Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Review and accuracy comparison of various permittivity-averaging schemes for material discontinuities in the two-dimensional FDFD method: implementation using efficient computer graphics techniques

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Several known and widely used averaging techniques aiming to improve the accuracy of the two-dimensional finite-difference frequency-domain (FDFD) method, in the presence of material discontinuities, are reviewed, numerically tested, and compared with respect to their accuracies. Furthermore, all averaging techniques are rigorously and efficiently implemented using the Supercover Digital Differential Analyzer algorithm and a modified Liang–Barsky algorithm suitably adapted from computer graphics applications. The FDFD with Gaussian blurring; the FDFD with volume-polarized effective permittivity; the FDFD with volume-polarized effective permittivity on shifted cells; and the FDFD with anisotropic smoothing [FDFD (AS)] are compared with respect to their accuracies (for both TE and TM polarization), in the case of scattering by an infinite homogeneous cylinder (for which analytical solution exists) comprising a lossless dielectric, a high-index, low-loss dielectric, or a metal. Sample plots of the relative errors are presented for various field components. Absolute error norms (L2 and L) are also presented for both polarizations and for two grid-cell sizes for quantitative comparisons. The results show that the FDFD (AS) prevails in accuracy mainly because it satisfies the boundary conditions at the cylinder’s boundary the best. However, for the high-index dielectrics and metals, even the FDFD without any averaging gives very good results for the field components parallel to the uniformity direction. However, the FDFD (AS) is always more accurate when the in-plane field components are sought.

© 2018 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Contour-path effective permittivities for the two-dimensional finite-difference time-domain method

Ahmad Mohammadi, Hamid Nadgaran, and Mario Agio
Opt. Express 13(25) 10367-10381 (2005)

Finite-difference-time-domain analysis of finite-number-of-periods holographic and surface-relief gratings

Aristeides D. Papadopoulos and Elias N. Glytsis
Appl. Opt. 47(12) 1981-1994 (2008)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (8)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (4)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (12)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved