Abstract
This paper presents a comparison among different consumer 3D
display technologies by means of a subjective assessment test. Therefore,
four 55-in displays have been considered: one autostereoscopic display,
one stereoscopic with polarized passive glasses, and two with active
shutter glasses. In addition, a high-quality 3D video database has
been used to show diverse material with both views in high definition.
To carry out the test, standard recommendations have been followed
considering also some modifications looking for a test environment
more similar to real home viewing conditions, with the objective of
obtaining more representative conclusions. Moreover, several perceptual
factors have been considered to study the performance of the displays,
such as picture quality, depth perception, and visual discomfort.
The obtained results show interesting issues, like the performance
improvement of active shutter glasses technology, the high performance
of the polarized glasses technology in terms of quality and comfort,
and the need of improvement of the autostereoscopic displays to complement
the visual comfort to reach a global high-quality visual experience.
© 2015 IEEE
PDF Article
More Like This
Cited By
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription
Add to BibSonomy