Abstract

We compared the effects of fixed and variable (proportional) spacing on reading speeds and found variable pitch to yield better performance at medium and large character sizes and fixed pitch to be superior for character sizes approaching the acuity limit. The data indicate at least two crowding effects at the smallest sizes: one that interferes with individual character identification and one that interferes with word identification. A control experiment using rapid serial visual presentation suggests that it is the greater horizontal compression and consequently reduced eye-movement requirements of variable pitch that are responsible for its superiority at medium and large character sizes.

© 1990 Optical Society of America

Effects of chromatic and luminance contrast on reading

Kenneth Knoblauch, Aries Arditi, and Janet Szlyk
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8(2) 428-439 (1991)

Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast

Gordon E. Legge, David H. Parish, Andrew Luebker, and Lee H. Wurm
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7(10) 2002-2010 (1990)

Equating character-identification performance across the visual field

J. E. Farrell and M. Desmarais
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 7(1) 152-159 (1990)

Reading speed with a pixelized vision system

Kichul Cha, Kenneth W. Horch, Richard A. Normann, and Duane K. Boman
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9(5) 673-677 (1992)

Scrolled and rapid serial visual presentation texts are read at similar rates by the visually impaired

Elisabeth M. Fine and Eli Peli
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12(10) 2286-2292 (1995)