Abstract

In this erratum, we correct mistakes in Eqs. (6), (8), and (9), typo in Eq. (11), as well as lattice period magnitudes and units in Fig. 1. We also update the funding information in Opt. Lett. 43, 3188 (2018) [CrossRef]  .

© 2018 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. C. Liang, X. Zhu, C. Mi, X. Peng, F. Wang, Y. Cai, and S. A. Ponomarenko, Opt. Lett. 43, 3188 (2018).
    [Crossref]

2018 (1)

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (1)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a1)–(c1) OCL distributions p with triangle, square, and hexagon patterns, respectively; (a2)–(c2) modulus of the source degree of coherence | μ | of the corresponding OCLs. (a3)–(c3) radiant intensity distributions of the generated quasi-BBAs with different beam orders. The radiant intensity distributions are normalized by the peak intensity.

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

I ( s ) 1 M n = 1 M | τ ˜ ( k s + V 0 n ) | 2 ,
I ( s ) n = 1 M J l 2 ( R | k s + V 0 n | ) .
p ( u ) = 1 M n = 1 M exp [ ( u U 0 n ) 2 / 2 w s 2 ] ,
τ ˜ ( r ) τ ( ρ ) exp ( i k r · ρ / f 2 ) d 2 ρ .

Metrics