [31] preparation methods) and if the initial homeotropic director of the LC molecules are along the z axis, an externally applied electric field E S, lying in the xz plane and forming an angle ϕ with the z-axis, is able to align the LC homeotropic director along the unit vector = sinϕ ê x + cosϕ ê z. As a consequence the LC optically behaves as a uniaxially anisotropic crystal (with optical axis along the direction ) and its permittivity tensor is ɛ(LC)=Rdiag(ɛo(LC),ɛo(LC),ɛe(LC))R1 where ɛo(LC) and ɛe(LC) are the ordinary and extraordinary permittivities, respectively and

R=(cosφ0sinφ010sinφ0cosφ)
is the y-axis rotation matrix. The slab hosts silver nanoparticles of radius r = 10 nm which are dispersed within the LC with the volume filling fraction f. If both the the radiation wavelength λ and the slab thickness L are much greater than the nanoparticles radius (λr and Lr), the overall optical response of the slab can be described by means of the effective medium approach suitably extended to encompass anisotropic constituents [32]. According to this approach, since silver nanoparticles are optically isotropic with scalar permittivity ɛ (Ag), the overall effective permittivity tensor is ɛ(eff)=Rdiag(ɛo(eff),ɛo(eff),ɛe(eff))R1 so that the homogeneous effective medium is a uniaxial crystal with optical axis along the direction and its ordinary (j = o) and extraordinary (j = e) effective permittivities are
ɛj(eff)=[1+f(ɛ(Ag)ɛj(LC))ɛj(LC)+(1f)Nj(ɛ(Ag)ɛj(LC))]ɛj(LC),
where the depolarization factors Nj are
Nj=ɛj(LC)20+ds1(1+sɛo(LC))2(1+sɛe(LC))1(1+sɛj(LC)).
The permittivities of Eq.(2) are the anisotropic generalization of the standard Maxwell Garnett mixing rule (to which Eq.(2) reduces in the isotropic limit where Nj = 1/3), the depolarization factors accounting for the effect of the anisotropy. Note that, in analogy to the isotropic situation, the nanoparticles radius does not appear in Eq.(2) so that the mixture design have to be performed by tuning the volume filling fraction f.

 

Fig. 1 Setup geometry. The liquid crystal (LC) fills the slab of thickness L, it is sandwiched between two silica layers of thickness d and it hosts silver nanoparticles (Ag) of radius r. The externally applied electric field E S, inclined at an angle ϕ with the z-axis, aligns the liquid crystal molecules in the direction of the unit vector (parallel to the electric field). The vacuum electromagnetic plane wave is made to impinge orthogonally onto the device interface.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

In order to discuss a feasible example of mixture, we have chosen SG-1 as nematic LC [33] due to its high birefringence and we have reported its ordinary and extraordinary permittivities in Fig.2(a) as functions of the vacuum wavelength λ in the spectral range between 410 and 430 nm. For the silver permittivity we have used the Drude model ɛ(Ag)=ɛωp2/(ω2+iΓω) with ɛ = 4.56, ωp = 1.38 · 1016 s−1 and Γ = 0.1 · 1015 s−1 [34] and we have plotted the real and imaginary parts of ɛ (Ag) in Fig.2(b) for λ between 410 and 430 nm. Note that we have used a scattering rate Γ which is an order of magnitude higher than that of bulk silver in order to accounting for the surface scattering (size effect) occurring within the considered nanometric sized particles. After setting f = 0.05 for the nanoparticles volume filling fraction, we have evaluated from Eq.(2) the principal permittivities of the effective medium and we have plotted their real and imaginary parts in Fig.2(c). Note that for wavelengths between λ 1 = 418 nm and λ 2 = 427.5 nm, Re(ɛe(eff))>0 and Re(ɛo(eff))<0 so that the effective medium has indefinite permittivity. Combining this result with the fact that the direction of the optic axis can be varied through the externally applied electric field, we conclude that the proposed LC/silver nanoparticles mixture behaves, within the limits of validity of the effective medium theory, as a tunable hyperbolic medium.

 

Fig. 2 Dielectric permittivities as a function of the vacuum wavelength λ. (a) Ordinary and extraordinary permittivities of the LC. (b) Real and imaginary parts of the silver permittivity. (c) Real and imaginary parts of the ordinary and extraordinary permittivities of the homogeneous effective medium. The shaded region (λ 1 < λ < λ 2, where λ 1 = 418 nm and λ 2 = 427.5 nm) corresponds to the spectral range where the effective permittivity tensor is indefinite.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The above described design of the anisotropic effective medium has been performed for the specific value f = 0.05 of the nanoparticles volume filling fraction. In order to complete the analysis and to elucidate the dependence of the whole phenomenology on the parameter f we have evaluated the wavelengths λ 1(f) and λ 2(f) characterizing the spectral region λ 1(f) < λ < λ 2(f) where the medium is indefinite for 0.02 < f < 0.1 and plotted them in Fig.3. Note that, a tolerance Δf = 0.005 for the volume filling fraction produces the uncertainties Δλ 1 = 2.3 nm and Δλ 1 = 1.4 nm, thus proving that the mixture design is not critical.

 

Fig. 3 Dependence of the wavelengths λ 1(f) and λ 2(f), characterizing the spectral region λ 1(f) < λ < λ 2(f) where the medium is indefinite, on the nanoparticle volume filling fraction f for 0.02 < f < 0.1.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

3. Optical switch

The intriguing optical properties of hyperbolic media combined with the tunability, allow the above described LC/nanoparticles mixture to be used for conceiving optical devices. As an example, consider the setup of Fig.1 where the LC slab with dispersed nanoparticles has thickness L = 300 nm and it is sandwiched between two d = 70 nm thick silica layers (of permittivity ɛ (S) = 2.088). If a monochromatic plane wave is made to impinge orthogonally, from vacuum, onto the device interface (as sketched in Fig.1), it is evident that we are considering an active device since its optical transmissivity can be altered by varying the direction of the externally applied electric field E S. Using the effective medium approach discussed in Sec.2 to model LC/nanoparticles mixture, the device transmissivity is easily evaluated and it is reported in Fig.4(a), as a function of both the vacuum wavelength λ and the angle ϕ defining the direction of the applied electric field. For clarity purposes, in Fig.4(a) we have reported two transparent gray planes corresponding to the two wavelengths 418 and 427.5 nm between which the effective medium predicts that the mixture is hyperbolic. The most striking feature of Fig.4(a) is the existence of three relevant spectral regions, I) λ < 418 nm, II) 418 nm < λ < 427.5 nm and III) λ > 427.5 nm, where the transmissivity is characterized by qualitatively different behaviors. Specifically within regions I and III, the slab is almost transparent and completely opaque, respectively whereas, within region II the transmissivity strongly depends on ϕ to the point that T ≃ 0 for ϕ ≃ 0 and, for increasing ϕ, it gradually increases eventually reaching its maximum (dependent on λ) for ϕ = π/2 (see Fig.4(b) where the level plot of the transmissivity of region II is plotted). Therefore, within region II, the considered structure can be regarded as a very thin optical switch which, being driven by the external electric field, is able to completely stop or allow the transmission of the light flow. Physically, such an overall behavior is readily grasped by noting that within region I and III (see Fig.2(c)) the effective medium behaves as a uniaxial crystal and an anisotropic conductor, respectively and therefore, within the same two regions, the plane wave impinging from vacuum excites homogeneous and evanescent waves, respectively. On the other hand, within region II the effective medium is indefinite so that, depending on the value of ϕ, the normally impinging plane wave incoming from vacuum is able to excite either homogeneous or evanescent waves. In order to clarify this crucial point, we start from the dispersion relation of extraordinary plane waves

kx2ɛe(eff)+kz2ɛo(eff)=k02,
where k′x and k′z are the components of the wave vector along the principal axis of the uniaxial crystal and k 0 = 2π/λ. Since the plane wave from vacuum normally impinges onto the device interface (see Fig.1), conservation of momentum requires that the wave vector of waves excited within the anisotropic slab is K = K ê z, i.e. it is along the z-axis. Therefore the wavevector components along the principal axis are k′x = –K sinϕ and k′z = K cosϕ which, inserted into Eq.(4) yield
K(φ)=k0ɛo(eff)ɛe(eff)ɛo(eff)sin2φ+ɛe(eff)cos2φ,
from which the impact of the angle ϕ on the excited waves is particularly evident. Even though we are not neglecting absorption (see the imaginary parts of the permittivity in Fig.2(c)), it is convenient here to regard the principal permittivities as real quantities with ɛo(eff)<0 and ɛe(eff)>0. Therefore, from Eq.(5), we readily obtain that K(0) is imaginary (evanescent waves) whereas K(π/2) is real (homogeneous waves), the switch between the two kinds of waves occurring at the angle φ=arctanɛe(eff)/ɛ0(eff). This explains the dependence of T on ϕ within region II of Fig.4 where, as discussed above, a realistic situation is reported in which absorption is not neglected (the only effects of absorption being the smoothing of the dependence of T on ϕ and the lowering of values of T).

 

Fig. 4 (a) Plot of the transmissivity of the device reported in Fig.1 (evaluated using the effective medium model for the LC/nanoparticels mixture) as a function of the vacuum wavelength of the incident radiation and the angle ϕ. (b) Level plot of the transmissivity of panel (a) restricted to region II where the effective medium has indefinite permittivity.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The just described mechanism is pictorially sketched in Fig.5 where we have reported the transmissivity T (ϕ) for λ = 420 nm extracted from Fig.4(a). In the insets A) and B) of Fig.5 we have plotted the hyperbolas of Eq.(4) in the two relevant situations (A) ϕ = 20° and (B) ϕ = 80° (regarding the permittivities as real quantities). The direction of the applied electric field is able to physically rotate the medium hyperbola and, as a consequence, in the two situations ϕ = 20° and ϕ = 80° the hyperbola does not intersect and intersects the z-axis, respectively, thus correspondingly allowing the normally impinging vacuum wave to excite evanescent and homogeneous waves. The switch between the two kinds of waves occurs when the hyperbola asymptote is nearly normal to the slab interface and this occurs for ϕ close to arctanɛe(eff)/ɛ0(eff).

 

Fig. 5 Transmissivity T(ϕ) for λ = 420 nm extracted from Fig.4(a). In the insets, the extraordinary waves hyperbolas of Eq.(4) are plotted in the two relevant situations (A) ϕ = 20° and (B) ϕ = 80° (regarding the permittivities as real quantities).

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

4. Full wave simulations

In order to check the homogenization of the LC/nanoparticles mixture and the device switching functionality, we have performed 3D full-wave simulations by means of a finite-element solver, using the numerical values of the parameters (constituent permittivities, nanoparticles radius and volume filling fraction, layers thicknesses, etc.) considered so far. In Fig.6(a) we have plotted the resulting transmissivity T as a function of the vacuum wavelength λ and the angle ϕ. It is worth noting that, even though the surface of Fig.6(a) does not strictly coincide with that of Fig.4(a), it is however evident that the actual structure is almost transparent and practically opaque for wavelengths λ smaller than 430 nm and greater than 445 nm, respectively. In addition, in the spectral range between 430 and 445 nm the transmissivity strongly depends on the angle ϕ and, at a given λ, T (ϕ) is a monotonically increasing function of ϕ (see Fig.6(b)). As a consequence, even though the spectral ranges are slightly different from those predicted by the effective medium approach, the sample behavior changes, for increasing radiation wavelengths, from that of a dielectric uniaxial crystal to that of an anisotropic conductor with an intermediate spectral region where the medium is hyperbolic. In Fig.6(b) we have plotted the transmissivity of the structure as a function of ϕ for three relevant wavelengths and the switching functionality is particularly evident. Moreover, since the transmissivity spans the range between 0.02 and 0.4 for λ = 425 nm, we conclude that the performance of the actual switching device is better than that predicted by the effective medium theory (whose transmissivity range is between 0 and 0.15).

 

Fig. 6 (a) Device transmissivity T as a function of the vacuum wavelength λ and the angle ϕ evaluated through full wave simulations. (b) Transmissivity T (ϕ) extracted from panel (a) at three different wavelengths where the mixture displays indefinite character.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The discrepancies between the predictions of the homogenized effective medium theory and those of the full-wave simulations are a consequence of the fact that, for the chosen slab thickness L = 300 nm, the edge effect due to the nanoparticles close to the slab interface can not be strictly neglected. The derivation of the Maxwell Garnett mixing rule (whose anisotropic extension has been used in this paper) is based on the evaluation of the polarizability of an isolated nanoparticle experiencing an external field which is uniform within its volume. For particle belonging to the mixture bulk, these requirements are fulfilled if the nanoparticle size is much smaller than the wavelength and if the nanoparticles volume filling fraction is very small. However, for nanoparticles close to the sample interface the above polarizability evaluation is wrong since it does not take into account the additional field existing within the nanoparticle volume which is due to surface polarization charges (i.e. to the discontinuity of the electromagnetic material properties at the interface) [35]. Since the corrections to the permittivity scale as (r/z)3 (z being the distance from the interface) the nanoparticles responsible for the edge effect are those whose distance from the interface is smaller than 40 or 50 nm (four or five times the radius r = 10 nm), so that we conclude that roughly a fourth of the considered slab volume can not be described through the Maxwell Garnett approach.

5. Conclusions

We have proposed a novel way for synthesizing indefinite media by dispersing metal nanoparticle within a highly birefringent liquid crystal. In addition to its simplicity and feasibility, the proposed mixture is also tunable since an externally applied electric field is able to change the overall effective permittivity tensor. Tunability of an indefinite medium is a very important property since, as we have shown, the ability of altering the orientation of the extraordinary wave hyperbola allows one to literally choose whether the electromagnetic field within the medium (as due to a give external excitation) has to be composed of propagating homogeneous or evanescent waves. We have exploited such a property characterizing tunable indefinite media to design a nanometric thick optical switch and investigated its functionality both through the effective medium approach and through full wave simulations. The effective medium approach has the sufficient simplicity to highlight the basic physical mechanisms supporting the device functionality. On the other hand, full wave simulations yield results which are slightly different from those predicted by the effective medium approach and the discrepancy are related to the very small device thickness we decided to consider. However, from the point of view of the device functionality, the results of the full wave simulations are even better than those of the effective medium approach.

References and links

1. D. R. Smith and D. Schurig, “Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in Media with Indefinite Permittivity and Permeability Tensors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077405 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. D. R. Smith, P. Kolinko, and D. Schurig, “Negative refraction in indefinite media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 1032–1043 (2004). [CrossRef]  

3. D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, P. Kolinko, and P. Rye, “Partial focusing of radiation by a slab of indefinite media,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244–2246 (2004). [CrossRef]  

4. A. Fang, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Optical anisotropic metamaterials: Negative refraction and focusing,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 245127 (2009). [CrossRef]  

5. Z. Jacob, L. V. Alekseyev, and E. Narimanov, “Optical Hyperlens: Far-field imaging beyond the diffraction limit,” Opt. Express 14, 8247–8256 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. H. Lee, Z. Liu, Y. Xiong, C. Sun, and X. Zhang, “Development of optical hyperlens for imaging below the diffraction limit,” Opt. Express 15, 15886–15891 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. J. Yao, K. T. Tsai, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, G. Bartal, Y. L. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Imaging visible light using anisotropic metamaterial slab lens,” Opt. Express 17, 22380–22385 (2009). [CrossRef]  

8. B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010). [CrossRef]  

9. Z. Liu, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, X. Hu, X. Li, and J. Zi, “Hyper-interface, the bridge between radiative wave and evanescent wave,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113507 (2010). [CrossRef]  

10. J. Yang, X. Hu, X. Li, Z. Liu, X. Jiang, and J. Zi, “Cancellation of reflection and transmission at metamaterial surfaces,” Opt. Lett. 35, 16–18 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. J. Zhao, Yan Chen, and Y. Feng, “Polarization beam splitting through an anisotropic metamaterial slab realized by a layered metal-dielectric structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 071114 (2008). [CrossRef]  

12. L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010). [CrossRef]  

13. J. Elser, R. Wangberg, and V. A. Podolskiy, “Nanowire metamaterials with extreme optical anisotropy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 261102 (2006). [CrossRef]  

14. Y. Liu, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “All-angle negative refraction and imaging in a bulk medium made of metallic nanowires in the visible region,” Opt. Express 16, 15439–15448 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009). [CrossRef]  

16. J. Schilling, “Uniaxial metallo-dielectric metamaterials with scalar positive permeability,” Phys. Rev. E 74, 046618 (2006). [CrossRef]  

17. A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007). [CrossRef]  

18. Y. J. Huang, W. T. Lu, and S. Sridhar, “Nanowire waveguide made from extremely anisotropic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 063836 (2008). [CrossRef]  

19. D. Korobkin, B. Neuner, C. Fietz, N. Jegenyes, G. Ferro, and G. Shvets, “Measurements of the negative refractive index of sub-diffraction waves propagating in an indefinite permittivity medium,” Opt. Express 18, 22734–22746 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. J. Sun, J. Zhou, B. Li, and Feiyu Kang, “Indefinite permittivity and negative refraction in natural material: Graphite,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 101901 (2011). [CrossRef]  

21. R. Wang, J. Sun, and J. Zhoua, “Indefinite permittivity in uniaxial single crystal at infrared frequency,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 031912 (2010). [CrossRef]  

22. M. V. Gorkunov and M. A. Osipov, “Tunability of wire-grid metamaterial immersed into nematic liquid crystal,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 036101 (2008). [CrossRef]  

23. R. Pratibha, K. Park, I. I. Smalyukh, and W. Park, “Tunable optical metamaterial based on liquid crystal-gold nanosphere composite,” Opt. Express 17, 19459–19469 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. X. Wang, D. Kwon, D. H. Werner, and I. C. Khoo, “Tunable optical negative-index metamaterials employing anisotropic liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 143122 (2007). [CrossRef]  

25. D. H. Werner, D. Kwon, I. C. Khoo, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Liquid crystal clad near-infrared metamaterials with tunable negative-zero-positive refractive indices,” Opt. Express 15, 3342–3347 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. A. Minovich, D. N. Neshev, D. A. Powell, I. V. Shadrivov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 193103 (2010).

27. I. C. Khoo, D. H. Werner, X. Liang, and A. Diaz, “Nanosphere dispersed liquid crystals for tunable negative-zero-positive index of refraction in the optical and terahertz regimes,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2592–2594 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. I. C. Khoo, A. Diaz, J. Liou, M. V. Stinger, J. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Liquid Crystals Tunable Optical Metamaterials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 410–417 (2010). [CrossRef]  

29. G. Pawlik, M. Jarema, W. Walasik, A. C. Mitus, and I. C. Khoo, “Field-induced inhomogeneous index distribution of a nano-dispersed nematic liquid crystal metamaterial near the Freedericksz transition: Monte Carlo studies,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 567–576 (2010). [CrossRef]  

30. J. S. Patel and H. Yokoyama, “Continuous anchoring transition in liquid crystals,” Nature 362525–527 (1993). [CrossRef]  

31. G. P. Bryan-Brown, E. L. Wood, and I. C. Sage, “Weak surface anchoring of liquid crystals,” Nature 399338–340 (1999). [CrossRef]  

32. A. Sihvola, “Mixing Rules with Complex Dielectric Coefficients,” Subsurf. Sens. Technol. and Appl. 1, 393–415 (2000). [CrossRef]  

33. S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005). [CrossRef]  

34. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants (Academic, 1985).

35. R. Stepanyan, “Effective dielectric properties of composite materials in the surface layer,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 073403 (2003). [CrossRef]  

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. D. R. Smith and D. Schurig, “Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in Media with Indefinite Permittivity and Permeability Tensors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077405 (2003).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. D. R. Smith, P. Kolinko, and D. Schurig, “Negative refraction in indefinite media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 1032–1043 (2004).
    [Crossref]
  3. D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, P. Kolinko, and P. Rye, “Partial focusing of radiation by a slab of indefinite media,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244–2246 (2004).
    [Crossref]
  4. A. Fang, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Optical anisotropic metamaterials: Negative refraction and focusing,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 245127 (2009).
    [Crossref]
  5. Z. Jacob, L. V. Alekseyev, and E. Narimanov, “Optical Hyperlens: Far-field imaging beyond the diffraction limit,” Opt. Express 14, 8247–8256 (2006).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. H. Lee, Z. Liu, Y. Xiong, C. Sun, and X. Zhang, “Development of optical hyperlens for imaging below the diffraction limit,” Opt. Express 15, 15886–15891 (2007).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. J. Yao, K. T. Tsai, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, G. Bartal, Y. L. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Imaging visible light using anisotropic metamaterial slab lens,” Opt. Express 17, 22380–22385 (2009).
    [Crossref]
  8. B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  9. Z. Liu, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, X. Hu, X. Li, and J. Zi, “Hyper-interface, the bridge between radiative wave and evanescent wave,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113507 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  10. J. Yang, X. Hu, X. Li, Z. Liu, X. Jiang, and J. Zi, “Cancellation of reflection and transmission at metamaterial surfaces,” Opt. Lett. 35, 16–18 (2010).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. J. Zhao, Yan Chen, and Y. Feng, “Polarization beam splitting through an anisotropic metamaterial slab realized by a layered metal-dielectric structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 071114 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  12. L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  13. J. Elser, R. Wangberg, and V. A. Podolskiy, “Nanowire metamaterials with extreme optical anisotropy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 261102 (2006).
    [Crossref]
  14. Y. Liu, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “All-angle negative refraction and imaging in a bulk medium made of metallic nanowires in the visible region,” Opt. Express 16, 15439–15448 (2008).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009).
    [Crossref]
  16. J. Schilling, “Uniaxial metallo-dielectric metamaterials with scalar positive permeability,” Phys. Rev. E 74, 046618 (2006).
    [Crossref]
  17. A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
    [Crossref]
  18. Y. J. Huang, W. T. Lu, and S. Sridhar, “Nanowire waveguide made from extremely anisotropic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 063836 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  19. D. Korobkin, B. Neuner, C. Fietz, N. Jegenyes, G. Ferro, and G. Shvets, “Measurements of the negative refractive index of sub-diffraction waves propagating in an indefinite permittivity medium,” Opt. Express 18, 22734–22746 (2010).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. J. Sun, J. Zhou, B. Li, and Feiyu Kang, “Indefinite permittivity and negative refraction in natural material: Graphite,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 101901 (2011).
    [Crossref]
  21. R. Wang, J. Sun, and J. Zhoua, “Indefinite permittivity in uniaxial single crystal at infrared frequency,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 031912 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  22. M. V. Gorkunov and M. A. Osipov, “Tunability of wire-grid metamaterial immersed into nematic liquid crystal,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 036101 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  23. R. Pratibha, K. Park, I. I. Smalyukh, and W. Park, “Tunable optical metamaterial based on liquid crystal-gold nanosphere composite,” Opt. Express 17, 19459–19469 (2009).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. X. Wang, D. Kwon, D. H. Werner, and I. C. Khoo, “Tunable optical negative-index metamaterials employing anisotropic liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 143122 (2007).
    [Crossref]
  25. D. H. Werner, D. Kwon, I. C. Khoo, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Liquid crystal clad near-infrared metamaterials with tunable negative-zero-positive refractive indices,” Opt. Express 15, 3342–3347 (2007).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. A. Minovich, D. N. Neshev, D. A. Powell, I. V. Shadrivov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 193103 (2010).
  27. I. C. Khoo, D. H. Werner, X. Liang, and A. Diaz, “Nanosphere dispersed liquid crystals for tunable negative-zero-positive index of refraction in the optical and terahertz regimes,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2592–2594 (2006).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  28. I. C. Khoo, A. Diaz, J. Liou, M. V. Stinger, J. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Liquid Crystals Tunable Optical Metamaterials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 410–417 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  29. G. Pawlik, M. Jarema, W. Walasik, A. C. Mitus, and I. C. Khoo, “Field-induced inhomogeneous index distribution of a nano-dispersed nematic liquid crystal metamaterial near the Freedericksz transition: Monte Carlo studies,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 567–576 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  30. J. S. Patel and H. Yokoyama, “Continuous anchoring transition in liquid crystals,” Nature 362525–527 (1993).
    [Crossref]
  31. G. P. Bryan-Brown, E. L. Wood, and I. C. Sage, “Weak surface anchoring of liquid crystals,” Nature 399338–340 (1999).
    [Crossref]
  32. A. Sihvola, “Mixing Rules with Complex Dielectric Coefficients,” Subsurf. Sens. Technol. and Appl. 1, 393–415 (2000).
    [Crossref]
  33. S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
    [Crossref]
  34. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants (Academic, 1985).
  35. R. Stepanyan, “Effective dielectric properties of composite materials in the surface layer,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 073403 (2003).
    [Crossref]

2011 (1)

J. Sun, J. Zhou, B. Li, and Feiyu Kang, “Indefinite permittivity and negative refraction in natural material: Graphite,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 101901 (2011).
[Crossref]

2010 (9)

R. Wang, J. Sun, and J. Zhoua, “Indefinite permittivity in uniaxial single crystal at infrared frequency,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 031912 (2010).
[Crossref]

A. Minovich, D. N. Neshev, D. A. Powell, I. V. Shadrivov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 193103 (2010).

I. C. Khoo, A. Diaz, J. Liou, M. V. Stinger, J. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Liquid Crystals Tunable Optical Metamaterials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 410–417 (2010).
[Crossref]

G. Pawlik, M. Jarema, W. Walasik, A. C. Mitus, and I. C. Khoo, “Field-induced inhomogeneous index distribution of a nano-dispersed nematic liquid crystal metamaterial near the Freedericksz transition: Monte Carlo studies,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 567–576 (2010).
[Crossref]

D. Korobkin, B. Neuner, C. Fietz, N. Jegenyes, G. Ferro, and G. Shvets, “Measurements of the negative refractive index of sub-diffraction waves propagating in an indefinite permittivity medium,” Opt. Express 18, 22734–22746 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010).
[Crossref]

Z. Liu, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, X. Hu, X. Li, and J. Zi, “Hyper-interface, the bridge between radiative wave and evanescent wave,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113507 (2010).
[Crossref]

J. Yang, X. Hu, X. Li, Z. Liu, X. Jiang, and J. Zi, “Cancellation of reflection and transmission at metamaterial surfaces,” Opt. Lett. 35, 16–18 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010).
[Crossref]

2009 (4)

J. Yao, K. T. Tsai, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, G. Bartal, Y. L. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Imaging visible light using anisotropic metamaterial slab lens,” Opt. Express 17, 22380–22385 (2009).
[Crossref]

M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009).
[Crossref]

A. Fang, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Optical anisotropic metamaterials: Negative refraction and focusing,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 245127 (2009).
[Crossref]

R. Pratibha, K. Park, I. I. Smalyukh, and W. Park, “Tunable optical metamaterial based on liquid crystal-gold nanosphere composite,” Opt. Express 17, 19459–19469 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2008 (4)

M. V. Gorkunov and M. A. Osipov, “Tunability of wire-grid metamaterial immersed into nematic liquid crystal,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 036101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Y. J. Huang, W. T. Lu, and S. Sridhar, “Nanowire waveguide made from extremely anisotropic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 063836 (2008).
[Crossref]

J. Zhao, Yan Chen, and Y. Feng, “Polarization beam splitting through an anisotropic metamaterial slab realized by a layered metal-dielectric structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 071114 (2008).
[Crossref]

Y. Liu, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “All-angle negative refraction and imaging in a bulk medium made of metallic nanowires in the visible region,” Opt. Express 16, 15439–15448 (2008).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2007 (4)

H. Lee, Z. Liu, Y. Xiong, C. Sun, and X. Zhang, “Development of optical hyperlens for imaging below the diffraction limit,” Opt. Express 15, 15886–15891 (2007).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

X. Wang, D. Kwon, D. H. Werner, and I. C. Khoo, “Tunable optical negative-index metamaterials employing anisotropic liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 143122 (2007).
[Crossref]

D. H. Werner, D. Kwon, I. C. Khoo, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Liquid crystal clad near-infrared metamaterials with tunable negative-zero-positive refractive indices,” Opt. Express 15, 3342–3347 (2007).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2006 (4)

2005 (1)

S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
[Crossref]

2004 (2)

D. R. Smith, P. Kolinko, and D. Schurig, “Negative refraction in indefinite media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 1032–1043 (2004).
[Crossref]

D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, P. Kolinko, and P. Rye, “Partial focusing of radiation by a slab of indefinite media,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244–2246 (2004).
[Crossref]

2003 (2)

D. R. Smith and D. Schurig, “Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in Media with Indefinite Permittivity and Permeability Tensors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077405 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

R. Stepanyan, “Effective dielectric properties of composite materials in the surface layer,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 073403 (2003).
[Crossref]

2000 (1)

A. Sihvola, “Mixing Rules with Complex Dielectric Coefficients,” Subsurf. Sens. Technol. and Appl. 1, 393–415 (2000).
[Crossref]

1999 (1)

G. P. Bryan-Brown, E. L. Wood, and I. C. Sage, “Weak surface anchoring of liquid crystals,” Nature 399338–340 (1999).
[Crossref]

1993 (1)

J. S. Patel and H. Yokoyama, “Continuous anchoring transition in liquid crystals,” Nature 362525–527 (1993).
[Crossref]

Alekseyev, L.

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Alekseyev, L. V.

L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010).
[Crossref]

Z. Jacob, L. V. Alekseyev, and E. Narimanov, “Optical Hyperlens: Far-field imaging beyond the diffraction limit,” Opt. Express 14, 8247–8256 (2006).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Barnakov, Yu. A.

L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010).
[Crossref]

M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009).
[Crossref]

Bartal, G.

Bryan-Brown, G. P.

G. P. Bryan-Brown, E. L. Wood, and I. C. Sage, “Weak surface anchoring of liquid crystals,” Nature 399338–340 (1999).
[Crossref]

Casse, B. D. F.

B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010).
[Crossref]

Chen, Yan

J. Zhao, Yan Chen, and Y. Feng, “Polarization beam splitting through an anisotropic metamaterial slab realized by a layered metal-dielectric structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 071114 (2008).
[Crossref]

Cheng, K. L.

S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
[Crossref]

Dabrowski, R.

S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
[Crossref]

Diaz, A.

I. C. Khoo, A. Diaz, J. Liou, M. V. Stinger, J. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Liquid Crystals Tunable Optical Metamaterials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 410–417 (2010).
[Crossref]

I. C. Khoo, D. H. Werner, X. Liang, and A. Diaz, “Nanosphere dispersed liquid crystals for tunable negative-zero-positive index of refraction in the optical and terahertz regimes,” Opt. Lett. 31, 2592–2594 (2006).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Elser, J.

J. Elser, R. Wangberg, and V. A. Podolskiy, “Nanowire metamaterials with extreme optical anisotropy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 261102 (2006).
[Crossref]

Fang, A.

A. Fang, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Optical anisotropic metamaterials: Negative refraction and focusing,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 245127 (2009).
[Crossref]

Feng, Y.

J. Zhao, Yan Chen, and Y. Feng, “Polarization beam splitting through an anisotropic metamaterial slab realized by a layered metal-dielectric structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 071114 (2008).
[Crossref]

Ferro, G.

Fietz, C.

Franz, K. J.

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Gauza, S.

S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
[Crossref]

Gmachl, C.

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Gorkunov, M. V.

M. V. Gorkunov and M. A. Osipov, “Tunability of wire-grid metamaterial immersed into nematic liquid crystal,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 036101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Gultepe, E.

B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010).
[Crossref]

Hoffman, A. J.

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Howard, S. S.

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Hu, X.

Z. Liu, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, X. Hu, X. Li, and J. Zi, “Hyper-interface, the bridge between radiative wave and evanescent wave,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113507 (2010).
[Crossref]

J. Yang, X. Hu, X. Li, Z. Liu, X. Jiang, and J. Zi, “Cancellation of reflection and transmission at metamaterial surfaces,” Opt. Lett. 35, 16–18 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Huang, J.

I. C. Khoo, A. Diaz, J. Liou, M. V. Stinger, J. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Liquid Crystals Tunable Optical Metamaterials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 410–417 (2010).
[Crossref]

Huang, Y. J.

B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010).
[Crossref]

Y. J. Huang, W. T. Lu, and S. Sridhar, “Nanowire waveguide made from extremely anisotropic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 063836 (2008).
[Crossref]

Jacob, Z.

Jarema, M.

Jegenyes, N.

Jiang, X.

Z. Liu, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, X. Hu, X. Li, and J. Zi, “Hyper-interface, the bridge between radiative wave and evanescent wave,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113507 (2010).
[Crossref]

J. Yang, X. Hu, X. Li, Z. Liu, X. Jiang, and J. Zi, “Cancellation of reflection and transmission at metamaterial surfaces,” Opt. Lett. 35, 16–18 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Kang, Feiyu

J. Sun, J. Zhou, B. Li, and Feiyu Kang, “Indefinite permittivity and negative refraction in natural material: Graphite,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 101901 (2011).
[Crossref]

Khoo, I. C.

Kildishev, A. V.

Kivshar, Y. S.

A. Minovich, D. N. Neshev, D. A. Powell, I. V. Shadrivov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 193103 (2010).

Kolinko, P.

D. R. Smith, P. Kolinko, and D. Schurig, “Negative refraction in indefinite media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 1032–1043 (2004).
[Crossref]

D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, P. Kolinko, and P. Rye, “Partial focusing of radiation by a slab of indefinite media,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244–2246 (2004).
[Crossref]

Korobkin, D.

Koschny, T.

A. Fang, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Optical anisotropic metamaterials: Negative refraction and focusing,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 245127 (2009).
[Crossref]

Kwon, D.

X. Wang, D. Kwon, D. H. Werner, and I. C. Khoo, “Tunable optical negative-index metamaterials employing anisotropic liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 143122 (2007).
[Crossref]

D. H. Werner, D. Kwon, I. C. Khoo, A. V. Kildishev, and V. M. Shalaev, “Liquid crystal clad near-infrared metamaterials with tunable negative-zero-positive refractive indices,” Opt. Express 15, 3342–3347 (2007).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Lee, H.

Li, B.

J. Sun, J. Zhou, B. Li, and Feiyu Kang, “Indefinite permittivity and negative refraction in natural material: Graphite,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 101901 (2011).
[Crossref]

Li, H.

L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010).
[Crossref]

M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009).
[Crossref]

Li, J.

S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
[Crossref]

Li, X.

J. Yang, X. Hu, X. Li, Z. Liu, X. Jiang, and J. Zi, “Cancellation of reflection and transmission at metamaterial surfaces,” Opt. Lett. 35, 16–18 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Z. Liu, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, X. Hu, X. Li, and J. Zi, “Hyper-interface, the bridge between radiative wave and evanescent wave,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113507 (2010).
[Crossref]

Liang, X.

Liang, Z.

Z. Liu, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, X. Hu, X. Li, and J. Zi, “Hyper-interface, the bridge between radiative wave and evanescent wave,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113507 (2010).
[Crossref]

Liou, J.

I. C. Khoo, A. Diaz, J. Liou, M. V. Stinger, J. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Liquid Crystals Tunable Optical Metamaterials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 410–417 (2010).
[Crossref]

Liu, Y.

Liu, Z.

Lu, W. T.

B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010).
[Crossref]

Y. J. Huang, W. T. Lu, and S. Sridhar, “Nanowire waveguide made from extremely anisotropic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 063836 (2008).
[Crossref]

Ma, Y.

I. C. Khoo, A. Diaz, J. Liou, M. V. Stinger, J. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Liquid Crystals Tunable Optical Metamaterials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 410–417 (2010).
[Crossref]

Menon, L.

B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010).
[Crossref]

Minovich, A.

A. Minovich, D. N. Neshev, D. A. Powell, I. V. Shadrivov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 193103 (2010).

Mitus, A. C.

Mock, J. J.

D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, P. Kolinko, and P. Rye, “Partial focusing of radiation by a slab of indefinite media,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244–2246 (2004).
[Crossref]

Narimanov, E.

Narimanov, E. E.

L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010).
[Crossref]

M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009).
[Crossref]

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Neshev, D. N.

A. Minovich, D. N. Neshev, D. A. Powell, I. V. Shadrivov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 193103 (2010).

Neuner, B.

Noginov, M. A.

L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010).
[Crossref]

M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009).
[Crossref]

Osipov, M. A.

M. V. Gorkunov and M. A. Osipov, “Tunability of wire-grid metamaterial immersed into nematic liquid crystal,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 036101 (2008).
[Crossref]

Palik, E. D.

E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants (Academic, 1985).

Park, K.

Park, W.

Patel, J. S.

J. S. Patel and H. Yokoyama, “Continuous anchoring transition in liquid crystals,” Nature 362525–527 (1993).
[Crossref]

Pawlik, G.

Podolskiy, V. A.

J. Elser, R. Wangberg, and V. A. Podolskiy, “Nanowire metamaterials with extreme optical anisotropy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 261102 (2006).
[Crossref]

Podolsky, V. A.

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Powell, D. A.

A. Minovich, D. N. Neshev, D. A. Powell, I. V. Shadrivov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 193103 (2010).

Pratibha, R.

Rye, P.

D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, P. Kolinko, and P. Rye, “Partial focusing of radiation by a slab of indefinite media,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244–2246 (2004).
[Crossref]

Sage, I. C.

G. P. Bryan-Brown, E. L. Wood, and I. C. Sage, “Weak surface anchoring of liquid crystals,” Nature 399338–340 (1999).
[Crossref]

Schilling, J.

J. Schilling, “Uniaxial metallo-dielectric metamaterials with scalar positive permeability,” Phys. Rev. E 74, 046618 (2006).
[Crossref]

Schurig, D.

D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, P. Kolinko, and P. Rye, “Partial focusing of radiation by a slab of indefinite media,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244–2246 (2004).
[Crossref]

D. R. Smith, P. Kolinko, and D. Schurig, “Negative refraction in indefinite media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 1032–1043 (2004).
[Crossref]

D. R. Smith and D. Schurig, “Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in Media with Indefinite Permittivity and Permeability Tensors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077405 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Shadrivov, I. V.

A. Minovich, D. N. Neshev, D. A. Powell, I. V. Shadrivov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 193103 (2010).

Shalaev, V. M.

Shvets, G.

Sihvola, A.

A. Sihvola, “Mixing Rules with Complex Dielectric Coefficients,” Subsurf. Sens. Technol. and Appl. 1, 393–415 (2000).
[Crossref]

Sivco, D. L.

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Smalyukh, I. I.

Smith, D. R.

D. R. Smith, P. Kolinko, and D. Schurig, “Negative refraction in indefinite media,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21, 1032–1043 (2004).
[Crossref]

D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, P. Kolinko, and P. Rye, “Partial focusing of radiation by a slab of indefinite media,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244–2246 (2004).
[Crossref]

D. R. Smith and D. Schurig, “Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in Media with Indefinite Permittivity and Permeability Tensors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077405 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Soukoulis, C. M.

A. Fang, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Optical anisotropic metamaterials: Negative refraction and focusing,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 245127 (2009).
[Crossref]

Spadlo, A.

S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
[Crossref]

Sridhar, S.

Y. J. Huang, W. T. Lu, and S. Sridhar, “Nanowire waveguide made from extremely anisotropic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 063836 (2008).
[Crossref]

Sridhara, S.

B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010).
[Crossref]

Stepanyan, R.

R. Stepanyan, “Effective dielectric properties of composite materials in the surface layer,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 073403 (2003).
[Crossref]

Stinger, M. V.

I. C. Khoo, A. Diaz, J. Liou, M. V. Stinger, J. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Liquid Crystals Tunable Optical Metamaterials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 410–417 (2010).
[Crossref]

Sun, C.

Sun, J.

J. Sun, J. Zhou, B. Li, and Feiyu Kang, “Indefinite permittivity and negative refraction in natural material: Graphite,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 101901 (2011).
[Crossref]

R. Wang, J. Sun, and J. Zhoua, “Indefinite permittivity in uniaxial single crystal at infrared frequency,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 031912 (2010).
[Crossref]

Tsai, K. T.

Tumkur, T.

L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010).
[Crossref]

M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009).
[Crossref]

Tzeng, Y. N.

S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
[Crossref]

Walasik, W.

Wang, R.

R. Wang, J. Sun, and J. Zhoua, “Indefinite permittivity in uniaxial single crystal at infrared frequency,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 031912 (2010).
[Crossref]

Wang, X.

X. Wang, D. Kwon, D. H. Werner, and I. C. Khoo, “Tunable optical negative-index metamaterials employing anisotropic liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 143122 (2007).
[Crossref]

Wang, Y.

Wang, Y. L.

Wangberg, R.

J. Elser, R. Wangberg, and V. A. Podolskiy, “Nanowire metamaterials with extreme optical anisotropy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 261102 (2006).
[Crossref]

Wasserman, D.

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Werner, D. H.

Wood, E. L.

G. P. Bryan-Brown, E. L. Wood, and I. C. Sage, “Weak surface anchoring of liquid crystals,” Nature 399338–340 (1999).
[Crossref]

Wu, S. T.

S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
[Crossref]

Xiong, Y.

Yang, J.

Yao, J.

Yokoyama, H.

J. S. Patel and H. Yokoyama, “Continuous anchoring transition in liquid crystals,” Nature 362525–527 (1993).
[Crossref]

Zhang, X.

Zhao, J.

J. Zhao, Yan Chen, and Y. Feng, “Polarization beam splitting through an anisotropic metamaterial slab realized by a layered metal-dielectric structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 071114 (2008).
[Crossref]

Zhou, J.

J. Sun, J. Zhou, B. Li, and Feiyu Kang, “Indefinite permittivity and negative refraction in natural material: Graphite,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 101901 (2011).
[Crossref]

Zhoua, J.

R. Wang, J. Sun, and J. Zhoua, “Indefinite permittivity in uniaxial single crystal at infrared frequency,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 031912 (2010).
[Crossref]

Zhu, G.

M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009).
[Crossref]

Zi, J.

J. Yang, X. Hu, X. Li, Z. Liu, X. Jiang, and J. Zi, “Cancellation of reflection and transmission at metamaterial surfaces,” Opt. Lett. 35, 16–18 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Z. Liu, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, X. Hu, X. Li, and J. Zi, “Hyper-interface, the bridge between radiative wave and evanescent wave,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113507 (2010).
[Crossref]

Appl. Phys. Lett. (11)

D. R. Smith, D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, P. Kolinko, and P. Rye, “Partial focusing of radiation by a slab of indefinite media,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2244–2246 (2004).
[Crossref]

B. D. F. Casse, W. T. Lu, Y. J. Huang, E. Gultepe, L. Menon, and S. Sridhara, “Super-resolution imaging using a three-dimensional metamaterials nanolens,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 023114 (2010).
[Crossref]

Z. Liu, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, X. Hu, X. Li, and J. Zi, “Hyper-interface, the bridge between radiative wave and evanescent wave,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113507 (2010).
[Crossref]

J. Zhao, Yan Chen, and Y. Feng, “Polarization beam splitting through an anisotropic metamaterial slab realized by a layered metal-dielectric structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 071114 (2008).
[Crossref]

L. V. Alekseyev, E. E. Narimanov, T. Tumkur, H. Li, Yu. A. Barnakov, and M. A. Noginov, “Uniaxial epsilon-near-zero metamaterial for angular filtering and polarization control,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 131107 (2010).
[Crossref]

J. Elser, R. Wangberg, and V. A. Podolskiy, “Nanowire metamaterials with extreme optical anisotropy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 261102 (2006).
[Crossref]

M. A. Noginov, Yu. A. Barnakov, G. Zhu, T. Tumkur, H. Li, and E. E. Narimanov, “Bulk photonic metamaterial with hyperbolic dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 151105 (2009).
[Crossref]

J. Sun, J. Zhou, B. Li, and Feiyu Kang, “Indefinite permittivity and negative refraction in natural material: Graphite,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 101901 (2011).
[Crossref]

R. Wang, J. Sun, and J. Zhoua, “Indefinite permittivity in uniaxial single crystal at infrared frequency,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 031912 (2010).
[Crossref]

X. Wang, D. Kwon, D. H. Werner, and I. C. Khoo, “Tunable optical negative-index metamaterials employing anisotropic liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 143122 (2007).
[Crossref]

A. Minovich, D. N. Neshev, D. A. Powell, I. V. Shadrivov, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Tunable fishnet metamaterials infiltrated by liquid crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 193103 (2010).

IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. (1)

I. C. Khoo, A. Diaz, J. Liou, M. V. Stinger, J. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Liquid Crystals Tunable Optical Metamaterials,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 410–417 (2010).
[Crossref]

J. Appl. Phys. (1)

M. V. Gorkunov and M. A. Osipov, “Tunability of wire-grid metamaterial immersed into nematic liquid crystal,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 036101 (2008).
[Crossref]

J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (2)

Liq. Cryst. (1)

S. Gauza, J. Li, S. T. Wu, A. Spadlo, R. Dabrowski, Y. N. Tzeng, and K. L. Cheng, “High birefringence and high resistivity isothiocyanate-based nematic liquid crystal mixtures,” Liq. Cryst. 32, 10771085 (2005).
[Crossref]

Nat. Materials (1)

A. J. Hoffman, L. Alekseyev, S. S. Howard, K. J. Franz, D. Wasserman, V. A. Podolsky, E. E. Narimanov, D. L. Sivco, and C. Gmachl, “Negative refraction in semiconductor metamaterials,” Nat. Materials 6, 946–950 (2007).
[Crossref]

Nature (2)

J. S. Patel and H. Yokoyama, “Continuous anchoring transition in liquid crystals,” Nature 362525–527 (1993).
[Crossref]

G. P. Bryan-Brown, E. L. Wood, and I. C. Sage, “Weak surface anchoring of liquid crystals,” Nature 399338–340 (1999).
[Crossref]

Opt. Express (7)

Opt. Lett. (2)

Phys. Rev. A (1)

Y. J. Huang, W. T. Lu, and S. Sridhar, “Nanowire waveguide made from extremely anisotropic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 063836 (2008).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. B (2)

A. Fang, T. Koschny, and C. M. Soukoulis, “Optical anisotropic metamaterials: Negative refraction and focusing,” Phys. Rev. B 79, 245127 (2009).
[Crossref]

R. Stepanyan, “Effective dielectric properties of composite materials in the surface layer,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 073403 (2003).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. E (1)

J. Schilling, “Uniaxial metallo-dielectric metamaterials with scalar positive permeability,” Phys. Rev. E 74, 046618 (2006).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (1)

D. R. Smith and D. Schurig, “Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in Media with Indefinite Permittivity and Permeability Tensors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 077405 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Subsurf. Sens. Technol. and Appl. (1)

A. Sihvola, “Mixing Rules with Complex Dielectric Coefficients,” Subsurf. Sens. Technol. and Appl. 1, 393–415 (2000).
[Crossref]

Other (1)

E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants (Academic, 1985).

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Setup geometry. The liquid crystal (LC) fills the slab of thickness L, it is sandwiched between two silica layers of thickness d and it hosts silver nanoparticles (Ag) of radius r. The externally applied electric field E S , inclined at an angle ϕ with the z-axis, aligns the liquid crystal molecules in the direction of the unit vector (parallel to the electric field). The vacuum electromagnetic plane wave is made to impinge orthogonally onto the device interface.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Dielectric permittivities as a function of the vacuum wavelength λ. (a) Ordinary and extraordinary permittivities of the LC. (b) Real and imaginary parts of the silver permittivity. (c) Real and imaginary parts of the ordinary and extraordinary permittivities of the homogeneous effective medium. The shaded region (λ 1 < λ < λ 2, where λ 1 = 418 nm and λ 2 = 427.5 nm) corresponds to the spectral range where the effective permittivity tensor is indefinite.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Dependence of the wavelengths λ 1(f) and λ 2(f), characterizing the spectral region λ 1(f) < λ < λ 2(f) where the medium is indefinite, on the nanoparticle volume filling fraction f for 0.02 < f < 0.1.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) Plot of the transmissivity of the device reported in Fig.1 (evaluated using the effective medium model for the LC/nanoparticels mixture) as a function of the vacuum wavelength of the incident radiation and the angle ϕ. (b) Level plot of the transmissivity of panel (a) restricted to region II where the effective medium has indefinite permittivity.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Transmissivity T(ϕ) for λ = 420 nm extracted from Fig.4(a). In the insets, the extraordinary waves hyperbolas of Eq.(4) are plotted in the two relevant situations (A) ϕ = 20° and (B) ϕ = 80° (regarding the permittivities as real quantities).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 (a) Device transmissivity T as a function of the vacuum wavelength λ and the angle ϕ evaluated through full wave simulations. (b) Transmissivity T (ϕ) extracted from panel (a) at three different wavelengths where the mixture displays indefinite character.

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

R = ( cos φ 0 sin φ 0 1 0 sin φ 0 cos φ )
ɛ j ( e f f ) = [ 1 + f ( ɛ ( A g ) ɛ j ( L C ) ) ɛ j ( L C ) + ( 1 f ) N j ( ɛ ( A g ) ɛ j ( L C ) ) ] ɛ j ( L C ) ,
N j = ɛ j ( L C ) 2 0 + d s 1 ( 1 + s ɛ o ( L C ) ) 2 ( 1 + s ɛ e ( L C ) ) 1 ( 1 + s ɛ j ( L C ) ) .
k x 2 ɛ e ( e f f ) + k z 2 ɛ o ( e f f ) = k 0 2 ,
K ( φ ) = k 0 ɛ o ( e f f ) ɛ e ( e f f ) ɛ o ( e f f ) sin 2 φ + ɛ e ( e f f ) cos 2 φ ,

Metrics