## Abstract

We demonstrate the cnoidal wave formation in a two-laser system with a saturable absorber in the cavity of one of the lasers. Another laser is used to activate the saturable absorber in order to control the pulse shape, width, intensity and frequency. Using the three-level laser model based on the Statz - De Mars equations, we show that for any value of the saturable absorber parameter there exists a certain modulation frequency for which the pulse shape is very close to a soliton shape with less than 5% error at the pulse base. Such a device may be prominent for optical communication and laser engineering applications.

©2011 Optical Society of America

## 1. Introduction

A cnoidal wave is also known as a soliton pulse train. Even though the first solitary wave to be reported was by Russell in 1834 [1], it was not until the late 19th century when Lord Rayleigh attempted for the first time to give explanation of this phenomenon [2], the subject was left to rest until the 1960’s [3]. The first phenomenological definition of a soliton that comes to mind is a self-reinforcing solitary wave (a wave packet or pulse) that maintains its shape while it travels at constant speed in a nonlinear dispersive medium. A balancing mechanism between nonlinearity and dispersion is responsible for this phenomenon [4].

Optical solitons can be either spatial [5] or temporal [6,7]. Hasegawa and Tappert [7] suggested that the balance between self-phase modulation and anomalous dispersion could explain soliton formation in optical fibers. Many exactly solvable models have soliton solutions, including the Korteweg - de Vries, the nonlinear Schrödinger, the coupled nonlinear Schrödinger, the Sine-Gordon, and the Manakov equations; actually this represents a very active field of mathematical and physical research. The main soliton practical feature, that makes it a good carrier for reliable optical communications, is its capacity to maintain its energy and shape (frequency) while propagating along a fiber. However, until now, the soliton production in a laser system has been quite expensive [8–10].

In this paper we propose a hybrid system (Fig. 1 ) composed by two lasers and a saturable absorber (SA) placed inside the cavity of one of the lasers, which acts as a passive Q-switching element for this laser. The radiation from another laser modulated by an electro-optical modulator (EOM) is injected directly into the SA to activate it and by such a way to control the output of the first laser. We demonstrate, for the first time to our knowledge that such a system can act as a cnoidal wave generator in a wide frequency range at quite a reasonable cost.

## 2. Theoretical model

The dynamics of the laser system presented in Fig. 1 can be described by the model based on the Statz - De Mars equations [11], which originally were deduced to describe oscillations in a maser, then this model has undergone many modifications to be adopted for laser systems. The Statz - De Mars equations for a three-level laser with a SA [12] without modulation are written as follows:

*S*is the emitted photon density,

*N*is the population inversion of the active medium, and

*k*is the resonant absorption of the saturable absorber. Γ,

_{a}*ν*,

*σ*, and

*T*stand, respectively, for cavity filling coefficient, optical frequency, active medium cross-section, and photon lifetime in the cavity,

*β*is the coefficient which accounts for the difference in population inversion coursed by lasing,

*l*and

*l*are, respectively, the active medium and the SA lengths,

_{a}*k*

_{0}

*is the linear resonant SA absorption coefficient without lasing,*

_{a}*σ*is the SA cross-section,

_{a}*N*

_{0}is the population inversion in the active medium without radiation,

*τ*and

*τ*stand for relaxation time in the active medium and in the SA, respectively, and finally $\hslash w$ is the photon energy.

_{a}We rewrite Eqs. (1) in an adimensional form [12,13] by introducing new parameters and variables defined as *t*´ = *t*/*τ*, *G* = *τ*/*T*, *δ* = *τ*/*τ _{a}*,

*ρ*= 2

*σ*/

_{a}*βσ*,

*α*=

*ΓνσTN*,

*α*= -

_{a}*ΓνTk*

_{0}

*(*

_{a}*l*/

_{a}*l*),

*n*(

*t*´) =

*ΓνσTN*(

*t*´),

*n*(

_{a}*t´*) = -

*Γν*(

*l*/

_{a}*l*)

*Tk*(

_{a}*t*´), and

*m*(

*t*´) = 2

*πβστS*(

*t*´)/

*hw*, and including the normalized control harmonic modulation (1 + cos(

*ωt*))/2 to

*α*in the third equation which describes the SA:

_{a}While an external signal injected into an optical cavity has often been used to modify the shape of the output signal [14,15], to our knowledge, this is the first time that it has been injected directly into the SA in order to modify the system dynamics and generate cnoidal waves. In this context, the SA acts as an active device since the laser output is regulated by it.

To evaluate necessary conditions for lasing, we find fixed points of Eqs. (2) and perform their linear stability analysis. In order to do so, we transform the non-autonomous system of Eqs. (2) into an autonomous one by making a change of variables, so that the new system is written as:

The characteristic equation for a perturbed stationary solution (i.e. *m ^{s}* = 0,

*n*=

^{s}*α*,

*n*=

_{a}^{s}*α*, and

_{a}*x*= 0) is:

^{s}*λ*

_{1}=

*G*(

*α*+

*α*– 1),

_{a}*λ*

_{2}= −1,

*λ*

_{3}= -

*δ*, and

*λ*

_{4}= 0 are eigenvalues which are all real, being

*λ*

_{2}and

*λ*

_{3}always negative. Therefore, the stability condition is defined only by the sign of

*λ*

_{1}, i.e. the fixed point is a source when

*α*+

_{a}*α*> 1, as shown in Fig. 2 . Thus, to obtain oscillations in the laser with SA [12],

*α*and

*α*should be chosen inside the dashed region shown in Fig. 2.

_{a}In the numerical simulations, we choose the parameters typical for a dye laser [14]: *G* = 200, *α* = 4, *δ* = 1, *ρ* = 0.001, and the initial conditions near one of the critical stable points of Eqs. (2), i.e. *m*
_{0} = 0.25, *n*
_{0} = 0, and *n _{a}*

_{0}= 0.152. Since the parameter

*α*depends on geometrical values and on the absorbent centers density in the SA (the dye concentration in a dye SA cell), we use it as the SA defining parameter and call it

_{a}*absorption ratio*.

## 3. Results

Figure 3
shows the temporal dynamics of the laser output for fixed *α _{a}* = 15 and different modulation frequencies

*ω*. For small

*ω*(lower than the laser relaxation oscillation frequency), the laser generates pulse trains with localized undulation windows, which are the damped relaxation oscillations (Figs. 3(a)–3(c)). For higher

*ω*, only one frequency remains, i.e. the laser oscillates with the modulation frequency (Figs. 3(d)–3(f)), and the pulse shape strongly depends on

*ω*. One important aspect is that as

*ω*is increased; the peak amplitude first increases, reaches a maximum, and then decreases, thus going from a

*sech*

^{2}(when the amplitude is maximum, Fig. 3(d)) to almost harmonic oscillations (Fig. 3(f)). While the peak amplitude is decreasing, the laser intensity never falls down to zero again; the continuous background appears because the frequency applied to the SA is so high that it has not enough time, neither to relax to its ground state nor to saturate. As

*ω*further increases, the signal behavior becomes more and more sinusoidal with relatively small amplitude. We repeat the simulations for different

*α*with a step of 5 and find that the results shown in Fig. 3 for

_{a}*α*= 15 follow exactly the same qualitative pattern for any other

_{a}*α*∈ [5, 60].

_{a}As discussed in [4] and following our results, the cnoidal wave behavior is bounded by two values of a control parameter; in our case, at high modulation frequencies the cnoidal waves are transformed to sinusoidal waves and at low frequencies to *sech*
^{2}. Note, that the generated cnoidal waves are asymptotically stable due to quadratic nonlinearities of the SA [16,17].

Another interesting feature of the observed dynamics is that when the pulse train amplitude reaches its maximum, a *sech*
^{2} (soliton-like) shape approximates the pulse shape with a very good precision as demonstrated in Fig. 4
. This is confirmed by overlapping one pulse with a *sech*
^{2} waveform; the difference that appears on the base right hand side is very small (in the order of 2%, and always less than 5%). We find that for every saturable absorber coefficient *α _{a}* there is an optimal modulation frequency

*ω*for which this soliton-shape approximation has better precision than for other frequencies. As seen from Fig. 5 ,

_{s}*ω*increases approximately linearly with

_{s}*α*with two jumps at

_{a}*α*= 5 and

_{a}*α*= 30. We should note that several theoretical and experimental works report the existence of solitons [18–22] meaning that the pulses shape obtained at the output presents the soliton characteristic functions (

_{a}*sech*and

*sech*

^{2}). While in the cited works, the difference between the reported pulses and the soliton shape is larger than 5%; our system allows the soliton generation with a higher precision, which makes it prominent for optical communication purposes.

## 4. Conclusions

We have numerically demonstrated with a modified Statz – De Mars model that a laser with an active saturable absorber under the influence of a control radiation from another laser can generate cnoidal waves within a certain range of control parameters, which bound soliton-like and sinusoidal regimes. No matter the physical saturable absorber characteristics, there is always a certain value of the modulation frequency that would result in the cnoidal waves generation. When we compared the resulting pulses with a typical soliton shape (*sech*
^{2}), we obtained less than 5% error at the pulse base. The proposed system can be a base for building a reliable and cheap device to generate cnoidal waves as efficient information carriers for optical communication; the proposed system is economic due to the elements involved, at using general purpose laser elements and not ultra-fast optics elements, the experimental implementation of the presented scheme results less expensive.

## Acknowledgments

We acknowledge CONACYT (Mexico) for the financial support through ANUIES-ECOS project M08-P02 and project No. 100429.

## References and links

**1. **J. S. Russell, “Report on waves,” Fourteenth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (1844).

**2. **L. Rayleigh, “On waves,” Philos. Mag. **1**, 257–279 (1876).

**3. **N. J. Zabusky and M. D. Kruskal, “Interaction of ‘solitons’ in a collisionless plasma and the recurrence of initial states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **15**(6), 240–243 (1965). [CrossRef]

**4. **P. G. Drazin and R. S. Johnson, *Solitons: An Introduction*, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1989).

**5. **J. E. Bjorkholm and A. A. Ashkin, “Cw self-focusing and self-trapping of light in sodium vapor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **32**(4), 129–132 (1974). [CrossRef]

**6. **A. Hasegawa and F. Tappert, “Transmission of stationary nonlinear optical physics in dispersive dielectric fibers I: Anomalous dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. **23**(3), 142–144 (1973). [CrossRef]

**7. **A. Hasegawa and F. Tappert, “Transmission of stationary nonlinear optical physics in dispersive dielectric fibers II: Normal dispersion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. **23**(4), 171–172 (1973). [CrossRef]

**8. **F. Gèrôme, P. Dupriez, J. Clowes, J. C. Knight, and W. J. Wadsworth, “High power tunable femtosecond soliton source using hollow-core photonic bandgap fiber, and its use for frequency doubling,” Opt. Express **16**(4), 2381–2386 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**9. **R. Herda and O. G. Okhotnikov, “All-fiber soliton source tunable over 500 nm,” in *Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics/Quantum Electronics and Laser Science and Photonic Applications Systems Technologies*, Technical Digest (CD) (Optical Society of America, 2005), paper JWB39.

**10. **S. Chouli and P. Grelu, “Rains of solitons in a fiber laser,” Opt. Express **17**(14), 11776–11781 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**11. **H. Statz and G. De Mars, “Transients and oscillation pulses in masers,” in *Quantum Electronics* (Columbia University Press, 1960), pp. 530–537.

**12. **L. Tarassov, *Physique des Processus dans les Générateurs de Rayonnement Optique Cohérent* (Éditons MIR, 1981).

**13. **M. Braun, *Differential Equations and their Applications: An Introduction to Applied Mathematics* (Springer, 1992).

**14. **V. Aboites, K. J. Baldwin, G. J. Crofts, and M. J. Damzen, “Fast high power optical switch,” Opt. Commun. **98**(4-6), 298–302 (1993). [CrossRef]

**15. **A. Kir’yanov, V. Aboites, and N. N. Il’ichev, “A polarisation-bistable neodymium laser with a Cr^{4+}:YAG passive switch under the weak resonant signal control,” Opt. Commun. **169**(1-6), 309–316 (1999). [CrossRef]

**16. **Y. A. Kartashov, A. A. Egorov, A. S. Zelenina, V. A. Vysloukh, and L. Torner, “Stabilization of one-dimensional periodic waves by saturation of the nonlinear response,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. **68**(6), 065605 (2003). [CrossRef]

**17. **Y. V. Kartashov, A. A. Egorov, A. S. Zelenina, V. A. Vysloukh, and L. Torner, “Stable multicolor periodic-wave arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **92**(3), 033901 (2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**18. **J. Li, X. Liang, J. He, L. Zheng, Z. Zhao, and J. Xu, “Diode pumped passively mode-locked Yb:SSO laser with 2.3 ps duration,” Opt. Express **18**(17), 18354–18359 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**19. **M. G. Clerc, S. Coulibaly, N. Mujica, R. Navarro, and T. Sauma, “Soliton pair interaction law in parametrically driven Newtonian fluid,” Philos. Transact. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. **367**(1901), 3213–3226 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**20. **A. C. Newell and J. V. Moloney, *Nonlinear Optics* (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1992).

**21. **P. T. Dinda, R. Radhakrishnan, and T. Kanna, “Energy-exchange collision of the Manakov vector solitons under strong environmental perturbations,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B **24**(3), 592–605 (2007). [CrossRef]

**22. **N. Akhmediev and A. Ankiewicz, *Solitons Nonlinear Pulses and Beams* (Chapman & Hall, 1997).