Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Microcavities based on multimodal interference

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We describe intricate cavity mode structures, that are possible in waveguide devices with two or more guided modes. The main element is interference between the scattered fields of two modes at the facets, resulting in multipole or mode cancelations. Therefore, strong coupling between the modes, such as around zero group velocity points, is advantageous to obtain high quality factors. We discuss the mechanism in three different settings: a cylindrical structure with and without negative group velocity mode, and a surface plasmon device. A general semi-analytical expression for the cavity parameters describes the phenomenon, and it is validated with extensive numerical calculations.

©2007 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Microcavity confinement based on an anomalous zero group-velocity waveguide mode

Mihai Ibanescu, Steven G. Johnson, David Roundy, Yoel Fink, and J. D. Joannopoulos
Opt. Lett. 30(5) 552-554 (2005)

Tunable triple Fano resonances based on multimode interference in coupled plasmonic resonator system

Shilei Li, Yunyun Zhang, Xiaokang Song, Yilin Wang, and Li Yu
Opt. Express 24(14) 15351-15361 (2016)

Fano resonances based on multimode and degenerate mode interference in plasmonic resonator system

Shilei Li, Yilin Wang, Rongzhen Jiao, Lulu Wang, Gaoyan Duan, and Li Yu
Opt. Express 25(4) 3525-3533 (2017)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (13)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) General picture of a system with two circulating modes. (b) Schematic of the cylindrical structure. The dashed line is the axis of the cylinder. (b) Dispersion of the HE11 mode.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Q versus L of the resonances. Dots are data points from mode expansion (CAMFR), crosses present results from FDTD (MEEP). (b) ω versus L for the same cavity modes.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) Field plot of some resonances. The electric field along ϕ is shown. L n and ωn are L/a and ω ×(a/2πc), respectively. (b) Far-field on- and off-resonance. The magnetic field along the direction of the axis is shown. The cavity is located to the left of these plots.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Magnitudes of the reflection matrix elements for the cylindrical structure with the negative group velocity mode.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Magnitude squared of the two eigenvalues for the cylindrical structure in the frequency range with a negative group velocity mode.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Dispersion of the TE modes with angular momentum zero in the cylindrical structure. The frequency region with two guided modes is indicated.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. (a) Q versus L of resonances. Dots are data points from mode expansion (CAMFR), crosses present checks with FDTD (MEEP). (b) ω versus L for the cavity modes in the cylindrical structure with two positive v g waveguide modes.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. (a) Field plot of some resonances. The electric field along ϕ is shown; only one half is presented. Ln and ωn are L/a and ω ×(a/2πc), respectively. (b) Magnitudes of the reflection matrix elements for the cylindrical structure in the frequency range with two positive group velocity modes.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. Magnitude squared of the two eigenvalues for the cylindrical structure in the frequency range with positive group velocity modes.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10. (a) Schematic of the two-dimensional, non-cylindrical plasmon structure. (b) Dispersion of the central waveguide (black), and of the outside waveguides (red).
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11. (a) Q versus L of a resonance. Data calculated with mode expansion (CAMFR). (b) ω versus L for the plasmonic cavity.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 12. (a) Depiction of the magnetic field at the peak of the resonance shown in Fig. 11(a) (L = 0.238L p and ω = 0.601ωp). (b) Magnitudes of the reflection matrix elements for the plasmonic structure.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 13. Numerically calculated magnitude squared of an eigenvalue for the plasmonic structure.

Equations (10)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

Q = ω r L v g ( 1 λ 2 ) .
P × R [ c 0 c 1 ] = λ [ c 0 c 1 ] ,
v g average = v g 0 c 0 2 + v g 1 c 1 2 .
P = [ exp ( i k 0 L ) 0 0 exp ( i k 1 L ) ] ,
R = [ r 00 r 01 r 10 r 11 ] ,
λ = exp ( i Δ L ) [ d cos ( kL ) sin ( kL ) ± ( id sin ( kL ) + δ cos ( kL ) ) 2 + r 01 2 ] .
λ 2 r 01 2 ± 2 cos ( kL ) Re ( r 01 d * ) 2 sin ( kL ) Im ( r 01 δ * ) ,
λ ± r 01 exp ( i Δ L ) .
λ 2 d ± δ 2 ± Re ( c 2 ( d * ± δ * ) exp ( ± i Δ L ) id sin ( Δ L ) + δ cos ( Δ L ) ) .
λ + 2 r 00 2 + 2 r 01 2 cos ( 2 kL ) + r 01 4 r 00 2 .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.