Spatial frequency-based angular behavior of a short-range flicker-free MIMO–OCC link

Shivani Rajendra Teli; Stanislav Zvanovec; Rafael Perez-Jimenez; Zabih Ghassemlooy

doi:10.1364/AO.404378

Applied Optics
Vol. 59,
Issue 33,
pp. 10357-10368
(2020)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.404378

Spatial frequency-based angular behavior of a short-range flicker-free MIMO–OCC link

Shivani Rajendra Teli, Stanislav Zvanovec, Rafael Perez-Jimenez, and Zabih Ghassemlooy

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Shivani Rajendra Teli, Stanislav Zvanovec, Rafael Perez-Jimenez, and Zabih Ghassemlooy, "Spatial frequency-based angular behavior of a short-range flicker-free MIMO–OCC link," Appl. Opt. 59, 10357-10368 (2020)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Check for updates

Related Topics
Table of Contents Category
- Fiber Optics, Fiber Sensors, and Optical Communications
Optics & Photonics Topics
?

The topics in this list come from the Optics and Photonics Topics applied to this article.

About this Article
History
- Original Manuscript: August 3, 2020
- Revised Manuscript: October 8, 2020
- Manuscript Accepted: October 19, 2020
- Published: November 17, 2020

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a solution based on spatial frequency ${f_{\textit{sf}}}$ to study the angular behavior of a flicker-free, short-range indoor multiple–input multiple–output (MIMO) optical camera communications (OCC) link. We focus on the experimental investigation of OCC’s performance for the transmitters (Txs) [i.e., light-emitting diode (LED) based arrays] located at the same and different distances from the receiver (Rx) with the off-axis rotation angle $\theta$. We have used two ${8} \times {8}$ distributed LED arrays and a commercial low-cost complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) Raspberry Pi camera with the rolling-shutter capturing mode as the Tx and Rx, respectively. The image and the respective communications link quality metrics are measured in terms of the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the rate of successfully received bits with respect to ${f_{\textit{sf}}}$ for different camera shutter speeds (SS). A CMOS image sensor noise characterization is carried in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and PSNR. The proposed study provides a 100% success rate in data reception at the optimum $\theta$ of 50° at lower captured values of ${f_{\textit{sf}}}$, which is projected onto the image sensor in the form of pixels. Moreover, the effect of channel saturation over ${f_{\textit{sf}}}$ is studied with respect to $\theta$ and SS and we show that, for $\theta$ exceeding the optimum value along transmission range, the ${f_{\textit{sf}}}$ area of the Txs reduces to less than ${\sim}{50}\%$ of the captured Tx units at $\theta$ of 0°, where no data can be fully recovered.

Full Article | PDF Article

More Like This

Curved OLED-based NLOS optical camera communications links

Shivani Rajendra Teli, Vicente Matus, Carmen Lidia Aguiar, Rafael Perez-Jimenez, Zabih Ghassemlooy, and Stanislav Zvanovec
Appl. Opt. 62(30) 8204-8210 (2023)

Interference cancellation in MIMO NLOS optical-camera-communication-based intelligent transport systems

Navid Bani Hassan, Zabih Ghassemlooy, Stanislav Zvanovec, Mauro Biagi, Anna Maria Vegni, Min Zhang, and Yingjia Huang
Appl. Opt. 58(34) 9384-9391 (2019)

Non-line-of-sight optical camera communications based on CPWM and a convolutional neural network

Xiangyu Wan, Bangjiang Lin, Zabih Ghassemlooy, Tianming Huang, Jiabin Luo, and Yongqi Ding
Appl. Opt. 62(28) 7367-7372 (2023)

Previous Article Next Article

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (14)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (3)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (11)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Parameter	Value
RaspiCam chip size	$5.09 m m (H) \times 4.930 m m (W)$
RaspiCam chip size	Diagonal: 4.60 mm
RaspiCam resolution	$1920 \times 1080 p i x e l s$
Raspberry display size	$7^{''}$ (diagonally)
Raspberry display resolution	$800 \times 400 p i x e l s$
$t_{c h i p}$	2.5 ms
$f_{s}$	400 Hz
RaspiCam frame rate	30 fps
$N_{r o w}$	1080 pixels
Tx	$8 \times 8$ RGB NeoPixel LED array
$N_{c h a n n e l s}$	16 LED groups with eight groups each Tx and 8LED/group
$I_{LED-array}$	1.28 A (for each Tx unit)
$t_{f r a m e}$	0.216 ms
SS	200, 400 and 800 µs
$R_{b}$	6.4 kbps
$L$	30–110 cm
$L_{1}$	60–140 cm
$r$	25–45 cm
Tx Rotation angle $θ$	0°–90°
Rx angle $θ_{c}$	90°

$L$ (cm)	$θ$ 0°–20°	$θ$ 30°–50°	$θ$ 60°–80°
30–50	$450 \times 450$	$210 \times 310$	$200 \times 300$
30–50	$459 \times 459$	$300 \times 300$	$171 \times 290$
60–80	$155 \times 285$	$150 \times 280$	$145 \times 260$
60–80	$200 \times 299$	$195 \times 294$	$185 \times 285$
90–110	$78 \times 230$	$65 \times 215$	$55 \times 200$
90–110	$115 \times 240$	$105 \times 235$	$100 \times 125$

$L$ and $L_{1}$ (cm)	$θ$ 0°–20°	$θ$ 30°–50°	$θ$ 60°–70°
60–70	$165 \times 175$	$160 \times 210$	$148 \times 200$
30–40	$450 \times 451$	$349 \times 351$	$170 \times 289$
80–90	$210 \times 210$	$190 \times 200$	$125 \times 155$
50–60	$100 \times 170$	$95 \times 165$	$80 \times 150$
90	$100 \times 160$	$70 \times 150$	$56 \times 175$
120	$80 \times 155$	$50 \times 140$	$40 \times 100$

Parameter	Value
RaspiCam chip size	$5.09 m m (H) \times 4.930 m m (W)$
RaspiCam chip size	Diagonal: 4.60 mm
RaspiCam resolution	$1920 \times 1080 p i x e l s$
Raspberry display size	$7^{''}$ (diagonally)
Raspberry display resolution	$800 \times 400 p i x e l s$
$t_{c h i p}$	2.5 ms
$f_{s}$	400 Hz
RaspiCam frame rate	30 fps
$N_{r o w}$	1080 pixels
Tx	$8 \times 8$ RGB NeoPixel LED array
$N_{c h a n n e l s}$	16 LED groups with eight groups each Tx and 8LED/group
$I_{LED-array}$	1.28 A (for each Tx unit)
$t_{f r a m e}$	0.216 ms
SS	200, 400 and 800 µs
$R_{b}$	6.4 kbps
$L$	30–110 cm
$L_{1}$	60–140 cm
$r$	25–45 cm
Tx Rotation angle $θ$	0°–90°
Rx angle $θ_{c}$	90°

$L$ (cm)	$θ$ 0°–20°	$θ$ 30°–50°	$θ$ 60°–80°
30–50	$450 \times 450$	$210 \times 310$	$200 \times 300$
30–50	$459 \times 459$	$300 \times 300$	$171 \times 290$
60–80	$155 \times 285$	$150 \times 280$	$145 \times 260$
60–80	$200 \times 299$	$195 \times 294$	$185 \times 285$
90–110	$78 \times 230$	$65 \times 215$	$55 \times 200$
90–110	$115 \times 240$	$105 \times 235$	$100 \times 125$

Shivani Rajendra Teli	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2122-6354
Rafael Perez-Jimenez	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8849-592X
Zabih Ghassemlooy	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5780-9703

Abstract

Cited By

Figures (14)

Tables (3)

Equations (11)

Applied Optics