We demonstrated a Čherenkov phase-matching method for monochromatic THz-wave generation using the difference frequency generation process with a lithium niobate crystal, which resulted in high conversion efficiency and wide tunability. We successfully generated monochromatic THz waves across the range 0.2–3.0 THz. We obtained efficient energy conversion in the low frequency region below 0.5 THz, and achieved a flat tuning spectrum by varying the pumping wavelength during THz-wave tuning.
©2008 Optical Society of America
Terahertz (THz) waves present attractive possibilities in advanced applications including biomedical analysis and stand-off detection for hazardous materials. The development of monochromatic and tunable coherent THz-wave sources is of great interest for use in these applications. Recently, a parametric process based on second-order nonlinearities was used to generate tunable monochromatic coherent THz waves using nonlinear optical crystals [1–4]. In general, however, nonlinear optical materials have high absorption coefficients in the THz-wave region, which inhibits efficient THz-wave generation.
Avetisyan, et al., proposed surface-emitting THz-wave generation using the difference frequency generation (DFG) technique in a periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) waveguide to overcome these problems . A surface-emitted THz wave radiates from the surface of the PPLN and propagates perpendicular to the direction of the pump beam. The absorption loss is minimized because the THz wave is generated from the PPLN surface. Moreover, the phase-matching condition can be designed using PPLN with an appropriate grating period . Surface-emitted THz-wave devices have the potential for high conversion efficiency, and continuous wave THz-wave generation has been successfully demonstrated . Unfortunately, the tuning range of the THz waves is limited to about 100 GHz by the nature of PPLN , and a wide tuning range cannot be realized using the quasi-phase–matching method.
We developed a Čherenkov phase-matching method for monochromatic THz-wave generation using the DFG process with a lithium niobate crystal, which resulted in both high conversion efficiency and wide tunability. Although THz-wave generation by Čherenkov phase matching has been demonstrated using femtosecond pumping pulses [9–11], producing very high peak power , these THz-wave sources are not monochromatic. Our method generates monochromatic and tunable THz waves using a nanosecond pulsed laser source.
2. Čherenkov phase matching
The Čherenkov phase-matching condition is satisfied when the velocity of the polarization wave inside the nonlinear crystal is greater than the velocity of the radiated wave outside. The radiation angle θ is determined by the refractive index of the pumping wave in the crystal, nopt, and that of THz-wave in the crystal, nTHz ,
where λ is a wavelength of the contributing waves in the DFG process (ω1–ω2=ωTHz) and Lc is the coherence length of the surface-emitted process (Lc=π/Δk, where Δk=k1–k2 and k is the wave number). We approximate the refractive index of the optical wave as n1≈n2=nopt because λ1 and λ2 have almost the same value for THz-wave generation. Equation (1) implies that nTHz should be larger than nopt. The lithium niobate crystal has a refractive index of about 2.1 in the near infrared region, and has a refractive index of about 5.1 in the THz-wave region. The generated THz-wave is totally reflected at the interface of air and the lithium niobate crystal. The silicon prevents total internal reflection of THz waves at the interface of air and the lithium niobate crystal, as shown in Fig. 1.
The radiation angle hardly changes during THz-frequency tuning because the silicon has low refractive index dispersion in the THz-wave region  and the optical wavelength requires only slight tuning. The change in radiation angle is less than 0.01° for a fixed pumping wavelength. The actual angle change of the THz wave is significantly better than for the THz parametric oscillator (TPO) with a Si prism coupler , which has an angle change of about 1.5° in the 0.7–3 THz tuning range.
3. Experimental setup
We demonstrated the method described above using the experimental setup shown in Fig. 2. The frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser, which has pulse duration of 15 ns, a pulse energy of 12 mJ when operating at 532 nm, and a repetition rate of 50 Hz, was used as the pump source for a dual-wavelength potassium titanium oxide phosphate (KTP) optical parametric oscillator (OPO). The KTP-OPO, which consists of two KTP crystals with independently controlled angles, is capable of dual-wavelength operation with independent tuning of each wavelength [16,17]. The OPO has a tunable range of 1300 to 1600 nm. The maximum output energy of 2 mJ was obtained for a pumping energy of less than 12 mJ. The 5 mol% MgO-doped lithium niobate crystal (MgO:LiNbO3) used in the experiment was cut from a 5 × 65 × 6 mm wafer, and the x-surfaces at both ends were mirror-polished. An array of seven Si prism couplers was placed on the y-surface of the MgO:LiNbO3 crystal. The y-surface was also mirror-polished to minimize the coupling gap between the prism base and the crystal surface, and to prevent scattering of the pump beam, which excites a free carrier at the Si prism base. To increase the power density, the pump beam diameter was reduced to 0.3 mm. The polarizations of the pump and THz waves were both parallel to the Z-axis of the crystals. The THz-wave output was measured with a fixed 4 K Si bolometer.
4. Results and Discussion
The THz-wave output map for various pumping wavelengths and corresponding THz-wave frequencies is shown in Fig. 3. The magnitude of the map denotes the output voltage of a Si bolometer with a gain of 200. The noise level of the bolometer was about 10 mV and is shown as the blue region in the figure. The regions where 100 mV and 1 V of output voltage were obtained are green and red, respectively. The blue, green, and red curves are contour plots for 10 mV, 100 mV, and 1 V, respectively. As seen in the figure, wide tunability in the range 0.2–3.0 THz was obtained by choosing the proper pumping wavelength. Especially for lower frequency below 1.0 THz, this was very efficient compared to our previous TPO systems that used 1470 nm pumping.
Figure 4 shows cross sections of the THz-wave output map of Fig. 3. We converted the output voltage of the Si bolometer to the actual THz-wave energy, using the fact that 10 V≈110 pJ/pulse for low repetition rate detection, pulsed heating of the Si device, and an amplifier gain of 200 at the bolometer. The highest THz-wave energy obtained was about 80 pJ, and the energy conversion efficiency from the λ1 wave (1 mJ/pulse) was about 10-5%. This value is comparable to that obtained with our previous TPO systems, despite the low excitation energy of only 1 mJ. The figures clearly show the strong dependence of THz-wave output energy on the pumping wavelength. In the case of 0.8 THz generation, the output energy had a dip at a pumping wavelength of approximately 1400 nm as shown in Fig. 4(a). We obtained extremely high energy in the low-frequency region below 0.3 THz (millimeter wave region) using 1470 nm pumping. The reason for this is not clear, and the dispersion of pumping waves cannot explain the results; thus, an explanation is left for future research. The important result is that we can obtain a flat output spectrum in the range 0.2–2 THz by varying the pumping wavelength.
Čherenkov phase matching inherently requires a waveguide structure for nonlinear polarization waves in the crystal to suppress phase mismatching in the direction perpendicular to the guiding mode (i.e., normal to the crystal surface) . If we reduce the width of the pumping beams in the direction of THz-wave propagation to about one-half of the THz wavelength, (i.e., about 10 µm for 3 THz) by taking into account the refractive index of MgO:LiNbO3 in the THz-wave region, no need exists to consider phase matching in that direction . In our case, the waist of the pump beams in the MgO:LiNbO3 was about 300 µm, which corresponds to about five cycles of THz waves at 1.0 THz, and one cycle of THz waves at 0.2 THz. Although the experimental conditions did not satisfy the requirement for Čherenkov phase matching, we did successfully detect Čherenkov-radiated THz waves, which originated in the higher absorbance area of the crystal at the THz-wave region. The THz waves generated far from the crystal surface would be attenuated and no significant phase mismatch would occur. This also remains an area for future study.
By shaping the pumping beams with a focused cylindrical lens or by adopting the waveguide structure of the crystal , we could neglect phase mismatches and obtain a higher power density of the pumping beams, resulting in higher conversion efficiency.
We demonstrated a Čherenkov phase-matching method for monochromatic THz-wave generation using the DFG process with a lithium niobate crystal, which resulted in both high conversion efficiency and wide tunability. We successfully generated monochromatic THz-waves with wide tunability in the range 0.2–3.0 THz. We obtained efficient energy conversion in the low-frequency region below 0.5 THz, and we achieved a flat tuning spectrum by varying the pumping wavelength during THz-wave tuning. The highest THz-wave energy was about 80 nJ/pulse, and this energy could be obtained for the broad spectral region in the range 0.2–2.0 THz.
The authors thank Dr. J. Shikata of the Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, for useful discussions, C. Takyu for his excellent work coating the crystal surface, and T. Shoji for polishing the crystals superbly. This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Communications Technology, Japan.
References and links
1. G. D. Boyd, T. J. Bridges, C. K. N. Patel, and E. Buehler, “Phase-matched submillimeter wave generation by difference-frequency mixing in ZnGeP2,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 21, 553–555 (1972). [CrossRef]
2. A. Rice, Y. Jin, X. F. Ma, X. C. Zhang, D. Bliss, J. Larkin, and M. Alexander, “Terahertz optical rectification from <110> zinc-blende crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1324–1326 (1994). [CrossRef]
3. W. Shi, Y. J. Ding, N. Fernelius, and K. Vodopyanov, “Efficient, tunable, and coherent 0.18–5.27-THz source based on GaSe crystal,” Opt. Lett. 27, 1454–1456 (2002). [CrossRef]
4. T. Tanabe, K. Suto, J. Nishizawa, K. Saito, and T. Kimura, “Tunable terahertz wave generation in the 3- to 7-THz region from GaP,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 237–239 (2003). [CrossRef]
5. Y. Avetisyan, Y. Sasaki, and H. Ito, “Analysis of THz-wave surface-emitted difference-frequency generation in periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide,” Appl. Phys. B 73, 511–514 (2001). [CrossRef]
6. Y. Sasaki, Y. Avetisyan, K. Kawase, and H. Ito, “Terahertz-wave surface-emitted difference frequency generation in slant-stripe-type periodically poled LiNbO3 crystal,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 3323–3325 (2002). [CrossRef]
7. Y. Sasaki, H. Yokoyama, and H. Ito, “Surface-emitted continuous-wave terahertz radiation using periodically poled lithium niobate,” Electron. Lett. 41, 712–713 (2005). [CrossRef]
8. Y. Sasaki, Y. Avetisyan, H. Yokoyama, and H. Ito, “Surface-emitted terahertz-wave difference frequency generation in two-dimensional periodically poled lithium niobate,” Opt. Lett. 30, 2927–2929 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. D. H. Auston, K. P. Cheung, J. A. Valdmanis, and D. A. Kleinman, “Cherenkov radiation from femtosecond optical pulses in electro-optic media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1555–1558 (1984). [CrossRef]
10. D. A. Kleinman and D. H. Auston, “Theory of electro-optic shock radiation in nonlinear optical media,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 20, 964–970 (1984). [CrossRef]
11. J. Hebling, G. Almasi, I. Kozma, and J. Kuhl, “Velocity matching by pulse front tilting for large area THz pulse generation,” Opt. Express 10, 1161–1166 (2002). [PubMed]
12. K.-L. Yeh, M. C. Hoffmann, J. Hebling, and K. A. Nelson, “Generation of 10 µJ ultrashort THz pulses by optical rectification,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 171121 (2007). [CrossRef]
13. R. L. Sutherland, Handbook of Nonlinear Optics, Chap. 2. Marcel Dekker, New York (2003). [CrossRef]
14. D. Grischkowsky, S. Keiding, M. van Exter, and Ch. Fattinger, “Far-infrared time-domain spectroscopy with terahertz beams of dielectrics and semiconductors,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 2006–2015 (1990). [CrossRef]
15. K. Kawase, J. Shikata, H. Minamide, K. Imai, and H. Ito, “Arrayed silicon prism coupler for a terahertz-wave parametric oscillator,” Appl. Opt. 40, 1423–1426 (2001). [CrossRef]
16. H. Ito, K. Suizu, T. Yamashita, and T. Sato, “Random frequency accessible broad tunable terahertz-wave source using phase-matched 4-dimethylamino-N-methyl-4-stilbazolium tosylate (DAST) crystal,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 7321–7324 (2007). [CrossRef]
17. K. Suizu, T. Shibuya, S. Nagano, T. Akiba, K. Edamatsu, H. Ito, and K. Kawase, “Pulsed high peak power millimeter wave generation via difference frequency generation using periodically poled lithium niobate,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46, L982–L984 (2007). [CrossRef]
18. K. Suizu, Y. Suzuki, Y. Sasaki, H. Ito, and Y. Avetisyan, “Surface-emitted terahertz-wave generation by ridged periodically poled lithium niobate and enhancement by mixing of two terahertz waves,” Opt. Lett. 31, 957–959 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Y. Sasaki, Y. Suzuki, K. Suizu, H. Ito, S. Yamaguchi, and M. Imaeda, “Surface-emitted terahertz-wave difference-frequency generation in periodically poled lithium niobate ridge-type waveguide,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45, L367–369 (2006). [CrossRef]