Silver–magnesium fluoride cermet films. 2: Optical and electrical properties

Positions τ′ of the Zeros and τ of the Poles for the Two Trials of Lowest Error Sum for the Cermet of Fig. 1

Note the correspondence between τ and −τ′ for each trial, consistent with the reciprocal relation for two dimensional composites.

Volume Fractions f_M for Five Films Deduced Using the Method of Bounds Compared with Measured Volume Fractions f_I and f_A Defined in the Text

Volume Fraction of Silver (f_A) of Voids (f_V) and Resistivity (ρ) for Thin Ag–MgF₂ Cermets (First Group), for Thin Voided Silver Cermets (Second Group), and for Thick Films (Third Group)

Table I

Positions τ′ of the Zeros and τ of the Poles for the Two Trials of Lowest Error Sum for the Cermet of Fig. 1

Note the correspondence between τ and −τ′ for each trial, consistent with the reciprocal relation for two dimensional composites.

Table II

Volume Fractions f_M for Five Films Deduced Using the Method of Bounds Compared with Measured Volume Fractions f_I and f_A Defined in the Text

Table III

Volume Fraction of Silver (f_A) of Voids (f_V) and Resistivity (ρ) for Thin Ag–MgF₂ Cermets (First Group), for Thin Voided Silver Cermets (Second Group), and for Thick Films (Third Group)