Performance evaluation of minimum average correlation energy filters

A. Mahalanobis; David P. Casasent

doi:10.1364/AO.30.000561

Performance evaluation of minimum average correlation energy filters

A. Mahalanobis and David P. Casasent

Applied Optics
Vol. 30,
Issue 5,
pp. 561-572
(1991)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.30.000561

Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
A. Mahalanobis and David P. Casasent, "Performance evaluation of minimum average correlation energy filters," Appl. Opt. 30, 561-572 (1991)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Get PDF (2227 KB)
Set citation alerts
Save article

Related Topics
Optics & Photonics Topics
?

The topics in this list come from the OSA Optics and Photonics Topics applied to this article.

About this Article
History
- Original Manuscript: October 2, 1989
- Published: February 10, 1991

Not Accessible

Your account may give you access

Abstract

A new SDF type correlation filter referred to as the minimum average correlation energy (MACE) filter has been recently described in the literature. In this paper, we experimentally address the distortion tolerance and noise properties of this filter. The MACE filter has attractive properties that include: easily detectable peaks, distortion invariance, simplified training set selection, solutions to input bias effects, performance in noise and real background clutter, and less clutter with its reduced number of training set images. Each of these properties is investigated in detail in this paper.

Full Article | PDF Article

OSA Recommended Articles

Minimum average correlation energy filters

Abhijit Mahalanobis, B. V. K. Vijaya Kumar, and David Casasent
Appl. Opt. 26(17) 3633-3640 (1987)

Gaussian–minimum average correlation energy filters

David Casasent, Gopalan Ravichandran, and Srinivas Bollapragada
Appl. Opt. 30(35) 5176-5181 (1991)

Advanced distortion-invariant minimum average correlation energy (MACE) filters

David Casasent and Gopalan Ravichandran
Appl. Opt. 31(8) 1109-1116 (1992)

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Figures (8)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Tables (4)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Equations (12)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Metrics

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Test Number	Object Class	Specified Peak at Center	Number of Errors	Percent Correct	Avg PSR	Avg N	Remarks
1	T1	1.0	8	78%	13.4	26.5	9 Training Images per Object
2	T2	1.0	7	81%	12.6	24.2
3	APC	0.0	6	83%	11.1	22.6
4	T1	0.0	13	64%	19.4	28.4
5	T2	1.0	11	69%	15.1	26.9
6	T1	1.0	4	89%	12.8	24.3	18 True Class Training Images per Object
7	T2	1.0	3	92%	12.6	23.9
8	APC	0.0	9	75%	10.4	19.6
9	T1	0.0	6	83%	17.6	24.7
10	T2	1.0	14	61%	12.3	22.9
11	T1	1.0	3	91%	11.3	24.1	18 Training Images per Object
12	T2	1.0	2	94%	10.4	19.2
13	APC	0.0	3	91%	9.3	20.1
14	T1	0.0	2	94%	14.4	22.2
15	T2	1.0	3	91%	10.4	21.4
16	T1	1.0	1	97%	11.4	17.6	19 Images per Object (CS on Edge)
17	T2	1.0	2	94%	12.2	19.4
18	APC	0.0	2	94%	13.5	18.2

σ	Tank T1	Tank T2	APC
0	97%	94%	94%
1	97%	94%	94%
2	97%	91%	91%
4	94%	91%	91%
8	94%	91%	89%
12	91%	89%	89%
16	89%	89%	86%

	Filter h₁ (no constant bias vector)		Filter h₂ (constant bias vector used)
Bias	PSR	Peak	PSR	Peak
0.1	100.2	1.0	98.0	1.0
0.5	100.0	1.0	98.0	1.0
1.0	100.0	1.0	98.0	1.0
10.0	94.1	0.99	98.0	1.0
20.0	90.1	0.92	98.0	1.0
30.0	88.7	0.86	98.0	1.0
40.0	80.5	0.84	98.0	1.0
50.0	71.5	0.81	98.0	1.0
60.0	69.0	0.78	98.0	1.0
70.0	65.0	0.75	98.0	1.0

Phase Levels	Amplitude Levels	T1	T2	APC	Probability of Correct Recognition
2	16	16	11	12	0.26
	8	11	9	10	0.27
	4	5	4	4	0.12
	2	9	5	5	0.11
8	16	27	24	23	0.69
	8	18	11	18	0.43
	4	12	7	9	0.26
	2	9	5	5	0.18
16	128	31	32	32	0.88
	64	31	32	31	0.87
	32	31	30	30	0.84
	16	30	27	28	0.79
	8	19	15	20	0.50
	4	14	9	10	0.31
	2	10	6	7	021
32	128	34	33	34	0.94
	64	34	33	34	0.94
	32	34	33	33	0.93
	16	32	31	32	0.88
	8	25	24	26	0.70
	4	17	14	13	0.41
	2	16	11	9	0.33

Test Number	Object Class	Specified Peak at Center	Number of Errors	Percent Correct	Avg PSR	Avg N	Remarks
1	T1	1.0	8	78%	13.4	26.5	9 Training Images per Object
2	T2	1.0	7	81%	12.6	24.2
3	APC	0.0	6	83%	11.1	22.6
4	T1	0.0	13	64%	19.4	28.4
5	T2	1.0	11	69%	15.1	26.9
6	T1	1.0	4	89%	12.8	24.3	18 True Class Training Images per Object
7	T2	1.0	3	92%	12.6	23.9
8	APC	0.0	9	75%	10.4	19.6
9	T1	0.0	6	83%	17.6	24.7
10	T2	1.0	14	61%	12.3	22.9
11	T1	1.0	3	91%	11.3	24.1	18 Training Images per Object
12	T2	1.0	2	94%	10.4	19.2
13	APC	0.0	3	91%	9.3	20.1
14	T1	0.0	2	94%	14.4	22.2
15	T2	1.0	3	91%	10.4	21.4
16	T1	1.0	1	97%	11.4	17.6	19 Images per Object (CS on Edge)
17	T2	1.0	2	94%	12.2	19.4
18	APC	0.0	2	94%	13.5	18.2

σ	Tank T1	Tank T2	APC
0	97%	94%	94%
1	97%	94%	94%
2	97%	91%	91%
4	94%	91%	91%
8	94%	91%	89%
12	91%	89%	89%
16	89%	89%	86%

σ	Tank T1	Tank T2	APC
0	97%	94%	94%
1	97%	94%	94%
2	97%	91%	91%
4	94%	91%	91%
8	94%	91%	89%
12	91%	89%	89%
16	89%	89%	86%

σ	Tank T1	Tank T2	APC
0	97%	94%	94%
1	97%	94%	94%
2	97%	91%	91%
4	94%	91%	91%
8	94%	91%	89%
12	91%	89%	89%
16	89%	89%	86%

σ	Tank T1	Tank T2	APC
0	97%	94%	94%
1	97%	94%	94%
2	97%	91%	91%
4	94%	91%	91%
8	94%	91%	89%
12	91%	89%	89%
16	89%	89%	86%

Abstract

References

Cited By

Figures (8)

Tables (4)

Equations (12)

Metrics

Login or Create Account

σ	Tank T1	Tank T2	APC
0	97%	94%	94%
1	97%	94%	94%
2	97%	91%	91%
4	94%	91%	91%
8	94%	91%	89%
12	91%	89%	89%
16	89%	89%	86%

σ	Tank T1	Tank T2	APC
0	97%	94%	94%
1	97%	94%	94%
2	97%	91%	91%
4	94%	91%	91%
8	94%	91%	89%
12	91%	89%	89%
16	89%	89%	86%