Abstract

We present a quantum theory of a spaser-based nanolaser, under the bad-cavity approximation. We find first- and second-order correlation functions g(1)(τ) and g(2)(τ) below and above the generation threshold, and obtain the average number of plasmons in the cavity. The latter is shown to be of the order of unity near the generation threshold, where the spectral line narrows considerably. In this case the coherence is preserved in a state of active atoms in contradiction to the good-cavity lasers, where the coherence is preserved in a state of photons. The damped oscillations in g(2)(τ) above the generation threshold indicate the unusual character of amplitude fluctuations of polarization and population, which become interconnected in this case. Obtained results allow to understand the fundamental principles of operation of nanolasers.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

In the last decade nanoplasmonics led to the emergence of many promising applications [1]. One of them is a near-field generator of nanolocalized coherent optical fields — spaser-based nanolaser or SPASER (surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation), which was shown to be an optical counterpart of the MOSFET (metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor) [2]. The device was proposed by D. Bergman and M. Stockman in the paper [3]. Operation principles of the spaser-based nanolaser are similar to operation principles of the usual laser, but instead of photons we deal with surface plasmons (SPs). The first experimental observations were made by M. Noginov’s group [4] and X. Zhang’s group [5] and they are dated back to year 2009.

Considerable spectral narrowing as compared to the spontaneous emission spectrum was observed above the generation threshold in both experiments. Generally, there are two main possible mechanisms which lead to the spectrum narrowing. For high Q-factor resonators, the narrowing is determined by the domination of stimulated emission of radiation and thus, by the large number of excited quanta in the resonator [6, 7]. This situation is typical for usual lasers. The opposite limit of low Q-factor resonators and relatively small excited quanta corresponds to spaser-based nanolaser operation [4]. In the case, the narrowing can be determined by large number of the excited atoms in the gain medium and their coherence, which is achieved by the mutual interaction of atoms through the resonator mode [8]. Here we show that the spaser-based nanolaser can produce narrow spectrum of generation even if the mean number of excited quanta in the resonator is of the order or less than unity, and find the spectrum of the generation and its statistics.

The exact analytical treatment of lasing involves quantum fluctuations, which are responsible for homogeneous broadening of the spectral line [6, 7]. Description of the laser with Maxwell-Bloch equations, see e.g. [2, 9], corresponds to mean-field approximation both for the resonator mode and atoms. We develop a theory which allows to account for quantum fluctuations in a low Q-factor resonator with the arbitrary number of quanta both below and above the generation threshold, which interacts with ensemble of N identical active atoms.

To solve the problem completely analytically we impose some restrictions. First, we assume that the cavity decay rate κ is the fastest rate in the system. Thus, the resonator mode can be adiabatically eliminated [10], and the state of the spaser-based nanolaser is fully characterized by the state of N identical two-level active atoms. Second, we believe N ≫ 1 and thereby the fluctuations of the state of atoms can be considered in the small-noise limit [7, ch.5.1.3]. Note that due to adiabatic mode elimination we can only resolve times τ ≫ 1/κ. The smaller times were considered in the paper [11], for the model with single active atom, N = 1, and below the generation threshold, when mean number of quanta in the resonator is well below unity.

The used method is well studied in laser physics, e.g. [12]. Here we present a self-consistent consideration from the firsts principles in the limit when active atoms have fast dephasing kinetics in comparison with transition lifetime [13, 14]. We describe the behaviour of the spaser-based nanolaser below and above generation threshold, and demonstrate that the spectral line narrows considerably, when passing through the threshold. We find the average number of plasmons in the cavity and show that this number near the generation threshold can be of the order of unity. In the case the coherence is preserved in a state of active atoms, which relax slowly than 1/κ. This fact fundamentally distinguishes the behaviour of the bad-cavity nanolasers in comparison with the good-cavity lasers, where the coherence is preserved in a state of photons. The evaluation for the number of plasmons is in accordance with the experimental observations [4]. We obtain second-order correlation function g(2)(τ) at κτ ≫ 1 and find that above the generation threshold the amplitude fluctuations of polarization of active atoms lead to the damped oscillations in g(2)(τ). A similar dependence was observed in numerical simulations in the paper [15], and it is usual for bad-cavity lasers [12]. In the opposite case of good-cavity lasers there is no oscillations in second-order correlation function [7]. Thus, the shape of the curve g(2)(τ) can be used as an indicator of the mechanism of the spectral line narrowing. We investigate at what relationship between cavity decay rate κ and homogeneous broadening of active atoms Γ the oscillations occur. Finally, we find attendant peaks in the spectrum S(ν), which are produced by the oscillations in g(2)(τ). We believe that the obtained results are important for understanding the fundamental principles of operation of spaser-based nanolasers.

2. Physical model and methods

We consider N ≫ 1 identical two-level active atoms with resonant frequency ω coupled to single strongly damped cavity, with a short plasmon lifetime (2κ)−1 centered at the same frequency. The interaction between the atoms and the field is described by the Tavis-Cummings Hamiltonian [7], HAF = ih̄g (a+JaJ+), where g is coupling constant identical for all atoms, a+ and a are the creation and annihilation operators of plasmons in the cavity mode [16], and Jα=j=1Nσjα are collective atomic operators, where σ, α = {x, y, z} – Pauly matrices, and σ = (σjx ± jy)/2. In a bad-cavity limit [10] the cavity mode can be adiabatically eliminated and the following master equation in the Schrödinger picture for the atomic density operator ρ = trFρAF :

ρ˙=i12ω[Jz,ρ]+γ2(j=1N2σj+ρσj+12Jzρ+12ρJzNρ)++γ2(j=1N2σjρσj+12Jzρ12ρJzNρ)+γp2(j=1NσjzρσjzNρ)++g2κ(2JρJ+J+JρρJ+J),
where the trace is taken over the field variables. Here the active atoms are incoherently pumped with rate γ and we take into account the spontaneous emission with rate γ. The dephasing processes, which are caused mostly by the interaction with phonons, have rate γp. The last term describes interaction of active atoms through the cavity mode. Adiabatic mode elimination can be performed only if κNg2/κ, γp, γ, γ. Note, that normal-ordered field operator averages can be restored by formal substitutions a+(t) → (g/κ)J+(t) and a(t) → (g/κ)J(t), [17, (13.60)]. The same model, but with an arbitrary number N of active atoms, was considered numerically by V. Temnov and U. Woggon in papers [15, 18], where they showed that the last term in Eq. (1) leads to the cooperative effects.

Our final interest is the state of the resonator, thus it is enough to describe the system of atoms in terms of collective atomic operators, despite the fact that some terms in Eq. (1) cannot be rewritten in terms of J+, Jz, J. First, we define characteristic function

χN(ξ,ξ*,η)tr(ρeiξ*J+eiηJzeiξJ),
which determines all normal-ordered operator averages in usual way. Next, we introduce the Glauber-Sudarshan P-representation (v, v*, m) as the Fourier transform of χN(ξ, ξ*, η), which can be interpreted as distribution function and allows to calculate normal-ordered operator averages as in statistical mechanics [7, (6.118a)]. Evolution equation on can be obtained by differentiation Eq. (2) with respect to time and replacement ρ with Eq. (1). The results is
P˜t=L(v,v*,m,v,v*,m)P˜,
where
L=γ2[(e2m1)(Nm)+4v2v*2e2m(N+m)+2N2vv*]++γ2(2e2m1+22vv*)(vv+v*v*)++γ2[(e2m1)(N+m)+vv+v*v*]++γp[vv+v*v*+2vv*e2m(N+m)]+iω[vvv*v*]++g2κ[2(2e2m)vv*(vvm+v*v*m)+2v2v2+2v*2v*2].
The closed form of the equation confirms the possibility of describing the system in terms of collective atomic operators.

The exact solution of the Eq. (3) is strictly singular due to the exponential factors in L, which describe transitions in active atoms. Moreover, the solution cannot be found in analytical form. However, we can obtain an approximate nonsingular distribution, replacing Eq. (3) by a Fokker-Planck equation. The key element to such replacement is a system size expansion procedure [7, ch. 5.1.3]. The large system size parameter in our case is the number N ≫ 1 of active atoms. Following the system size expansion method we will obtain an adequate treatment of quantum fluctuations in the first order in 1/N.

To make a systematic expansion of the phase-space equation of motion in 1/N, we move into rotating frame and introduce dimensionless polarization σ = tr[ρJeiωt]/N and inverse population n = tr[ρJz]/N per one atom. Next, we separate the mean values and fluctuations in the phase-space variables

veiωt/N=σ+N1/2ν,m/N=n+N1/2μ,
and introduce a distribution function P(ν, ν*, μ, t) ≡ N3/2(v(ν, t), v*(ν*, t), m(μ, t), t), which depends on variables, corresponding to fluctuations. Using the Eq. (3) and neglecting terms ∼ O(N−1/2), we obtain the equation for a scaled distribution function P. More accurately, we obtain two sets of equations: the first set describes dynamics of macroscopic variables, and one more equation characterizes fluctuations.

3. Macroscopic equations and generation threshold

First, we analyze the system of equations describing the dynamics of macroscopic variables, which takes a form

d(σ/ns)Γdt=(1nns)σ/ns,
d(n/ns)Γdt=n/ns1ΓT14|σ/ns|2,
where we introduce population relaxation time T1 = 1/(γ + γ), homogeneous broadening Γ = γp + 1/(2T1) and equilibrium inverse population ns = (γγ)/(γ + γ). The system has two different stable steady-states solutions, depending on pump-parameter = 0ns, where 0 = Ng2/(κΓ).

In the case < 1, one obtains the solution n = ns, σ = 0. Thus, there is no macroscopic polarization and this situation corresponds to the nanolaser operating below generation threshold. In the opposite case > 1, the solution takes a form n = 1/0, |σ|=(ns/2)(1)/ΓT1 that corresponds to the spaser-based nanolaser operating above generation threshold. Overall, the situation is completely analogous to the behaviour of a good-cavity laser [7, ch. 8.1.2].

Note, that the solutions coincide in the case = 1 and this point corresponds to the spaser generation threshold, which was obtained in earlier semiclassical papers, e.g. [2, 9].

4. Quantum fluctuations below threshold

Second, we analyze the equation, which provides a linearized treatment of fluctuations about solution to the system of macroscopic equations. In the case below generation threshold, i.e. < 1, we obtain

Pt=Γ(1)[νν+ν*ν*]P+1T1μμP+2γ(Γ+2γ)(γ+γ)2Pνν*+4γγγ+γ2Pμ2.
The equation can be solved by separation of variables, and we calculate the steady-state correlation functions as in statistical mechanics
a+ass,<=g2κ2J+Jss,<=Ng2κ2(1)γ(Γ+2γ)Γ(γ+γ),
g<1(τ)=limta+(t)a(t+τ)<a+ass,<=eΓ(1)τeiωτ,τ1/κ,
g<(2)(τ)=limta+(t)a+(t+τ)a(t+τ)a(t)<a+ass,<2=1+e2Γ(1)τ,τ1/κ.

The result for two-time correlation functions is analogous to the case of a good-cavity laser, up to the replacement Γ → κ, since we adiabatically eliminate the cavity mode, rather than the polarization of active atoms [7, ch. 8.1.4]. Note, that due to adiabatic mode elimination we can only resolve times τ ≫ 1/κ. The smaller times were resolved in paper [11], but only for the model with a single active atom.

In the case = 1 the drift term in the Eq. (7) vanishes and there is no restoring force to prevent the fluctuations from growing without bound. Thus, the average number of plasmons in the cavity mode (8) diverges at the point = 1. Thereby, the Eq. (7) cannot correctly describe the behaviour of system at the generation threshold. Note, that the operation of a bad-cavity laser at the threshold was discussed in the paper [12].

5. Quantum fluctuations above threshold

Now, we turn out to the description of fluctuations above the generation threshold. As follows from the steady-state solution in the case > 1, the phase of polarization is undetermined. Thus, in place of the first equation in (4), we write

veiωt/N=eiN1/2ψ(|σ|+N1/2ν),
where the variable ν represents real amplitude fluctuations now, which must fall within the range −N1/2|σ| ≤ ν ≤ ∞, and the variable ψ represents phase fluctuations. The distribution function in scaled variables, normalized with respect to the integration measure dνdψdμ, is defined by P(ν, ψ, μ, t) ≡ N3/2 (|σ| + N−1/2 ν)(v (ν, ψ, t),v*(ν, ψ, t), m(μ, t), t).

One can partially separate variables P(ν, ψ, μ, t) = A(ν, μ, t)Φ(ψ, t) in the limit of small amplitude fluctuations above the generation threshold, |σ| ≫ N−1/2ν. Moreover, in accordance with experimental papers [13, 14], we believe ΓT1 ≫ 1. Under the assumptions, the evolution of the distribution functions A and Φ is governed by equations:

At=Γ(1)4T1[8μννμ]A+1T1μμA+γp4(1+10)2ν2A,
Φt=γpΓT1(0+1)0(1)2ψ2Φ.

Solution of the Eq. (12) allows to calculate the average number of plasmons in the cavity mode above the generation threshold

a+ass,>Γ(1)4T1g2=γp(0+1)8κ[2ΓT1+1/(1)].
Here the second term in the left part corresponds to the steady-state solution of macroscopic Eqs. (5,6) and the right part describes fluctuations. Our theory is correct if fluctuations are small. Far enough away from the threshold, when ΓT1( − 1) ≫ 1, this leads to the restriction − 1 ≫ (γp)(gT1)2(0 + 1). Thus, our theory is self-consistent if (γp)(gT1)2 ≪ 1.

Next, taking into account the amplitude fluctuations in the main order, we can obtain fist-order correlation function (τ ≫ 1/κ)

g>(1)(τ)=e(iω+D)τ[1DT1+DT1eτ/2T1cos(2ΓT1(1)τ/T1)],D=γpΓT1N0(0+1)(1)=γpΓ4h¯ω(0+1)P>1/T1,
where D defines the width of spectral line above the generation threshold, and we rewrite it in term of the output power P> = κh̄ωa+ass,>. Summands proportional to DT1 ≪ 1 correspond to amplitude fluctuations. Qualitatively, the result is similar to the case of good-cavity lasers, compare with [7, (8.138)]. However, the mechanism which leads to the narrowing of the spectral line is quite different. We will discuss it in detail in the next section.

Finally, we obtain the second-order correlation function. In the region of interest, where ΓT1( − 1) ≫ 1, one can find (τ ≫ 1/κ)

g>(2)(τ)=1+4DT1eτ/2T1cos(2ΓT1(1)τ/T1).
The damped oscillations in g>(2)(τ) are usual for bad-cavity lasers [12]. As we discussed above, our consideration is reliable only in small-noise limit, i.e. g>(2)(0)11. The similar behaviour had been observed in numerical calculations in the paper [15], but authors dealt with the regime of large fluctuations. Note, that in the case of good-cavity lasers the amplitude fluctuations does not lead to the oscillations in g>(2)(τ), see [7, (8.139)]. In the next section we explain the origin of the damped oscillations in detail and establish when the good-cavity behaviour is replaced by the bad-cavity damped oscillations.

6. Numerical parameters and discussion

To present results we should propose numerical values to parameters of our theory. We take Γ = 5 · 1012 s−1, γ = 1010 s−1, γ = 9 · 1010 s−1 for active atoms, based on the paper [13]. Next, to perform bad-cavity approximation, we propose κ = 2 · 1015 s−1 and g = 1011 s−1. In experiments and theoretical papers, e.g. [4, 16], the cavity decay rate κ is usually less and the coupling constant g is usually larger than ours. Thus, proposed numerical parameters are easily achievable in experiment and reasonable. To change pump-parameter we variate the number N of active atoms.

In the Fig. 1(a) we plot the dependence of the average number of plasmons in the cavity on the pump-parameter below and above the generation threshold. The dashed line corresponds to the semiclassical mean-field theory, see Eqs. (5)(6), and the solid line takes into account quantum fluctuations, see Eqs. (8), (14). Emphasize, that near the threshold ∼ 1 the average number of plasmons in the cavity mode 〈a+a〉 < 1. Despite this fact, a linewidth of the order of Γ well below threshold is changed into a considerably narrower line of the order of D above threshold. When − 1 = 0.1, we find D/Γ ∼ 1/850. Note, that amplitude fluctuations slightly changes the shape of the spectral curve above generation threshold, see Fig. 1(b), which was obtained as the Fourier transform of the first-order correlation function (15). The height of the side peaks is small compared with the height of the central peak as (DT1)2 ≪ 1.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) The dependence of the average number of plasmons in the cavity on the pump-parameter , for the following parameters: κ = 2 · 1015 s−1, Γ = 5 · 1012 s−1, g = 1011 s−1, γ = 9 · 1010 s−1, γ = 1010 s−1. The dashed line corresponds to the mean-field theory, the solid line takes into account quantum fluctuations. (b) Normalized spectrum with corrections arising from the amplitude fluctuations.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

In the good-cavity lasers the spectral line width becomes narrower above the generation threshold because the stimulated emission starts to play more important role than the spontaneous emission. In this case the average number of photons in the cavity near the threshold is sufficiently greater than unity [6, 7]. In our case, the average number of plasmons is less than unity. Thus, a born plasmon should be coherent with the already dead plasmon in order to spectral line width becomes narrower. This is possible since the active atoms preserve the coherence. Originally arising plasmon interacts with active atoms and make them coherent to each other. Then the plasmon dies after a short time ∼ 1/κ, but the coherence is still alive in active atoms, which relax slowly, 1/Γ ≫ 1/κ. The next plasmon generated by such atoms can be coherent to the previous one. This mechanism of the spectral line narrowing was demonstrated in experiment with the laser, which deals with photons, in the paper [8]. However, we cannot directly applied our theory to this experiment, since the assumption ΓT1 ≫ 1 is not fulfilled. Another experimental realization of the lasing regime was presented in the paper [4], where mean number of plasmons is also less than unity, 〈a+a〉 ∼ 0.2. Indeed, the total pumping energy absorbed per one nanolaser is PW ∼ 〈a+ah̄ω2τp/Q, where τp = 5ns is the duration of the pumping pulse, the measured value PW = 10−13J near the generation threshold, Q = 13.2, and h̄ω = 2.3eV. Note, that numerical parameters in the Fig. 1 are slightly different from those from the paper [4]. The reason is that for the experimental parameters the amplitude fluctuations are large, see Eq. (14), and our theory is not applicable well. The regime of large fluctuations will be a subject of our further research.

Next, in the Fig. 2(a) we plot the second-order correlation function above the generation threshold, according to the Eq. (16). The dependence is valid if τ ≫ 1/κ, because it was obtained under the bad-cavity approximation. In order to explain the nature of the damped oscillations, we plot the vector field on the n-|σ|-plane, see Fig. 2(b), which corresponds to the right parts of the mean-field Eqs. (5)(6). The red point represents the steady-state solution of these equations. Fluctuations move the system from its equilibrium state and then it relaxes to the steady-state. The spiral movement corresponds to the damped oscillations in polarization amplitude |σ| and inverse population n, and as a consequence in the second-order correlation function.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) The second-order correlation function above the generation threshold. The parameters are as for the Fig. 1. (b) The vector field obtained from the right parts of the macroscopic equations with = 1.1, ns = 0.8 and ΓT1 = 50. The spiral movement to the steady-state leads to the damped oscillations in g>(2)(τ).

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

In the same way we can analyze a laser with a resonator of arbitrary Q-factor, but we should go beyond the bad-cavity approximation. Instead of macroscopic Eqs. (5)(6), we need to consider a full system of three Maxwell-Bloch equations [2]. The evolution of amplitude fluctuations around the steady-state solution is defined by three eigenvalues. One eigenvalue is always real and negative. Two others can be either real or complex conjugated, which corresponds to non-oscillating and oscillating character of the second-order correlation function respectively. The eigenvalues are fully defined by three parameters: κT1, ΓT1 and . In the Fig. 3 we plot a ”phase diagram” in logarithmic coordinates for different pump-parameters > 1. The area to the right and below to the corresponding curves responds to the non-oscillating regime. The parameters from the painted area above the dotted line always correspond to the oscillations in g>(2)(τ). This is an area of bad-cavity lasers, where the mechanism of spectral line narrowing is based on the coherence conservation in the state of active atoms. The asymptotic behaviour ( ≫ 1) of the dotted line was obtained numerically and it corresponds to the dependencies κT1 ≈ 0.16 and ΓT1 ≈ 2.5. In the area below the dotted line both the oscillating and non-oscillating behaviour of g>(2)(τ) is possible, depending on pump-parameter . Thus, the shape of the second-order correlation function provides insufficient information to obtain a mechanism of spectral line narrowing. The answer on this question is contained in the ”phase diagram” in the Fig. 3.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 The “phase diagram” contained information about oscillations in g>(2)(τ), for different pump-parameters . The area below and to the right to the corresponding curves responds to the non-oscillating regime. The painted area above the dotted line corresponds to the bad-cavity lasers.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

7. Conclusion

To summarize, the quantum theory of a spaser-based nanolaser was presented. We found that the average number of plasmons in the cavity mode near the generation threshold can be less than unity both in our theory and experiments [4]. Despite this fact, the spectral line width narrows sufficiently, when passing through the threshold. We argued that it is possible behaviour since the coherence is preserved by the active atoms, which relax slowly than the damping of cavity mode occurs. We also studied the amplitude fluctuations of the generation and concluded that they change the shape of the spectrum and lead to the damped oscillations in the second-order correlation function g(2)(τ) above the generation threshold. It is unusual behaviour for the good-cavity lasers, and we investigated in detail what relationship between cavity decay rate κ and homogeneous broadening of active atoms Γ corresponds to the bad-cavity damped oscillations and non-oscillating regime.

Acknowledgments

We thank V.V. Lebedev and V.P. Drachev for fruitful discussions. The work was supported by RFBR grant No. 14-02-31357.

References and links

1. M. I. Stockman, “Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future,” Opt. Express 19, 22029–22106 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt. 12, 024004 (2010). [CrossRef]  

3. D. Bergman and M. Stockman, “Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. M. O. Scully and M. Sh. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997). [CrossRef]  

7. H.J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1 (Springer, New York, 2010).

8. J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. V. M. Parfenyev and S. S. Vergeles, “Intensity-dependent frequency shift in surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 043824 (2012). [CrossRef]  

10. J. I. Cirac, “Interaction of a two-level atom with a cavity mode in the bad-cavity limit,” Phys. Rev. A 46, 4354–4362 (1992). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Spectrum of surface plasmons excited by spontaneous quantum dot transitions,” JETP 117, 205–213 (2013). [CrossRef]  

12. S. Gnutzmann, “Photon statistics of a bad-cavity laser near threshold,” EPJD 4, 109–123 (1998). [CrossRef]  

13. J. Trieschmann, S. Xiao, L. J. Prokopeva, V. P. Drachev, and A. V. Kildishev, “Experimental retrieval of the kinetic parameters of a dye in a solid film,” Opt. Express 19, 18253–18259 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. J. Kim, V. P. Drachev, Z. Jacob, G. V. Naik, A. Boltasseva, E. E. Narimanov, and V. M. Shalaev, “Improving the radiative decay rate for dye molecules with hyperbolic metamaterials,” Opt. Express 20, 8100–8116 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Photon statistics in the cooperative spontaneous emission,” Opt. Express 17, 5774–5782 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. E. S. Andrianov, D. G. Baranov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Loss compensation by spasers in plasmonic systems,” Opt. Express 21, 13467–13478 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2 (Springer, New York, 2008). [CrossRef]  

18. V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Superradiance and subradiance in an inhomogeneously broadened ensemble of two-level systems coupled to a low-Q cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 243602 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. M. I. Stockman, “Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future,” Opt. Express 19, 22029–22106 (2011).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt. 12, 024004 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  3. D. Bergman and M. Stockman, “Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. M. O. Scully and M. Sh. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
    [Crossref]
  7. H.J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1 (Springer, New York, 2010).
  8. J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. V. M. Parfenyev and S. S. Vergeles, “Intensity-dependent frequency shift in surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 043824 (2012).
    [Crossref]
  10. J. I. Cirac, “Interaction of a two-level atom with a cavity mode in the bad-cavity limit,” Phys. Rev. A 46, 4354–4362 (1992).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Spectrum of surface plasmons excited by spontaneous quantum dot transitions,” JETP 117, 205–213 (2013).
    [Crossref]
  12. S. Gnutzmann, “Photon statistics of a bad-cavity laser near threshold,” EPJD 4, 109–123 (1998).
    [Crossref]
  13. J. Trieschmann, S. Xiao, L. J. Prokopeva, V. P. Drachev, and A. V. Kildishev, “Experimental retrieval of the kinetic parameters of a dye in a solid film,” Opt. Express 19, 18253–18259 (2011).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. J. Kim, V. P. Drachev, Z. Jacob, G. V. Naik, A. Boltasseva, E. E. Narimanov, and V. M. Shalaev, “Improving the radiative decay rate for dye molecules with hyperbolic metamaterials,” Opt. Express 20, 8100–8116 (2012).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Photon statistics in the cooperative spontaneous emission,” Opt. Express 17, 5774–5782 (2009).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. E. S. Andrianov, D. G. Baranov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Loss compensation by spasers in plasmonic systems,” Opt. Express 21, 13467–13478 (2013).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2 (Springer, New York, 2008).
    [Crossref]
  18. V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Superradiance and subradiance in an inhomogeneously broadened ensemble of two-level systems coupled to a low-Q cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 243602 (2005).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]

2013 (2)

E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Spectrum of surface plasmons excited by spontaneous quantum dot transitions,” JETP 117, 205–213 (2013).
[Crossref]

E. S. Andrianov, D. G. Baranov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Loss compensation by spasers in plasmonic systems,” Opt. Express 21, 13467–13478 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2012 (3)

J. Kim, V. P. Drachev, Z. Jacob, G. V. Naik, A. Boltasseva, E. E. Narimanov, and V. M. Shalaev, “Improving the radiative decay rate for dye molecules with hyperbolic metamaterials,” Opt. Express 20, 8100–8116 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

V. M. Parfenyev and S. S. Vergeles, “Intensity-dependent frequency shift in surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 043824 (2012).
[Crossref]

2011 (2)

2010 (1)

M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt. 12, 024004 (2010).
[Crossref]

2009 (3)

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Photon statistics in the cooperative spontaneous emission,” Opt. Express 17, 5774–5782 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2005 (1)

V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Superradiance and subradiance in an inhomogeneously broadened ensemble of two-level systems coupled to a low-Q cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 243602 (2005).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2003 (1)

D. Bergman and M. Stockman, “Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

1998 (1)

S. Gnutzmann, “Photon statistics of a bad-cavity laser near threshold,” EPJD 4, 109–123 (1998).
[Crossref]

1992 (1)

J. I. Cirac, “Interaction of a two-level atom with a cavity mode in the bad-cavity limit,” Phys. Rev. A 46, 4354–4362 (1992).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Andrianov, E. S.

E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Spectrum of surface plasmons excited by spontaneous quantum dot transitions,” JETP 117, 205–213 (2013).
[Crossref]

E. S. Andrianov, D. G. Baranov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Loss compensation by spasers in plasmonic systems,” Opt. Express 21, 13467–13478 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Bakker, R.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Baranov, D. G.

Bartal, G.

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Belgrave, A.M.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Bergman, D.

D. Bergman and M. Stockman, “Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Bohnet, J. G.

J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Boltasseva, A.

Carmichael, H. J.

H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2 (Springer, New York, 2008).
[Crossref]

Carmichael, H.J.

H.J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1 (Springer, New York, 2010).

Chen, Z.

J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Cirac, J. I.

J. I. Cirac, “Interaction of a two-level atom with a cavity mode in the bad-cavity limit,” Phys. Rev. A 46, 4354–4362 (1992).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Dai, L.

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Dorofeenko, A. V.

E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Spectrum of surface plasmons excited by spontaneous quantum dot transitions,” JETP 117, 205–213 (2013).
[Crossref]

E. S. Andrianov, D. G. Baranov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Loss compensation by spasers in plasmonic systems,” Opt. Express 21, 13467–13478 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Drachev, V. P.

Gladden, C.

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Gnutzmann, S.

S. Gnutzmann, “Photon statistics of a bad-cavity laser near threshold,” EPJD 4, 109–123 (1998).
[Crossref]

Herz, E.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Holland, M. J.

J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Jacob, Z.

Kildishev, A. V.

Kim, J.

Lisyansky, A. A.

E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Spectrum of surface plasmons excited by spontaneous quantum dot transitions,” JETP 117, 205–213 (2013).
[Crossref]

E. S. Andrianov, D. G. Baranov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Loss compensation by spasers in plasmonic systems,” Opt. Express 21, 13467–13478 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Ma, R.-M.

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Meiser, D.

J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Naik, G. V.

Narimanov, E. E.

Narimanov, E.E.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Noginov, M.A.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Oulton, R. F.

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Parfenyev, V. M.

V. M. Parfenyev and S. S. Vergeles, “Intensity-dependent frequency shift in surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 043824 (2012).
[Crossref]

Prokopeva, L. J.

Pukhov, A. A.

E. S. Andrianov, D. G. Baranov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Loss compensation by spasers in plasmonic systems,” Opt. Express 21, 13467–13478 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Spectrum of surface plasmons excited by spontaneous quantum dot transitions,” JETP 117, 205–213 (2013).
[Crossref]

Scully, M. O.

M. O. Scully and M. Sh. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
[Crossref]

Shalaev, V. M.

Shalaev, V.M.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Sorger, V. J.

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Stockman, M.

D. Bergman and M. Stockman, “Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Stockman, M. I.

M. I. Stockman, “Nanoplasmonics: past, present, and glimpse into future,” Opt. Express 19, 22029–22106 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt. 12, 024004 (2010).
[Crossref]

Stout, S.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Suteewong, T.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Temnov, V.

V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Photon statistics in the cooperative spontaneous emission,” Opt. Express 17, 5774–5782 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Superradiance and subradiance in an inhomogeneously broadened ensemble of two-level systems coupled to a low-Q cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 243602 (2005).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Thompson, J. K.

J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Trieschmann, J.

Vergeles, S. S.

V. M. Parfenyev and S. S. Vergeles, “Intensity-dependent frequency shift in surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 043824 (2012).
[Crossref]

Vinogradov, A. P.

E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Spectrum of surface plasmons excited by spontaneous quantum dot transitions,” JETP 117, 205–213 (2013).
[Crossref]

E. S. Andrianov, D. G. Baranov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Loss compensation by spasers in plasmonic systems,” Opt. Express 21, 13467–13478 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Weiner, J. M.

J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Wiesner, U.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Woggon, U.

V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Photon statistics in the cooperative spontaneous emission,” Opt. Express 17, 5774–5782 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Superradiance and subradiance in an inhomogeneously broadened ensemble of two-level systems coupled to a low-Q cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 243602 (2005).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Xiao, S.

Zentgraf, T.

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Zhang, X.

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Zhu, G.

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Zubairy, M. Sh.

M. O. Scully and M. Sh. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
[Crossref]

EPJD (1)

S. Gnutzmann, “Photon statistics of a bad-cavity laser near threshold,” EPJD 4, 109–123 (1998).
[Crossref]

J. Opt. (1)

M. I. Stockman, “The spaser as a nanoscale quantum generator and ultrafast amplifier,” J. Opt. 12, 024004 (2010).
[Crossref]

JETP (1)

E. S. Andrianov, A. A. Pukhov, A. V. Dorofeenko, A. P. Vinogradov, and A. A. Lisyansky, “Spectrum of surface plasmons excited by spontaneous quantum dot transitions,” JETP 117, 205–213 (2013).
[Crossref]

Nature (3)

J. G. Bohnet, Z. Chen, J. M. Weiner, D. Meiser, M. J. Holland, and J. K. Thompson, “A steady-state superradiant laser with less than one intracavity photon,” Nature 484, 78–81 (2012).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

M.A. Noginov, G. Zhu, A.M. Belgrave, R. Bakker, V.M. Shalaev, E.E. Narimanov, S. Stout, E. Herz, T. Suteewong, and U. Wiesner, “Demonstration of a spaser-based nanolaser,” Nature 460, 1110–1112 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

R. F. Oulton, V. J. Sorger, T. Zentgraf, R.-M. Ma, C. Gladden, L. Dai, G. Bartal, and X. Zhang, “Plasmon lasers at deep subwavelength scale,” Nature 461, 629–632 (2009).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Opt. Express (5)

Phys. Rev. A (2)

V. M. Parfenyev and S. S. Vergeles, “Intensity-dependent frequency shift in surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation,” Phys. Rev. A 86, 043824 (2012).
[Crossref]

J. I. Cirac, “Interaction of a two-level atom with a cavity mode in the bad-cavity limit,” Phys. Rev. A 46, 4354–4362 (1992).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (2)

D. Bergman and M. Stockman, “Surface plasmon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation: quantum generation of coherent surface plasmons in nanosystems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 027402 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

V. Temnov and U. Woggon, “Superradiance and subradiance in an inhomogeneously broadened ensemble of two-level systems coupled to a low-Q cavity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 243602 (2005).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Other (3)

H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 2 (Springer, New York, 2008).
[Crossref]

M. O. Scully and M. Sh. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
[Crossref]

H.J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1 (Springer, New York, 2010).

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (3)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) The dependence of the average number of plasmons in the cavity on the pump-parameter , for the following parameters: κ = 2 · 1015 s−1, Γ = 5 · 1012 s−1, g = 1011 s−1, γ = 9 · 1010 s−1, γ = 1010 s−1. The dashed line corresponds to the mean-field theory, the solid line takes into account quantum fluctuations. (b) Normalized spectrum with corrections arising from the amplitude fluctuations.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) The second-order correlation function above the generation threshold. The parameters are as for the Fig. 1. (b) The vector field obtained from the right parts of the macroscopic equations with = 1.1, ns = 0.8 and ΓT1 = 50. The spiral movement to the steady-state leads to the damped oscillations in g > ( 2 ) ( τ ) .
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The “phase diagram” contained information about oscillations in g > ( 2 ) ( τ ) , for different pump-parameters . The area below and to the right to the corresponding curves responds to the non-oscillating regime. The painted area above the dotted line corresponds to the bad-cavity lasers.

Equations (17)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

ρ ˙ = i 1 2 ω [ J z , ρ ] + γ 2 ( j = 1 N 2 σ j + ρ σ j + 1 2 J z ρ + 1 2 ρ J z N ρ ) + + γ 2 ( j = 1 N 2 σ j ρ σ j + 1 2 J z ρ 1 2 ρ J z N ρ ) + γ p 2 ( j = 1 N σ j z ρ σ j z N ρ ) + + g 2 κ ( 2 J ρ J + J + J ρ ρ J + J ) ,
χ N ( ξ , ξ * , η ) tr ( ρ e i ξ * J + e i η J z e i ξ J ) ,
P ˜ t = L ( v , v * , m , v , v * , m ) P ˜ ,
L = γ 2 [ ( e 2 m 1 ) ( N m ) + 4 v 2 v * 2 e 2 m ( N + m ) + 2 N 2 v v * ] + + γ 2 ( 2 e 2 m 1 + 2 2 v v * ) ( v v + v * v * ) + + γ 2 [ ( e 2 m 1 ) ( N + m ) + v v + v * v * ] + + γ p [ v v + v * v * + 2 v v * e 2 m ( N + m ) ] + i ω [ v v v * v * ] + + g 2 κ [ 2 ( 2 e 2 m ) v v * ( v v m + v * v * m ) + 2 v 2 v 2 + 2 v * 2 v * 2 ] .
v e i ω t / N = σ + N 1 / 2 ν , m / N = n + N 1 / 2 μ ,
d ( σ / n s ) Γ d t = ( 1 n n s ) σ / n s ,
d ( n / n s ) Γ d t = n / n s 1 Γ T 1 4 | σ / n s | 2 ,
P t = Γ ( 1 ) [ ν ν + ν * ν * ] P + 1 T 1 μ μ P + 2 γ ( Γ + 2 γ ) ( γ + γ ) 2 P ν ν * + 4 γ γ γ + γ 2 P μ 2 .
a + a s s , < = g 2 κ 2 J + J s s , < = N g 2 κ 2 ( 1 ) γ ( Γ + 2 γ ) Γ ( γ + γ ) ,
g < 1 ( τ ) = lim t a + ( t ) a ( t + τ ) < a + a s s , < = e Γ ( 1 ) τ e i ω τ , τ 1 / κ ,
g < ( 2 ) ( τ ) = lim t a + ( t ) a + ( t + τ ) a ( t + τ ) a ( t ) < a + a s s , < 2 = 1 + e 2 Γ ( 1 ) τ , τ 1 / κ .
v e i ω t / N = e i N 1 / 2 ψ ( | σ | + N 1 / 2 ν ) ,
A t = Γ ( 1 ) 4 T 1 [ 8 μ ν ν μ ] A + 1 T 1 μ μ A + γ p 4 ( 1 + 1 0 ) 2 ν 2 A ,
Φ t = γ p Γ T 1 ( 0 + 1 ) 0 ( 1 ) 2 ψ 2 Φ .
a + a s s , > Γ ( 1 ) 4 T 1 g 2 = γ p ( 0 + 1 ) 8 κ [ 2 Γ T 1 + 1 / ( 1 ) ] .
g > ( 1 ) ( τ ) = e ( i ω + D ) τ [ 1 D T 1 + D T 1 e τ / 2 T 1 cos ( 2 Γ T 1 ( 1 ) τ / T 1 ) ] , D = γ p Γ T 1 N 0 ( 0 + 1 ) ( 1 ) = γ p Γ 4 h ¯ ω ( 0 + 1 ) P > 1 / T 1 ,
g > ( 2 ) ( τ ) = 1 + 4 D T 1 e τ / 2 T 1 cos ( 2 Γ T 1 ( 1 ) τ / T 1 ) .

Metrics