Abstract

We demonstrate a novel dual-beam atom laser formed by outcoupling oppositely polarized components of an all-optical F = 1 spinor Bose-Einstein condensate whose Zeeman sublevel populations have been coherently evolved through spin dynamics. The condensate is formed through all-optical means using a single-beam running-wave dipole trap. We create a condensate in the magnetic field-insensitive mF = 0 state, and drive coherent spin-mixing evolution through adiabatic compression of the initially weak trap. Such dual beams, number-correlated through the angular momentum-conserving reaction 2m 0m +1 + m -1, have been proposed as tools to explore entanglement and squeezing in Bose-Einstein condensates, and have potential use in precision phase measurements.

©2006 Optical Society of America

Since the creation of the first spinor Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC)[1] and the development of all-optical techniques to achieve BEC[26], a considerable body of work has emerged focusing on the properties and dynamics of spinor condensates, in which the spin degree of freedom (frozen in traditional magnetic-trap BEC) has been liberated and the order parameter is vectorial. Metastable states, spin domains, and coreless vortices were observed in sodium[2, 3, 4], the dynamics of spin mixing in both hyperfine ground states of rubidium have been extensively studied[5, 6, 7, 8, 9], and the coherence of the mixing process has been concretely established[10]. Spin mixing has been used to drive the creation of multicomponent condensates at constant temperature[11], the spatial magnetization profile of an F = 1 spinor BEC has been observed[12], and the clock transition has been explored[13]. Considerable theoretical work has been devoted to the understanding of the spin-spin interaction Hamiltonian and the nature of the spinor condensate ground state[14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. In addition, the spinor condensate has stimulated theoretical proposals regarding schemes to create squeezed and entangled beams of atoms via coherent spin mixing[20, 21]. Notions of entanglement and squeezing in dual-beam atom lasers are inherently related to the number conservation between the two evolved components, resulting in an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen relationship between the measured number of each population. In particular, these proposals suggested a scheme using spin-dependent light shifts to create oppositely propagating beams that were each superpositions of mF = ±1, and explored the correlations between them[20, 21].

In this article we present observations with an experimental scheme aimed at exploring these ideas: the generation of dual atom laser beams with an inherent number correlation between them due to their spin-mixing origin. The novelty of the scheme lies not in the output coupler (simple magnetic field gradients that tilt the optical potential for the polarizable states) but rather in the correlated nature of the outcoupled populations and the utilization of spinor dynamics to ‘pump’ population into the outcoupled states. In addition, the presence of a true reservoir and the ability to control both the strength of the output coupler and the rate of ‘pumping’ make this a particularly intriguing atom-laser scheme.

In optical trapping, the atoms are confined by a dipole-force potential proportional to radiant intensity. The path to condensation is thus largely unconcerned with spin, yet once degeneracy (as well as the high densities associated with it) sets in, the spin-spin interactional energy scale becomes relevant. As such, the interparticle interaction can be described by U(r) = δ(r)(c 0 + c 2 F 1F 2), where c 0 is the traditional scattering length defined as c 0 = [4πh¯ 2/m)[a 0 + 2a 2)/3, and c 2 is the spin-spin energy scale, which is given by c 2 = (4πh¯ 2/m)(a 2 - a 0)/3[14]. Here a 2 and a 0 are the well-known 87Rb scattering lengths in the total spin channels f = 2 and f = 0, respectively[22, 23].

It has been established that the spin-spin interaction of 87Rb is ferromagnetic[5,6], i.e. c 2 < 0, yet since the energy scale is so small (c 2 = -3.6 × 10-14 Hz cm3) a true ground state of this new Hamiltonian is not observable except in μG-level magnetically shielded environments[5]. Nevertheless, a consequence of this interaction at finite field is that spin mixing will occur; in particular, a pure condensate in the field-insensitive mF = 0 sublevel will coherently evolve into a superposition condensate through the collision 2m 0m +1 + m -1, which for the condensate atoms is the only allowed spin dynamics[14, 5]. This spin mixing should be first observed after a timescale of order τ 0 = 1/(c 2 n) at zero field, where n is the mean condensate density; however, the quadratic Zeeman shift is opposed to this evolution, and at a magnetic field where any evolution away from mF = 0 is energetically unfavorable we expect no mixing to occur. In addition, despite low fields, if the condensate number is low enough such that the Thomas-Fermi densities force τ(B 2) = 1/(c 2 n - v B2) to be significant compared to the condensate lifetime, mixing will be inaccessible (this restriction is overcome through adiabatic compression, as detailed below). Worth particular mention among the many other investigations of spin dynamics are the observations of number correlation in the evolved components, performed by examining fluctuations in the ±1 populations of mixed condensates[5]. Also notable is the observation of number-correlated atom laser beams generated as a result of four-wave mixing in a sodium BEC[24].

Our apparatus, similar to that of other groups[25, 26], utilizes a single-beam running-wave dipole trap produced by a focused CO2 laser, which provides at full power a trap depth of approximately 1.6 mK via the DC polarizability of 87Rb. We load the dipole trap from an ultra-high vacuum magneto-optical trap (MOT) which is itself loaded by a cold atomic beam provided by an upstream 2-dimensional MOT[27]. The 2D-MOT exists in a rubidium vapor cell which is differentially pumped from the adjoining science chamber. All 780nm trapping light is provided by a laser system based on a frequency-doubled 1560nm fiber amplifier, described elsewhere[28]. The loading of the dipole trap proceeds according to established technique[26]; we obtain initial populations in the trap of ~ 2 × 106 87Rb atoms at ~ 120 μK. The initial trap frequencies (measured via parametric resonance) are approximately 3.2 kHz transversely and 220 Hz longitudinally.

Evaporative cooling proceeds via a programmed rampdown of CO2 laser intensity. We observed the onset of BEC at critical temperatures near 100 nK with around 105 atoms, and typically obtain condensates of 3 × 104 atoms with little or no discernible thermal component. Typical trap frequencies for holding a formed condensate were 175 Hz (transverse) and 12 Hz (longitudinal).

The spin projections of the condensate are obtained through Stern-Gerlach separation during ballistic expansion. The conveniently located MOT coils are used for this purpose. Absorption imaging is performed on the expanded condensates (or, in the case of the atom lasers, immediately after dipole trap turnoff) using the F = 2 → F′ = 3 transition after optically pumping from the lower ground state.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Spinor BEC creation options: a) the default triplet, with repeatable population distribution likely set by initial MOT alignment; b) mF = 0 trap, created by selective application of magnetic field gradient along the weak axis of the trap; c) enhanced mF = +1, created via application of a supportive gradient throughout evaporation. Gravity is directed toward the lower right, and the trapping laser is directed toward the upper right. All images are of partially condensed samples at a ballistic expansion time of 17.5 ms. The long axis of the dipole trap is directed toward the upper right. Images are 1.3 mm × 1 mm.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 1 summarizes the various types of dipole-trap BECs available to us in the current configuration. Typical evaporation yields a condensate with all three components visible; the ratio of these three populations appears to be a constant of the experiment. It has been speculated that this initial population is set by the particular location of the dipole trap within the MOT reservoir during trap loading[29].

Application of a magnetic field gradient along the weak axis of the trap during the first few seconds of evaporation preferentially biases out the mF = ±1 components, resulting in a BEC solely occupying the field-insensitive mF = 0 projection. It should be noted that this process results in nearly the same number of condensed atoms as the gradient-free process, implying a sympathetic cooling process whereby the polarized components remove more than their average share of thermal energy.

Finally, application of a small magnetic field gradient of order a few G/cm in the vertical direction provides a bias for one or the other polarized components. If this supportive gradient is only on for the first few seconds of evaporation, we obtain polarized condensates of number similar to the other options. However, if this gradient is maintained through condensate formation and through ballistic expansion, we observe significant enhancement in condensate number of order 100%; we attribute this to the fact that the trap depth is strongly perturbed by gravity near criticality, and even a gradient small with respect to gravity allows for much more efficient near-critical evaporation.

For the observations reported here, we begin with a nominally pure mF = 0 condensate held in a trap whose unperturbed depth is 5 μK and is approximately a factor of 10 weaker due to gravitational tilt. Typical condensate densities at this point are in the range 4 - 6 × 1013 cm-3, and even given up to two seconds of observation spin mixing does not occur. We fix background field levels at 60 mG as determined by RF spectroscopy. To coherently mix the condensate we adiabatically compress the trapping field by raising the laser power from 100 mW to 700 mW over 100 ms, holding the compressed condensate for a variable time, adiabatically expanding, and finally ballistically expanding while applying the Stern-Gerlach field, as summarized by Fig. 2. We observe that the fraction of atoms evolved into the polarized projections increases with high-density hold time and eventually reaches a static level of 50%, as expected given previous experiments and theoretical prediction[5, 15]. Oscillations of spin populations are obscured by imaging noise and considerable shot-to-shot number variance. We also observe that the time taken to reach this steady state varies linearly with density, with a possible offset given by the density at which the quadratic Zeeman effect dominates the dynamics. Densities are calculated in the Thomas-Fermi picture wherein the peak condensate density varies as npN 2/5 U03/5, where U 0 is calculated from the trap frequencies alone and is only slightly perturbed by the strong gravitational tilt which so strongly affects evaporation. We observe strong losses at high (> 2 W) compression assumed to be caused by three-body recombination; the loss rates are consistent with projected values of the Thomas-Fermi densities and the measured value of the three-body rate constant K 3c[30].

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. The effect of adiabatic compression on the spin mixing process; the top row shows condensates held for equivalent durations without compression. a) 100 ms of hold time at 700 mW b) 400 ms of hold time c) 1.2 s of hold time. The slightly fewer overall number in (c) is due to condensate lifetime. The ballistic expansion time for all images is 17.5 ms. Images are 1 mm × .8 mm.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

After compression-driven spin mixing, we implement magnetic outcoupling, similar in principle to the all-optical mF = 0 atom laser reported in 2003[25] but applied in a state-selective fashion whereby applied field gradients nonadiabatically distort the trapping potential and provide a velocity kick for spin-polarized atoms to escape. Fig. 3 illustrates a typical run; here, a magnetic field gradient dominantly directed along the weak axis of the optical trap (toward the upper right) is turned on quickly (over several ms) at a variable delay (5–50 ms) before the optical trap is turned off. In this case ballistic expansion is limited to a minimum time of 100 μs (nonzero so as to allow for optical pumping), and is thus effectively in situ.

Using slightly different velocity kicks we observe several variants of the dual-beam atom laser. Most commonly, we observe immediate outcoupling and ballistic flight of the mF = -1 component while the mF = +1 component first propagates in the opposite direction (as expected), reverses its motion, passes through the parent mF = 0 condensate, and finally escapes, as depicted in Fig. 3. With greater velocity kicks, we also observe the more intuitive case of both polarized components escaping into ballistic flight from opposite ends of the cigar-shaped trap. Rarely, we observe partial exit of an evolved fraction due to insufficient magnetic field tilt compared to the condensate chemical potential μ, which illustrates the fine control of output coupling possible using this scheme. Deviation from horizontal of the trap itself is also assumed to bias the exit paths of the evolved components.

The shape of the outcoupled fraction demands close inspection. To begin with, the transverse atom laser density profile obtained by gravity-directed beams[31, 25] is not to be expected here, as we outcouple over timescales short enough such that the combination of gravity and local gradients do not move the outcoupled fraction appreciably over the time that the trap height U 0 tilts significantly with respect to μ. This short outcoupling time is helpful in making sure that the broad resulting clouds are visible. We do observe a downward-directed atom laser in the case of the aforementioned ‘supported’ condensate, depicted in Fig. 4, outcoupled simply by removing the support in the last few ms before ballistic expansion. This effect is unrelated to the physics of spin mixing or number-correlated dual-beam atom lasers and is essentially analogous to the Tübingen experiment[25].

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. A typical outcoupling run of the spinor dynamics-driven dual beam atom laser. a) 0 ms: the full condensate, in situ. b)+ 20 ms: immediately after outcoupling. The mF = -1 component immediately passes beyond the reach of the dipole trap and experiences ballistic flight and mean-field expansion. The mF = +1 component remains confined in an effective guide and travels in the opposite direction. c) +25 ms: the mF = -1 beam continues to propagate while the mF = +1 beam is turned around and returned toward the origin. d) +45 ms: the mF = +1 beam now falls freely and experiences mean-field expansion, like the mF = -1 component before it. Note a slightly different path than mF = -1. e) +50 ms: continued mF = +1 propagation; note the mF = -1 component has traveled out of the field of view by this point. Images are 1 mm × .25 mm; gravity is directed toward the lower right and the trapping laser is directed toward the upper right.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Downward outcoupling of the supported mF = +1 condensate (cf. Fig. 1c), generated by removing the supportive gradient that had preferentially created a polarized condensate. This is shown to illustrate the difference in outcoupled beam collimation between the case where mean-field expansion is along the direction of propagation and the case of the spinor dynamics-driven atom laser in Fig. 3, where expansion is perpendicular to travel. Images are 1.2 mm × .75 mm.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The immediate broadening of the outcoupled spinor atom laser pulse compared to the downward-directed one is perhaps counterintuitive, but can be explained in terms of the nature of the condensate and the path it takes via the long axis of the trap, rather than the more traditional transverse outcoupling. The horizontally outcoupled beam experiences preferred mean-field expansion perpendicular to the direction of travel, and thus does not exhibit the tight collimation characteristic of our downward-directed mF = +1 pulse. We have duplicated this behavior using simple simulations combining center-of-mass motion and standard mean-field expansion theory.

Since not all of the initial reservoir is used up in the creation of the dual-beam atom laser, in principle our compression and outcoupling process could be repeated as long as a population of mF = 0 atoms remained. The current experiment does not produce large condensate numbers, but several groups have produced large-N spinor condensates showing that such quasi-continuous generation of spinor dynamics-driven atom laser pairs is achievable.

The impetus behind this work is the set of proposals that seek to create squeezing and entanglement in oppositely-propagating atom laser beams which originate in optically-trapped BEC. Future work will explore the nature of correlations and entanglement in these beams, the possibility of spin-independent outcoupling as in the 2000 proposals, and also explore the possibilities of improving this process into the quasi-continuous regime. Also of interest is the possibility of creating undisturbed number states, which would be useful for Heisenberg-limited precision phase measurements[32].

We acknowledge helpful conversation with Eric Burt, Nan Yu, James Kohel, and Kenneth Libbrecht. The research described here was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

References and links

1. J. Stengeret al., “Spin domains in ground-state Bose-Einstein condensates,” Nature 396, 345 (1998). [CrossRef]  

2. H.-J. Miesneret al., “Observation of metastable states in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2228–2231 (1999). [CrossRef]  

3. D. M. Stamper-Kurnet al., “Quantum tunneling across spin domains in a Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 661–665 (1999). [CrossRef]  

4. A. E. Leanhardtet al., “Coreless vortex formation in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 140403 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. M.-S. Changet al., “Observation of spinor dynamics in optically trapped 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 140,403 (2004).

6. H. Schmaljohannet al., “Dynamics of F = 2 spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 040402 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. J. Mur-Petitet al., “Dynamics of F = 1 87Rb condensates at finite temperatures,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 013629 (2006). [CrossRef]  

8. J. Kronjageret al., “Evolution of a spinor condensate: coherent dynamics, dephasing, and revivals,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 063619 (2005). [CrossRef]  

9. T. Kuwamotoet al., “Magnetic field dependence of the dynamics of 87Rb spin-2 Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 063604 (2004). [CrossRef]  

10. M.-S. Changet al., “Coherent spinor dynamics in a spin-1 Bose condensate,” Nature Phys. 1, 111 (2005). [CrossRef]  

11. M. Erhardet al., “Bose-Einstein condensation at constant temperature,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 031602 (2004). [CrossRef]  

12. J. M. Higbieet al., “Direct nondestructive imaging of magnetization in a spin-1 Bose-Einstein gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 050401 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. A. Gorlitzet al., “Sodium Bose-Einstein condensates in the F = 2 State in a large-volume optical trap,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 090401 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. T.-L. Ho, “Spinor Bose condensates in optical traps,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 742 (1998). [CrossRef]  

15. W. Zhang, S. Yi, and L. You, “Mean field ground state of a spin-1 condensate in a magnetic field,” New J. Phys. 5, 77.1 (2003). [CrossRef]  

16. C. K. Law, H. Pu, and N. P. Bigelow, “Quantum spins mixing in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5257–5261 (1998). [CrossRef]  

17. T. Ohmi and K. Machida, “Bose-Einstein condensation with internal degrees of freedom in alkali atom gases,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 67, 1822 (1998). [CrossRef]  

18. W. Zhanget al., “Coherent spin mixing dynamics in a spin-1 atomic condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 013602 (2005). [CrossRef]  

19. H. Puet al., “Spin-mixing dynamics of a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 1463–1470 (1999). [CrossRef]  

20. L.-M. Duan, A. Sorenson, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Squeezing and entanglement of atomic beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3991 (2000). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. H. Pu and P. Meystre, “Creating macroscopic atomic Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen states from Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3987 (2000). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. E. G. M. van Kempenet al., “Interisotope determination of ultracold rubidium interactions from three high-precision experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093201 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. N. N. Klausen, J. L. Bohn, and C. H. Greene, “Nature of spinor Bose-Einstein condensates in rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 053602 (2001). [CrossRef]  

24. J. Vogels, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, “Generation of macroscopic pair-correlated atomic beams by four-wave mixing in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 020401 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. G. Cenniniet al., “All-optical realization of an atom laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240408 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. M. D. Barrett, J. A. Sauer, and M. S. Chapman, “All-optical formation of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010404 (2001). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. K. Dieckmannet al., “Two-dimensional magneto-optical trap as a source of slow atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 58, 3891–3895 (1998). [CrossRef]  

28. R. J. Thompson, M. Tu, D. C. Aveline, N. Lundblad, and L. Maleki, “High power single frequency 780nm laser source generated from frequency doubling of a seeded fiber amplifier in a cascade of PPLN crystals,” Optics Express 11, 1709 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. R. Dumkeet al., “All-optical generation and photoassociative probing of sodium Bose-Einstein condensates,” New Journal of Physics 8, 64 (2006). [CrossRef]  

30. E. A. Burtet al., “Coherence, correlations, and collisions: what one learns about Bose-Einstein condensates from their decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 337 (1997). [CrossRef]  

31. I. Bloch, T. W. Hansch, and T. Esslinger, “Atom laser with a cw output coupler,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3008–3011 (1999). [CrossRef]  

32. P. Bouyer and M. A. Kasevich, “Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with degenerate Bose-Einstein gases,” Phys. Rev. A 56, R1083–R1086 (1997). [CrossRef]  

References

  • View by:

  1. J. Stengeret al., “Spin domains in ground-state Bose-Einstein condensates,” Nature 396, 345 (1998).
    [Crossref]
  2. H.-J. Miesneret al., “Observation of metastable states in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2228–2231 (1999).
    [Crossref]
  3. D. M. Stamper-Kurnet al., “Quantum tunneling across spin domains in a Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 661–665 (1999).
    [Crossref]
  4. A. E. Leanhardtet al., “Coreless vortex formation in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 140403 (2003).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. M.-S. Changet al., “Observation of spinor dynamics in optically trapped 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 140,403 (2004).
  6. H. Schmaljohannet al., “Dynamics of F = 2 spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 040402 (2004).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. J. Mur-Petitet al., “Dynamics of F = 1 87Rb condensates at finite temperatures,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 013629 (2006).
    [Crossref]
  8. J. Kronjageret al., “Evolution of a spinor condensate: coherent dynamics, dephasing, and revivals,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 063619 (2005).
    [Crossref]
  9. T. Kuwamotoet al., “Magnetic field dependence of the dynamics of 87Rb spin-2 Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 063604 (2004).
    [Crossref]
  10. M.-S. Changet al., “Coherent spinor dynamics in a spin-1 Bose condensate,” Nature Phys. 1, 111 (2005).
    [Crossref]
  11. M. Erhardet al., “Bose-Einstein condensation at constant temperature,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 031602 (2004).
    [Crossref]
  12. J. M. Higbieet al., “Direct nondestructive imaging of magnetization in a spin-1 Bose-Einstein gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 050401 (2005).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. A. Gorlitzet al., “Sodium Bose-Einstein condensates in the F = 2 State in a large-volume optical trap,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 090401 (2003).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. T.-L. Ho, “Spinor Bose condensates in optical traps,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 742 (1998).
    [Crossref]
  15. W. Zhang, S. Yi, and L. You, “Mean field ground state of a spin-1 condensate in a magnetic field,” New J. Phys. 5, 77.1 (2003).
    [Crossref]
  16. C. K. Law, H. Pu, and N. P. Bigelow, “Quantum spins mixing in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5257–5261 (1998).
    [Crossref]
  17. T. Ohmi and K. Machida, “Bose-Einstein condensation with internal degrees of freedom in alkali atom gases,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 67, 1822 (1998).
    [Crossref]
  18. W. Zhanget al., “Coherent spin mixing dynamics in a spin-1 atomic condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 013602 (2005).
    [Crossref]
  19. H. Puet al., “Spin-mixing dynamics of a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 1463–1470 (1999).
    [Crossref]
  20. L.-M. Duan, A. Sorenson, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Squeezing and entanglement of atomic beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3991 (2000).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. H. Pu and P. Meystre, “Creating macroscopic atomic Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen states from Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3987 (2000).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. E. G. M. van Kempenet al., “Interisotope determination of ultracold rubidium interactions from three high-precision experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093201 (2002).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. N. N. Klausen, J. L. Bohn, and C. H. Greene, “Nature of spinor Bose-Einstein condensates in rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 053602 (2001).
    [Crossref]
  24. J. Vogels, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, “Generation of macroscopic pair-correlated atomic beams by four-wave mixing in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 020401 (2002).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. G. Cenniniet al., “All-optical realization of an atom laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240408 (2003).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. M. D. Barrett, J. A. Sauer, and M. S. Chapman, “All-optical formation of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010404 (2001).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. K. Dieckmannet al., “Two-dimensional magneto-optical trap as a source of slow atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 58, 3891–3895 (1998).
    [Crossref]
  28. R. J. Thompson, M. Tu, D. C. Aveline, N. Lundblad, and L. Maleki, “High power single frequency 780nm laser source generated from frequency doubling of a seeded fiber amplifier in a cascade of PPLN crystals,” Optics Express 11, 1709 (2003).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  29. R. Dumkeet al., “All-optical generation and photoassociative probing of sodium Bose-Einstein condensates,” New Journal of Physics 8, 64 (2006).
    [Crossref]
  30. E. A. Burtet al., “Coherence, correlations, and collisions: what one learns about Bose-Einstein condensates from their decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 337 (1997).
    [Crossref]
  31. I. Bloch, T. W. Hansch, and T. Esslinger, “Atom laser with a cw output coupler,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3008–3011 (1999).
    [Crossref]
  32. P. Bouyer and M. A. Kasevich, “Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with degenerate Bose-Einstein gases,” Phys. Rev. A 56, R1083–R1086 (1997).
    [Crossref]

2006 (2)

J. Mur-Petitet al., “Dynamics of F = 1 87Rb condensates at finite temperatures,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 013629 (2006).
[Crossref]

R. Dumkeet al., “All-optical generation and photoassociative probing of sodium Bose-Einstein condensates,” New Journal of Physics 8, 64 (2006).
[Crossref]

2005 (4)

J. Kronjageret al., “Evolution of a spinor condensate: coherent dynamics, dephasing, and revivals,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 063619 (2005).
[Crossref]

M.-S. Changet al., “Coherent spinor dynamics in a spin-1 Bose condensate,” Nature Phys. 1, 111 (2005).
[Crossref]

J. M. Higbieet al., “Direct nondestructive imaging of magnetization in a spin-1 Bose-Einstein gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 050401 (2005).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

W. Zhanget al., “Coherent spin mixing dynamics in a spin-1 atomic condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 013602 (2005).
[Crossref]

2004 (4)

M. Erhardet al., “Bose-Einstein condensation at constant temperature,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 031602 (2004).
[Crossref]

T. Kuwamotoet al., “Magnetic field dependence of the dynamics of 87Rb spin-2 Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 063604 (2004).
[Crossref]

M.-S. Changet al., “Observation of spinor dynamics in optically trapped 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 140,403 (2004).

H. Schmaljohannet al., “Dynamics of F = 2 spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 040402 (2004).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2003 (5)

A. E. Leanhardtet al., “Coreless vortex formation in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 140403 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

A. Gorlitzet al., “Sodium Bose-Einstein condensates in the F = 2 State in a large-volume optical trap,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 090401 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

W. Zhang, S. Yi, and L. You, “Mean field ground state of a spin-1 condensate in a magnetic field,” New J. Phys. 5, 77.1 (2003).
[Crossref]

G. Cenniniet al., “All-optical realization of an atom laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240408 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

R. J. Thompson, M. Tu, D. C. Aveline, N. Lundblad, and L. Maleki, “High power single frequency 780nm laser source generated from frequency doubling of a seeded fiber amplifier in a cascade of PPLN crystals,” Optics Express 11, 1709 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2002 (2)

J. Vogels, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, “Generation of macroscopic pair-correlated atomic beams by four-wave mixing in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 020401 (2002).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

E. G. M. van Kempenet al., “Interisotope determination of ultracold rubidium interactions from three high-precision experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093201 (2002).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2001 (2)

N. N. Klausen, J. L. Bohn, and C. H. Greene, “Nature of spinor Bose-Einstein condensates in rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 053602 (2001).
[Crossref]

M. D. Barrett, J. A. Sauer, and M. S. Chapman, “All-optical formation of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010404 (2001).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2000 (2)

L.-M. Duan, A. Sorenson, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Squeezing and entanglement of atomic beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3991 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

H. Pu and P. Meystre, “Creating macroscopic atomic Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen states from Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3987 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

1999 (4)

I. Bloch, T. W. Hansch, and T. Esslinger, “Atom laser with a cw output coupler,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3008–3011 (1999).
[Crossref]

H. Puet al., “Spin-mixing dynamics of a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 1463–1470 (1999).
[Crossref]

H.-J. Miesneret al., “Observation of metastable states in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2228–2231 (1999).
[Crossref]

D. M. Stamper-Kurnet al., “Quantum tunneling across spin domains in a Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 661–665 (1999).
[Crossref]

1998 (5)

J. Stengeret al., “Spin domains in ground-state Bose-Einstein condensates,” Nature 396, 345 (1998).
[Crossref]

C. K. Law, H. Pu, and N. P. Bigelow, “Quantum spins mixing in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5257–5261 (1998).
[Crossref]

T. Ohmi and K. Machida, “Bose-Einstein condensation with internal degrees of freedom in alkali atom gases,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 67, 1822 (1998).
[Crossref]

T.-L. Ho, “Spinor Bose condensates in optical traps,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 742 (1998).
[Crossref]

K. Dieckmannet al., “Two-dimensional magneto-optical trap as a source of slow atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 58, 3891–3895 (1998).
[Crossref]

1997 (2)

P. Bouyer and M. A. Kasevich, “Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with degenerate Bose-Einstein gases,” Phys. Rev. A 56, R1083–R1086 (1997).
[Crossref]

E. A. Burtet al., “Coherence, correlations, and collisions: what one learns about Bose-Einstein condensates from their decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 337 (1997).
[Crossref]

Aveline, D. C.

R. J. Thompson, M. Tu, D. C. Aveline, N. Lundblad, and L. Maleki, “High power single frequency 780nm laser source generated from frequency doubling of a seeded fiber amplifier in a cascade of PPLN crystals,” Optics Express 11, 1709 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Barrett, M. D.

M. D. Barrett, J. A. Sauer, and M. S. Chapman, “All-optical formation of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010404 (2001).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Bigelow, N. P.

C. K. Law, H. Pu, and N. P. Bigelow, “Quantum spins mixing in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5257–5261 (1998).
[Crossref]

Bloch, I.

I. Bloch, T. W. Hansch, and T. Esslinger, “Atom laser with a cw output coupler,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3008–3011 (1999).
[Crossref]

Bohn, J. L.

N. N. Klausen, J. L. Bohn, and C. H. Greene, “Nature of spinor Bose-Einstein condensates in rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 053602 (2001).
[Crossref]

Bouyer, P.

P. Bouyer and M. A. Kasevich, “Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with degenerate Bose-Einstein gases,” Phys. Rev. A 56, R1083–R1086 (1997).
[Crossref]

Burt, E. A.

E. A. Burtet al., “Coherence, correlations, and collisions: what one learns about Bose-Einstein condensates from their decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 337 (1997).
[Crossref]

Cennini, G.

G. Cenniniet al., “All-optical realization of an atom laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240408 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Chang, M.-S.

M.-S. Changet al., “Coherent spinor dynamics in a spin-1 Bose condensate,” Nature Phys. 1, 111 (2005).
[Crossref]

M.-S. Changet al., “Observation of spinor dynamics in optically trapped 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 140,403 (2004).

Chapman, M. S.

M. D. Barrett, J. A. Sauer, and M. S. Chapman, “All-optical formation of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010404 (2001).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Cirac, J. I.

L.-M. Duan, A. Sorenson, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Squeezing and entanglement of atomic beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3991 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Dieckmann, K.

K. Dieckmannet al., “Two-dimensional magneto-optical trap as a source of slow atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 58, 3891–3895 (1998).
[Crossref]

Duan, L.-M.

L.-M. Duan, A. Sorenson, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Squeezing and entanglement of atomic beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3991 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Dumke, R.

R. Dumkeet al., “All-optical generation and photoassociative probing of sodium Bose-Einstein condensates,” New Journal of Physics 8, 64 (2006).
[Crossref]

Erhard, M.

M. Erhardet al., “Bose-Einstein condensation at constant temperature,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 031602 (2004).
[Crossref]

Esslinger, T.

I. Bloch, T. W. Hansch, and T. Esslinger, “Atom laser with a cw output coupler,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3008–3011 (1999).
[Crossref]

Gorlitz, A.

A. Gorlitzet al., “Sodium Bose-Einstein condensates in the F = 2 State in a large-volume optical trap,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 090401 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Greene, C. H.

N. N. Klausen, J. L. Bohn, and C. H. Greene, “Nature of spinor Bose-Einstein condensates in rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 053602 (2001).
[Crossref]

Hansch, T. W.

I. Bloch, T. W. Hansch, and T. Esslinger, “Atom laser with a cw output coupler,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3008–3011 (1999).
[Crossref]

Higbie, J. M.

J. M. Higbieet al., “Direct nondestructive imaging of magnetization in a spin-1 Bose-Einstein gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 050401 (2005).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Ho, T.-L.

T.-L. Ho, “Spinor Bose condensates in optical traps,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 742 (1998).
[Crossref]

Kasevich, M. A.

P. Bouyer and M. A. Kasevich, “Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with degenerate Bose-Einstein gases,” Phys. Rev. A 56, R1083–R1086 (1997).
[Crossref]

Kempen, E. G. M. van

E. G. M. van Kempenet al., “Interisotope determination of ultracold rubidium interactions from three high-precision experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093201 (2002).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Ketterle, W.

J. Vogels, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, “Generation of macroscopic pair-correlated atomic beams by four-wave mixing in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 020401 (2002).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Klausen, N. N.

N. N. Klausen, J. L. Bohn, and C. H. Greene, “Nature of spinor Bose-Einstein condensates in rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 053602 (2001).
[Crossref]

Kronjager, J.

J. Kronjageret al., “Evolution of a spinor condensate: coherent dynamics, dephasing, and revivals,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 063619 (2005).
[Crossref]

Kuwamoto, T.

T. Kuwamotoet al., “Magnetic field dependence of the dynamics of 87Rb spin-2 Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 063604 (2004).
[Crossref]

Law, C. K.

C. K. Law, H. Pu, and N. P. Bigelow, “Quantum spins mixing in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5257–5261 (1998).
[Crossref]

Leanhardt, A. E.

A. E. Leanhardtet al., “Coreless vortex formation in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 140403 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Lundblad, N.

R. J. Thompson, M. Tu, D. C. Aveline, N. Lundblad, and L. Maleki, “High power single frequency 780nm laser source generated from frequency doubling of a seeded fiber amplifier in a cascade of PPLN crystals,” Optics Express 11, 1709 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Machida, K.

T. Ohmi and K. Machida, “Bose-Einstein condensation with internal degrees of freedom in alkali atom gases,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 67, 1822 (1998).
[Crossref]

Maleki, L.

R. J. Thompson, M. Tu, D. C. Aveline, N. Lundblad, and L. Maleki, “High power single frequency 780nm laser source generated from frequency doubling of a seeded fiber amplifier in a cascade of PPLN crystals,” Optics Express 11, 1709 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Meystre, P.

H. Pu and P. Meystre, “Creating macroscopic atomic Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen states from Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3987 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Miesner, H.-J.

H.-J. Miesneret al., “Observation of metastable states in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2228–2231 (1999).
[Crossref]

Mur-Petit, J.

J. Mur-Petitet al., “Dynamics of F = 1 87Rb condensates at finite temperatures,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 013629 (2006).
[Crossref]

Ohmi, T.

T. Ohmi and K. Machida, “Bose-Einstein condensation with internal degrees of freedom in alkali atom gases,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 67, 1822 (1998).
[Crossref]

Pu, H.

H. Pu and P. Meystre, “Creating macroscopic atomic Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen states from Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3987 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

H. Puet al., “Spin-mixing dynamics of a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 1463–1470 (1999).
[Crossref]

C. K. Law, H. Pu, and N. P. Bigelow, “Quantum spins mixing in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5257–5261 (1998).
[Crossref]

Sauer, J. A.

M. D. Barrett, J. A. Sauer, and M. S. Chapman, “All-optical formation of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010404 (2001).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Schmaljohann, H.

H. Schmaljohannet al., “Dynamics of F = 2 spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 040402 (2004).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Sorenson, A.

L.-M. Duan, A. Sorenson, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Squeezing and entanglement of atomic beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3991 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Stamper-Kurn, D. M.

D. M. Stamper-Kurnet al., “Quantum tunneling across spin domains in a Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 661–665 (1999).
[Crossref]

Stenger, J.

J. Stengeret al., “Spin domains in ground-state Bose-Einstein condensates,” Nature 396, 345 (1998).
[Crossref]

Thompson, R. J.

R. J. Thompson, M. Tu, D. C. Aveline, N. Lundblad, and L. Maleki, “High power single frequency 780nm laser source generated from frequency doubling of a seeded fiber amplifier in a cascade of PPLN crystals,” Optics Express 11, 1709 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Tu, M.

R. J. Thompson, M. Tu, D. C. Aveline, N. Lundblad, and L. Maleki, “High power single frequency 780nm laser source generated from frequency doubling of a seeded fiber amplifier in a cascade of PPLN crystals,” Optics Express 11, 1709 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Vogels, J.

J. Vogels, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, “Generation of macroscopic pair-correlated atomic beams by four-wave mixing in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 020401 (2002).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Xu, K.

J. Vogels, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, “Generation of macroscopic pair-correlated atomic beams by four-wave mixing in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 020401 (2002).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Yi, S.

W. Zhang, S. Yi, and L. You, “Mean field ground state of a spin-1 condensate in a magnetic field,” New J. Phys. 5, 77.1 (2003).
[Crossref]

You, L.

W. Zhang, S. Yi, and L. You, “Mean field ground state of a spin-1 condensate in a magnetic field,” New J. Phys. 5, 77.1 (2003).
[Crossref]

Zhang, W.

W. Zhanget al., “Coherent spin mixing dynamics in a spin-1 atomic condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 013602 (2005).
[Crossref]

W. Zhang, S. Yi, and L. You, “Mean field ground state of a spin-1 condensate in a magnetic field,” New J. Phys. 5, 77.1 (2003).
[Crossref]

Zoller, P.

L.-M. Duan, A. Sorenson, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Squeezing and entanglement of atomic beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3991 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

J. Phys. Soc. Japan (1)

T. Ohmi and K. Machida, “Bose-Einstein condensation with internal degrees of freedom in alkali atom gases,” J. Phys. Soc. Japan 67, 1822 (1998).
[Crossref]

Nature (1)

J. Stengeret al., “Spin domains in ground-state Bose-Einstein condensates,” Nature 396, 345 (1998).
[Crossref]

Nature Phys. (1)

M.-S. Changet al., “Coherent spinor dynamics in a spin-1 Bose condensate,” Nature Phys. 1, 111 (2005).
[Crossref]

New J. Phys. (1)

W. Zhang, S. Yi, and L. You, “Mean field ground state of a spin-1 condensate in a magnetic field,” New J. Phys. 5, 77.1 (2003).
[Crossref]

New Journal of Physics (1)

R. Dumkeet al., “All-optical generation and photoassociative probing of sodium Bose-Einstein condensates,” New Journal of Physics 8, 64 (2006).
[Crossref]

Optics Express (1)

R. J. Thompson, M. Tu, D. C. Aveline, N. Lundblad, and L. Maleki, “High power single frequency 780nm laser source generated from frequency doubling of a seeded fiber amplifier in a cascade of PPLN crystals,” Optics Express 11, 1709 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Phys. Rev. A (9)

K. Dieckmannet al., “Two-dimensional magneto-optical trap as a source of slow atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 58, 3891–3895 (1998).
[Crossref]

N. N. Klausen, J. L. Bohn, and C. H. Greene, “Nature of spinor Bose-Einstein condensates in rubidium,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 053602 (2001).
[Crossref]

P. Bouyer and M. A. Kasevich, “Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with degenerate Bose-Einstein gases,” Phys. Rev. A 56, R1083–R1086 (1997).
[Crossref]

J. Mur-Petitet al., “Dynamics of F = 1 87Rb condensates at finite temperatures,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 013629 (2006).
[Crossref]

J. Kronjageret al., “Evolution of a spinor condensate: coherent dynamics, dephasing, and revivals,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 063619 (2005).
[Crossref]

T. Kuwamotoet al., “Magnetic field dependence of the dynamics of 87Rb spin-2 Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 063604 (2004).
[Crossref]

W. Zhanget al., “Coherent spin mixing dynamics in a spin-1 atomic condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 013602 (2005).
[Crossref]

H. Puet al., “Spin-mixing dynamics of a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 60, 1463–1470 (1999).
[Crossref]

M. Erhardet al., “Bose-Einstein condensation at constant temperature,” Phys. Rev. A 70, 031602 (2004).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. Lett (2)

L.-M. Duan, A. Sorenson, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Squeezing and entanglement of atomic beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3991 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

H. Pu and P. Meystre, “Creating macroscopic atomic Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen states from Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3987 (2000).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (15)

E. G. M. van Kempenet al., “Interisotope determination of ultracold rubidium interactions from three high-precision experiments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 093201 (2002).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

C. K. Law, H. Pu, and N. P. Bigelow, “Quantum spins mixing in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5257–5261 (1998).
[Crossref]

J. M. Higbieet al., “Direct nondestructive imaging of magnetization in a spin-1 Bose-Einstein gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 050401 (2005).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

A. Gorlitzet al., “Sodium Bose-Einstein condensates in the F = 2 State in a large-volume optical trap,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 090401 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

T.-L. Ho, “Spinor Bose condensates in optical traps,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 742 (1998).
[Crossref]

H.-J. Miesneret al., “Observation of metastable states in spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2228–2231 (1999).
[Crossref]

D. M. Stamper-Kurnet al., “Quantum tunneling across spin domains in a Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 661–665 (1999).
[Crossref]

A. E. Leanhardtet al., “Coreless vortex formation in a spinor Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 140403 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

M.-S. Changet al., “Observation of spinor dynamics in optically trapped 87Rb Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 140,403 (2004).

H. Schmaljohannet al., “Dynamics of F = 2 spinor Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 040402 (2004).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

J. Vogels, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, “Generation of macroscopic pair-correlated atomic beams by four-wave mixing in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 020401 (2002).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

G. Cenniniet al., “All-optical realization of an atom laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240408 (2003).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

M. D. Barrett, J. A. Sauer, and M. S. Chapman, “All-optical formation of an atomic Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 010404 (2001).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

E. A. Burtet al., “Coherence, correlations, and collisions: what one learns about Bose-Einstein condensates from their decay,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 337 (1997).
[Crossref]

I. Bloch, T. W. Hansch, and T. Esslinger, “Atom laser with a cw output coupler,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3008–3011 (1999).
[Crossref]

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Spinor BEC creation options: a) the default triplet, with repeatable population distribution likely set by initial MOT alignment; b) mF = 0 trap, created by selective application of magnetic field gradient along the weak axis of the trap; c) enhanced mF = +1, created via application of a supportive gradient throughout evaporation. Gravity is directed toward the lower right, and the trapping laser is directed toward the upper right. All images are of partially condensed samples at a ballistic expansion time of 17.5 ms. The long axis of the dipole trap is directed toward the upper right. Images are 1.3 mm × 1 mm.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The effect of adiabatic compression on the spin mixing process; the top row shows condensates held for equivalent durations without compression. a) 100 ms of hold time at 700 mW b) 400 ms of hold time c) 1.2 s of hold time. The slightly fewer overall number in (c) is due to condensate lifetime. The ballistic expansion time for all images is 17.5 ms. Images are 1 mm × .8 mm.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. A typical outcoupling run of the spinor dynamics-driven dual beam atom laser. a) 0 ms: the full condensate, in situ. b)+ 20 ms: immediately after outcoupling. The mF = -1 component immediately passes beyond the reach of the dipole trap and experiences ballistic flight and mean-field expansion. The mF = +1 component remains confined in an effective guide and travels in the opposite direction. c) +25 ms: the mF = -1 beam continues to propagate while the mF = +1 beam is turned around and returned toward the origin. d) +45 ms: the mF = +1 beam now falls freely and experiences mean-field expansion, like the mF = -1 component before it. Note a slightly different path than mF = -1. e) +50 ms: continued mF = +1 propagation; note the mF = -1 component has traveled out of the field of view by this point. Images are 1 mm × .25 mm; gravity is directed toward the lower right and the trapping laser is directed toward the upper right.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Downward outcoupling of the supported mF = +1 condensate (cf. Fig. 1c), generated by removing the supportive gradient that had preferentially created a polarized condensate. This is shown to illustrate the difference in outcoupled beam collimation between the case where mean-field expansion is along the direction of propagation and the case of the spinor dynamics-driven atom laser in Fig. 3, where expansion is perpendicular to travel. Images are 1.2 mm × .75 mm.

Metrics