Abstract
Twelve ruby rods incorporating two kinds of controllable gross inhomogeneities (banding and lineage) were studied. Optical evaluation by means of interferographs and low-angle scattering measurements were compared with actual performance measurements. It is concluded that not enough information is available to predict the performance of a ruby laser rod from its manner of growth or from measures of passive optical homogeneity. Time-dependent measurements are suggested as being more useful, and a hypothesis to explain the differences in performance between various rods is proposed.
© 1965 Optical Society of America
Full Article |
PDF Article
More Like This
Cited By
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription
Figures (5)
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription
Tables (2)
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription
Equations (4)
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription