Abstract

While investigating the instrumental function of a Fabry–Perot interferometer [Appl. Opt. 34, 58 (1995)], we noticed some variation in finesse and contrast in the measured spectra when a 1.5-mm-diameter aperture was used at various spots within the standard 8-mm aperture. By comparing experimentally determined finesse versus contrast plots for many such spectra with calculated plots, we found spots on the plates that gave non-Airy-function line shapes over the entire order of interference, unlike the Airy line shape we determined previously by using the entire 8-mm aperture. We have reviewed several models that describe the effects of various types of surface defects, such as Gaussian-height distribution of roughness, curvature and tilt of plates, sinusoidal roughness, and asymmetrical roughness on the finesse and contrast. Our experimental results can be accounted for if we assume that the reflectivity is nonuniform over the Fabry–Perot plates and that there is some reasonable contribution that is due to Gaussian roughness, curvature, or tilt.

© 1996 Optical Society of America

Line-shape studies for single- and triple-pass Fabry–Perot interferometer systems

E. D. Palik, Hacène Boukari, and Robert W. Gammon
Appl. Opt. 34(1) 58-68 (1995)

Exact evaluation of the transmitted amplitude for a Fabry-Perot interferometer with surface defects

D. P. Mahapatra and S. K. Mattoo
Appl. Opt. 25(10) 1646-1649 (1986)

Closed-form expressions to fit data obtained with a multipass Fabry–Perot interferometer

Hacène Boukari, E. D. Palik, and Robert W. Gammon
Appl. Opt. 34(1) 69-86 (1995)

Analytical and experimental study of ringing effects in a Fabry–Perot cavity. Application to the measurement of high finesses

Jérôme Poirson, Fabien Bretenaker, Marc Vallet, and Albert Le Floch
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 14(11) 2811-2817 (1997)

Calculation of the finesse of an ideal Fabry–Perot resonator

Martin Suter and Peter Dietiker
Appl. Opt. 53(30) 7004-7010 (2014)