Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Local luminance nonlinearity and receptor aliasing in the detection of high-frequency gratings

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity for orientation discrimination is limited to spatial frequencies below 50–60 cycles per degree by neural spatial integration, and we find that contrast sensitivity, measured using an orientation-discrimination criterion, declines sharply with increasing spatial frequencies in that range. Yet interference fringe patterns pulsed at constant mean luminance can be detected at spatial frequencies far above that resolution limit [ D. R. Williams, Vision Res. 25, 195 ( 1985)]. This is due at least in part to aliasing by the receptor mosaic, but another possible cue is provided by nonlinear distortion, which can create spatially uniform temporal transients when a pulsed fringe pattern is presented. We investigated the contribution of these spatially unstructured distortion products to grating detection by superimposing the pulsed fringe patterns on a randomly flickering uniform field. This manipulation has almost no effect on contrast sensitivity well below the resolution limit. Just above the resolution limit, however, the random luminance mask greatly elevates the fringe pattern detection threshold, suggesting that spatially unstructured cues provide the basis for detection in this range. At still higher fringe pattern frequencies, which approximately match the cone mosaic, the random luminance flicker again becomes ineffective for some observers, creating a clear secondary peak in contrast sensitivity in the flicker mask condition, which is presumably due to spatially structured cues provided by aliasing with the cone mosaic. The aliasing peak is still more clearly demarcated if the subject sets contrast thresholds for the perception of pattern as such. The contrast sensitivity function then has a notch or gap between the normal sensitivity range and the aliasing range. Apparently, in the unmasked case, spatially uniform cues (changes in overall color and brightness) bridge this gap.

© 1996 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Cone spacing and the visual resolution limit

David R. Williams and Nancy J. Coletta
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(8) 1514-1523 (1987)

Effect of window size on detection acuity and resolution acuity for sinusoidal gratings in central and peripheral vision

Roger S. Anderson, David W. Evans, and Larry N. Thibos
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13(4) 697-706 (1996)

Psychophysical estimate of extrafoveal cone spacing

Nancy J. Coletta and David R. Williams
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4(8) 1503-1513 (1987)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (12)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (8)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.