Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Revisiting comparison between entanglement measures for two-qubit pure states

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Given a non-maximally entangled state, an operationally significant question is to quantitatively assess as to what extent the state is away from the maximally entangled state, which is of importance in evaluating the efficacy of the state for its various uses as a resource. It is this question which is examined in this paper for two-qubit pure entangled states in terms of different entanglement measures such as negativity (N), logarithmic negativity (LN), and entanglement of formation (EOF). Although these entanglement measures are defined differently, to what extent they differ in quantitatively addressing the earlier mentioned question has remained uninvestigated. The theoretical estimate in this paper shows that an appropriately defined parameter characterizing the fractional deviation of any given entangled state from the maximally entangled state in terms of N is quite different from that computed in terms of EOF, with their values differing up to $ {\sim} 15\% $ for states further away from the maximally entangled state. Similarly, the values of such fractional deviation parameters estimated using the entanglement measures LN and EOF also strikingly differ among themselves, with the maximum value of this difference being around 23%. This analysis is complemented by illustration of these differences in terms of empirical results obtained from a suitably planned experimental study. Thus, such an appreciable amount of quantitative non-equivalence between the entanglement measures in addressing the experimentally relevant question considered in the present paper highlights the requirement of an appropriate quantifier for such intent. We indicate directions of study that can be explored towards finding such a quantifier.

© 2019 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Steady-state entanglement of two coupled qubits

Elena del Valle
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28(2) 228-235 (2011)

Measuring two-qubit gates

Andrew G. White, Alexei Gilchrist, Geoffrey J. Pryde, Jeremy L. O'Brien, Michael J. Bremner, and Nathan K. Langford
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24(2) 172-183 (2007)

Entanglement transfer from entangled nonlinear coherent states to separable qubits

Azam Anbaraki, Davood Afshar, and Mojtaba Jafarpour
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 34(7) 1366-1373 (2017)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (9)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (3)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (43)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.