One mathematical error from [Appl. Opt. 50, 6391–6398 (2011)] is corrected in this erratum.
© 2013 Optical Society of America
There is one error in  that is corrected here. In the simplification of Eq. (4) to Eq. (5), it was incorrectly assumed that the object wavefront radius of curvature could be related to the image wavefront radius of curvature through the magnification, . As the derivation progressed, this led Eq. (8),1] where the object wavefront phase difference at is defined as 2) and (3), the correct relationship for is 2].
1. S. Lampen, M. Dubin, and J. H. Burge, “Implementation of sine condition test to measure optical system misalignments,” Appl. Opt. 50, 6391–6398 (2011). [CrossRef]
2. S. Lampen, M. Dubin, and J. H. Burge, “Design and optimization of the sine condition test for measuring misaligned optical systems,” Appl. Opt. 52, 7099–7108 (2013). [CrossRef]