Abstract

A tunable polarization-independent coherent perfect absorber (CPA) is proposed based on the metal-graphene hollowed-out cross array nanostructure at the mid-infrared region. By adjusting the phase difference between the incident beams, the coherent absorption at 9969nm is all-optically modulated from 99.97% to nearly 0 with the modulation depth over 80dB. The absorption resonance of the CPA is tuned by the gate-controlled Fermi energy with the coherent absorption remaining nearly 100%. The CPA is also found to be angular insensitive to incident beams within the range of −12° to 12°. The central-symmetry nanostructure leads to the polarization independence and the introduced graphene layer results in the electrical tunability of the CPA at the absorption resonance, which have prospects in applications such as for tunable mid-infrared detectors, transducers, modulators, and optical switches.

© 2017 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Coherent perfect absorption, which relies on the suppression of the scattering waves, has attracted much attention [1–4] for the all-optical tunability of absorption through the interference of the two counter-propagating coherent incident beams. The coherent perfect absorber (CPA) was first realized in a simple Si slab cavity illuminated in the 500 – 900nm range [5], and has been theoretically analyzed with the scattering matrix by Stone’s group [6]. Then the CPA with different structures have been proposed successively. A free-standing corrugated metal film CPA was proposed by Gupta’s group [7], in which the specular order energy is suppressed and converted into the surface plasmon. The broadband nearly coherent perfect absorber is studied by Luo’s group [8] with the heavily doping ultrathin silicon film. A perfect magnetic conductor (PMC) surface covered by an ultrathin conductive film has been fabricated to accomplish the single-beam illuminated coherent perfect absorption by Wang’s group [9]. With a heterogeneous metal-dielectric structure, the tunability of the absorption resonance wavelength of the CPA is achieved [10], which is further explored in the graphene-based system including the monolayer graphene quasi-CPA and the metal-graphene metamaterial surface quasi-CPA [11–14].

In this paper, a tunable polarization-independent metal-graphene coherent perfect absorber (CPA) with the central-symmetry etched cross array nanostructure is proposed at mid-infrared region. The scattering matrix is used to demonstrate the principle of coherent absorption and the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method is employed to analyze the tunability of the CPA. When the incoherent absorption limit is matched, the polarization-independent coherent perfect absorption is achieved at the absorption resonance. The coherent absorption is all-optically modulated from nearly 100% to zero by tuning the phase difference between coherent incident beams. By adding the graphene layer, the absorption resonance of the CPA is electrically tuned with the Fermi energy. And within range of incident angle θ = −12° to θ = 12°, the CPA is angular insensitive. The electric tunability of the absorption resonance and the central-symmetry metal-graphene nanostructure enable the CPA promising in the tunable polarization-independent detections, modulators, transducers and switches at mid-infrared region.

2. Principle

The schematic of the tunable polarization-independent metal-graphene coherent perfect absorber (CPA) is shown in Fig. 1, which is composed of the hollowed-out cross array in the golden film placed on the graphene-covered glass substrate. The geometric parameters of unit cell of the CPA are shown in Fig. 1(b). The length and width of the cross structure is a1 = 3100nm and a2 = 360nm, respectively. The thickness of the gold film is 100nm. The thickness of glass substrate is 2mm. The period of CPA unit is P = 8150nm. The refractive index of the environment at the upper and lower side of the CPA is the same, which builds a symmetric environment. The incident laser beams I1 and I2 with identical incident polarization and angle impact on the CPA from above and below, respectively. I1 = αeI2, where α is the relative amplitude of I2 compare with I1, β is the phase difference between I1 and I2. O1 and O2 are the output beams scattering to the upper and lower side, respectively.

 

Fig. 1 (a) The schematic of the tunable polarization-independent metal-graphene coherent perfect absorber. (b) The unit cell of the metal-graphene CPA nanostructure

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

When only incident beam I1 impacts on the CPA, which is defined as incoherent illumination, the incoherent absorption of the CPA at the condition that the thickness of CPA is much smaller than the wavelength of incident beam is derived [15]:

A=1(|r|2+|t|2)=1RT
where r and t are the reflection and transmission coefficients of the CPA, respectively; R and T are the transmittance and reflectivity, respectively. In the symmetric environment, r and t of the CPA are written as [16]:
r=η,t=1+η
where η is the self-consistent amplitude depends on the parameter of the geometry and material, incident wavelength and angle. On the basis of Eq. (1) and Eq. (2), the maximum incoherent absorption of the CPA is derived Amax = 0.5 at η = −0.5 and R = T = 0.25, which is called incoherent absorption limit.

When two incident beams I1 and I2 oppositely impinge on the CPA, which is defined as coherent illumination, the input beams I1, I2 and the output beams O1, O2 are related by the scattering matrix S [15]:

[O1O2]=S[I1I2]=[r1 t2 t1 r2 ][I1I2]
where r1 , r2 , and t1 , t2  are the reflection and transmission coefficients of each side, respectively. In the symmetry environment, the scattering matrix S owns the same transmission and reflection coefficients in both upper and lower direction: r1 =r2 =r, t1 =t2 =t. Utilizing Eq. (3) and I1 = αeI2, the coherent absorption of the CPA is derived:
Aco=1|O1|2+|O2|2|I1|2+|I2|2=1|r1 I1+t2 I2|2+|r2 I2+t1 I1|2|I1|2+|I2|2=1|r+tαeiβ|2+|t+rαeiβ|21+α2
When the incoherent absorption limit is satisfied, there is r′ = −0.5 and t′ = 0.5. Hence, Eq. (4) is rewritten as:
Aco=11/21+α22αcosβ1+α2
From Eq. (5) the maximum coherent absorption Acomax = 1 is obtained with the α = 1 and β = 2 (N is integer). On the basis of Eq. (5), the coherent absorption Aco can be tuned by changing α or β. Especially when α = 1, the coherent absorption of the CPA varies between 0 and 1 with β, therefore the all-optical modulated switch is achieved.

3. Simulation

The characteristics of the tunable polarization-independent metal-graphene CPA are simulated by a 3-dimension finite-difference time-domain(FDTD) solution. A Johnson and Christy model is used to describe the relative permittivity ϵg of gold [17]. The conductivity of graphene is computed from Kubo formula:

σ(ω)=ie2(ω2iΓ)π2[1(ω2iΓ)20ϵ(fd(ϵ)ϵfd(ϵ)ϵ)dϵ0fd(ϵ)fd(ϵ)(ω2iΓ)24(ϵ/)2dϵ]
where fd(ϵ)=(e(ϵEF)/(kBT)+1)1 is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, ϵ is the permittivity of graphene, kB is the Boltzman constant, T is the temperature, EF is the Fermi energy of graphene, ω is the angular frequency and ħΓ = 0.001eV is the scattering rate [18].

The spectrum characteristics of the metal-graphene CPA are simulated by the FDTD solution with Fermi energy EF = 0.2eV. Under the incoherent illumination with p polarized incident beam, the simulated transmission, reflection and absorption spectra of the CPA are represented as the black, red and blue curve in Fig. 2(a), respectively. The transmission spectrum intersects with the reflection spectrum at λ = 9969nm where the absorption spectrum climbs to the peak. The excited surface plasmon resonance, corresponding to the peak in the absorption spectrum, results in the enhancement of the incoherent absorption, therefore the incoherent absorption limit is satisfied. The simulated transmission, reflection and absorption spectra of the CPA under the coherent illumination with two identical p polarized incident beams are shown by the black, red and blue curve in Fig. 2(b), respectively. The transmission spectrum and the reflection spectrum of the CPA almost overlap totally and both of them decline to near 0 at λ = 9969nm where the coherent perfect absorption is obtained with Acomax = 99.97%. The surface plasmon resonance excited by the incident beams interact with each other which eventually leads to the coherent perfect absorption at λ = 9969nm. The absorption spectrum of coherent illumination with s polarized incident beams shown by the purple dash curve in Fig. 2(b) is also simulated, which is highly fitted with that of with p polarized incident beams. Hence the metal-graphene CPA is a polarization-independent device. The electrical field distribution at the resonance peak with p and s polarized incident beam are shown in Fig. 2(c). The electrical field energy concentrates from the horizontal bar to vertical bar of the hollowed-out cross structure when the polarization of incident beams switches from s to p. Though the electric field distribution with different polarized incident beams are different, the absorption remains the same due to the central symmetry of the hollowed-out cross array structure, resulting the polarization independent of the metal-graphene CPA.

 

Fig. 2 (a)The simulated transmission, reflection and absorption spectra with the p polarization under the incoherent illumination. (b) The simulated transmission, reflection and absorption spectra with the p polarization under the coherent illumination and the absorption spectrum with the s polarization under the coherent illumination. (c) The simulated electric filed distribution at the absorption resonance of the coherent illumination under the p and s polarization, respectively.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The modulation of coherent absorption of the metal-graphene CPA with the changed phase difference β between incident beams is simulated with Fermi energy EF = 0.2eV. The correspond coherent absorption, transmission and reflection of the CPA versus the phase difference between the two incident beams at the absorption resonance λ = 9969nm are shown by the black, red and blue curve in Fig. 3, respectively. The incident beams are p polarized and the relative amplitude of the beams is α = 1. The coherent absorption of the CPA changes as a function of β. At β = 2, the coherent perfect absorption is achieved with Acomax=99.97% where the transmission and reflection decline to near 0. At β = (2N + 1)π, the coherent absorption drops to near 0 where the transmission and reflection both rise to around 50%. When the β changes from 2N π to (2N + 1)π, the coherent absorption Aco of the CPA adjusts from the maximum and minimum, and the transmission and reflection move from nearly 0 to 50%, which is fitted with the conclusion derived from the Eq. (5). The interaction of the surface plasmon resonance excited by the incident beams changes with the variation of β, which leads to the modulation of the coherent absorption of the CPA. The modulation depth D versus the wavelength λ is shown in inset. At resonance wavelength λ = 9969nm, the modulation depth is the highest. By controlling the phase difference between the incident beams, the all-optical modulation is achieved, especially, when β = 2 the coherent perfect absorption is accomplished.

 

Fig. 3 The simulated coherent absorption, transmission and reflection versus the phase difference between two incident beams at the absorption resonance wavelength λ = 9969nm. The inset is the simulated modulation depth D of the metal-graphene CPA.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The coherent absorption spectra of the metal-graphene CPA with various hollowed-out cross structure size are simulated with the Fermi energy EF = 0.2eV. When the hollowed-out cross structure length a1 decrease from 3100nm to 2900nm with fixed a2 = 360nm, the absorption resonance of the coherent absorption spectrum of the CPA blue shifts from the 9969nm to the 9557nm as shown in Fig. 4(a). When the hollowed-out cross structure width a2 ranges from 300nm to 420nm with fixed a1=3100nm, the coherent absorption spectrum has been changed for less than 100nm as shown in the Fig. 4(b). The effective circuits models for CPA has been used [19, 20] to analyse the tunability of the absorption resonance, which the hollowed-out cross in the gold film has been interpreted as the equivalent capacitance CR and the graphene film has been represented as the equivalent resistance RG and the equivalent inductance LG. When the geometric parameter of CPA has been changed, CR, RG and LG have been changed correspondingly, which leads to the variation in the absorption resonance. The coherent absorption is almost unchanged at the absorption resonance with different a1 and a2, of which the spectrum position for η = −0.5 is shifted to maintain the coherent perfect absorption.

 

Fig. 4 The simulated coherent absorption spectra of the metal-graphene CPA with (a) different hollowed-out cross structure length a1, (b) different hollowed-out cross structure width a2, (c) different Fermi energies. And (d) is the effective circuit model of the CPA.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The coherent absorption spectra of the metal-graphene CPA with different Fermi energies EF are simulated with the fixed hollowed-out cross structure a1 = 3100nm and a2 = 360nm. When the Fermi energy of the graphene increases from 0.2eV to 0.8eV, the absorption resonance of the coherent absorption spectrum blue shifts from 9969nm to 9313nm with the maximum coherent absorption of the CPA almost unchanged as shown in Fig. 4(c). By changing the Fermi energy of the graphene through applied voltage, the absorption resonance has been tuned with the varied equivalent inductance LG and equivalent resistance RG. The maximum coherent absorption is almost unchanged, where the self-consist amplitude η has been maintained to −0.5 to achieve the coherent perfect absorption [21, 22]. Comparing with the adjustment of the geometric parameter of the CPA, the actively tuning of the absorption resonance wavelength by Fermi energy of graphene layer is much more flexible, high-speed and efficient.

The performance of the metal-graphene CPA dependent on the different incident angles θ are also simulated with EF = 0.2eV. The simulated coherent absorption spectra with the different incident angles θ are shown in Fig. 5(a). With the incident angle θ moving from −12° to 12°, the simulated absorption spectra are almost unchanged. Meanwhile, the coherent absorption of the CPA versus the phase difference between the incident beams are also simulated with different incident angles θ at λ = 9969, as shown in Fig. 5(b). For different incident angles, the curves all overlap with each other. With fixed material and geometric parameter of the CPA, the η is almost invariable within the incident angle range from −12° to 12° [23, 24].

 

Fig. 5 (a) The coherent absorption spectra of the metal-graphene CPA with the different incident angles θ. (b) The coherent absorption of the metal-graphene CPA versus the phase difference between the incident beams with different incident angles θ.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

With the central-symmetry metal-graphene nanostructure, the polarization-independent coherent perfect absorption is achieved at the absorption resonance. By changing the phase difference between the incident beams, the coherent absorption is optically modulated. And the absorption resonance wavelength of CPA is electrically tuned with Fermi energy, which is much faster and more convenient than geometric adjustment. Though in our simulation the insensitivity to the incident angle is observed within −12° to 12°, it could be adjusted by the variation of the materials and the geometric parameter of the CPA for different application.

4. Conclusion

In summary, a tunable polarization-independent metal-graphene coherent perfect absorber (CPA) is designed at mid-infrared region. The coherent perfect absorption of the CPA is analyzed with the scattering matrix and simulated with the FDTD solution. The coherent absorption is all-optically tuned by the phase difference between the incident beams, meanwhile the absorption resonance wavelength of the coherent perfect absorption is dynamically modulated with the gate-controlled Fermi energy. Within the range of incident angle −12° to 12°, the metal-graphene CPA is angular insensitive to the incident angle. By introducing the graphene layer, the CPA has the ability to electrically tune the absorption resonance efficiently and conveniently, which is helpful in applications such as the tunable detector, sensor and switches in mid-infrared wavelength.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61378067, 61675131).

References and links

1. S. Longhi, “Non-reciprocal transmission in photonic lattices based on unidirectional coherent perfect absorption,” Opt. Lett. 40, 1278–1281 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. S. Mukherjee and S. D. Gupta, “Coherent perfect absorption mediated enhancement of transverse spin in a gap plasmon guide,” Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 30001 (2016). [CrossRef]  

3. S. Longhi, “Coherent perfect absorption in a homogeneously-broadened two-level medium,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 911–915 (2011). [CrossRef]  

4. S. Longhi and G. D. Valle, “Coherent perfect absorbers for transient, periodic or chaotic optical fields: time-reversed lasers beyond threshold,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 5272–5291 (2012). [CrossRef]  

5. W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, “Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. S. Dutta-Gupta, R. Deshmukh, A. V. Gopal, O. J. F. Martin, and S. D. Gupta, “Coherent perfect absorption mediated anomalous reflection and refraction,” Opt. Lett. 37, 4452–4454 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. C. Wang, C. Huang, C. Hu, M. Wang, M. Pu, Q. Feng, X. Luo, X. Ma, and Z. Zhao, “Ultrathin broadband nearly perfect absorber with symmetrical coherent illumination,” Opt. Express 20, 2246 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. S. Dutta-Gupta, O. J. Martin, S. D. Gupta, and G. S. Agarwal, “Controllable coherent perfect absorption in a composite film,” Opt. Express 20, 1330–1336 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. Y. Fan, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, and H. Li, “Tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption in a monolayer graphene,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6269–6272 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016). [CrossRef]  

14. X. Hu and J. Wang, “High-speed gate-tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption using a split-ring graphene,” Opt. Lett. 40, 5538–5541 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. J. Zhang, C. Guo, K. Liu, Z. Zhu, W. Ye, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Coherent perfect absorption and transparency in a nanostructured graphene film,” Opt. Express 22, 12524–12532 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. S. Thongrattanasiri, F. H. Koppens, and F. J. G. De Abajo, and , “Complete optical absorption in periodically patterned graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 047401 (2012). [CrossRef]  

17. P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]  

18. G. W. Hanson, “Dyadic green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 19912 (2008). [CrossRef]  

19. Y. Bao, S. Zu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Fang, “Active control of graphene-based unidirectional surface plasmon launcher,” Acs Photonics 2, 1335 (2015). [CrossRef]  

20. K. Arik, S. Abdollahramezani, and A. Khavasi, “Polarization insensitive and broadband terahertz absorber using graphene disks,” Plasmonics 12, 1–6 (2017). [CrossRef]  

21. S. Abdollahramezani, K. Arik, A. Khavasi, and Z. Kavehvash, “Analog computing using graphene-based metalines,” Opt. Lett. 40, 5239–5242 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. S. Abdollahramezani, K. Arik, S. Farajollahi, A. Khavasi, and Z. Kavehvash, “Beam manipulating by gate-tunable graphene-based metasurfaces,” Opt. Lett. 40, 5383 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. X. Zhang and Y. Wu, “Scheme for achieving coherent perfect absorption by anisotropic metamaterials,” Opt. Express 25, 4860–4874 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. X. Kong, S. B. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Bian, and C. Chen, “Incident angle insensitive tunable multichannel perfect absorber consisting of nonlinear plasma and matching metamaterials,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 207402 (2014). [CrossRef]  

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. S. Longhi, “Non-reciprocal transmission in photonic lattices based on unidirectional coherent perfect absorption,” Opt. Lett. 40, 1278–1281 (2015).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. S. Mukherjee and S. D. Gupta, “Coherent perfect absorption mediated enhancement of transverse spin in a gap plasmon guide,” Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 30001 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  3. S. Longhi, “Coherent perfect absorption in a homogeneously-broadened two-level medium,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 911–915 (2011).
    [Crossref]
  4. S. Longhi and G. D. Valle, “Coherent perfect absorbers for transient, periodic or chaotic optical fields: time-reversed lasers beyond threshold,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 5272–5291 (2012).
    [Crossref]
  5. W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, “Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. S. Dutta-Gupta, R. Deshmukh, A. V. Gopal, O. J. F. Martin, and S. D. Gupta, “Coherent perfect absorption mediated anomalous reflection and refraction,” Opt. Lett. 37, 4452–4454 (2012).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. C. Wang, C. Huang, C. Hu, M. Wang, M. Pu, Q. Feng, X. Luo, X. Ma, and Z. Zhao, “Ultrathin broadband nearly perfect absorber with symmetrical coherent illumination,” Opt. Express 20, 2246 (2012).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. S. Dutta-Gupta, O. J. Martin, S. D. Gupta, and G. S. Agarwal, “Controllable coherent perfect absorption in a composite film,” Opt. Express 20, 1330–1336 (2012).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Y. Fan, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, and H. Li, “Tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption in a monolayer graphene,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6269–6272 (2014).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  14. X. Hu and J. Wang, “High-speed gate-tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption using a split-ring graphene,” Opt. Lett. 40, 5538–5541 (2015).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. J. Zhang, C. Guo, K. Liu, Z. Zhu, W. Ye, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Coherent perfect absorption and transparency in a nanostructured graphene film,” Opt. Express 22, 12524–12532 (2014).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. S. Thongrattanasiri, F. H. Koppens, and F. J. G. De Abajo, and , “Complete optical absorption in periodically patterned graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 047401 (2012).
    [Crossref]
  17. P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).
    [Crossref]
  18. G. W. Hanson, “Dyadic green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 19912 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  19. Y. Bao, S. Zu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Fang, “Active control of graphene-based unidirectional surface plasmon launcher,” Acs Photonics 2, 1335 (2015).
    [Crossref]
  20. K. Arik, S. Abdollahramezani, and A. Khavasi, “Polarization insensitive and broadband terahertz absorber using graphene disks,” Plasmonics 12, 1–6 (2017).
    [Crossref]
  21. S. Abdollahramezani, K. Arik, A. Khavasi, and Z. Kavehvash, “Analog computing using graphene-based metalines,” Opt. Lett. 40, 5239–5242 (2015).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. S. Abdollahramezani, K. Arik, S. Farajollahi, A. Khavasi, and Z. Kavehvash, “Beam manipulating by gate-tunable graphene-based metasurfaces,” Opt. Lett. 40, 5383 (2015).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. X. Zhang and Y. Wu, “Scheme for achieving coherent perfect absorption by anisotropic metamaterials,” Opt. Express 25, 4860–4874 (2017).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. X. Kong, S. B. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Bian, and C. Chen, “Incident angle insensitive tunable multichannel perfect absorber consisting of nonlinear plasma and matching metamaterials,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 207402 (2014).
    [Crossref]

2017 (2)

K. Arik, S. Abdollahramezani, and A. Khavasi, “Polarization insensitive and broadband terahertz absorber using graphene disks,” Plasmonics 12, 1–6 (2017).
[Crossref]

X. Zhang and Y. Wu, “Scheme for achieving coherent perfect absorption by anisotropic metamaterials,” Opt. Express 25, 4860–4874 (2017).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2016 (2)

S. Mukherjee and S. D. Gupta, “Coherent perfect absorption mediated enhancement of transverse spin in a gap plasmon guide,” Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 30001 (2016).
[Crossref]

N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016).
[Crossref]

2015 (6)

2014 (4)

X. Kong, S. B. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Bian, and C. Chen, “Incident angle insensitive tunable multichannel perfect absorber consisting of nonlinear plasma and matching metamaterials,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 207402 (2014).
[Crossref]

Y. Fan, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, and H. Li, “Tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption in a monolayer graphene,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6269–6272 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

J. Zhang, C. Guo, K. Liu, Z. Zhu, W. Ye, X. Yuan, and S. Qin, “Coherent perfect absorption and transparency in a nanostructured graphene film,” Opt. Express 22, 12524–12532 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2012 (5)

2011 (2)

W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

S. Longhi, “Coherent perfect absorption in a homogeneously-broadened two-level medium,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 911–915 (2011).
[Crossref]

2010 (1)

Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, “Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2008 (1)

G. W. Hanson, “Dyadic green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 19912 (2008).
[Crossref]

1972 (1)

P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).
[Crossref]

Abdollahramezani, S.

Agarwal, G. S.

Altan, H.

N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016).
[Crossref]

Anwar, S.

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Arik, K.

Balci, O.

N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016).
[Crossref]

Bao, Y.

Y. Bao, S. Zu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Fang, “Active control of graphene-based unidirectional surface plasmon launcher,” Acs Photonics 2, 1335 (2015).
[Crossref]

Bian, B.

X. Kong, S. B. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Bian, and C. Chen, “Incident angle insensitive tunable multichannel perfect absorber consisting of nonlinear plasma and matching metamaterials,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 207402 (2014).
[Crossref]

Cao, H.

W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, “Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Chen, C.

X. Kong, S. B. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Bian, and C. Chen, “Incident angle insensitive tunable multichannel perfect absorber consisting of nonlinear plasma and matching metamaterials,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 207402 (2014).
[Crossref]

Chong, Y.

W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Chong, Y. D.

Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, “Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Christy, R. W.

P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).
[Crossref]

De Abajo, F. J. G.

S. Thongrattanasiri, F. H. Koppens, and F. J. G. De Abajo, and , “Complete optical absorption in periodically patterned graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 047401 (2012).
[Crossref]

Deshmukh, R.

Dutta-Gupta, S.

Fan, Y.

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. Fan, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, and H. Li, “Tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption in a monolayer graphene,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6269–6272 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Fang, Z.

Y. Bao, S. Zu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Fang, “Active control of graphene-based unidirectional surface plasmon launcher,” Acs Photonics 2, 1335 (2015).
[Crossref]

Farajollahi, S.

Feng, Q.

Fu, Q.

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Ge, L.

W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, “Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Gopal, A. V.

Gu, C.

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Guo, C.

Gupta, S. D.

Hang, Z. H.

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Hanson, G. W.

G. W. Hanson, “Dyadic green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 19912 (2008).
[Crossref]

Hou, B.

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Hu, C.

Hu, X.

Huang, C.

Johnson, P. B.

P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).
[Crossref]

Kakenov, N.

N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016).
[Crossref]

Kavehvash, Z.

Khavasi, A.

Kocabas, C.

N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016).
[Crossref]

Kong, X.

X. Kong, S. B. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Bian, and C. Chen, “Incident angle insensitive tunable multichannel perfect absorber consisting of nonlinear plasma and matching metamaterials,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 207402 (2014).
[Crossref]

Koppens, F. H.

S. Thongrattanasiri, F. H. Koppens, and F. J. G. De Abajo, and , “Complete optical absorption in periodically patterned graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 047401 (2012).
[Crossref]

Lai, Y.

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Li, H.

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. Fan, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, and H. Li, “Tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption in a monolayer graphene,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6269–6272 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Li, J.

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Li, S.

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Liu, K.

Liu, S. B.

X. Kong, S. B. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Bian, and C. Chen, “Incident angle insensitive tunable multichannel perfect absorber consisting of nonlinear plasma and matching metamaterials,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 207402 (2014).
[Crossref]

Liu, Z.

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Longhi, S.

S. Longhi, “Non-reciprocal transmission in photonic lattices based on unidirectional coherent perfect absorption,” Opt. Lett. 40, 1278–1281 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

S. Longhi and G. D. Valle, “Coherent perfect absorbers for transient, periodic or chaotic optical fields: time-reversed lasers beyond threshold,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 5272–5291 (2012).
[Crossref]

S. Longhi, “Coherent perfect absorption in a homogeneously-broadened two-level medium,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 911–915 (2011).
[Crossref]

Lu, W.

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Luo, J.

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Luo, X.

Ma, X.

Martin, O. J.

Martin, O. J. F.

Mukherjee, S.

S. Mukherjee and S. D. Gupta, “Coherent perfect absorption mediated enhancement of transverse spin in a gap plasmon guide,” Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 30001 (2016).
[Crossref]

Noh, H.

W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Ozkan, V. A.

N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016).
[Crossref]

Pu, M.

Qin, S.

Shen, M.

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Stone, A. D.

W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, “Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Takan, T.

N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016).
[Crossref]

Thongrattanasiri, S.

S. Thongrattanasiri, F. H. Koppens, and F. J. G. De Abajo, and , “Complete optical absorption in periodically patterned graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 047401 (2012).
[Crossref]

Valle, G. D.

S. Longhi and G. D. Valle, “Coherent perfect absorbers for transient, periodic or chaotic optical fields: time-reversed lasers beyond threshold,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 5272–5291 (2012).
[Crossref]

Wan, W.

W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Wang, C.

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

C. Wang, C. Huang, C. Hu, M. Wang, M. Pu, Q. Feng, X. Luo, X. Ma, and Z. Zhao, “Ultrathin broadband nearly perfect absorber with symmetrical coherent illumination,” Opt. Express 20, 2246 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Wang, J.

Wang, M.

Wei, Z.

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. Fan, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, and H. Li, “Tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption in a monolayer graphene,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6269–6272 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Wu, Y.

Ye, W.

Yuan, X.

Zhang, F.

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. Fan, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, and H. Li, “Tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption in a monolayer graphene,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6269–6272 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Zhang, H.

X. Kong, S. B. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Bian, and C. Chen, “Incident angle insensitive tunable multichannel perfect absorber consisting of nonlinear plasma and matching metamaterials,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 207402 (2014).
[Crossref]

Zhang, J.

Zhang, X.

Zhang, Y.

Y. Bao, S. Zu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Fang, “Active control of graphene-based unidirectional surface plasmon launcher,” Acs Photonics 2, 1335 (2015).
[Crossref]

Zhao, Q.

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. Fan, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, and H. Li, “Tunable terahertz coherent perfect absorption in a monolayer graphene,” Opt. Lett. 39, 6269–6272 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Zhao, Z.

Zhu, Z.

Zu, S.

Y. Bao, S. Zu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Fang, “Active control of graphene-based unidirectional surface plasmon launcher,” Acs Photonics 2, 1335 (2015).
[Crossref]

ACS Photonics (1)

N. Kakenov, O. Balci, T. Takan, V. A. Ozkan, H. Altan, and C. Kocabas, “Observation of gate-tunable coherent perfect absorption of terahertz radiation in graphene,” ACS Photonics 3, 1531–1535 (2016).
[Crossref]

Y. Bao, S. Zu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Fang, “Active control of graphene-based unidirectional surface plasmon launcher,” Acs Photonics 2, 1335 (2015).
[Crossref]

Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. (1)

S. Mukherjee and S. D. Gupta, “Coherent perfect absorption mediated enhancement of transverse spin in a gap plasmon guide,” Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 30001 (2016).
[Crossref]

J. Appl. Phys. (1)

G. W. Hanson, “Dyadic green’s functions and guided surface waves for a surface conductivity model of graphene,” J. Appl. Phys. 103, 19912 (2008).
[Crossref]

Opt. Express (4)

Opt. Lett. (6)

Phys. Plasmas (1)

X. Kong, S. B. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Bian, and C. Chen, “Incident angle insensitive tunable multichannel perfect absorber consisting of nonlinear plasma and matching metamaterials,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 207402 (2014).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. A (2)

S. Longhi, “Coherent perfect absorption in a homogeneously-broadened two-level medium,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 911–915 (2011).
[Crossref]

S. Longhi and G. D. Valle, “Coherent perfect absorbers for transient, periodic or chaotic optical fields: time-reversed lasers beyond threshold,” Phys. Rev. A 85, 5272–5291 (2012).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. B (1)

P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of the noble metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6, 4370–4379 (1972).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (2)

S. Thongrattanasiri, F. H. Koppens, and F. J. G. De Abajo, and , “Complete optical absorption in periodically patterned graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 047401 (2012).
[Crossref]

Y. D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, “Coherent perfect absorbers: time-reversed lasers,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053901 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Plasmonics (1)

K. Arik, S. Abdollahramezani, and A. Khavasi, “Polarization insensitive and broadband terahertz absorber using graphene disks,” Plasmonics 12, 1–6 (2017).
[Crossref]

Sci. Rep. (2)

S. Li, J. Luo, S. Anwar, S. Li, W. Lu, Z. H. Hang, Y. Lai, B. Hou, M. Shen, and C. Wang, “An equivalent realization of coherent perfect absorption under single beam illumination,” Sci. Rep. 4, 7369 (2014).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. Fan, Z. Liu, F. Zhang, Q. Zhao, Z. Wei, Q. Fu, J. Li, C. Gu, and H. Li, “Tunable mid-infrared coherent perfect absorption in a graphene meta-surface,” Sci. Rep. 5, 13956 (2015).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Science (1)

W. Wan, Y. Chong, L. Ge, H. Noh, A. D. Stone, and H. Cao, “Time-reversed lasing and interferometric control of absorption,” Science 331, 889 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) The schematic of the tunable polarization-independent metal-graphene coherent perfect absorber. (b) The unit cell of the metal-graphene CPA nanostructure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a)The simulated transmission, reflection and absorption spectra with the p polarization under the incoherent illumination. (b) The simulated transmission, reflection and absorption spectra with the p polarization under the coherent illumination and the absorption spectrum with the s polarization under the coherent illumination. (c) The simulated electric filed distribution at the absorption resonance of the coherent illumination under the p and s polarization, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The simulated coherent absorption, transmission and reflection versus the phase difference between two incident beams at the absorption resonance wavelength λ = 9969nm. The inset is the simulated modulation depth D of the metal-graphene CPA.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The simulated coherent absorption spectra of the metal-graphene CPA with (a) different hollowed-out cross structure length a1, (b) different hollowed-out cross structure width a2, (c) different Fermi energies. And (d) is the effective circuit model of the CPA.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 (a) The coherent absorption spectra of the metal-graphene CPA with the different incident angles θ. (b) The coherent absorption of the metal-graphene CPA versus the phase difference between the incident beams with different incident angles θ.

Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

A = 1 ( | r | 2 + | t | 2 ) = 1 R T
r = η , t = 1 + η
[ O 1 O 2 ] = S [ I 1 I 2 ] = [ r 1   t 2   t 1   r 2   ] [ I 1 I 2 ]
A c o = 1 | O 1 | 2 + | O 2 | 2 | I 1 | 2 + | I 2 | 2 = 1 | r 1   I 1 + t 2   I 2 | 2 + | r 2   I 2 + t 1   I 1 | 2 | I 1 | 2 + | I 2 | 2 = 1 | r + t α e i β | 2 + | t + r α e i β | 2 1 + α 2
A c o = 1 1 / 2 1 + α 2 2 α c o s β 1 + α 2
σ ( ω ) = i e 2 ( ω 2 i Γ ) π 2 [ 1 ( ω 2 i Γ ) 2 0 ϵ ( f d ( ϵ ) ϵ f d ( ϵ ) ϵ ) d ϵ 0 f d ( ϵ ) f d ( ϵ ) ( ω 2 i Γ ) 2 4 ( ϵ / ) 2 d ϵ ]

Metrics