Network Planning for Dual Residential-Business Exploitation of Next-Generation Passive Optical Networks to Provide Symmetrical 1&#x2009;&#x2009;Gb/s Services

Rafael Sánchez; José Alberto Hernández; David Larrabeiti

doi:10.1364/JOCN.8.000249

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking
Vol. 8,
Issue 4,
pp. 249-262
(2016)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.8.000249

Network Planning for Dual Residential-Business Exploitation of Next-Generation Passive Optical Networks to Provide Symmetrical 1 Gb/s Services

Rafael Sánchez, José Alberto Hernández, and David Larrabeiti

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Rafael Sánchez, José Alberto Hernández, and David Larrabeiti, "Network Planning for Dual Residential-Business Exploitation of Next-Generation Passive Optical Networks to Provide Symmetrical 1 Gb/s Services," J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 8, 249-262 (2016)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

Demand for high-speed access for business and residential subscribers has grown rapidly in recent years; thus, service providers need to offer cost-effective solutions to cover this demand. Convergence within the same infrastructure for clients requiring different service levels may have benefits in terms of cost, but their respective service-level specifications need to be guaranteed. This article compares different flavors of next-generation passive optical networks (PONs), namely, gigabit PON (GPON), 10-gigabit PON (XG-PON), time and wavelength division multiplexing PON (TWDM-PON), and wavelength division multiplexing PON (WDM-PON), and evaluates which one can provide 1 Gb/s symmetrical service at the more affordable cost when there is a mix of residential and business subscribers. Results show that the recommended technology depends on the percentage of business subscribers in the scenario.

Full Article | PDF Article

More Like This

Techno-Economic Analysis of Active Optical Network Migration Toward Next-Generation Optical Access

K. Wang, C. Mas Machuca, L. Wosinska, P. J. Urban, A. Gavler, K. Brunnström, and J. Chen
J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 9(4) 327-341 (2017)

Economics of Time and Wavelength Domain Multiplexed Passive Optical Networks

Theodoros Rokkas, Dimitris Katsianis, Thomas Kamalakis, and Dimitris Varoutas
J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2(12) 1042-1051 (2010)

Passive-Optical-Network- (PON-) Based Converged Access Network [Invited]

Rajesh Yadav
J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 4(11) B124-B130 (2012)

Previous Article Next Article

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (7)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (5)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (29)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

	GPON	XG-PON	TWDM-PON	WDM-PON
Standard	ITU-T G.984	ITU-T G.987	ITU-T G.989	ITU-T G.698.3
Availability	In market	In market	In-progress	In market
Feeder rate ( $C_{D L} / C_{U L}$ )	2.5G/1.25G	10G/2.5G	40G/10G	32G/32G
Security	No	No	No	Yes
Outside Plant	Splitter	Splitter	Splitter with WDM mux	AWG
Price	Lower	Medium	Medium	Higher
Power budget (dB)	28 (B+)	35 (E2)	38.5	15

	$1 ∶ 4$	$1 ∶ 8$	$1 ∶ 16$	$1 ∶ 32$	$1 ∶ 64$
$E (b)$ , $β$	$q = 15 %$
GPON	956 Mb/s, 89%	847 Mb/s, 65%	612 Mb/s, 28.4%	323 Mb/s, 3%	145 Mb/s, $\sim 0 %$
XG-PON	998 Mb/s, 99%	978 Mb/s, 89%	871 Mb/s, 56%	588 Mb/s, 12%	289 Mb/s, 0.2%
TWDM	1000 Mb/s, 100%	1000 Mb/s, 100%	998 Mb/s, 99%	978 Mb/s, 89%	871 Mb/s, 56%
WDM-PON		–	–	1000 Mb/s, 100%	–
$E (b)$ , $β$	$q = 50 %$
GPON	670 Mb/s, 31%	363 Mb/s, 4%	168 Mb/s, $\sim 0 %$	80 Mb/s, $\sim 0 %$	40 Mb/s, $\sim 0 %$
XG-PON	935 Mb/s, 69%	665 Mb/s, 14%	336 Mb/s, $\sim 0 %$	162 Mb/s, $\sim 0 %$	79 Mb/s, $\sim 0 %$
TWDM	1000 Mb/s, 100%	1000 Mb/s, 100%	935 Mb/s, 69%	665 Mb/s, 14%	336 Mb/s, $\sim 0 %$
WDM-PON		–	–	1000 Mb/s, 100%	–

	$x_{b}$
$E (b_{r})$ , $β_{r}$	0	1	2
GPON $1 ∶ 1$	1000 Mb/s, 100%	–	–
GPON $1 ∶ 2$	991 Mb/s, 98%	943 Mb/s, 94%	–
GPON $1 ∶ 4$	956 Mb/s, 89%	840 Mb/s, 78%	–
GPON $1 ∶ 8$	847 Mb/s, 66%	664 Mb/s, 52%	–
GPON $1 ∶ 16$	612 Mb/s, 28%	424 Mb/s, 20%	–
GPON $1 ∶ 32$	323 Mb/s, 4%	204 Mb/s, 2%	–
XG-PON $1 ∶ 2$	1000 Mb/s, 100%	1000 Mb/s, 100%	–
XG-PON $1 ∶ 4$	997 Mb/s, 99%	991 Mb/s, 97%	961 Mb/s, 92%
XG-PON $1 ∶ 8$	978 Mb/s, 89%	947 Mb/s, 82%	871 Mb/s, 72%
XG-PON $1 ∶ 16$	870 Mb/s, 56%	795 Mb/s, 46%	678 Mb/s, 37%
XG-PON $1 ∶ 32$	589 Mb/s, 12%	499 Mb/s, 9%	395 Mb/s, 6%

Costs	Notation	Description
Fiber	$η_{d}$	Cost of distribution fiber (unit length)
	$η_{f}$	Cost of feeder fiber (unit length)
Equipment	$η_{o}$	Cost of residential ONT
	$η_{b}$	Cost of business ONT
	$η_{c h}$	Cost of OLT chassis and common equipment
	$η_{o l t}$	Cost of OLT line card
	$η_{e}$	Cost of Ethernet port to connect to metro network
	$η_{k}$	Cost of fiber distribution panel at CO
Splitter/AWG	$η_{s}$	Cost of first splitter/AWG at the FAP
	$η_{a}$	Cost of an additional splitter/AWG
Labor	$η_{l}$	Cost of installing splitter/AWG
	$η_{i}$	Cost per splice
	$η_{l c}$	Cost of installation at CO

Terms	Description	Subsection V.C
$η_{f} \sum_{c \in C} \sum_{m \in M} l_{c, m}^{f} {\bar{f}}_{c, m}$	Total cost of feeder fiber	Feeder fiber
$\sum_{m \in M} \sum_{o \in O} l_{m, o}^{d} d_{m, o} + η_{d} \sum_{m \in M} \sum_{b \in B} l_{m, b}^{d} e_{m, b}$	Total cost of distribution fiber, residential, and business	Distribution fiber
$\sum_{m \in M} {\bar{s}}_{m} η_{k}$	Total cost of feeder fiber connectivity at CO	Passive
$\sum_{m \in M} s_{m} η_{s}$	Cost of first splitter	Passive
$\sum_{m \in M} ({\bar{s}}_{m} - s_{m}) η_{a}$	Cost for additional splitter	Passive
$\sum_{m \in M} s_{m} η_{l}$	Installation cost of splitters at selected FAPs	Passive
$(n_{u} + n_{e} + \sum_{m \in M} {\bar{s}}_{m}) η_{i}$	Total residential and business splicing cost	Passive
$n_{u} η_{o}$	Total cost of residential ONTs	Residential ONT
$n_{e} η_{b}$	Total cost of business ONTs	Business ONT
$\sum_{c \in C} {\bar{x}}_{c} η_{o l t}$	Total cost of OLT line cards	Common active
$n_{w} (η_{c h} + η_{e})$	Total cost of OLT chassis	Common active
$n_{w} η_{l c}$	Labor cost at CO	Common active

Abstract

Cited By

Figures (7)

Tables (5)

Equations (29)

Journal of Optical Communications and Networking